Slashdot Mirror


Cellphone Use On Planes Coming Soon?

s31523 writes "A while back it was reported that cell phone use was given the OK on Emirate airlines. The BBC is now reporting European agencies back the use of cell phones in air. Plans have been developed to introduce technology that allow cell phone use on planes without any risk of interference. A spokesman for the UK regulator Ofcom said there were still many stages to pass through before final approval was given to the roll out of the plans, but the regulator said that the technology could be implemented next year."

36 of 249 comments (clear)

  1. Boxed SOAP response. by Argon+Sloth · · Score: 4, Funny

    Eagerly awaiting the Motorola Snake and all the jokes that come with it.

    --
    Laziness is a virtue, anyone who bothers to tell you otherwise, is clearly lacking it.
  2. The newest accessary by dreadlord76 · · Score: 3, Funny

    In related news, Boeing and Airbus both announced the immediate availability of "Cone Of Silence" option on all airplanes.

    1. Re:The newest accessary by pushing-robot · · Score: 4, Funny

      Strange, I thought that was a Cingular/AT&T feature.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
  3. And you thought you loved half hour train rides by Cryacin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now we get loud mouthed cellphone jabbers AND 13 yr old SMS kiddies beeping away during the entire duration of Sydney and LA... I can forsee 15 hrs of absolute murderous psychopatic bliss.

    --
    Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
  4. Uh...you can do that now by TheAxeMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My phone has "airplane" mode where it doesn't transmit/receive, so I can still use it for its camera/music abilities.
     
    On to the more important aspect: I hope this never gets implemented and for the most part I don't think it will. Lots of people like to sleep on planes and won't be able to with others yammering on their phones. Plus there is the extra time and cost for airlines to install the equipment to relay the signals. God only knows what "roaming" means at 38000 ft.

    1. Re:Uh...you can do that now by Martin+Blank · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've seen flight attendants get very upset with passengers who swear that their phones are in airplane mode, and who offer to show the current setting. Some of them do not allow for anything that looks like a phone to even appear operational.

      They also miss the wireless notebooks that are operational and probing for their home networks.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
  5. Re:Let me be the first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "You'll never guess where I'm calling from!"

  6. Interference? by Ydna · · Score: 3, Funny

    Without interference, eh? Yet another annoyance to deal with while flying: listening to some yammerhead yacking into their phone for the whole flight. I'll show you interference. I'm gonna yank that phone out of your hand and flush it down the toilet. Or tell the crew that the passenger next to me is holding some electrical device next to their head and it has wires sticking out of it and strange lights flashing. And it might be ticking!

    --

    "The great thing about multitasking is that several things can go wrong at once." -me

  7. Cell phone free flights please by OrangeTide · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I refuse to fly until an airline offers a cell phone free flight. I don't want to sit in a tiny tin can for 4+ hours listening to some dork yapping about god knows what, when there is no possibility of getting away from him.

    If I can't "just walk away" then the only alternative is an ass kicking, and I assume if I punched someone out on a plane they would arrest me on the ground as a terrorists or something.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:Cell phone free flights please by l2718 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Second that!

      It's bad enough on trains and busses. Also, I don't think airline staff (that is the flight attentands) will want to mediate the disputes between people loudly yapping on the phone and people who want to sleep quietly. I suspect that till now the airlines were rather thappy to say "the government says you can't use your phone" and not have to worry about this. In the future they'll have to come down on one side or the other.

    2. Re:Cell phone free flights please by jamesh · · Score: 4, Funny

      How about they designate an area where you are allowed to talk on your phone. I suggest on the wing, or on the ground.

      In terms of coming down on one side or the other, if the airline gets a share of the phone revenue, I'll give you one guess as to which side they'll come down on...

      What's really unfair though, is that if you bring a cell phone jammer onto an airoplane, _you_ would be the one to go to jail!

