Slashdot Mirror


The Happiest Days of Our Lives

If you've ever read Wil Wheaton's blog (clevernickname to us), you know he's not afraid to put everything on the table. One of the things I've always admired about his writing is his willingness to talk about his kids. On the internet. With ... people. Despite the obvious problems that could cause, Wil has been sharing anecdotes about his adventures in parenting since the early days of WWDN. His newest book, The Happiest Days of Our Lives, talks about growing up geek and what it means to be a nerd and a father at the same time. Read on for my review. The Happiest Days of Our Lives author Wil Wheaton pages 136 publisher Monolith Press rating 8/10 reviewer Zonk ISBN 0974116017 summary Wil Wheaton's recollections of growing up, and parenting, as a nerd.

That the bones of the book's content comes directly from Wil's website shouldn't distract you. Whether you've been a reader all along (and might recognize some of these stories) or not, they've all been expanded and clarified for inclusion in the book. That clarification is something that comes across very strongly in Happiest Days, especially if you have read any of his previous work. Wil has put a great deal of work into the craft of writing over the past few years, and it shows. Some three years have passed since his sophomore effort in Just a Geek, and even more since Dancing Barefoot.

Where once it seemed as though Wil had something to prove in his writing - that he was over showbiz, that he was over Star Trek - Happiest Days is full of simple stories. The day he bought a Lando Calrissian action figure essentially by mistake, a simple outing for ice cream with his sons; they're everyday events but artfully told. In total he has about thirteen short tales in the chapbook-sized novel, ranging from just two pages long to a few dozen.

Some of his most evocative stories (and the reason this review is here) are all about Wil's growth as a nerdling. The most evocative for me was the chapter 'a portrait of the artist as a young geek', which details Wil's introduction to tabletop roleplaying. From his first brush with the infamous 'red box' D&D set at Christmas 1983, to his experience teaching his kids how to roll up characters under the 3.0 rulesset, the story reminds me (and may remind you) of a D6-laden past.

And really, that's what Wil makes this a book about. It's about his own past, his troubles, his triumphs, but in reality this is meant to be a book that reaches out to you as a reader. If you see something of yourself in the kid who agonized in the toy aisle, if you see something of yourself in the dad who argues with his kids over the radio station (and rocks out to 80s synth-pop), then the purpose of the Happiest Days has been fulfilled. Or at least, as I see it.

And, of course, if you like Wil's discussion of Star Trek there's some elements of that there as well. The difference, again, is that instead of pining for Trek itself, Wil reminisces about the impact Trek has had upon him. Great experiences talking like adults with Jonathan Frakes, the chance to speak to Ron Moore backstage at a con, and the recording of a documentary are what makes for stories from Wil in the here and now.

Probably the book's strongest element is also its biggest drawback. Wil's vicious editing and strong prose makes for an incredibly short book. The amount of story and emotion packed into the bare 136 pages is impressive. But ... it's still just 136 pages. And for $20, that seems a bit steep. For me, though, it was worth it to support an author that's been a pleasure to watch grow over the last several years. From blogger to published writer, Wil Wheaton's journey is laid out in miniature in the pages of Happiest Days. With the sour taste of Just a Geek washed out of his mouth, my hope is that we'll see more long-form work from Wheaton in the future. In the meantime this is a worthy 'sequel' to Dancing Barefoot, and well worth a look by fans of the well-placed word.

You can purchase The Happiest Days of Our Lives from Monolith Press. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

34 of 149 comments (clear)

  1. Really very good by MrAndrews · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is definitely one of my favourite books of the year, if for no other reason than the simple familiarity of the writing. Reading it is like sitting in a pub with an especially expressive friend, listening to him tell you some crazy story about his past that you suspect must be embellished, but don't mind if it is. After a crazy day dealing with puffed-up psychopaths a few weeks ago, I read four chapters, and it's like the casual tone just evaporated all my tension. Wil sucks the pretension out of the air with his writing... it's just superb.

    The one thing I'm hoping for is a work of fiction next... I know it's an extra-daunting task, but I'm sure it'd kick ass.

    1. Re:Really very good by CleverNickName · · Score: 4, Informative

      The one thing I'm hoping for is a work of fiction next... I know it's an extra-daunting task, but I'm sure it'd kick ass.

      I don't know if it counts, but I did a story for the latest TOS manga from TokyoPop, and I'm currently working on a short story that I hope to release in the near future.

      (And thank you so much for your kind words about my book. I'm really happy you liked it.)

    2. Re:Really very good by MrAndrews · · Score: 3, Interesting

      On the off chance you're still hanging around here (rather than, say, fighting with PayPal), I had a question for you: now that you've done fiction and non-fiction, which do you find more difficult to wrap your mind around? You seem to be very much at ease with writing about your real life, but I wonder if that's just a general skill that you're applying in a specific way.

      For me, I can't write about my life without collapsing into a puddle of trembling self-doubt, but I can make stuff up about invented people without breaking a sweat. I wonder if your talent in that area stems from being an actor, and being more comfortable "putting yourself out there".

      Very much looking forward to your short story! Good luck with the 300!

    3. Re:Really very good by CleverNickName · · Score: 4, Interesting

      For me, I can't write about my life without collapsing into a puddle of trembling self-doubt, but I can make stuff up about invented people without breaking a sweat. I wonder if your talent in that area stems from being an actor, and being more comfortable "putting yourself out there".

      It's the exact opposite for me, or at least it has been to this point. When I write narrative non-fiction, I know the whole story arc and all the characters, because I've experienced it all firsthand already. All I do is try my best to recreate as vividly and simply as possible what's already happened. To be honest, though, I'm starting to get bored telling stories about my own life, and if I'm getting bored with it, the audience can't be far behind (if they haven't gotten there ahead of me.) So now it's time to focus on writing fiction, which is sort of like moving from the outfield to third base for me.

      Until recently, when I've sat down to write fiction, I've gotten tremendous performance anxiety about creating something almost entirely out of whole cloth. I've felt like, "Hey, look at me! I. Am. A. Writer. I. Am. Writing. Now." (That works if you say each word out loud and make exaggerated typing motions with your hands, and use a dumb guy voice.) I'm still not entirely over that self-consciousness, but it's getting easier with each attempt. I think the key for me (at least right now -- I'm still at that point where it's easy to level up quickly) is coming up with a beginning and an ending, and using a couple of characters I care about to tie them together. The real trick is not being afraid to suck, because it's easier to fix something that sucks than it is to fill a blank page.

    4. Re:Really very good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      I've felt like, "Hey, look at me! I. Am. A. Writer. I. Am. Writing. Now."


      In my head I just hear it as William Shatner saying it, and I know exactly what you mean.

    5. Re:Really very good by myth_of_sisyphus · · Score: 4, Informative

      WIl, I really enjoy your writing about being a father and a geek but I especially like the reviews of STTNG episodes on TV Squad.

      http://www.tvsquad.com/bloggers/wil-wheaton/

      The insider references are great, but the writing itself is hilarious. Rarely have I laughed more than when reading your one-liners and non-sequiturs. When are you going to do more of those?

    6. Re:Really very good by beav007 · · Score: 2, Funny

      So now it's time to focus on writing fiction, which is sort of like moving from the outfield to third base for me.
      Nobody on Slashdot has ever moved to third base before. Maybe you should write about it...
  2. Can't buy it today by stoolpigeon · · Score: 3, Informative

    But the site says ordering will be back up by the 26th.
     
    Wil just sold through 300 signed hard cover copies and I guess the paperbacks will be available again in the next week or so.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:Can't buy it today by Jess+(geek-chick) · · Score: 2, Informative

      He was having issues with PayPal and had to suspend the softcover sales to get the process to work with the hardbacks. He has posted that once he gets the hardbacks shipped he will start up paperback sales again.

      I'm happy I am one of the 300!

      --
      If anyone needs me, I'll be in the Angry Dome.
  3. Not buying it. by CptPicard · · Score: 4, Funny

    Clearly, it is not possible to be a nerd and a father at the same time... the former should make the latter impossible.

    --
    I want to play Free Market with a drowning Libertarian.
    1. Re:Not buying it. by CptPicard · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, but you still want to watch all the cool gcc output scrolling by as it makes you feel l33t, instead of staring into your girl's eyes, and the she is jealous that you're drooling your kernel build and getting all hard off your compiler optimization flags instead instead of her...

      --
      I want to play Free Market with a drowning Libertarian.
    2. Re:Not buying it. by rbanffy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I concede it's funny, but it is also a horrible thing to say.

      As a father, I can tell you that, while you may sometimes get tired of your kids (kids _are_ noisy), there are no moments as precious as those when they are around.

      Even those rare moments when you got all the config values just right and, for the first time in months your wireless work flawlessly under WPA2, cannot compare.

    3. Re:Not buying it. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Put the monitor behind you. Then you can stare romantically into her eyes... and watch the reflection of the GCC output scroll by.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  4. What "obvious problems"? by sseaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One of the things I've always admired about his writing is his willingness to talk about his kids. On the internet. With ... people. Despite the obvious problems that could cause, ... Am I missing something? What's so problematic about discussing your children on the internet? Everyone with kids does it.
    1. Re:What "obvious problems"? by mabinogi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was wondering exactly the same thing - I'm not sure why you got modded as flamebait for asking...

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    2. Re:What "obvious problems"? by gambino21 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Probably many people are concerned about the privacy issues. Public information about your family could be used against you or your family by classmates, angry neighbors, etc. But I agree with you, and I'm not sure why you were modded down. I blog about my family, mostly for the enjoyment of my friends and relatives. I do think about what information I should or shouldn't share with the public, but in general I think if someone is out to get me for some reason, they probably aren't going to be helped that much by a blog. In fact it may even be a deterrent if they get to know me or my kids.

    3. Re:What "obvious problems"? by unlametheweak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Writing about" is not the same as "gossip". What makes you think it is? The medium is besides the point. It is all verbal communication. The outcome is the same. "Gossip" does not necessarily imply malicious intent, however it can invade people's privacy.

      I write about my kids. Anything I write is a fair and accurate description that does not try to portray them in a poor light. It's certainly good that you do not try to portray your kids in a bad light; however a writer's intentions may not always reflect the opinions of their children. For example, a person may not think that talking about a child's bowel movements may not be malicious, but that child may not think that is "fair" or appropriate. Talking about a child's romantic crushes or their love of some unpopular musical style may also not be in the child's best interests, however "fair" the author may think he / she is trying to be. These are just a couple of an infinite amount of examples I could use.

      If they dislike it now or later, that's their problem, not mine. I agree that it is their problem, and they will have to deal with it. That's also a rather callous way of thinking about your children. If you don't care about the feelings of your children then you shouldn't be a parent IMHO.

      I will state that if a person (whether it be you or Wil Wheaton) writes about their kids, then they should discuss this with their children first and get their permission. Otherwise it is just gossip, whether it be written or oral in nature. If one wants to talk about their kids while at the same time protecting their anonymity, then this would be acceptable to me.

      People should have etiquette and show respect for their children. In respects to the original poster:

      What's so problematic about discussing your children on the internet? Everyone with kids does it. I stand by what I have said all along, and I have answered the question (whether people agree or disagree with the answer). I hope I have elaborated appropriately on the premise that "Because the kids may not like that, either now or in the future." I certainly hope you do think about your children's feelings when you talk or write about them, and keep an open (and open-minded) dialogue with them.

  5. Re:Why do people like Wheaton? by vux984 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I still want to kick him in the nuts repeatedly.

    I did too, until I read some of his stuff. And then I learned that I just wanted to kick Wesley Crusher in the nuts repeatedly, and bore no ill will whatsoever to his doppleganger Wil Wheaton.

    Its not really Wil's fault he played the most annoying kid in Star Trek (and most other franchises for that matter). And if he hadn't done it someone else would have played the part, and we would have hated it just as much.

    In other words: blame Roddenberry and his writers for inflicting us with Wesley Crusher, not Wil Wheaton.

  6. Comparative economics? by Dachannien · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But ... it's still just 136 pages. And for $20, that seems a bit steep. I agree. But it's vaguely on-topic to point out that Wizards of the Coast regularly pawns off D&D sourcebooks shorter than 136 pages for more than $20 each.

    1. Re:Comparative economics? by east+coast · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The D&D books are reference guides. Their value can not be figured out using the same methods as normal reading material.

      Put it this way: if you buy Wil's book how many hours will you read and reread it for? On the other hand how many hours will you spend playing D&D off a set of books?

      It's like a Tangram set I bought at Barnes and Nobles a couple years ago... it was just a couple tiles of plastic and a 120 page book that I forked the money over for, it was the hours and hours of activity that I was paying for.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    2. Re:Comparative economics? by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We may pay $30 or $40 for a meal that we finish in an hour and feel we've had a good deal, then pay $10 for a pen with which we will write for over a hundred hours and feel ripped off, then spend $20,000 on a wedding that lasts a day and feel it's well-spent, while thinking that is too much to spend on a car that we will use for 5 years.

      Value is not just a function of time of use.

  7. Wait... wut?? by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 3, Funny

    Zonk can read?

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  8. Interesting by orclevegam · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I find it kind of sad to think of Wil reading through the comments on here. I'm sure as a regular to slashdot he's probably used to the trolling that goes on, but it's still got to be hard on him at some level to read some of this stuff. I for one hadn't heard about this book before now, but I think I'll go pickup a copy. It's always interesting to see a fellow geeks perspective on life, and Wil usually does a pretty good job of expressing that perspective.

    --
    Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    1. Re:Interesting by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I find it kind of sad to think of Wil reading through the comments on here. I'm sure as a regular to slashdot he's probably used to the trolling that goes on, but it's still got to be hard on him at some level to read some of this stuff. I like to think that the guy who picked up a "Shut up, Welsey" button at a vendor booth and wore it for the duration of a Star Trek convention has figured out how to handle the bleating of Slashdot trolls. After all, not only is Wil something of a Slashdot regular - he is also responsible for one of the best meta geek posts in slashdot history. Who else would use Slashdot, and a rare public interview opportunity with a nerd culture icon, to have a pseudo-private conversation?
  9. Re:Honestly by juuri · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't know, because he is one of us?

    How many of the true slashdot long term readers, posters and contributors have had his experiences? While he may never have such artful tales to tell like the one time where Bill Joy asked me what my favourite text editor was (without me knowing who he was, thank goodness for knowing emacs was shit even back then) he has many tales that involve that whole scary black box of hollywood and the sycophants involved. More importantly he can spin a good tale about being a modern day grown up geek in America with kids. Where's the harm in enjoying that?

    Slashdot is as much about being a place for geeks as it is about rehashing the geeky news on a daily basis. Here's to you Goatboy (from Y irc circa 92? 93?) for continuing to be who you are even with far too many people watching and caring.

    --
    --- I do not moderate.
  10. Re:Why do people like Wheaton? by sairen42 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Heh ... When I was a kid, I watched ST:TNG faithfully and had a massive crush on Wesley Crusher. Nerd girls...what can I say? We're our own breed. It's good to know Wheaton's doing well as an adult.

  11. Dude, he played Wesley Crusher!!! by Weaselmancer · · Score: 5, Funny

    You think a few lame-o trolls on Slashdot are going to affect him? At one point in time he had almost all of nerddom hating him. Usenet groups dedicated to his destruction. People at cons screaming at him. In Klingon. You name it.

    Wil probably has thicker skin than a rhino at this point.

    That being said - I'm a fan. Of both Wil and Wesley. Suck it, haters.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:Dude, he played Wesley Crusher!!! by orclevegam · · Score: 4, Funny

      You can talk in Klingon without screaming? Who knew.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
  12. A Great Geek Read by Fricka · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I got my copy in the mail a few weeks ago, right before I left on a trip. When I got back I picked it up and then didn't put it down until I was done. It's a real thrill ride of a "whodunit". Ok, it's not but it IS very compelling reading.

    I enjoyed it immensely. Perhaps this was partly because I grew up in the town neighboring his so those stories had extra meaning to me. However, I think any geek will enjoy it, as someone else said in the comments, he's "one of us".

    My formal review is on my blog: http://www.offlinetshirts.com/blog/index.php/2007/11/20/book-review-happiest-days-of-our-lives/

    As a disclaimer, I must admit to having met Wil in person and to getting my copy for free (which was a very cool surprise).

    --
    ~Fricka
    OffLineTshirts.com
  13. Re:Jeebus! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Funny

    But if I hear one more story of how he slipped Ashley Judd the tongue...
    What, he worked in a deli, too?

    I hope he sliced it nice and lean.
    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  14. Re:Why do people like Wheaton? by jafac · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When I was a kid, I watched ST:TNG faithfully and had a massive crush on Wesley Crusher. Nerd girls...what can I say?

    . . . I suspect this is the root of the ire coming from nerd guys. . . .

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  15. Re:"parenting" is a horrible word by martinX · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't you just hate people who verbify nouns?

    --
    When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  16. regarding Klingon by CleverNickName · · Score: 5, Funny

    You can talk in Klingon without screaming?

    Well, you can, but nobody is going to understand you. And trust me, Klingon is not a language where you want to risk being misunderstood.

  17. D6? Oh please. by Azari · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the story reminds me (and may remind you) of a D6-laden past

    D6?? I associate D6 with Monopoly and Steve Jackson & Ian Livingstone Fighting Fantasy books, not D&D. I think I still have my d20 (if I can still call it that without getting permission from Hasbro ;P) from my first edition of D&D.

    ...+1 Pedantic nerd?