Slashdot Mirror


Sloshing Cellphones Reveal Their Contents

holy_calamity writes "UK researchers have developed software that represents a handset's battery life by using a phone's speaker and vibrator to make a device feel and sound like it contains liquid. You give it a shake to find out how much is left. The same technique can be used to represent new messages by simulating balls rattling around inside a box. It runs on recent Nokias with accelerometers; video from the researchers explains it well." What a bizarrely fun idea.

160 comments

  1. that's just stupid by yagu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Even the best battery "life" indicators I've ever seen mostly suck. If this one uses the dropoff in voltage as a detection device like every other one has for the last brazillion years, it'll basically be completely full for the life of the charge, and about 10 minutes before it tanks, if you're lucky, you'll get the joy of the sensation of a sloshing, albeit mostly empty sloshing, in your digital device.

    Now, as for the detecting how many messages there are by simulating the sound of balls rattling around in a box, it's kind of cute, as long as they're not my balls. Again, though, if you already have the device out, why not put a little numeric in the display? Huh?

    1. Re:that's just stupid by CheShACat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      All true, but you can't deny that this is a pretty cool tactile feedback mechanism! More of these great ideas please!

    2. Re:that's just stupid by Steve+Newall · · Score: 5, Interesting
      As a manufacturer of portable data terminals, we always seem to spend an excessive amount of time in attempting to get a better indication of the amount of power left in a battery. Each battery chemistry has it's own set of rules and the rules tend to change as the battery ages.

      One of the better methods is to use a coulumb counter that attempts to measure the power put into a battery against the power removed from the battery. See http://www.linear.com/pc/productDetail.jsp?navId=H0,C1,C1003,C1037,C1134,P2354 for a typical device. Even using these, we only seem to be able to approach something that doesn't suck.

      One of our devices has a tilt sensor, so I may try to impliment the sloshing sound as well as our normal battery icon on the display.

    3. Re:that's just stupid by SnoopJeDi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Even the best battery "life" indicators I've ever seen mostly suck. If this one uses the dropoff in voltage as a detection device like every other one has for the last brazillion years, it'll basically be completely full for the life of the charge, and about 10 minutes before it tanks, if you're lucky, you'll get the joy of the sensation of a sloshing, albeit mostly empty sloshing, in your digital device.


      Don't hate the player, hate the game.

      This implementation in-and-of-itself does not really signify any important breakthrough to me. Just a bunch of geeks who took a feature and put a software aspect to it for a unique function. However, this is the second cell-phone shakey article I've seen on Slashdot recently. So, what really matters to me is the meta-content here: adding an accelerometer to a cellphone opens up a lot of functionality on the mobile platform.
    4. Re:that's just stupid by ShatteredArm · · Score: 1

      I'm not familiar with Brazilian years... Do they measure them differently in the southern hemisphere?

    5. Re:that's just stupid by yagu · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Hmmmm, btw, I apologize for the tone... prolly teeing off after some bad karma with some others (recruiters, actually, sigh)... and am kicking the dog. Sorry... (but, this is, after all, slashdot).

      That said, I appreciate you concede the difficulty of battery life measurement. I'd long since given up on paying too much attention to gauges, and instead pay more attention to keeping backup batteries for devices which have removeable ones (it actually is a large factor in my decision making process whether or not I can swap in a spare battery, proprietary or otherwise.)

      Cheers. :-)

    6. Re:that's just stupid by mach1980 · · Score: 1, Informative

      We use lithium-ion batteries that have a very flat voltage curve followed by a steep dropoff once the juice starts to drain. Our solution were to measure the current used by the device and integrate towards the mAh left.
      It kinda works but as the batteries gets old it looses accuracy.

      Go ahead and score this as off topic.

      --
      Break the sound barrier - bring the noise.
    7. Re:that's just stupid by yagu · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's in reference to a joke I'd heard a while back...

      In his early morning Iraq war briefing Bush's advisor said 2 Brazilian soldiers had died the day before. After a pause, Bush leaned over to Cheney and asked him, "How many zeros are in a brazillion?"

      No political affiliation or skewering intended... just a funny joke.

    8. Re:that's just stupid by Thangodin · · Score: 1

      And of course, the problem with this one is that all that sound and vibration drains the battery.

    9. Re:that's just stupid by fmobus · · Score: 1

      why, yes, they start just after carnival and ends when the 13th salary is paid (usually by December, 20th)

    10. Re:that's just stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. There's a *separate* battery to power the sloshing feature. Think CMOS.

    11. Re:that's just stupid by fitten · · Score: 1

      Yeah... and it's not like cell phone companies have to deal with enough repairing/replacing phones dropped in normal operation already (which normally doesn't require shaking or slinging the phone around), but they're asking users to actually shake the phones around to determine information about them... Neat... but I'm guessing they may say "Doh!" later...

    12. Re:that's just stupid by halfabee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not stupid, just different.

      It's all about human interface. You may think it's dumb, but it may be just the thing that helps John Q. Public integrate a device into his lifestyle.

      Remember that:
      1. Technology should serve people.
      2. People are corporeal, not virtual.
      3. "Average" is dumber than you think.
      --
      -- Halfabee
    13. Re:that's just stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the increasingly disused "relax" technique? Although I completely, utterly agree that it was stupid of your meat-headed co-worker to put that on your door, it's probably not going to singlehandedly label you as a poor choice for promotion. Also, you appear to have handled it fine, and it's very likely that your jackass comedy-impaired co-worker will get over this jilting (I'm sure it's not his first) in short order.

      Breathe deeply, young man.

    14. Re:that's just stupid by grumbel · · Score: 1

      ### we always seem to spend an excessive amount of time in attempting to get a better indication of the amount of power left in a battery

      How about throwing all the physics and chemistry out of the window and simply using good old statistics? In a lot of chases the device should now when the battery was charged, for how long it was charged and for how long it ran on that charge, just use that data to extrapolate how long it will last the next time you charge it.

    15. Re:that's just stupid by Random+Destruction · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure who is chasing these devices, or how a device could 'now' anything, but grammar nazi-isms aside, what the GP described is pretty much what you're talking about. They measure electricity in and electricity out, and make a guess as to the energy left based on that. The only difference to your approach is you ignore the rate at which the device is consuming energy, which would make it significantly less accurate.

      --
      :x
    16. Re:that's just stupid by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      right, that would work very well for batteries that are charged while in storage and then discharged completely at an almost constant rate then put back into charging/storage.

      batteries in your typical portable hardware are not used like that. