Slashdot Mirror


Invisible Solar Nano Cells Promise Clean Energy

An anonymous reader writes "ZDNet is reporting that Harvard scientists have developed a silicon nanowire 200 hundred times thinner than a human hair that crank out up to 200 picowatts. Charles Leiber from Harvard University, who devised the technology with colleagues, is quoted: "An individual nanoelectronic device will indeed consume very little power, but to do something interesting will require many interconnected devices and thus the power requirement — even for nanosystems — can be a challenge". Conventional sources, he added, are "bulky, non-renewable and expensive" by comparison."

11 of 88 comments (clear)

  1. If I had a nickle.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'd be 95 cents short of a dollar.

  2. a side product of balding hair research by rgaginol · · Score: 4, Funny

    what's sad is that this was discovered in the attempt to create a more life like toupe;P

    1. Re:a side product of balding hair research by edwardpickman · · Score: 2, Funny

      The really sad thing was it they didn't discover it in the 70s. A self powered neon toupe would have been huge among the middle aged disco fans.

  3. An obvious question? by Linker3000 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "...Charles Leiber and colleagues at Harvard University, have devised a 'silicon nanowire' that can convert light into electrical energy.... ...Two hundred billionths of a watt may not seem much, but at nanoscale it is enough to provide a steady output of electricity to run ultralow power electronics, including some that could be worn on -- or even inside -- the body. "

    Erm, how bright is the inside of a body!?

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
    1. Re:An obvious question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "Erm, how bright is the inside of a body!?"

      I don't know about you, but the sun shines out of MY ass.

    2. Re:An obvious question? by vbraga · · Score: 3, Funny

      It depends on the type of body. Think of goatse. Sunshine can reach inside it. Well, almost the whole Sun.

      (Yes, I'm ashamed of thinking this...)

      --
      English is not my first language. Corrections and suggestions are welcome.
    3. Re:An obvious question? by edwardpickman · · Score: 2, Funny
      Erm, how bright is the inside of a body!?

      It's being developed for people that live near Chernobyl. Kind of like the X Ray film that you just have to stand next to for five minutes and the lead lined shorts that are a fashionable item in Kiev.

    4. Re:An obvious question? by fishthegeek · · Score: 2, Funny

      That depends. From my point of view there aren't any problems with light getting to the inside of a body.

      Sincerely,
      Hannibal Lecter

      --
      load "$",8,1
  4. Wait a minute, I'm confused by shlashdot · · Score: 2, Funny

    Where is the promise that this will be commercialized in a few years and we can paint our houses with it? What kind of solar article is this?

    --
    Additional plugins are required to display all the media on this page.
  5. Hey.... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Invisible" "Solar" "Nano" "Cells" ... "Clean Energy"

    I WON SLASHDOT BINGO!!!

  6. Re:I Hate Science Reporting by fractoid · · Score: 4, Funny
    The article also contains this gem:

    Incoming light generates electrons in the outer shell, which are then swept into the second layer and the inner core along micropores. Nice to see that they're actually generating electrons instead of just moving them around like most of those lazy-ass photovoltaics. I hope they generate positrons at the same time to balance out the overall charge of the universe...
    --
    Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.