  8. Re:Let me be the first to say by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If some guy next to you is annoying, just ask him nicely to not be.
    So what do you think is the best way to handle some irrational jackass on that horribly enclosed space that is a commercial passenger airliner? I agree with you in general that politely asking someone not to do something that is annoying usually works. After all, some people do things that are annoying that they don't realize are annoying at the time, and if you politely tell them, they will politely cease since they will then realize that they are doing something annoying. *BUT*, there are some people who are complete shits and totally irrational to boot. How does one handle people like that on an airplane? I'm not really sure myself.
  9. Re:Let me be the first to say by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "If some guy next to you is annoying, just ask him nicely to not be."

    If we lived in a society where people tried to be nice to one another then you'd be right, the rants would be dumb.

    We don't live in such a society.

    It's pretty clear from the way people act with cell phones on the ground that this is going to be an annoying change on airplanes. Who here hasn't seen/interacted with someone who talked excessively loud over their cell? I see (more hear) those people every day, are they magically going to vanish on airplanes? Same goes for people who talk forever.

    We already have passenger's irritating other passengers without care on airplanes. My last flight we had someone who couldn't get a particular movie to play on the (obviously cheap) entertainment system. It was an old movie and (in my opinion) not very good but they kept complaining until the pilot decided to reset the system just to shut the guy up. After the reset he was fine, his movie played. Everyone else started getting random movies and the sound system didn't work but he was quite happy with himself. Add that to the multiple people swinging their luggage about without care while we were on the ground, the guy who went and got something out of his luggage when we were on the final runway, and the person who complained about the food and the trip was a quite unpleasant 9+ hours. Now add on someone talking on a cell phone for the entire trip, they don't even have to be that loud but they, or someone else, is always talking. Tell me, do you want to fly on that airplane?

    --
    There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
  10. mithra save us by misanthrope101 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd rather someone be allowed to surf the web next to me, goatse and all, than be allowed to gab on their cell. I even hate it that they can use their cells in the terminals. Why does anyone need to call to say "I'm on the ground now"? Obviously we can't rely on people to be considerate of others, but up till now we could rely on airline restrictions for a little peace. I vote we allow text messages, but no voice messages. Everyone gets to play the quiet game. Shut the hell up.

    1. Re:mithra save us by misanthrope101 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Can't they seen on the monitor that the plane has landed? I've picked up many people from the airport, and never needed a phone call to find out that their plane was on the ground. If I'm not in the airport to look at the monitor, a phone call isn't going to get me there any faster.

    2. Re:mithra save us by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Parking.

      Very often, the person picking you up will be waiting just off-airport at a safe/sane parking spot, rather than looping around the airport or paying $50 just to park for 15 minutes.

      Back when I was in graduate school I would frequently pick my father up from the airport. Rather than loop around the airport, contributing to traffic 10-20 times, I would park in a small parking lot near the airport and wait for a call. (Similarly, about half the limo drivers picking people up at Newark Airport do the same, in fact I picked up the trick from observing them.)

      While the person picking you up can see when the plane lands (esp. with a cell phone that has a data plan), the person picking you up doesn't have any status info on whether the luggage pickup system got delayed.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    3. Re:mithra save us by Molochi · · Score: 2, Informative

      In Atlanta, short term parking is $1 for the first hour. When I need to pick someone at the airport I can usually check the status of the flight online so I don't have to wait too long.

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
  11. Wait, what? by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Let me get this straight:

    You can bring on a cell phone, but not an iPod...

    You can bring on a lighter, but not a water bottle...

    You can wear a belt, but you have to remove your shoes...

    Are they just making the rules up randomly or something?

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    1. Re:Wait, what? by clarkkent09 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Are they just making the rules up randomly or something?

      Pretty much. The idea is to make people feel safer because they are doing something. What that something is is less important, they might as well require passengers to do a tap dance or whatever amuses them the most

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    2. Re: Wait, what? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Are they just making the rules up randomly or something? Pretty much. The idea is to make people feel safer because they are doing something. Or less safe, if some important unconstitutional legislation is up for a vote.
      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  12. Earplugs by feepness · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Pssst... you can wear them the entire time you're in the airport: http://www.earplugsonline.com/

    Those earplugs + noise canceling headphones + a sleeping pill if you want = Transoceanic bliss.

    Throw in a PSP or DS and a movie or two and you are good to go. Just don't forget to bring some spare batteries.

  13. Compromise with text by shmlco · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Allow SMS/text messaging only. No voice. Then we can have peace and quiet, and bozo business types who're afraid to be out of touch for an hour or so can still communicate with their underlings.

    --
    Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    1. Re:Compromise with text by QuickFox · · Score: 3, Funny

      My cellphone can be set to emit horribly shrill bleeps at every single keypress. MUAHAHAHAHAHA!

      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    2. Re:Compromise with text by xaxa · · Score: 3, Informative

      Many long-distance trains in the UK have a "quiet coach" where they ask people not to use mobile phones, personal stereos, children etc. The difference is, of course, that it's very easy to move from the quiet coach to another one if you need to make a call (or the reverse), not so easy on a plane (more people to climb over, less space).

      Hmm... I wonder how long it'll be before mobile phones can be used in the Channel Tunnel? You're only underground for 20 minutes though (it's 30 miles).

    3. Re:Compromise with text by Mythrix · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And if you can apply the same rules to babies, we'll be all set!

    4. Re:Compromise with text by mdwh2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Many long-distance trains in the UK have a "quiet coach" where they ask people not to use mobile phones, personal stereos, children etc.

      This is a good idea, though I was annoyed one time when I reserved seats, and they put us in the quiet coach without asking. Everytime someone made a quiet phone call, this guy came over to complain at them, saying "Excuse me, when I want to make a phone call, I go to the end of the carriage". I guess it's nice that he wanted to uphold the rules, but I was more disturbed by that than the phone calls - I felt like saying to him "Excuse me, when I want to complain to someone, I go to the end of the carriage"...

  14. Re:Let me be the first to say by vtcodger · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Yes, that's correct. Tests in Canada have shown that as altitude increases, the likelyhood of getting a cellular connection drops to about zero. And at jet aircraft speeds, you'd have to switch from cell tower to cell tower much faster than is thought to be possible, so even if you got a connection, you probably couldn't keep it for more than 40 seconds or so.

    I assume that they plan to put a cellular transceiver on the aircraft and use some specialized technology to get the signals from the airplane to the ground -- satellite or some special mode of dealing with ground stations or something.

    Anyway, just when I thought that they couldn't find any more ways on top of miniscule seats with no leg room, long unexplained takeoff delays, intrusive security, losing baggage, scheduling impossible connections, overbooking, and chronically late flights to make airline travel more distasteful, they've come up with this. I rarely do airplanes any more, and the last time I did, it took me something like 36 hours to get from Burlington, VT to Seattle.

    --
    You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  15. real reason they ban 'em by Pvt.+Cthulhu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    likely mobile devices will never be allowed on commercial flights on american airlines, as the government, and therefore the people's will, here has little sway over business practices. airlines dont want you to have portable electronic devices, so you aren't gonna get them. at least not overtly.

    the question then is why, which people seem to think they know. it is most definitely not because they interfere with the flight systems. think about how many hundreds of people are on their cellphone or laptop inside the airport, why is there no record of that causing a problem with planes taking off/landing, or even messing with ATC? even if your device matched a signal a plane used, it stands to reason that the multi-million dollar commercial plane would overpower your cute little phone, and you would lose the connection, not them.

    so then the most likely reason is that the airlines want to control communication. if something goes wrong, and it is apparent that the plane will go down, then passengers will of course call family and such. the stewardesses will make sure they do no such thing, believing that even the lowly gameboy might interfere with the pilots' rectifying of the situation.

    once the plane crashed and everyone is either dead or in too much a state of shock, the airline can retrieve the blackbox, debrief the pilots if they survived, and now the only story on what exactly happened to the plane is one written by corporation not interested in being sued by the families of all the passengers.

  16. Re:Let me be the first to say by QuickFox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So what do you think is the best way to handle some irrational jackass on that horribly enclosed space that is a commercial passenger airliner? The best solution is to allow cellphone usage in the seats at the back of the plane and forbid it in the seats at the front. You choose where to sit depending on your needs and preferences.
    --
    Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
  17. 9/11 Anyone? by anarking · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Gee... I thought we could already make crystal clear calls from 25,000ft up on cell phones based on the calls from supposed passengers on 9/11!

