Slashdot Mirror


Verizon Wireless To Open Network

A number of readers are letting us know about Verizon's plans, announced today, to open their nationwide wireless network to devices that they don't sell. A NYTimes blog posting puts VZW's announcement in industry context. From the press release: "In early 2008, the company will publish the technical standards the development community will need to design products to interface with the Verizon Wireless network. Any device that meets the minimum technical standard will be activated on the network. Devices will be tested and approved in a $20 million state-of-the-art testing lab which received an additional investment this year to gear up for the anticipated new demand. Any application the customer chooses will be allowed on these devices."

6 of 286 comments (clear)

  1. This seems very much unlike Verizon by yincrash · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm in shock. Verizon is fairly well known for locking down every phone they offer. What spurred the sudden change of heart? Google Android?

    1. Re:This seems very much unlike Verizon by Isao · · Score: 4, Interesting
      What spurred the sudden change of heart?

      Sprint. They were the first to lose the class-action lawsuit.

  2. Unprecedented doesn't begin to describe it by jeffmeden · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What might Verizon have up their sleeve on this one? They have traditionally been a VERY closed, clandestine network that offers no support for third party anything, and a very aggressive attitude against any efforts to open up (bluetooth lockout is one example). To see them changing their attitude is great, but what is the catch?

    1. Re:Unprecedented doesn't begin to describe it by kackle · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Undoubtedly it was in response to Google's bidding to make an "open spectrum".

      As a person who has explored making a device for use on Ver*izon's network (job related), I tell you that there is a substantial certification fee for such devices; 2 years ago anyway I was told it was roughly a couple of hundred thousand dollars for a design. I wonder whether they are changing that too...

  3. Let me get this straight... by Shoeler · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The most evil of evil cellular companies, the company that replaces perfectly unacceptable, already crippled stock phone operating systems with COMPLETELY UTTERLY crippled operating systems, the same one who if you buy their Motorola RAZR and try to use MOTOROLA's OWN MOBILE PHONE TOOLS, will not allow said use. The same one who requires a USB CHARGER PURCHASED FROM THEM, when any charger will suffice, is now opening their network???!!!

    'Scuse me - that sizzling sound was hell freezing over.

  4. Any device? by a_nonamiss · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Any device that meets the minimum technical standard will be activated on the network That's a helluva loophole. It's possible that they just want to protect their network from rogue devices, but I think they could use that clause to deny a lot of devices. Also, the article mentions fees associated with testing. Are those fees geared towards the individual consumer or phone manufacturers? Hundreds or millions of dollars?

    I'd like to be optimistic, but I've (unwillingly) been a Verizon customer for years, and I'd be surprised to see a leopard change its spots...
    --
    -Arthur
    Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules