Humans Not Evolved for IT Security
Stony Stevenson writes to tell us that at the recent RSA Conference security expert Bruce Schneier told delegates that human beings are not evolved for security in the modern world, especially when it comes to IT. "He told delegates at the 2007 RSA Conference that there is a gap between the reality of security and the emotional feel of security due to the way our brains have evolved. This leads to people making bad choices. 'As a species we got really good at estimating risk in an East African village 100,000 years ago. But in 2007 London? Modern times are harder.'"
As a species we got really good at estimating risk in an East African village 100,000 years ago.
I wonder how many days would that guy last in an East African village 100,000 years ago.
Looking at the number of people falling for Nigerian scammers, I'd say that our ability to "estimate risk in an East African village" is not so hot either. :)
If you open yourself to the foo, You and foo become one.
Thank God I was intelligently designed for this kind of thing ;)
Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
"Only human."
--Agent Smith on IT security
You forgot :
5.Building an insecure system from the ground up and expecting the users to fix it.
Then, it sounds like we need a lethal, compulsory video game with a computer security theme.
True science means that when you re-evaluate the evidence, you re-evaluate your faith.
Well, for any equations where the solution is "go fuck yourself!", "I got somethin' you can solve, sugah!", or "no seriously, go fuck yourself" the subjects in my test study pass with flying colors.
Wow. You truly are entertaining. Here, have some more rope. I'm sure you can find an entertaining way of hanging yourself again.
Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
Anyway you should only trust Humans V1.0 after SP1 has been released.
Engineering is the art of compromise.
IT GUY: Your PC is insecure.
CEO: It's your job to secure it, dumbfuck. Give me a secure computer.
IT GUY: Yes sir.
I can explanate how to administrate your network. You must configurate and segmentate it, so it can computate.
> You are alone in a dark room and cannot see. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
Actually, sounds like what you can't see WILL in fact eat you.
No, those were South African villages. :-)
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
And that is why it SUCKS to be the person in charge of security for a domain. Make the security too harsh and the users complain (with good reason) that they can't get anything done. Make things too lax, and you turn into an alcoholic schitzophrenic who does nothing but sit at home in the dark murmering about exploits and unencrypted telnet sessions that your entire company runs on, and how even the software providers out in north carolina won't implement SSL into their software because all of their programmers are from the 1970s even the guy who supposedly "knows-linux" and wants to run gentoo on the soekris box that you sent them to use as a firewall; you sit there alone, and paranoid that some russian script kid, or 14 year old digg user wanna-be l33t-sausage hack-zore is gonna come accross a username/pass and burn your precious servers to the ground!
The relation between beer/security can most properly be illustrated by this graph
NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
They believe that having rolled many sixes recently, they are "due for a 1 or a 2" even though the probability of rolling a particular number on a die is independent of previous rolls.
My goodness, this is simply untruth! While it may be so in the white halls of academia, where such things as "fair dice" and "independent events" are bandied about as though they actually exist in their perfect mathematical forms, it isn't so in the harsh reality of the craps table! Allow me to explain. You see, when you roll a die and it lands as a six, this means that the one side is facing down. While bouncing and rolling each side of the die will contact the table only momentarily, but just prior to stopping the die will have one side contacting the table and will move ever so slightly until friction eliminates its remaining kinetic energy. This friction creates heat on the one, which is held in by the felt table, while the six is facing up and exposed to the air currents and thus is cooled. As hot objects expand and cool objects contract, and a less dense object is more buoyant than a dense one, this creates a natural tendency for the subsequent roll to favor landing one-up rather than six-up. Successive rolls of six will only increase this heat differential. So you see, the gambler's intuition is correct that they are "due" for a one as the odds every increasingly push the die in that direction.
I have myself used this fact to acquire vast sums of money from casinos, to the point where I was able to purchase a casino myself. You should come and visit and play at my craps table. I'm sure with my the knowledge I've given you, you will soon be buying the casino from me!
The enemies of Democracy are