Slashdot Mirror


Russian Police Seize Kasparov

An anonymous reader writes "Russian police seized Garry Kasparov, the Russian chess champion, for staging a political rally against Vladimir Putin. IBM's Deep Blue computer was the first to beat a world champion when it defeated Kasparov, who is one of the strongest players in history." He's also been a giant critic of the Russian administration which is increasingly restricting free speech.

82 of 495 comments (clear)

  1. obigatory joke by 2.7182 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Checkmate!
    Seriously, this sucks.

    1. Re:obigatory joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      In Soviet Russia, police seize Kasparov!

      what, what?

    2. Re:obigatory joke by sentientbeing · · Score: 5, Funny

      He's obviously just a pawn in all this.

      --

      ------
      beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
    3. Re:obigatory joke by SlashThat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually this might benefit Kasparov's cause. He's a respected person both in Russia and abroad, and a move like this could provoke a stronger protest against Putin. I trust Kasparov has calculated this 6 moves ahead :)

      --
      1's and 0's should be free.
    4. Re:obigatory joke by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2, Funny

      Checkmate!


      If he can just hit that bulls-eye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards!

      Chris Mattern
    5. Re:obigatory joke by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I can't say for the other countries, but here in Russia most people do not appreciate Kasparov as a politician. That might have something in common with Putin's high approval rating.

    6. Re:obigatory joke by Kiffer · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was gonna say
      In Soviet Russia, Kasparov seizes you!
      but that does not really apply.


      In Soviet Russia, Pawns seize Kasparov!

      sigh... I had to say it ...
    7. Re:obigatory joke by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean, Fox News is illegal in Russia?

      I think I might like to move there.

      Wow.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    8. Re:obigatory joke by einhverfr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I am not so sure about this. Kasparov's "fear-mongering" about the end of democracy in Russia seem more fact based than one might otherwise think.

      Look, I am not saying that Russia doesn't have the right to choose a system which trades central control over infrastructure development and management of the country instead of one which safeguards individual liberty. This is a choice for Russians alone and I don't think we should interfere with that part itself. However, when Putin starts assassinating dissidents outside of Russia, then he crosses a line which makes him pretty clearly a problem everyone in the world has to face. We *should* have done this when Litvinenko was assassinated with polonium from a Russian nuclear reactor. Maybe this will help people start to realize the danger that Putin poses outside Russia.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    9. Re:obigatory joke by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Informative

      They won't, but I don't trust the news on the TV anyway. The opposition does conduct their own polls though, and while they don't show the same sky-high 70%+ ratings we see on TV, Putin still comes off as the most trusted and popular politician at the moment. Not acknowledging it for the fact is simply foolish.

    10. Re:obigatory joke by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not that they do not have any other means to protest, in nowadays Russia you may protest as much as you want, nobody gives a shit
      This hasn't been the case for at least the last 2 years. You have to obtain permission from the local government for any form of public protest (i.e. a demonstration), and they can refuse to grant it without explanation. In fact, the vast majority of requests filed by Other Russia (they planned demonstrations in many cities throughout the country, not just Moscow) were declined.
    11. Re:obigatory joke by Xonstantine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think your country is seriously fucked up, and as a foreigner, I'd fear for my safety. I think our country is seriously fucked up too, but then again, name me one that has a population over 5 million people and isn't fucked up. But the great thing about our country IS Fox news, or rather, if you don't like Fox news, you don't have to watch it. There are other media outlets to satisfy your progressive tastes. And if you are the type that likes Fox news or the 700 Club, well, that's available for you as well. We don't have some government autocrat dictating what's allowed and what isn't allowed and poisoning or beating to death dissident journalists that criticize the President and are anti-war (which has happened in Russia to people who criticized Putin and the war in Chechnya...short life expectancy, that carries). So, holding up Russia as something admirable because of the real life oppression that is there the way you do is stupid. Really stupid.
  2. Don't Worry by Zeinfeld · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't worry. George Bush has looked at Putin's soul and pronounced it excellent.

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    1. Re:Don't Worry by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Funny

      We can only assume he was comparing it to his own, in which case Putin's is excellent.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    2. Re:Don't Worry by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, as Kasparov was born "Garri Weinstein" you might be correct. It might be that name the Russian's shun; history tells us so.

    3. Re:Don't Worry by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Funny

      -1: Woosh.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    4. Re:Don't Worry by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      George Bush has looked at Putin's soul and pronounced it excellent.

      It's true, Bush did say something along those lines. To this day, that leaves me scratching my head till all my hair falls out. I've been keeping up with politics for a long time. But this...THIS leaves me confused! Seriously, WTF?

      To be rational about it however, I can only think of a few reasons why he would say this.

      1. He's trying to befriend Putin so he can get him to change his ways. You know the drill "Keep your friends close, keep your enemies closer"

      2. Putin is a psychopath , and equally as dangerous as Mahmoud Ahmadinjad. Bush it kissing major ass in order to keep him from doing something the world will regret. It's one thing to stop someone trying to acquire WMDs, it's another dealing with someone who already has them.

      I'm putting my money on #2. I feel like America is being blackmailed some how. Particularly with energy and their support of Iran.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    5. Re:Don't Worry by fastest+fascist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      3. It was an honest opinion, expressed in support of a guy doing things how Bush would like to, if he could.

  3. Re:another obligatory joke by empaler · · Score: 2, Funny

    You know, what doesn't kill you makes you stronger... Big Blue might make you stronger, but the Russian Federation isn't big on the making-people-stronger part of the equation.

  4. Re:another obligatory joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    First beaten by Blue, then by Red. For someone who spent the vast majority of their life pondering black and white, this has to be shocking splash of color.

  5. In Soviet Russia by EaglemanBSA · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In Soviet Russia, they sieze dissidents. What, you were expecting a joke? 'Cuz this isn't funny.

    --
    Quiz: True or False -- On a scale of 1 to 10, what is your middle name?
    1. Re:In Soviet Russia by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In Putin's Russia, they seize dissidents.
      In Soviet Russia, they shoot dissidents.
      Not quite there yet, guys.

    2. Re:In Soviet Russia by TeknoHog · · Score: 3, Funny

      In Putin's London, you are served a cuP of tea.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    3. Re:In Soviet Russia by calebt3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hope you are kidding. If not, your ignorance amazes me.

    4. Re:In Soviet Russia by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 4, Informative

      In Putin's Russia, they seize dissidents.
      In Soviet Russia, they shoot dissidents.
      Not quite there yet, guys. Where have you been? Putin's been killing dissidents for a long time. Ever heard of Anna Politkovskaya?
    5. Re:In Soviet Russia by TorKlingberg · · Score: 2, Informative
    6. Re:In Soviet Russia by blackest_k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      then there is the polonium option for when in the uk. followed up by a run for political office.

      In putin's russia they deny shooting dissidents.

      To be fair though you can be accidently shot in the head five times in the UK If your french you can blow up boats in new zealand and if your mossad you can pretty much do as you please. Of course if your in bhopal then even corporations get to cause bloody mayhem.

      depressing isn't it.

    7. Re:In Soviet Russia by ErikInterlude · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ever heard of Anna Politkovskaya?

      I hadn't, so I looked it up. The Wikipedia article is here. It's an unfortunate story. It makes me recall an NPR segment where a reporter was mentioning that the journalistic freedoms and protections we have in the larger, more powerful countries don't exist in elsewhere. Because of this, journalists have a reasonable expectation of protection from harm, but elsewhere there is no real journalism because everyone gets killed. It's too bad Russia is going down that route.

      --

      --Erik
    8. Re:In Soviet Russia by einhverfr · · Score: 4, Informative

      And another dissident investigating her death is poisoned with Polonium...

      But Politkovskaya was no mere political dissident. She had been prevented from mediating an end to the standoff in Beslan but was poisoned on her way there. This lead her to accuse Putin of direct involvement in the school massacre. Soon after this, she is shot dead. Litvinenko, on investigating her death, is then poisoned with Polonium from a Russian nuclear reactor.

      Even if Politkovskaya's allegations of Putin's involvement in the Beslan massacre turn out to be inaccurate, the subsequent assassination of both her and Litvinenko can only be called state sponsor of terrorism.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  6. gratuitous IBM inclusion by gargletheape · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Surely a story about the greatest chessplayer of all time, and a key campaigner for civil liberties in Soviet Russia counts as "news for nerds" without some Deep Blue window-dressing. Do we really need to fake-tag this story as being about supercomputers to get it here?

    1. Re:gratuitous IBM inclusion by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Informative

      Adding that he's a "giant critic" of the Putin government is an improvement, but how about the fact that Kasparov is an actual candidate for president, hoping to be elected head of that government in March? This is akin to arresting Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    2. Re:gratuitous IBM inclusion by Elemenope · · Score: 5, Interesting

      In 2004, the Libertarian and Green candidates for President of the United States were arrested for attempting to enter the building in which the presidential debates were being held.

      Yes, it is that serious, and, yes, it does happen here.

      --
      All the techniques ever used to make men moral have been themselves thoroughly immoral... (Nietzsche)
    3. Re:gratuitous IBM inclusion by timeOday · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Surely a story about the greatest chessplayer of all time, and a key campaigner for civil liberties in Soviet Russia counts as "news for nerds" without some Deep Blue window-dressing.
      Actually I think being the last human to hold the absolute title of "chess champion" is pretty significant too. Not that they won't keep having contests to see who the currently best human is, but the fact that the very best chess players are computers has changed chess for me. Humans have never been the fastest runners on earth, or the strongest, or had the best vision. But we were the best chess players. No longer. Maybe we should hand the political reigns over to supercomputers after all :)
    4. Re:gratuitous IBM inclusion by turgid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And here in good old Blighty, let us not forget the frail, old Holocaust survivor who got arrested under Anti-Terrorism laws for shouting, "Nonsense," at a Labour Party conference.

      Keep on rockin' in the Free World.

    5. Re:gratuitous IBM inclusion by TheMiddleRoad · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They weren't invited. Candidates who haven't a snowball's chance in hell of winning are usually barred from major debates seeing as their inclusion would be a waste of time. The Peace and Freedom, Communist, and leading Nazi candidates wouldn't have been allowed in either. This is totally different from arresting them for just being opposition candidates.

  7. "Stern but fair?" by qw0ntum · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Who tagged this "Stern but fair"? Please explain how this is "fair" and not just more of Putin's power grab?

    --
    'Every story, if continued long enough, ends in death.' --Ernest Hemingway
    1. Re:"Stern but fair?" by mapkinase · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I worked in Moscow for outsourcing company for several months. All of the developers were big Putin (and /.) fans. The popularity of Putin might be artificially bumped up by the relentless propaganda, but this propaganda plus excellent economic context works. People REALLY like Putin in Russia, brainwashed (which I am sure about) or not. So "fear of being imprisoned" as you nicely exaggerated has nothing to do with it.

      You have to understand the political climate in Russia to see that Putinism does not have many alternatives, given sincere dislike of what West looks like in the light of American foreign policy.

      Putin came to power "with the blood of Chechens up to his elbows", but he made some good changes in Russia after the lawlessness of 90's. That happened many time in history, that is how autocratic rulers usually come to power: after screw ups of democracy, they fix many things (and then they fall, of course, and that what will eventually happen to Putinisim as well). Autocratism vs democracy is like dinosaurs vs mammals. Dinosaurs are bigger and stronger, but mammals are more resilient.

      Kasparov and other liberal opposition have ZERO influence or support in Russia. The only (very weak as well) opposition in Russia is a Communist party (do not laugh, it is not funny). The West of course do not care and they will support this puppet liberal opposition, anyway...

      Putinism in Russia is for long for better or for worse (for whom?).

      And "fairness" has very little to do in politics. Laws are typically broken by the powers.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    2. Re:"Stern but fair?" by tverbeek · · Score: 2, Informative

      Kasparov is "linked with" the NazBols only by them both being part of the same opposition coalition. It's little more than a classic example of "politics makes strange bedfellows".

      Political parties - no matter how disgusting, crackpot, or offensive - are not banned in the U.S. I'm not aware of any Nazi Commie parties, but we have just plain Nazis and just plain Commies (and probably even a radical Islamist party) and they're perfectly legal.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  8. Surprised? by Pecisk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Russia never was a democracy, and never wanted to be. At least seems to me.

    Yeah, I know, it sucks, because no one wants another Cold War. But seemingly US and West pays now for their lack of involvement of helping Russia to scurb corruption, investigating old crimes and anything else.

    Now we all pay the price.

    --
    user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu This server is going down for shutdown NOW!
  9. this is all still a remnant of Gorbachev's legacy by jacquesm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If the transition had been a little milder than it was then the crime bosses in Russia would not have been able to grab as much as they did. The last thing the new 'vlasti' want is to have their playground taken away from them. This is going to be an extremely tense time for Russia.

  10. See, if only Kasparov had a soft, supple by antifoidulus · · Score: 2, Funny

    stomach. He wouldn't have to worry about Putin arresting him at all. Kissing on the other hand.....

  11. Meet the new boss... by Organic+Brain+Damage · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...he's not the same as the old boss. He IS the old boss.

    At least with Russia, the citizens can blame Putin for their woes. In the USA, we've got nobody to blame for Bush but ourselves.

  12. The Kremlin Plays Brutal Chess by reporter · · Score: 5, Informative
    Unfortunately for Gary Kasparov, the Kremlin plays brutal chess.

    According to a report recently issued by Reuters, the leading political candidate representing the liberal anti-Kremlin Yabloko party has been shot by an unknown assailant. The candidate is now in serious condition in a hospital. This attempted assassination caps a year-long effort, by the Kremlin, to rig the parliamentary election on December 2. Under orders from the Kremlin, banks have refused to accept donations from supporters for deposit in the accounts of opposition parties. Owners of assembly halls have canceled contracts allowing opposition politicians to stage rallies. The police have seized the newspapers of opposition parties in a draconian attempt to prevent them from spreading their message.

    In early November, the election-monitoring arm of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) declined to send election observers to Russia to monitor the 2007 parliamentary election. This OSCE decision resulted from (1) the Kremlin's refusing to allow more than 70 OSCE observers to enter Russia and (2) the Kremlin's delaying the granting of visas to them. In 2003, the Kremlin had accepted 400 OSCE observers, but after the OSCE condemned the 2003 election for being unfair, many folks in the Kremlin vowed to stymie OSCE's efforts in future elections.

    1. Re:The Kremlin Plays Brutal Chess by Fred_A · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What I don't get is why people still act as if Russia wasn't a dictatorship while it clearly is.

      It puts on a lazy show of elections like any dictatorship is expected to do, even goes as far as not having the party in power not win with 97% of votes but that doesn't change anything to the reality of what's going on there. Made up wars (although the "western" democracies seem to do that a lot lately), numerous murders, broadlight corruption at every level of the state...

      That the states play the "our good friend Putin" game because of the hydrocarbons flowing out of Russia is one thing, but that a lot of people still somewhat believe it's a "rough" democracy still baffles me (not that the parent poster sems to believe so).

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    2. Re:The Kremlin Plays Brutal Chess by iminplaya · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What I don't get is why people still act as if Russia wasn't a dictatorship while it clearly is.

      It doesn't matter. It never did. As long as they're not Communist, everything is hunky-dory.

      --
      What?
    3. Re:The Kremlin Plays Brutal Chess by happyemoticon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Then why does America still have such close ties to China? Nixon and Kissinger really helped improve things, true; both America and China had bones against the USSR; and it's better to be at peace than at war (at least in my opinion, but why is there no strong ideological war being carried out? The real answer is that they're awesome trading partners, unlike the inefficient, walled-off USSR. I feel like I'm playing a shell game, and at some point, "democracy" was replaced with "capitalism". As was said before, now that they're pumping dinosaur juice out to the rest of the world and we can build a McDonalds in Red Square, we like Russia.

      I suppose this is a trite observation. Of course democracy has been usurped by capitalism. I just hadn't really thought about it in terms of foreign policy before.

    4. Re:The Kremlin Plays Brutal Chess by DeepHurtn! · · Score: 2

      Your new perspective warrants a review of US foreign policy since the end of WWII. Look at what the US has done in places like South America and Indochina for yourself. Without the cheery propaganda about democracy (which is often directly contradicted by the reality of what and whom the US supports) you may start to understand how so much of the world can see the US as the "bad guys".

    5. Re:The Kremlin Plays Brutal Chess by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      China isn't getting things in trade for those exports. They're exporting on loan, to the tune of billions and billions of dollars, and they're doing it so they can keep justifying the existing power structures where everyone goes to a factory to work while preventing too much wealth from being created that might lead to a cease in production.

      They could accomplish the same goal by dumping the goods into the Pacific as quickly as they were made. The USA hasn't had anything significant to offer by way of trade in a long, long time. If you're going to talk about China-US relations, you really need to fully digest these realities, or you're going to end up way off.

      To the people of China, working in those factories is no more practically useful than the Pyramids were to the Egyptians.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
  13. Re:Someone sieze that bitch Hillary by rednip · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wish our president had such powers to sieze anti-American politicians like Clinton I thought that was funny as hell and was about to moderate it as such, but the sad thing is, I'm not sure if hes kidding. As I've heard people say in all seriousness such things.
    --
    The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
  14. Re:obligatory joke by Aminion · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hope that you are right, but if the world hasn't been able to do anything about Russia's horrible crimes against the people of Chechnya, how big are the chances that Kasparov can make a difference? Also, don't forget that Putin's approval ratings are pretty high even if you disbelieve the official statistics from the Kremlin, i.e. the Russians themselves might not even care about this and that is what's really required here. You can't force changes like this from the outside (are you going to sanction Russia? Use military force? Hardly), it has to come from the people of Russia.

  15. In a Russian City, Clues to Putin's Abiding Appeal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    Today's Washington Post has an interesting article which explains why the Russian people love Putin, or at least look the other way with respect to Putin's excesses.

    As Bill Clinton would say: "It's the economy, stupid". From the article:

    The lean, balding 35-year-old, who has spent his adult life working on the line at a glass factory in the suburbs of this city, now sits at a laden table with his wife and 13-year-old son. Behind him is a brand-new television beside a matching CD player, also new. His Lada car, bought recently with a bank loan, is parked outside the family's second-story walk-up apartment.

    "I feel much safer now," said Ignatiyev, whose family recently took its first vacation abroad, a package tour to a Turkish resort. "I have a good job, not a prestigious job, but a good living." In just the past two years, his salary has more than doubled, to $700 a month, reflecting his factory's growing sales.
  16. Re:Kasparov's allies... by ducomputergeek · · Score: 3, Informative
    Kasperov is a member of this organization:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Civil_Front

    Which is part of a larger organization:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Other_Russia

    This more a case of politics makes strange bed fellows. All those groups have one thing in common: opposition to the current government and the direction Russia is heading. Take that common cause away, and I doubt many of these groups would have much to do with each other.

    So saying Kasperov is guilty by association in this context isn't exactly fair.

    --
    "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
  17. Re:Someone sieze that bitch Hillary by neomunk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Move to Saudi Arabia then you too-scared-to-live-in-a-democracy little pussy. I can't stand Clinton either, but I'm not so pussyfied that I'd wanter her arrested for scaring me.

    If you can't handle freedom, go somewhere where you can have big-daddy-authority-figure hold your hand and change your diaper. Scared little bitch.

    Do YOU have a problem with THAT, you anonymous little shitstain?

  18. In Soviet Russia... by turgid · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ...under Gorbachev, at least, people had much more freedom of speech than this.

    This is a personal tragedy for Kasparov, but dangerous for the rest of the world too.

  19. Finish the analogy by apankrat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    > This is akin to arresting Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama.

    This is also akin Hillary organizing illegal political rally against George Bush.

    --
    3.243F6A8885A308D313
  20. Re:obligatory joke by thrillseeker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    how big are the chances that Kasparov can make a difference

    Even less while imprisoned.

  21. Re:Since slashdot is also against free speech by Synn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Free speech doesn't apply to private property like Slashdot.

  22. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  23. Re:The Deep Blue Win by florescent_beige · · Score: 4, Interesting

    He's got a massive ego, so people dismiss him as a bad loser. But his accusations of cheating aren't without merit.

    My respect for him has gone up quite a bit because of this incident. I wonder if I would have the courage to stand up to police and arbitrary imprisonment, knowing what Russian jails must be like these days.

    I hear lots of griping about the state of the world on /. and elsewhere, but I wonder if any of us would have the courage to put our beliefs into action like he has.

    --
    Equine Mammals Are Considerably Smaller
  24. Re:Since slashdot is also against free speech by neomunk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah, damn slashdot for being so against freedom of speech that they removed your post. I'm outraged! I REALLY wanted to reply and tell you how right you are, but now I just CAN'T because slashdot has gone and censored you. ...

    Show me the censorship. That's all I ask. Back that childish whining up with some bruises from the abuse you've taken. Oh, that's right, slashdot doesn't censor.... ever. That's right, I said it, EVER, as in being an absolute (I'm the kind of guy that likes to tack qualifiers and quantifiers on everything). That's why it's one of the few places I actually post instead of lurk. (I know, it looks like I'm saying I troll alot, I don't, I troll alittle, (and almost exclusively non-anon) I'm just principled about free speech like that)

    As far as your list of topics goes, you're not being censored, you're RIGHTLY being pushed to the back of the room by the CROWD (not the site) for being a... well... what IS the right-wing equivalent of a tin foil hat wearer? Oh yes, a Kool-Aid drinker. Very few of the little factoids you present have any basis in real-life at ALL, and those that do have a tenuous connection to reality at best.

    To sum up: You're not being censored for being 'edgy', you're being ignored for being ridiculous. You don't get to be a martyr for that.

  25. Re:Perhaps that was meant as some joke by aproposofwhat · · Score: 2, Informative
    Guess what?

    Followed your link, actually read further than the summary, and it turns out GP was right!

    From the Wikipedia page that you linked:

    Garry Kasparov was born Garri Weinstein [1] (Russian: ) in Baku, Azerbaijan SSR to an Armenian mother and a Jewish father. He first began the serious study of chess after he came across a chess problem set up by his parents and proposed a solution.[2] His father died when he was seven years old. At the age of twelve, he adopted his mother's Armenian surname, Kasparyan, modifying it to a more Russified version, Kasparov.

    --
    One swallow does not a fellatrix make
  26. Nobody is watching. by moxley · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now that the US has become transparently hypocritical to it's own citizens and the rest of the world in regard to "democracy" and civil liberties, there is no country to serve as the example/beacon/leader of "democracy."

    Obviously it isn't quite that simple; I don't for a minute think that the current administration (or many before) even cares about the rights of it's own citizens tpo petition for redress, let alone the citizens of Russia - but now they can't even pretend to pressure these other countries to allow freedom of speech and respect the rights of the individual.

    Unfortunately it seems like things are trending toward the corporations and governments getting all of the rights, basically becoming untouchable - while the individual is is losing rights, control and even "having a say" by the day.

  27. Thug-ocracy by MajorBlunder · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I spent a couple of years living in Russia back in the Yeltsin years of the mid 90's. Overall Russians are extremely friendly and hospitable, but they have a long sad history of instituting governments that are in effect a legitimized mafia. From the 10th through the 19th centuries the rule of the Tsars were essentially a gang of thugs with pretensions of royalty. The better part of the 20th century they switched to a government that was another gang of thugs with pretense of communism. And now they have switched to a new band of thugs with pretensions of democracy. (Actually this is still the same band of thugs as the communist ones, they just switched pretensions). It seems that Putin is slowly dropping any pretense of democracy.

    --

    "I'm making perfect sense, you're just not keeping up."

  28. A *hard* challenge for AI by rbrander · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When an AI can mimic *this* aspect of human intelligence and decide to risk a change from "well-off and greatly respected", to being shut in a concrete box, all for the greater good of its fellows, THEN I'll be impressed with AI.

    Until then, its just a glorified calculator brute-forcing its way through a mechanical computation, as impressive as a newspaper press making 500,000 copies of todays celebrity news faster than 50,000 human scribes.

  29. I wonder by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why is there so little reporting on what this Kasparov actually stands for? Check wikipedia, about the only thing I can find is that he is far-left (communist?) and that the Other Russia party is a coalition of parties including communists and nationalists. Well, that is a load of my mind. That is Stalin and Hitler in one party, why choose when you can have two!

    It is kinda like the US people who keep saying vote Ron Paul, then you read up on the guy and learn that, yes there people who would make even worse presidents then Bush.

    Just what does Kasparov stand for, just because he is against Putin who clearly ain't all that nice does NOT make kasparov himself any better. The problem with the media is that they like the idea of heroes, Putin clearly no longer is one so they need someone else. The world doesn't work like that.

    No comments so far seem to explain anything about Kasparov except one commenter who points out that his dad was jewish. Oh well that eases my mind. I think another person rallying against a troubled goverment promising better things had a jewish father (step-father).

    Godwin or not, just what does the Unitied Civil Front (his real party, Other Russia is a coalition of multiple parties) stand for? I do not know and don't speak russian and the western media seems almost reluctant (or kasparov just ain't as intresting as britney spears) to report on it.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  30. Re:Mod GP "Funny" by rednip · · Score: 2, Informative
    You are correct, 'Funny' has no Karma attached to it, and as other moderations do, one's Karma could be affected. Due to that, those who which to participate on Slashdot as 'class clowns' would eventually fall into the karma pits below zero, and ignored by most, if they are only 'ha-ha funny' rather than achieving the 'funny because it's true, funny'. So I guess that only those who don't care about karma, as either a few black marks couldn't hurt an already fine reputation, or they just don't give a shit, should consider posting puns, memes and such, unless of course you are certain that it would be worthy of an 'insightful' or two.

    Thank you I'll be here all week!

    --
    The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
  31. Help, help, he's being oppressed! by roystgnr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's a difference between being "against free speech" by imprisoning the speaker and being "against free speech" by posting things which contradict a speaker's arguments. I'm sorry if you've been emotionally scarred by the latter experience, but my advice is to try sucking it up, accepting that some of your opinions are unsubstantiated and unpopular, and moving on.

    Claiming that it's cowardly to protest Bush and get stuffed into the Pier 57 cages just makes it seem more pathetic that you're simultaneously whining about Slashdot users modding you down. Somehow I'm guessing you're not battling the evil Modstapo from an airport wifi connection on your way to Darfur.

  32. ObChess by Jay+L · · Score: 2, Funny

    We wish -- no, must -- make our disgust at this abuse perfectly clear.

  33. Re:obligatory joke by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Even less while imprisoned.

    They said the same about Nelson Mandela...

  34. Agreed by einhverfr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would add that Iran is clearly far more democratic than Russia is today. Russia is more like Iraq under Saddam, where elections occur but nobody has any possibility of being elected except Putin. Despite meddling in the elections by the Council of Guardians, there are actual and real political dynamics which exist in Iran today. No such real dynamics occur under Russia today.

    The big difference is that, unlike Saddam, Putin actually does have weapons of mass destruction.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    1. Re:Agreed by tftp · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The big difference is that, unlike Saddam, Putin actually does have weapons of mass destruction.

