Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Forces Desktop Search On Windows Update

An anonymous reader writes "The Register is reporting that the blogosphere is alight with accusations of Microsoft forcing Windows Desktop Search on networks via the 'automatic install' feature of Windows Update — even if they had configured their systems not to use the program. Once installed, the search program began diligently indexing C drives and entire networks slowed to a crawl."

12 of 579 comments (clear)

  1. Addition to TFA by cerberusss · · Score: 4, Informative

    This only happens on Windows XP, when you have either Office 2007 or Windows Live Photo gallery installed.

    Not saying it's OK, just mentioning the facts.

    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    1. Re:Addition to TFA by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have neither Office 2007 nor Windows Live Photo gallery installed but Desktop Search was got installed anyway.

  2. Annoying? Yes. by walterwalter · · Score: 5, Informative

    However to say that by default it was indexing the entire C: drive is erroneous. The default behavior is to index user files in "doc and settings" and then your outlook files after you open that program.

  3. Article Incorrect by Toreo+asesino · · Score: 5, Informative

    This applies to WSUS only, not the consumer Windows Update as everyone has mistaken it for. WSUS is the corporate, large-network version of managing and deploying product patches & upgrades to Windows machines (even if it's useful networks of any size really).

    What I find bizarre is that this system, not Windows Update (which I stress again, is different) has been subjected to a patch that seems to auto-approve itself!
    Under normal circumstances, each patch has to be approved (if set this way) by a network-admin before it will trickle out to workstations. This is the first time it would appear an update has approved itself.

    --
    throw new NoSignatureException();
    1. Re:Article Incorrect by hb253 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Wrong. I'm administaer WSUS 3.0 in my company and the desktop search app was not auto approved or autoinstalled. As I've said in other posts, if WSUS released the patch, it's the admins fault, pure and simple.

      --
      Self awareness - try it!
  4. I tell a lie.... by Toreo+asesino · · Score: 5, Informative

    The problem here is in fact that the search has come as an update for Windows, rather than a separate product. Looks like the people that are affected are auto-approving updates as they come, which more or less half the reason you'd use WSUS in the first place - to test patch deployments before releasing onto the network at large.

    http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=2315860&SiteID=1

    --
    throw new NoSignatureException();
  5. Re:misleading by MikeyVB · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, TFA is not misleading at all.

    I am one of the Systems Admin for a company with 2000+ users. We use WSUS for updating our clients, and our WSUS settings are set to not install any updates of any kind what so ever unless we explicitly approved of them.

    Yesterday ALL of our users suddenly got the Windows Desktop Search app. We double checked our WSUS settings, confirmed that updates only install with approval, and also explicitly "Declined" the Windows Desktop Search. It still continued to roll out, even though we said we didn't want it!

    We use Lotus Notes for our corperate e-mail, and so Outlook is not installed on any computers, and so of course since Windows Desktop Search indexes your Outlook e-mail, and since we didn't have it, everytime a user logs on now, they get two error messages about that it can't find Outlook and can't index your e-mail. Ridiculus!!!!!

    Called Microsoft for support (we have an enterprise license) and said they would "look into it" and "get back to us". No matter that our users are calling like crazy and wondering what is going on...

    I *hate* Microsoft now.

  6. WSUS is your friend by Verteiron · · Score: 4, Informative

    I declined this for my network via WSUS. It never set itself to "auto-install" as some of the comments I'm reading say it did, at least not in my network environment.

    Saw it in WSUS, declined it, end of issue.

    --
    End of lesson. You may press the button.
  7. You don't have to install it... by Techogeek · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you have your PC set to notify before downloading updates, you can simply uncheck it when the yellow shield pops up. When you close the window a box will pop up asking if you want to install it later. Just uncheck the box again and it will never ask again.. Worked for me!

  8. Re:What's worse... by HouseOfMisterE · · Score: 4, Informative

    If the update was mandatory, then it would be listed under "critical" updates instead of "optional" updates at the Microsoft Update site. It's not, because it isn't.

  9. Re:misleading by cwastell · · Score: 5, Informative

    It was released as an revision update. WSUS automatically approves those by default, even if you've got every other type of update set to manual approval. Its a separate tab (Advanced) in the Automatic Approvals dialog, so its basically a hidden setting unless you're looking for it.

  10. Re:Who's being "forced" to do anything?! by crabpeople · · Score: 4, Informative

    WRONG. mod parent down.

    My wsus downloaded and marked them as INSTALL tuesday night, they were rolled out at 3am just as any update I would have approved. EXCEPT I DID NOT APPROVE IT. Why the fuck would I 1) approve a patch the same day it was released with NO testing and 2) EVER APPROVE WINDOWS DESKTOP SEARCH.

    People like you piss me the fuck off. I run a tight ship. WSUS has NEVER done this before. EVER. It was 100% their fucking fault. Just because it didnt happen to you doesnt mean it didnt happen.

    --
    I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...