Slashdot Mirror


Antique Fridge Could Keep Venus Rover Cool

Hugh Pickens writes "In the 1970s and 80s, several probes landed on Venus and returned data from the surface but they all expired less than 2 hours after landing because of Venus' tremendous heat. It's hard to keep a rover functioning when temperatures of 450 C are hot enough to melt lead but NASA researchers have designed a refrigeration system that might be able to keep a robotic rover going for as long as 50 Earth days using a reverse Stirling engine. NASA has not committed to a Venus rover mission, but a 2003 National Academies of Science study recommended that high priority be given to a robot mission to investigate the Venusian surface helping to answer such questions as why Venus ended up so different from Earth and if the changes have taken place relatively recently."

13 of 229 comments (clear)

  1. No problem. by dozer · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've got an easier solution. Don't make the robot out of lead.

  2. i've always said by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Interesting

    venus is a better terraforming candidate than mars. oh sure, if you want to get somewhere as quickly as possible that is vaguely hospitable to settlement, mars beats venus hands down

    but if you want to talk about recreating earthlike conditions (water, temperature, gravity, atmospheric density), i think it would easier (easier, not easy) to precipitate out venus' atmosphere than to bulk up mars'. and if you stood on venus right now, you would weigh roughly the same. big bonus right there

    where is all the water going to come from? how the heck do you thin out the venusian atmosphere to earth-like densities? i don't know. but however you do it, it's an easier starting scenario than mars

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i've always said by evanbd · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, in terraforming terms, finding stuff to make up the Martian atmosphere probably isn't that hard. There are significant CO2 ice caps, and there may be significant water available with modest effort. CO2 plus plants gives you O2. Also, there is some good evidence to suggest that the icecaps' existence is bistable -- that is, if you could mostly evaporate them, the additional greenhouse effect would warm the planet enough to finish the job and keep it that way.

      Basically, the problem of terraforming is to find resources that are already available in almost the form you want, and find some way to leverage your input effort. You don't want to have to process every single megaton of atmosphere you want to add / remove. It's far easier to (for example) dust carbon black on the poles and add a few orbiting mirrors.

      Of course, the only reference I have handy is Zubrin's The Case for Mars which is a bit dated but (I think) still basically correct. The details may well have changed thanks to newer lander data.

    2. Re:i've always said by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Informative

      Prior to the global warming, Venus is generally believed to had surface water.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    3. Re:i've always said by jimbojw · · Score: 3, Funny

      but however you do it, it's an easier starting scenario than mars
      That's ridiculous - everyone knows that as soon as Quaid activates the turbidium reactor, Mars' atmosphere will fill out nicely.
    4. Re:i've always said by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 4, Interesting

      i don't know. but however you do it, it's an easier starting scenario than mars

      Probably not due to the 243 day rotation.

    5. Re:i've always said by schnikies79 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Isn't the problem with mars a lack of a magnetic field which allows the solar wind to strip away the atmosphere? I don't see how we could jump-start a magnetic field, so whats the point of even trying to rebuild the atmosphere if it's all going to blow away?

      How about the lack of gravity? Can you build atmospheric pressure comparable to earth with lower gravity?

      I saw Zurbin give a talk at my Univ a couple years ago and was going to ask him about it, but I forgot.

      --
      Gone!
  3. Stirling coolers by EaglemanBSA · · Score: 4, Informative

    While stirling engines are certainly old, the idea of using them as refrigerators is just recently catching on. Here in sleep Athens, OH a company called Global Cooling is the forefront producer of such devices (and is still hand-making a good number of them).

    The nice little advantage to these coolers is that they operate with very high COP's, and are limited in lower temperature merely by available power and the boiling point of the working gas. In global cooling's case, Helium is typically used, so temperatures down to around 5K are obtainable (at which point the helium liquifies. Yeah. Cold.) Also, control of the device can be very precise, in that instead of a compressor kicking on and off, it operates constantly, quietly, and with good variable control.

    LG is beginning to outfit refrigerators with Stirling pumps because they're so much better than current designs - only problem is they're not mass produced yet. Coleman has a portable unit shown here that is quite a nice unit, albeit very pricey.

    One of my professors here at school is one of the pioneers of Stirling refrigeration, so I've been exposed to it a lot. If the whole country switched their refrigerators to stirling compressors, California could shut off its power grid and we'd still have a surplus of energy country-wide.

    --
    Quiz: True or False -- On a scale of 1 to 10, what is your middle name?
    1. Re:Stirling coolers by EaglemanBSA · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, actually they're using the stirling design as the actual pump - that's the beauty of it. They're looking at using CO2 or helium as the refrigerant as well as the working fluid in the stirling cooler - especially with respect to helium, getting the gas-phase bubbles out of the fluid is as simple as letting it evaporate and leak back into the cooler itself. The design is much simpler this way, and leaks are quite benign.

      That being said, helium is a bit more expensive than other refrigerants, and CO2 requires intensely high pressures, so much work is yet to be done. As a heat pump, Stirling cycle engines operate on the theoretical threshold (we evaluate them using the Carnot cycle) of efficiency, so they...well, blow other designs out of the water. For numbers, I don't have any here. To give you some perspective though, I've seend a 40 watt unit freeze the water in the air around it within seconds of being turned on.

      --
      Quiz: True or False -- On a scale of 1 to 10, what is your middle name?
  4. 1970's refrigerator? by downix · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sterling's are older than the 70's. I've been tinkering on using a sterling for cooling off an engine block for a few years now (pretty good results too, allowing me to generate electricity from the previously wasted heat).

    --
    Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
  5. From the Stirling Engine article by AnonymousCactus · · Score: 5, Funny
  6. The real test by kaoshin · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, but can this device provide adequate cooling for a pair of NVIDIA 8800's in a brutal "room temperature" environment?

  7. Pseudoscience by MaDeR · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Funny that many people mistake mythology with factual history... you also think that x-files are documentary, aren't you?

    Your comment is classical pseudoscience tactic: find some problem with actual theories and claim "so my completely ludicrous idiotic shambling on acid must be right!!!!oneone".

    And for rest of universe, I would like to present Velikovsky in all ot his (in)famous glory...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Velikovsky

    http://skepdic.com/velikov.html

    "report the arrival of Venus into our solar system as a comet-like body within the past 10,000 years"

    No. Venus was to be expelled from Jupiter. And remind me, what comets have anything in common with Venus? Mass? Temperature? Looks? Materials? Orbital parameters?

    --
    What modern Obelix would say today? Of course, "Those crazy Americans!".