Slashdot Mirror


Technology Innovation Areas For 2025

Kyle Spector writes "A global futurist research firm convened an expert panel to forecast the major areas and potential advances in technology innovation through the year 2025. This blog entry contains the full list of 12 areas and some details about each, including personalized medicine, distributed energy, pervasive computing, and nanomaterials."

26 of 131 comments (clear)

  1. I know the first two! by stormguard2099 · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Penis enlargement
    2. Hair regeneration

    --
    http://greenobyl.com/ please.... think of the children!!
  2. consultants ? by polar+red · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The site reads a bit like the site of a hot-air factury.
    from their front-page 'Social Technologies is a global research and consulting firm specializing in the integration of foresight, strategy, and innovation.' djeezes.

    On energy, they say nothing about renewable energy like solar or wind, while it's clear even to me that solar will take a very big part of the production in the next years.

    transportation : 'personal transportation coordinated through wireless computer networks,' I think they're spot-on. In 2025, nobody will be allowed to steer vehicles anymore. (currently there are more deaths per year on the road than you wanna know)

    --
    Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    1. Re:consultants ? by Slashidiot · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well, they don't name renewable energy as such, but when they refer to "Distributed energy", they are clearly meaning solar and wind (and others), as one of the things about those energy sources is that it's hard to create a big central that produces most of the energy needed, but it's easy to have bits of electricity generation here and there, saving in line losses.

      About in 2025 nobody steering any vehicles anymore, I'm still waiting for my year 2000 flying car, good luck with your self steered 2025 car. Truth is, we are still VERY far from having those type of cars, and will probably never happen. What will happen (and is already happening) is that sensors and electronics will make driving far easier. For example, on the latest models of BMW, you have cruise control that keeps safety distance, on screen radar that let you see position of objects when parking, the steering wheel vibrates if you are on cruise control and go out of your lane, and many more cute things like those.

      But for the moment we are quite far from letting the car drive itself, as it's really difficult to control all variables and preview all unexpected things that could go wrong. I'm not saying a human will do them better than a computer, but when the self steered car appears, it'd better be 100% safe, as people don't like to put their lives on a computer's hands.

      --
      Tis women makes us love, Tis Love that makes us sad, Tis sadness makes us drink, And drinking makes us mad.
    2. Re:consultants ? by polar+red · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Distributed energy" I have to see it first before i believe electricty companies giving up their grip on our b@lls. I would like to be in control of my own power instead of paying a monthly bill ... give me those advanced batteries !
      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    3. Re:consultants ? by oliverthered · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Most driving is done because:
      It costs less than the cost of public transport.
      Goes at exactly the time you want it to
      Allows you to take lots of luggage
      Is often quicker (especially when companired to busses)
      and goes from your house and travels very close to the location you want to be at.
      You don't have to stand or sit next to someone you don't want to
      runs through the night.

      Until public transport can do all that it's never going to catch on.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    4. Re:consultants ? by tehcyder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Until public transport can do all that it's never going to catch on.
      It caught on a long time ago outside the US, you know.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    5. Re:consultants ? by OldBus · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'd agree with most of this, expanding 'runs through the night' to 'runs where it is impossible to use public transport'.

      However, I'm not sure about 'It costs less than the cost of public transport'. If you already have a car/automobile then there is a good chance that a given journey will be cheaper than public transport - especially if more than one person is making the journey. However, my experience in the UK suggests that if you book plane/train far enough in advance you can often get prices cheaper than a car journey (especially considering fuel prices over here.)

      If you don't need a car, then doing without one entirely is almost certainly going to be cheaper. I don't have a car and spend probably 600 to 800 GB pounds a year on public transport (excluding any long distance holiday flights for which I wouldn't use a car). Given that I couldn't repair a car myself, I doubt that I could run a car for this (when you include fuel, wear and tear, insurance, tax, MOT, depreciation, interest on a loan etc).

    6. Re:consultants ? by siufish · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It costs less than the cost of public transport.

      I think it depends on who you are and where you live. For example, if you're a good American living in New York, and you go out and buy a 2008 Ford F-250, you'll spend about $46,000 in 5 years. That gives you ~$9,000 each year (forget time value and all that for the moment). Compare that with getting the 30-day unlimited ride MetroCard for $76 ($38 for reduced fare), it costs only ~$900 a year. You have ~$8,000 left to take a plane or taxi or rent a car to go wherever subway or buses don't go.

  3. pfft...the 'predictions' are a joke, right? by djupedal · · Score: 4, Informative

    What a conjob
    "# With the initial mapping of the human genome, scientists are moving rapidly toward the following likely breakthroughs for gene-based products and services:
    * creation of an individual's genome map for a retail price of less than $1,000

    This was announced last week...no waiting. Come on down.

    1. Re:pfft...the 'predictions' are a joke, right? by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 5, Funny

      Frankly, I think predictions #28: "Playstation 9 will sweep market", #31: "Blu-Ray 3D conquers adult entertainment market", #60: "President Chelsea Clinton announces new Green Initiative with husband Tommy Lee Gore", and #81: "Windows 2025 requires 16 TB PC memory and delivers faultless DRM with only 23 minute bootup time" are all too likely to come true. However, I'm rooting for #110, "RealDoll 2025 cooks, vacuums, and comes with MUTE button" and #111, "Android-Human marriage legalized".

    2. Re:pfft...the 'predictions' are a joke, right? by skoaldipper · · Score: 2, Funny

      What a cronjob
      # With the initial mapping of the human genome, scientists are moving rapidly toward the following likely breakthroughs for gene-based products and services:
      * 47 6 * * 7 root test -x /usr/bin/creation --individual --genome ~/.map && /usr/bin/sh retail-price -lt 1000 | exit
      Fixed it for you.
      --
      I hope, when they die, cartoon characters have to answer for their sins.
  4. Evolutions, not Revolutions by Aminion · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The list is so general that it is bound to be accurate to a certain degree. Also, I seriously doubt that even the brightest and knowledgeable people can predict the really revolutionary stuff that's going to happen. I mean, back in 1989, how many (few?) people could envision the Internet in its current form? Certain societal advances are so revolutionary and disruptive that we cannot even begin to imagine them.

    Not that any of this means that the predicted future isn't amazing and great for mankind, of course. What's really encouraging is the focus on health and the environment. Advances in (bio) medicine, improved water purification, carbon management and engineered agriculture will arguably save and improve the lives of millions of human beings lessen mankind's impact on the environment. And it's all thanks to technology, and not /Modern society is evil!/We must go back to nature!/ thinking.

    1. Re:Evolutions, not Revolutions by Gr8Apes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Envisioning the internet as it is today back in 89 would most likely have predicted today's internet in about another 10 years. It's only the speed, not the internet itself, that would have been hard to predict. Most of the things done on the internet today already existed in some form back in 89, some far before then. Email (and IM,SMS), the Web (a combination of FTP repositories, WAIS, Archie, Gopher, and USENET with a better interface), streaming media/video conferencing. And as for P2P, the internet started with people sharing things off of their systems available to all, became somewhat centralized due to the explosion of end users, and now is moving back to a decentralized format again.

      The major surprise was the speed of cabling and price drops in hardware, making internet access ubiquitous.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    2. Re:Evolutions, not Revolutions by Indiana+Joe · · Score: 2, Informative

      I mean, back in 1989, how many (few?) people could envision the Internet in its current form?

      I've been on the Internet since 1989. It hasn't changed much. We just have prettier pictures now.

      --
      I can't decide if this post is interesting, funny, insightful, or flamebait.
  5. Universal water thing... by Slashidiot · · Score: 3, Informative

    They are not saying anything too futuristic about the Universal water. What they say is almost here (with a good margin for improvement). However, what they don't say is that all those expensive cool ways to get water only matter to the first world, and not third world countries. We'll be lucky if they have a couple of drops of bleach to put on their drinking water to prevent waterborne diseases for 2025. That would save 1.8 million lives a year. Without any cool ways to get the water, just some basic water treatment for everybody.

    --
    Tis women makes us love, Tis Love that makes us sad, Tis sadness makes us drink, And drinking makes us mad.
  6. 2025? Try 2008. by ThreeGigs · · Score: 3, Informative

    Every single one of the points mentioned in each of the 12 areas is something that's happening now. This is a 5 year outlook, not an 18 year one. I was hoping to read about the 'next big thing'. 18 years ago it was cell phones and the internet. 18 years before that it was space (satellite), computers and materials science. 18 years before that it was the transistor and rock and roll. Each one had radical, far flung implications that had revolutionary effects, not evolutionary ones.

    creation of an individual's genome map for a retail price of less than $1,000 - try $985
    advanced electric storage devices and batteries at all scales - lithium? Supercaps?
    very simple and inexpensive computing devices with integrated wireless telephone and Internet capabilities - www.nokia.com?
    the "semantic Web," - Google? Netflix?
    multiple variable and inexpensive sensors linked with computers - your door is ajar?
    ultra-fine filters (probably from nanotechnology) - semipermeable membranes? Reverse osmosis?
    affordable and effective carbon capture and storage technologies and systems for coal-burning power plants - riiiight... why not just re-burn the carbon after you capture it? Oh that's right, perpetual motion and all that.
    identification of specific genomes for desired growing and use qualities - you mean ones that Monsanto hasn't already patented?
    radio frequency tags for people and valuables - been shopping lately folks?
    onboard sensors and computers for smart vehicles - your door is... we know, we know
    advanced high-speed rail - presumably the high speed (400 km/h) rail we have now isn't advanced.

    This reads more like someone's current R&D budget.

  7. Utopia or Dystopia? by owlnation · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Security and Tracking
    As an inmate of the UK, can I suggest that those of you who live in other countries begin fighting these "advances" before they ever happen? You do not want this to be your future. In the UK we already have some of it as our present, and it is run by corrupt and incompetent politicians. What's currently happening in the UK is a warning to you all. This is no Utopia. There won't be any British flying cars.
    1. Re:Utopia or Dystopia? by Stooshie · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... In Brownian Britain, the flying cars are watching you! ...

      In Brownian Britain all our citizens just move about randomly bashing into each other.

      --
      America, Home of the Brave. ... .and the Squaw.
  8. In 2025... by doyoulikeworms · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We'll look back on how naively optimistic we were. I remember there was an article back in 2000 about what a group of so-called futurists in the '50's predicted the year 2000 to be like. The only one that was right was "Television in Every Classroom."

  9. very western, very expensive by petes_PoV · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The only item on the list that will affect the vast majority (including the 1/3rd of the population that has no electricity) is universal water. Even that presumes there's some rainfall for the filtration to work on.

    If you want major breakthroughs for the "other" 90% of the world they'll have to cost less than $10 to the end-user.

    When all these pundits (and their audiences) start thinking in those terms, that'll be a real breakthrough

    P.S. My suggestion for the list would be a viable neural interface.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  10. DUPE ALERT by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well it feels like it anyway, I am pretty sure I saw this list before. Oh yeah, every damn year. It is just a blessing the flying car ain't on it anymore, have you got yours yet? Mine must be stuck in the mail. I knew there would be problems going all email.

    But hey, I got time, so lets go through the whole list shall we.

    Personalized medicineWith the initial mapping of the human genome, scientists are moving rapidly toward the following likely breakthroughs for gene-based products and services:

    • creation of an individuals genome map for a retail price of less than $1,000 Good one, with the dollar going DOWN, that means you can get your genome mapped for the price of a coffee.
    • correlation of specific genes and proteins with specific conditions, such as cancers, Alzheimers, heart disease, and diabetes, which will allow both physicians and patients to anticipate, plan for, and mitigate, if not cure, DNA-based health challenges Well, duh, and can I predict that women will get tested for breast cancer so it can be detected earlier? Oh wait, this is already happening. It ain't much of a predition if it is already happening. That is pretty much the problem with this entire list
    • development of pharmaceuticals that treat gene-based diseases, replacing surgeries and chemotherapy Same as above, no not just my comment, this one is part of the previous point.

    Distributed energyThe evolution of distributed energy will reflect that of computing: just as computing has migrated from the 20th centurys centralized model (powerful mainframes delivering applications to remote workstations) to todays decentralized model (PCs and networks), so energy generation and delivery will move from central to distributed sources, increasingly featuring local generators that can be linked when needed for greater output. Specific innovations will include:

    • advanced electric storage devices and batteries at all scales WoW, batteries will be better then they were before. Gosh. This includes small batteries and big batteries. Who would have thought. The future is bright indeed.
    • new power systems with source-switching flexibilityNot even sure what the hell this means. Is this like my laptop that can switch over from battery to net power without a hitch?
    • new energy management systemsWhat kind of energy management systems, are we talking new CPU throttling here OR management of nation wide energy? But hey, whatever. I am pretty sure new systems will be introduced. Sale people got to make a living you know.

    Pervasive computingAlmost every device or object in consumers lives will be both smart and networked, giving rise to an Internet of things. Pervasive computing will drive the convergence of computing, the Internet, voice communications, and televisionultimately blurring categories of infotech products and services. Specific breakthroughs will include:

    • very simple and inexpensive computing devices with integrated wireless telephone and Internet capabilities (the $100 computer) Ah, that is cheap, now I can get a computer for less then a visit to the toilet. Damn inflation is a bitch eh. Bit lazy to predict the $100 dollar computer after it launched (at 200 dollars but lets not be picky). Also kinda ignores that the really hot item is the overpriced iPhone. We may GET simple and inexpensive but do we WANT it? Anyway, computers will be cheaper. WoW. I wish I had known that before I robbed a bank to pay for my PC
    • the semantic Web, enabled by Web data that automatically self-organizes based on its content, allowing search tools or software agents to better identify relevant Web pagesnot just find keywords on them The semantic web cannot exist until you somehow manage to stop people from spamming pages with all kinds of drivel just to get them listed. Google some obscure game and IGN will come up as the ultimate source of info for it, despite the fact that they have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ON I
    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  11. Social impact of technology by pubjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This list looks 18 years into the future, if we look back 18 years, it takes us to 1989. In 1989 practically nobody had predicted the web or its implications. A single development, and yet the implications of it are profound and are still in progress.

    The thing about technology is that it develops at a different rate to the social changes it causes. For instance, the social impact of the web is still happening and is likely to continue for a couple of decades, even if web technology doesn't change much. Why? Because people that grow up with a technology behave differently that those that didn't, so the profound social changes sometimes only happen when children grow up and enter active society.

  12. No, self driving vehicles are already available. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    About in 2025 nobody steering any vehicles anymore, I'm still waiting for my year 2000 flying car, good luck with your self steered 2025 car. Truth is, we are still VERY far from having those type of cars, and will probably never happen They're being implemented, now in the UK.
    http://www.atsltd.co.uk/media/pictures/

    But for the moment we are quite far from letting the car drive itself, as it's really difficult to control all variables and preview all unexpected things that could go wrong. Which is why the other way to do it is to remove the variables. You then get the additional benefit of eliminating traffic congestion as well which actually makes it faster than a traditional car.
    --
    Deleted
  13. sounds reasonable, but not much to read by zappepcs · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Necessity is still the mother of invention. All you have to do is look at problems that will not be solved next year, and think a little bit about it, you too can be a futurist. I'm not saying you will be great at it, but you can be a futurist. Being able to predict likely future trends used to be something useful and difficult to do. With the advent of the Internet, you have a veritable research facility in your home. What? you need to know about materials engineering? Google it bro! Oh, need to know about animal husbandry? Google it bro! At no previous time in man's history has so much information been available to so many people. I really am saddened to see that such is left out of the loop on how the future is going to look.

    We are currently at some point of compromise between where society was when the original Star Trek was written, and where it predicts we will eventually go. The world has become much more flat, as they say, with regard to commerce, news, politics, and many other things. None of this seems to be affecting technology predictions. Well, I'll make a prediction; the things I've just mentioned will have a far greater impact on future technology than people generally give credence to.

    Look at the results of what some of the current technology will bring: Health insurance industry upheaval with bio-tech innovations; big pharma industry upset with open source style medicines; auto insurance upheaval with computer driven vehicles; in general, all of the current trend in innovation is about to upset the big business apple cart. Trouble with this is not that things will change, but that third and second world countries are better poised to take advantage of it as it happens. Big businesses will fight tooth and nail to keep their stranglehold on their markets with the same determination that we have seen the **AA use. There is no good that can come from this.

    I also predict that business will change in general. There will be polarization of business practices. Simply opening a company with one cash cow will not be good enough. There will be more vertical integration of business as well as more single mom-n-pop salons. Walmart and their ilk will crumble under their own weight. That seems to contradict what I said of vertical integration, but it does not. There will be more self reliance in business as technology becomes more important, and wise CEO's will see that they need in-house expertise rather than simply paying someone else to do what they can no longer trust another company to do for them. As the world becomes more flat, and regulation of industries becomes more equalized, it will not be possible for some huge multinationals to remain that way. Yes, shrinking profits is what is ahead for the globe.

    It will take only one invention to upset the entire global economy, say for instance, free fuel. Hydrogen power for free or very cheap and made open source would destabilize a huge section of the global economy. None of these 'futurists' seem to get any of that in their predictions.... ?

  14. Re:Need for standard unit for measuring cost by khallow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Any thoughts how we could create a fixed unit of value that would be as valid today as it will be in 10,000 years?

    Short answer. You can't. The usual approach is to take the value of a basket of goods (like an ounce of gold or the constantly shifting weighted pile of stuff used in the US Consumer Price Index or CPI). But even that will depend on where you are and what methods you use to adjust for what you think are changes in the value of the goods (say via hedonics). And there's no apparent consistency between valuation methods. Even if I know the price of everything (in US dollars) in 2100, I won't know what the CPI is, simply because I won't know how the basket of goods has been weighted by then.
  15. Distributed energy by khakipuce · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Really good idea, perhaps we could ... errm ... how about ... oh I don't know ... use metallic cables to distribute the energy.

    so energy generation and delivery will move from central to distributed sources So we have lots of little, local power sources - which are harder to regulate (both in terms out power output and in terms of ensuring that emissions are clean up etc.), less efficient in terms of materials consumption, and need yet more batteries to store energy at times when the generator is not working. I know, let's cover the world in lead, acid, lithium and cadmium - that will solve lots of problems.
    --
    Art is the mathematics of emotion