      And another big difference is that not much you can do about this :-)

      But really all this naming game ("democracy", "dictatorship", "monarchy") starts getting silly. We now see, on US's own example, that democracy does not work (it's too easy to manipulate.) In Europe you can see that the democratic governments are pandering to the electors instead of doing the right things. So why all the surprises that for Russia a different model seems to be optimal, based on an elected, strong ruler who defends the stability of the country against all wandering salesmen of snake oil? It doesn't have to be a hereditary monarchy, of course, but people like long term stability. For example, US politicians are mostly concerned about reelecting themselves rather than about doing the job regardless of what the people think. There is a reason why US Supreme Court judges are given the job for life. But this is a delicate balancing act, obviously - a bad ruler can, and will hurt the country.

      If you look around the world, there are just as many definitions of democracy as there are democratic countries. Deal with countries as they are, and not as you'd like them to be. Those countries know better, and the test for it is in popular opinion - it is somewhat harder to influence than an election.

    2. Re:Agreed by zzidre · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Don't get me wrong, but when a son takes the presidency after his father, only delayed by a man whose wife is likely to take it over after them all, it really looks like the difference is only that there are two elite groupings instead of one.

  35. So, then Russia is a state sponsor of terrorism by einhverfr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Look at the Litvenenko case. The assassination was designed to be clearly traceable to Russia (since you can fingerprint artificial isotopes to show what reactors they come from), and could not have been done without state help. Russia denies this, and this represents an assassination of a dissident emigrant specifically to warn other emigrants not to speak out against Putin. This is violence for the sole purpose of invoking terror, and it is arguably a greater threat to our way of life than Al Qaeda ever has been.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  36. Re:obligatory joke by SlashThat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    :S
    Is this guy from the KGB? Or how they call it now... FSB?

    --
    1's and 0's should be free.
  37. Malum in se versus malum prohibitum by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 2

    But they do not tell you the details - like those that the Burmese monks indeed broke Burmese law and were treated exactly according to it.

  38. Re:Since slashdot is also against free speech by anothy · · Score: 2, Interesting
    what the hell, i'm bored. in order:
    • certainly violence, but not significantly more per volume than the christian or jewish holy texts. the pedophilia thing gets slightly murkier because you've got more cultural norms to account for, but the same statement probably holds (there's certainly plenty of rape incest, and other manner of sexual depravity amongst our spiritual fathers). it's a simple matter of reading the text. i doubt you've been contradicted overly much on that point; i suspect it's really the bizarre conclusions you're coming to that people are taking issue with. your posted straw man, however, makes you look like less of a tool.
    • okay, say a correlation exists. i actually agree. but how strong is that correlation, and at what point does some correlation justify restricting the freedoms of everyone else? again, it's not particularly the claim you're making here that gets you slammed (although i'd love to see some citations there), it's the questionable and unsupported conclusions you draw from it.
    • "anything"? really? here let me try: George W Bush is the worst US president since the beginning of the 20th century, and possibly ever. now, start the timer for deletion, or even editorial mods to unattainable negative numbers. again, i think what's behind your straw man is that particular claims regarding bush you make get ridiculed, shot down, and/or laughed at (probably deservedly so). are we seeing the pattern yet?
    • a question of terms. many people don't believe abortion kills a human being because the human in question isn't finished being made yet. you're defining your terms to suit your argument, but ignoring the fact that those definitions are not universal by any means. you certainly don't have to go back very far in history (200 years is way more than enough; i can't pinpoint it much better than that) to find where the universal understanding for the creation of a human was birth. at lest your argument has a different problem than the last several here.
    • i've seen a pretty good debate on this topic on /., actually. but the claim that a significant increase will not have catastrophic effects is pretty well unfounded as far as i'm aware. can you cite? i think you're just upset your particular assertions aren't taken as authoritative.
    • just false. here, again, we can time the deletion or ultra-demoding: most violent deaths in Iraq in the past year or two have been muslim-on-muslim violence due to religious or pseudo-religious differences (although this might interfere with the above experiment, i'm willing to take that risk). now we're back to your straw man tactic. nobody would seriously doubt that, i think. but moving from that to some sort of assertion that the hundreds of thousands of deaths the US-led occupation is responsible for somehow don't matter, or the hundreds of direct killings by US troops every year don't matter, or that the US-led overthrow of Iraq's former sovereign government doesn't have a role to play in the current sectarian strife, is all further unfounded conclusions skipping several steps in reasoning from your stated starting point.
    • um, what? on the one hand, it sounds like you're asserting that the majority of /. readers would deny the American Revolution ever happened; i think it's safe to say that's patently false. on the other hand, it sounds like you're condoning vigilantism, armed rebellion, and/or sectarian violence, which, yeah, i think you're going to have a hard time getting support for. i don't think that's actually your intent, but here you've set up a straw man so far removed from the point you're actually trying to argue that i can't even tell what that is.
    • you're free to mention it. you're just stupid and wrong. Bush, by his actions, words, and decisions, is directly responsible for all sorts of badness - hundreds of thousands of deaths in Iraq, an uncounted (but almost certainly much smaller) number in the US, trillions of dollars pissed away, giving our children an
    --

    i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
  39. Re:obligatory joke by flosofl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    By comparison, rich foreign capitalists who want to plunder Russia support Kasparov
    Instead, rich, domestic capitalists are not only plundering Russia, they're raping it to death. Kleptocratic oligarchy FTW!
    --
    "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
  40. Re:The Deep Blue Cheated by bussdriver · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I suggest curious people look into the chess match. I did at the time and I had a little A.I. experience and gained a little more since then. Chess is an interesting test because the problem is so vast that brute force attacks are unrealistic; although, still used by computers since it helps and they can out calculate humans. In terms of actually learning to play chess well, computers have a long way to go.

    I'll consider computers as better at chess when they can honestly beat someone at Kasparov's peak WITHOUT unfair advantages such as a whole team of engineers tweaking the system DURING AND IN BETWEEN MATCHES!

    The purpose of the chess exercise is to develop Applied Intelligence so it can be approximately as good as a human and hopefully learn enough to apply the discovered concepts to other areas. Any advancement in Applied Intelligence is a win since that is the true purpose for the game. Actually, 'winning' is actually a loss for Applied Intelligence as well as A.I. and sadly IBM was only thinking of themselves when they got lucky. They dare not risk losing again-- after all, they LOST ALL THE TIME until they finally beat a top human once.

    Life is a non-linear approximation ;-)

  41. In Soviet Russia by Daneurysm · · Score: 2, Funny

    ....In Soviet Russia Government protests you!

  42. Re:obligatory joke by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is this guy from the KGB? Or how they call it now... FSB?
    Yes, I always wondered how a former top KGB man could be elected President of the Russian Federation. It would be as dumb as, say, a former head of the CIA being elected President of the U.S.
  43. Re:obligatory joke by DJCacophony · · Score: 2, Informative
    Do you think that the South should have been allowed to secede from the rest of America? How about Chechnya from Russia? The former resulted in many more deaths, why are you not defending those poor Southerners and their slaves, if you favor secession so much? How about a little selection of the horrible misdeeds these poor "people of Chechnya" have committed?
    • In October 2005, at least eighty-five people were killed in street fighting in the southern Russian city of Nalchik after Chechen rebels assaulted government buildings, telecommunications facilities, and the airport.
    • A three-day attack on Ingushetia in June 2004, which killed almost a hundred people and injured another 120.
    • A December 2002 dual suicide bombing attack on the headquarters of Chechnya's Russian-backed government in the Chechen capital, Grozny. Russian officials claim that international terrorists helped local Chechens mount the assault, which killed eighty-three people.
    • A bomb blast that killed at least forty-one people, including seventeen children, during a military parade in the southwestern town of Kaspiisk in May 2002; Russia blamed the attack on Chechen terrorists.
    • In Moscow, an August 1999 bombing of a shopping arcade and a September 1999 bombing of an apartment building that killed sixty-four people, and two more terrorist bombings in September 1999 in the neighboring Russian republic of Dagestan and southern Russian city Volgodonsk. Controversy still surrounds questions about whether these attacks were conclusively linked to Chechens.
    • In 2004, when Basayev, ordered an attack on a school Beslan, a town in North Ossetia. More than 300 people died in the three-day siege, most of them children. There were thirty-two militants, all but three or four were non-Chechens, and all but one were reportedly killed during the siege.
    Why should the people of Russia demand change in the policy against Chechens when the image they portray is not that of the righteous freedom fighter, but that of the ruthless, child killing terrorist? If my child was held hostage and then slaughtered, I wouldn't have much sympathy for their cause, either.
    --
    Slow Down, Cowboy! It's been 60 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment.
  44. Re:obligatory joke by SlashThat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well first of all I meant the guy from the dumb pro-Putin posts above, not Putin himself.
    But you raise a good point. No, it's not as dumb, it's much worse. You can't compare CIA to KGB. As much as CIA is disliked in the US (and people really love to hate CIA, it's so "in"...), they really don't deserve this treatment. The CIA's job, and this should be really trivial when you think about it, is to PROTECT american citizens, and this is what they do every day. Often while endangering their own lives. I really don't understand just how ungrateful people can be (btw, I'm not an american citizen, so I consider myself to have an unbiased view on this). I truely believe that most of the CIA staff are really good people who do they best to protect the citizens of US. How they keep doing this in such an ungrateful environment is a mistery to me.
    The KGB's job, on the other hand, was to spy on and torture Soviet citizens. So no comparison here. To elect a president from KGB is really a kind of masochism.

    --
    1's and 0's should be free.