Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Apple Adds Memory Randomization To Leopard

Posted by kdawson on from the shuffling-the-wormholes dept.

.mack notes a ZDNet blog outlining some of the security features added to OSX Leopard (10.5). Here's Apple's brief description of all 11 new security features. "Apple has announced plans to add code-scrambling diversity to Mac OS X Leopard, a move aimed at making the operating system more resilient to virus and worm attacks. The security technology, known as ASLR (address space layout randomization), randomly arranges the positions of key data areas to prevent malware authors from predicting target addresses. Another new feature coming in Leopard is Sandboxing (systrace), which limits an application's access to the system by enforcing access policies for system calls."

35 of 311 comments (clear)

  1. Woo! by gazbo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Apple is finally catching up with BSD, Linux and Vista!

    1. Re:Woo! by Corwn+of+Amber · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I, for one, am going to buy Leopard, the day it's out.
      Then I'll put it on in a drawer.
      Then I'll download the ISO of the version I'll install on my PC.

      And I'll be a happy Apple customer :)

      (I'm NOT going to buy a Mac unless I win the lottery or something. But I can spend $139 on the company that's produced the best OS for my use.)

      --
      Making laws based on opinions that stem up from false informations leads to witch hunts.
    2. Re:Woo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      ... or, an OS with popularity of BSD, the consistent feel of Linux, the security of a Windows, with the openness and price point of OSX.

      After an old joke about the EU, sorry.

    3. Re:Woo! by bunratty · · Score: 5, Informative

      As far as I can tell, even the Linux kernel doesn't have memory randomization. You need a patch like PaX to get that feature.

      --
      What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
    4. Re:Woo! by suv4x4 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Apple is finally catching up with BSD, Linux and Vista!

      Hehe, you were modded +5 Funny, but if it was the other way around:

      "Vista is finally catching up with BSD, Linux and OSX!"

      You would be modded +5 Insightful... Where are the scores of Microsoft fanboys bashing Apple, damn it!

    5. Re:Woo! by bzzzt · · Score: 4, Informative

      Microsoft definitely has something going on with .NET code though. The kind of security you can get there can't be compared with anything you can do on the software or even hardware level, with pure unmanaged code.

      Nice to hear those Microsoft people are about to catch up with the Java sandbox model from 1997 ;)
    6. Re:Woo! by jsiren · · Score: 5, Funny

      Even I have a random memory!

      --
      Usage: km/h for speed (kilometers per hour); kph for very slow impulses (kilopond hours).
    7. Re:Woo! by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 3, Funny

      your plan doesn't give him the option to continue using it but to forget to pay for it.

      or to decide that it's good enough to use but not worth his money - maybe he'll spend a few hours learning what's new and consider himself even with Apple after they forced him to 'waste his precious time'.

    8. Re:Woo! by shmlco · · Score: 4, Informative

      "DVD Player.app won't skip past things that the movie studios put on the DVD..."

      True. In order to license the codecs and software needed to play DVDs legally a DVD Player has to honor the DVD player spec, which means honoring the stupid "operation not allowed" messages embedded in the DVDs.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    9. Re:Woo! by kestasjk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Safari asks. Most modern browsers have security settings that can do this. No as in any foreign executable, including executables downloaded via network shares, are flagged as foreign. This isn't the same as your browser asking "are you sure you want to download this executable file?"

      It is called Little Snitch. It works great. Okay, but it wasn't part of the OS. We're talking about the OS here, not applications for the OS.

      Nice feature, but if you were really concerned with security you would have memory encryption enabled anyhow. No problems with this when using encrypted memory. Encrypted memory? Can you elaborate on this? I'm guessing you're talking about encrypted swap files, but that doesn't make it any harder for foreign code to know where in the address space useful libraries are.

      Public Key signing anyone? This has been around for decades - even on OSX! Manual public key signing isn't the same as automatic digitally signed binaries. Manual public key signing means that the user has to know to download the digital signature separately and check the executable, which is a big hassle and pretty unrealistic for most users.

      These are not things that weren't available on OSX. They weren't gaping holes. Apple just decided to make them easier for the average user by including them out of the box and beefing them up a bit where necessary (like the memory randomization). They were already available? Where in Tiger is memory randomization, digitally signed binaries, flagged-as-new binaries, and the built in application-level firewall?
      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    10. Re:Woo! by shelterpaw · · Score: 5, Informative
      Easy enough to write an applescript to bypass that, which I've done. It's ugly, but it works and you can add it to your dvd applescript menu:

      tell application "DVD Player"
      activate
      set viewer full screen to true
      try -- use try to bypass the FBI warning, menu's etc.
      play dvd
      set title to 1
      set chapter to 1
      end try
      (* The following will wait for DVD's that refuse to bypass the intro's and jump to the beggining. Annoying!*)<br>
      delay [3]
      if title is not equal to 1 then
      repeat until active dvd menu is equal to main
      go to main menu
      delay [15]
      end repeat
      go return to dvd
      end if
      (* The following will be used for odd dvd's like Questar Documentarys's they don't start with the standard title, they start with title 2 or something different. *)
      delay [30]
      set oddTitle to 2
      -- check to see if we're still on the main menu page
      if dvd menu active is equal to true then
      repeat until dvd menu active is equal to false
      set title to oddTitle
      set oddTitle to oddTitle + 1
      end repeat
      end if
      end tell
  2. obligitary troll by pat+mcguire · · Score: 4, Funny

    If only this broke bootcamp compatibility - then they'd really prevent viruses.

  3. Cool, but even better... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the changelog:

    CalDAV Group Scheduling
    Schedule a meeting with colleagues, check availability, and book conference rooms when using iCal with a compatible CalDAV server like iCal Server.

    Reserve Rooms and Equipment
    Reserve meeting rooms and equipment as you create your meeting invitations. If your calendar is administered through a CalDAV server, iCal automatically displays availabilities when you add a room or resource to your meeting.

    It sounds like a high-level player finally decided to take on Exchange. My biggest questions: are there Windows programs that support these features via CalDAV, and is there a CalDAV server in FreeBSD's ports?

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    1. Re:Cool, but even better... by link915 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Currently no viable solution exists on a Windows box. There are things like Sunbird and Yagoon but they don't work well with Outlook (i.e. no real integration). Currently there is a project called Open Connector that exists to bring caldav support to Outlook. It is quickly reaching beta but the main developer needs help. I am pitching in and hope that others will as well. Check it out at http://www.openconnector.org./

      Also, the calendar server that is used in Leopard is nothing more than the open-source Darwin calendar server at http://trac.calendarserver.org/projects/calendarserver

      So, although nothing exists in ports that I can find you can run the Darwin calendar server on FreeBSD.

      --
      "I reject your reality and substitute my own!"
  4. Even Windows does this by OriginalArlen · · Score: 4, Informative

    Even Vista has a not-completely-broken implementation of ASLR. Linux, of course, has been doing it for years...

    --

    Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
    1. Re:Even Windows does this by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It works like this: Everyone cheers on the guy that they like and boo the guy they don't like, but in the end they are having beers with the winner who is pretty much never the guy that they like.

      Just look at the U.S. election this year. Everyone and their brother loves Colbert because he is cool and hip and represents a stick in the eye to every other goddamned POLITICIAN out there who can't help but pander to big money and special interest groups. But come election day, it ain't OSX you're putting on your servers.

      Know what I mean?

    2. Re:Even Windows does this by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 5, Informative

      From your Wikipedia link:

      ASLR is enabled by default in Linux since 2.6.20

      Since that release was made on 2007-02-05, you could more accurately say that "Linux, of course, has been doing it for months". OpenBSD didn't even really get a strong version of it until 3.8, and that wasn't quite 2 years ago. It sounds like Windows had problems with it as recently as February 2007, but maybe that's fixed now.

      This is still fairly cutting-edge stuff. It's not like they just now implemented memory protection for the first time.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    3. Re:Even Windows does this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You have an apt nickname.

    4. Re:Even Windows does this by martin-sandsmark · · Score: 3, Informative

      It has been the default in certain distros (e. g. Gentoo Hardened) long before it was set as default in vanilla Linux. So, Linux has been doing it for years, although Linus hasn't.

  5. Re:Leopard? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why would Apple chooses such a gay name for its operating system?

    To give you closeted folk an excuse to talk about your feelings in public.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  6. Simple. by Lethyos · · Score: 4, Funny

    Because the Macintosh is the Gay Computer.

    --
    Why bother.
  7. These are just bandaids by Cthefuture · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All measures like this are just bandaids and may in fact open up more holes because it adds complexity to an already complex beast.

    There is just no way to do this in software. The future is going to be implementing these types of features in well proven hardware. Things like the no-execute bit, virtualization extensions and such are steps in the right direction but eventually I think we will see some really good security measures put into hardware.

    --
    The ratio of people to cake is too big
    1. Re:These are just bandaids by _merlin · · Score: 5, Informative

      Eventually? Look back at the past! IBM System/390 mainframes (and the zSeries derived from it) have all those features in hardware. Array overrun? Hardware exception. Integer overflow? Hardware exception. Touch memory you deallocated? Hardware exception. ALU produces a spurious result? System picks it up because it runs all the code on at least two cores, and the same fault is unlikely to occur in two cores simultaneously - operation is retried on two more cores to determine which of the two original cores was correct, and the failing core is taken out of service.

      You know why we don't do all that in hardware in PCs? Because it requires a huge amount of silicon. Sure, it's great. You learn good programming practices, because you can't get away with slipping even a little. But it costs a lot, gets hot, and goes slow. PCs are meant to be a good enough and cheap enough solution - not necessarily the best solution.

    2. Re:These are just bandaids by suv4x4 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      All measures like this are just bandaids and may in fact open up more holes because it adds complexity to an already complex beast.

      99% of security is bandaid and "obscurity" under cover. Even cryptography with large prime numbers is just obscurity: they give you the number and if you could factor is quickly, you can break it. You just can't break it quickly yet.

      Still though, it's the nature of the beast. It's in uphill battle with the hackers. Tech gets sophisticated, hackers get sophisticated, tech gets more sophisticated... It's evolution in a way.

      There are very few security concepts which aren't "bandaids", for example privilege levels are such a security measure, and still, most apps that take advantage of this have a bunch of "bandaids" in them to avoid privilege escalation situations.

      ASLR is a practical approach to easily calling known adresses after buffer overflow exploit. If all apps in existence made proper use of the no-execute bit and made sure not to overrun buffers in the first place, ASLR could've been useless.

      OS designers though meet a world with imperfect apps, and their task is to improve security in this *existing* situation. They do good.

  8. Re:Pre-Binding? by dreamchaser · · Score: 3, Informative

    The OS knows where it's bits and pieces are and anyone using published API's will be fine; it's rather transparent to the programmer. Where you'll run afoul is if you are trying to directly access a 'known' code entry point illicitly, without going through the proper channels via the OS. This is why it is a step that can help prevent some types of attacks.

    It's still a bandaid though, just as it is in every other OS that's implemented it (pretty much everything OTHER than OS X has a form of this already).

  9. crash logs (was Re:ASLR == Windows Feature...) by WillAdams · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I first started using Quark XPress 6.5 in Mac OS X here at my new job, it took a while to work out the kinks for a rather complex project (doing layout for a journal w/ a 24 hr. turn-around), to the point that I actually put up a ``crash log'' outside of my cubicle, so that people could gauge my mood before entering. It's been a year now, and while I've gotten the project in question worked out (had to train myself _never_ to undo re-sizing a text box &c.), the totals might be interesting to people:

    2006:
    Quark XPress: 207 crashes (as many as 9 per day)
    Adobe Illustrator: 25
    InDesign: 35
    PhotoShop: 15
    Acrobat: 65
    Microsoft Word: 23
    Macromedia FreeHand: 9
    Mac OS X: 14 (this includes Mac OS X apps like Mail.app and Safari.app)

    The totals for this year are a bit more reasonable --- Quark XPress v6.5: 26, v7: 46 (I had to move the afore-mentioned journal over to Quark 7 after a re-design and that involved a new set of things to work-around) --- but I find Mac OS X overall reliable and workable as an environment (thought not as nice, consistent and synergistic as NeXTstep).

    William

    --
    Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
  10. Re:ASLR == Windows Feature Since 3.1 by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When mac software crashes it usually just vanishes, with no user feedback at all. When the OS crashes it blackscreens (like, say, plugging in a firewire drive into Tiger, which they *still* haven't fixed) but I wouldn't say the information it gives is useful at all.. about as useful as a bluescreen.

    Then there's the spinning beachball of death crashes which are a sore point with me.. they happen every time it decides it can't access a network resource* and the only way out is to pull the power cord (since if finder is dead you can't even power off or run the kill application). Got rather sick of doing that last night...

    * Which happens rather a lot if you decide to use NFS. NFS under Tiger is broken on intel macs but works OK on ppc macs.. same OS version (allegedly), same NFS share, even the same damned cables.. different result every time.

  11. Trend by MadMacSkillz · · Score: 5, Funny

    There is a trend emerging, ever so slowly... It used to be Mac users attacking Windows users... More and more I'm starting to hear Windows users attacking Mac users. Fortunately, so long as the argument is "Mac is gay," I don't really feel like Mac users need to bother responding. Linux I respect, though... because once I'm in the command line, it's just like OS X. (ducks)

    --
    Music - www.richardmac.com
  12. Re:Why? by tiocsti · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Changing the memory address layout is roughly akin to doing home security by locking different doors on different nights, but always leaving one unlocked. The would-be burglar just has to try all the doors to get in. Doing this kind of thing is trivial on a computer."

    Yes, it's just like that, except you have millions of doors, and a intruder can only try to open one door per night, and the unlocked door changes randomly every night.

    "People really need to stop adding these kinds of things that increase complexity and do not address the real issue, which in this case is access to the memory space of another application without some sort of credential or approval. When the real problem is addressed, this overly complex and fundamentally useless random memory address layout 'feature' will be left in to cause bugs and complexity forever."

    This has nothing to do with access to the memory space of another application.

  13. Re:ASLR == Windows Feature Since 3.1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    You be glad to read that Leopard makes connecting to network shares a threaded operation, so the spinning beachballs in finder related to this issue should be far fewer. In theory.

    I've never had any problems plugging a Firewire driving into a Mac. Sure that something's not dodgy at your end?

  14. Sandboxing != Systrace by plsuh · · Score: 4, Informative

    Another new feature coming in Leopard is Sandboxing (systrace), which limits an application's access to the system by enforcing access policies for system calls

    Folks,

    Just FYI, the sandboxing in Leopard is not systrace. Systrace is vulnerable to race conditions -- see Robert Watson's paper "Exploiting Concurrency Vulnerabilities in System Call Wrappers". I asked him about this at WWDC, and he told me that Leopard's sandboxing is based on a different technology and is not vulnerable to the same attacks.



    --Paul
  15. Re:ASLR == Windows Feature Since 3.1 by sith · · Score: 4, Informative

    Seems like you might have some issues - I plug firewire drives into Tiger systems multiple times per day and have never had a crash. And even if it did, you'd get the multi-lingual "please restart" screen - I haven't seen OSX do a black screen panic since 10.1 ...

    Also, if applications are "just vanishing" on launch, you may have disabled the little popup that tells you the 'application quit, wrote a crash log, and would you like to reopen it?' ...

  16. Come to think of it... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... or, an OS with popularity of BSD, the consistent feel of Linux, the security of a Windows, with the openness and price point of OSX. That's a pretty good description of Vista, actually.
    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  17. Re:ASLR == Windows Feature Since 3.1 by Kadin2048 · · Score: 3, Informative

    When mac software crashes it usually just vanishes, with no user feedback at all. When the OS crashes it blackscreens (like, say, plugging in a firewire drive into Tiger, which they *still* haven't fixed) but I wouldn't say the information it gives is useful at all.. about as useful as a bluescreen.

    Huh? When most Mac apps crash it produces that "The Application [ApplicationName] has quit unexpectedly" crashlog dialog box, where it shows you a trace and you can choose to type a friendly little note in and send it away to Apple. this thing.

    I don't see it that frequently but I did find a pattern of actions that would repeatedly crash Aperture the other day, and it popped that thing up every time.

    Don't know whether it only comes up for Apple applications or what (I don't think so; I remember getting it a few times when Vuescan crashed). Maybe it only comes up as a result of some types of faults, and not all of the fatal ones. But it seems to work fairly well for me.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  18. Re:I hope they let you disable this junk. by NatasRevol · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the appalling 'Open "safe" files after downloading' feature in Safari. Seriously? This is one of your 'real' security holes? This one comes turned off by default AND HAS A CHECKBOX IF YOU WANT TO TURN IT OFF.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure