The Evolving Face of Credit Card Scams

An anonymous reader writes "The 12 Angry Men have a followup to their piece on the cross-sell scam credit card companies have begun using. Their new article concerns another evolving scam being employed, where users are racking up huge fees and charges on cards that have never even been activated. The article goes deep into the standard way the scam plays out, as well as detailing some interesting history on how credit applications are processed, and where they are typically (and frighteningly) subject to tampering."

Comments

Simple (sort of) solution:

[Z80xxc!]

Just don't use credit cards. Really. Using credit gets you into debt anyway. True, there are other ways to get scammed, but if you don't have a credit card, they can't rack up the charges. If you were to use a debit card instead, then you stand to loose something, but once it runs out, it's gone and they can't keep charging more. Credit is necessary in some circumstances, but for day-to-day purchases, you might be better off without one.

Re:Simple (sort of) solution:

[andy666]

True, but the fact of the matter is that people DO get into debt more when they use credit cards. But maybe one way to look at this is that a credit card is a easy way to get a short high interest loan, and people are fine with that. On the other hand, most people don't treat it that way and it turns into a long term high interest loan. So it is sort of psychological reasons that get people into trouble. Many people are not disciplined enough to do what you recommend.

A lot of people gamble and get into trouble because of bad judgement. It's sort of like that. Basically a lot of adults act like kids, and you have to expect that as the norm.

Re:Simple (sort of) solution:

[ejdmoo]

Just don't use credit cards. Really. Using credit gets you into debt anyway.

Wrong. Using credit gets you into debt, maybe, but not me. Credit does not get you into debt; debt comes from not repaying your creditors.

People these days just can't accept personal responsibility for things; it's ridiculous.

Re:Simple (sort of) solution:

[AK Marc]

Using credit gets you into debt anyway.

Hmmm, I have about $150,000 of debt to three separate institutions, and not a single one of them is a credit card company. Well, not counting credit cards paid off within 30 days with no finance charges as "debt." I have about $50,000 available on my cards, and use it like a convenient checkbook that pays me money for using it and takes nothing from me in return. Anyone not using credit cards for all possible purchases is losing money.

If you were to use a debit card instead, then you stand to loose something, but once it runs out, it's gone and they can't keep charging more.

Debit (tied into your bank account) gives you less protection than a credit card. Also, if there is a problem and your charge account is frozen, if you have credit cards, you pull out another. Most people don't have a full backup checking account in case the first one doesn't work.

Credit is necessary in some circumstances, but for day-to-day purchases, you might be better off without one.

The way I see it, using a credit card for all purchases gives me rebates (cash, airline miles or whatever) protects my checking account from loss, and leaves a more trackable account history than checks or cash. Using credit cards is something people should do, not avoid. Now, the question of paying it off is a completely separate issue. Just like you shouldn't write a check your account can't cash, neither should you charge something more than what you can write the check for when the bill comes.

Re:Simple (sort of) solution:

[davetd02]

I'm trying to understand where the "scam" is here. You officially became a joint owner of the account. Presumably there were some documents and signatures involved. You never told Wells Fargo that you were no longer the joint owner of the account. Wells Fargo, thinking you to still be the joint owner of the account, did exactly what "joint owners" do. You get all of the benefits AND all of the drawbacks.

The right thing to do would have been to do more than return the ATM card to your ex-, but also remove yourself from the account.

who would cross-sell with such losers?

[Greenisus]

i don't know about most e-commerce operations, but where I work, we make a point to not tie ourselves in with the kinds of companies that would do these sorts of cross-sell scams. TFA says some people think of this as free money, but it's not at all. when you hand control of what your users see to a third party, that's not free.