Slashdot Mirror


Australian Army Invests in Electrical Shirts

Stony Stevenson writes "The Australian Defence Department has injected $4.4 million worth of funding to further Australia's national science agency's (the CSIRO) research into designing clothing which can be used as a self-recharging electrical source on the battlefield. The Defence Department is hoping the technology can be used to replace cumbersome disposable batteries that soldiers must carry on the battlefield. The Flexible Integrated Energy Device (FIED) will be used to store and provide energy over a continuous period of time. It can be charged by either vibration energy harvesting or through plugging into an electrical power point."

10 of 124 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Now say after me by bestiarosa · · Score: 5, Interesting

    True, but I guess those shirt will harvest energy from body heat the soldiers would have lost anyway and from movements the soldiers would have done anyway. This way, the shirt would only be recycling energy which would've been otherwise lost.

    On the other hand, imagine if the battery somehow breaks starting to leak acid all over the guy's skin.

    --
    :(){ :|:& };:
  2. So we're buying NEW stuff now? by vandan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I thought our politicians only saw it fit to buy decommissioned US junk, such as 30 year-old helicopters, and the odd fleet of dud tanks and fighter jets. Perhaps this is Howard's idea of renewable resources. Personally, I'd rather just put the grunts put to work in a more economic - imagine how much clean energy we could produce if we took our soldiers from the bloodbaths in Iraq and Afghanistan, and lined them up in a big grid of treadmill generators. We could put a picture of Kylie Minogue in front of them, and maybe a picture of Bin Laden behind her. This would pretty much motivate the lot of them.

    1. Re:So we're buying NEW stuff now? by EnigmaPenguin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I only really would point out two things.

      "and doesn't have any highly lucrative natural resources"
      Who would ever want all that oil, gas, coal, bauxite, various other heavy metals, gold, uranium ( of which we have a lot of), diamonds, pearls right? Some people postulate that war will be waged over the worlds resources one day, why not consider that a point when you have all those people screaming about peak oil. Whether you believe it or not, it only takes for the enemy to believe it.

      "it's also completely surrounded by water"
      Not the best defensible position is it.

      Other than that you'd be right, we have an okay standing minus the war in Iraq and it really wouldn't do well for the invader on the world stage. I'll also concede that considering the Indonesian's purchase of military hardware from Russia for the coming decade (This includes a whole range of weaponry that could cause a lot of damage) we could have issues. After the F111 retires our long range bombing is reduced until the joint strike fighter program finishes up. This obviously limits our actions in regards to strategic options and its not as if they wont hear a collins class coming.

      It just might be wise to improve our own technology in regards to ground forces, be it for the regular peace keeping or out right war.

  3. Sounds like a great idea, perhaps. by backbyter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The extra weight of the clothing is offset by not having to carry the extra batteries. So it shouldn't place anymore weight on the troop. I know it's much more convenient for me to wear a loaded photographers vest than it is to carry the bag. Same weight, but the distribution of that weight on your shoulders feels much better at the end of the day.

    My concerns are these.

    What's this vest made of? If a trooper takes a bullet through the vest, what type of stuff from the vest is going to follow the bullet into the body?

    If this shirt is meant to be worn under armor then what impact does the constraint of being sandwiched between the body and the armor have on the overall effectiveness of the shirt?

    If the shirt is meant to be worn over the armor, is there any redundancy to the power generation when the shirt takes a hit? With batteries, the trooper could always ask a buddy for a spare battery. Asking for the shirt from your buddies back, in combat, would probably be looked on negatively.

  4. Much better idea by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Build some solar cells into their helmets.

    --
    Deleted
  5. fremen by rucs_hack · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sooner or later this kind of tech is going to result in a stilsuit. Hope so anyway, those things are just too cool not to be instantiated.

    Seriously though, if we colonise mars, they will be more then interesting, they may well be essential.

    Frank Herbert had way more right than people realise. Except for the spice thing, but if I have this right, in his original musings on the story, spice wasn't as important, and it was Stilgar, not Paul Atraides who was to be the major character.

  6. What happens... by Nameisyoung007 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If a soldier gets shot? What would typically be a bad flesh wound now has an electric battery system thrown in there as well...

  7. Another feature by Maljin+Jolt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Shock shirts: soldiers will _always_ obey their orders without any hesitation.

    --
    There you are, staring at me again.
  8. Re:Cant wait till I can get one of these! by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Having spent some time in the field wearing various uniforms, I have to say, the idea of wearing a bunch of plastic and metal fibers in the field doesn't sound very appealing. It sounds like a recipe for heat exhaustion.

    Are other energy sources really so inconvenient that this is justifiable?

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth
  9. Re:Yeah, but... by timeOday · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Y'know... I think you just invented perpetual motion!
    Bull. You almost have to wonder if people should even be taught the laws of thermodynamics, they're so eager to run off and leap to unsupported conclusions. Every single story in any way related to power, somebody refers to the laws of thermodynamics to "prove" it's not a good idea because "the power still has to come from somewhere." I got news for you kids, that doesn't mean all power sources are equally useful, economic, reliable, efficient, or anything else.