Slashdot Mirror


Law Firm Claims Copyright on View of HTML Source

An anonymous reader writes "A law firm with all sorts of interesting views on copyright has decided to go the extra mile. As reported on Tech Dirt, they've decided that viewing the HTML source of their site is a violation of copyright. From the site's EULA: 'We also own all of the code, including the HTML code, and all content. As you may know, you can view the HTML code with a standard browser. We do not permit you to view such code since we consider it to be our intellectual property protected by the copyright laws. You are therefore not authorized to do so.'"

1 of 601 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Apropo legal responce by polymath69 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Can some one find the British legal responce that essentially equates to telling the other party to "Fuck off" in so many words?

    "We refer you to the reply given in the case of Arkell v Pressdram".

    --

    --
    I don't want to rule the world... I just want to be in charge of mayonnaise.