Slashdot Mirror


Blogger Wins 1.5 Year Legal Battle

FixYourThinking writes "After nearly one and a half years of harassment from a relentless attorney, it seems that quietly a blogger in South Carolina has won a monumental ruling in favor of bloggers. In a summary judgement requested by the Defendant, Philip Smith was able to obtain a special sanction after the Plaintiff attorney put a 'notice of lien' (called lis pendens) on Smith's residence. The judge also reprimanded the Plaintiff attorney for abusive deposition and court procedure. The case set forth the following; 'It's not the format; it's the content and intention that make text journalism / reporting.'"

11 of 207 comments (clear)

  1. Re:1.5 years for a court case isn't that bad by dintech · · Score: 3, Funny

    I believe I can lie...

  2. Re:I just wish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    There is no word "priviledge". Perhaps you were referring to the outhouse on the cliff?

  3. Re:A lien for what? by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Funny

    "we are suing you for a brazillion dollars.

          Actually, the unit of currency in Brazil is not the dollar but the "real". Oh, wait...

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  4. Re:I just wish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    >people who are considered processional journalists

    Nah, they're just spinning you a line...

  5. Familiarity . . . by Dausha · · Score: 2, Funny

    I am not familiar with the 1.5 year lawsuit between a blogger and a corporation. However, I heard of a similar 18-month lawsuit where the corporation sued an individual and lost. Could these two lawsuits be related?

    --
    What those who want activist courts fear is rule by the people.
  6. Re:Right! by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 3, Funny

    No sex in the champagne room. Sorry.

    --
    Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
    Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
  7. Re:I just wish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Correct. The very same cliff I'd like to push you off of.

  8. Re:Why the third person? by Sockatume · · Score: 2, Funny

    "This just in: I'm not being sued anymore, in a landmark ruling which is sure to shake the judiciary to its core. More at eleven."

    Huh, guess he does qualify as a journalist. ;)

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  9. Re:What's so special about that press card? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Who knows, maybe this would allow people working for Fox News to graduate onto becomming real journalists.

  10. Re:1.5 years for a court case isn't that bad by Iridium_Hack · · Score: 2, Funny

    Grammar Police - Notice of Ticket: I'm Sorry Sir, but use of the possessive pronoun "its" does not require an apostrophe. Your use of the contraction "it's" is improper and is normally restricted to situations where it shortens the common two word phrase "it is". Your blog is classified as improper usage by the Grammar Police Authority.

    Show up at your local Grammar Police office within the next 30 days to be booked for your infraction. Fail to do so and your every letter will be audited for punctuation errors.

    Viewing this sig signifies reception of this Sig

  11. Re:What's so special about that press card? by beav007 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The case set forth the following; 'It's not the format; it's the content and intention that make text journalism / reporting.'"

    If that's the case, perhaps CNN have something to worry about...