    Oh wait... someone actually tested that with cell phones and none worked at all...

    Funny isn't it how they were all made through Verizon and how chummy Verizon has been with DHS and the other agencies. hmmmmmm...

  18. Re:Let me be the first to say by hedwards · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't see why this was modded informative. Cell phones have been a problem for quite a while. I have one myself, and I rarely use it when there are other people present.

    I take it from your post that you don't actually fly ever, because nobody that has been on a plane in the last few years would take those positions.

    I am personally a large man, while I don't have a whole lot of extra flab, I do take up my entire seat, and more if we're talking about a 737. When somebody is taking up more space than is in a seat due to being obese they should be charge for the extra space. I barely fit in a seat as it is, and that's with the shoulders I was born with. I shouldn't have to forfeit any of my space because the person next to me chose to put on a lot of weight.

    You do have a bit of a point with babies, but it is still a miserable way to fly.

    As for the phones, they are basically a menace to any sort of restful flight. The vast majority of cell phone users don't realize that you don't have to yell into them to be heard. I have one myself, and most of the time I can't hear myself and the microphone still picks it up sufficiently for the other party to hear my clearly.

    Limiting the cell phone use on plans to a specific walled off area would be fine by me, but expecting me or the flight attendants to moderate how loud is too loud because people invariably don't care is fundamentally unreasonable.

  19. Re:more airplane homicides by Bazman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Instead of killing them be a bit more creative. Get your phone out and go 'Michael? Hi! Mike! How's Mrs Hayden?, Do me a favour? Pull up the passenger manifest for AA96 and make the guy in 5E disappear will you? Great! Golf tomorrow? Sure! Bye!"

    It'll be one of those low-numbered rows since only people in First and Business class will be able to afford to yak away for a whole long flight. Since you'll be in that class too, don't kill them yourself, get one of your staff to do it.

    If you really are in Sardine class and have someone talk all the time he's either very rich, in which case make him change his will and then kill him, or he's not really talking to anyone and just wants you to think he's rich and popular. I don't have a cellphone, I think they don't really work, people just clamp them to their heads and pretend they have friends.

  20. Cell phones are different... by Joce640k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Cell phones are different because it isn't always the person sitting next to you who initiates the jackassery - other people can call them. Can you honestly ask somebody not to answer their phone if it starts ringing?

    Me? I think this is a terrible move. Air travel is bad enough as it is without having to put up with somebody talking 12 inches from your ear for hours. NOBODY is suffering with the current system.

    If somebody annoys me with a cellphone, ie. it's obvious that it's not an emergency call and they're not going to be hanging up anytime soon, I'm going to lean over and start talking loudly into the cellphone for as long as it takes for them to give up.

    --
    No sig today...
  21. I'm amazed and disgusted... by mi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That the "freedom-loving" slashdotters are all — posters and moderators — claiming to be happy, that the big lie of "cell phones may interfere with safety equipment on board" is being used to stop their fellow passengers from using their cell phones on the planes.

    Evidently, the ends justify the means... Lying to millions of travelers to prevent a tiny minority of them from being inconsiderate, while at the same time offering them an option to pay $6/minute for the same sort of inconsideration...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  22. YES! flying is not annoying enough yet by peter303 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Airlines have found they not reached the limits of annoying passengers yet. Hobbit-size seats, stuffy air, trip-long fasting, long bathroom lines were not enough. Bring on the cell phones!

  23. You all underestimate the inanity of most calls by wsanders · · Score: 2, Funny

    Typical loud mouthed moron on BART (SF Bay Area subway):

    LMM: "WHERE YOU AT?"

    LMM: "I'M ON BART"

    LMM: "BART!"

    LMM: "I'M ON BART!"

    LMM: "YES .. NO ..."

    LMM: "I'M ON BART!"

    [Train goes in to tunnel]

    LMM: "HELLO?"

    LMM: "HELLO?"

    LMM: "HELLO?"

    [Repeat N times directly proportional to loudness and stupidness of conversation]

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"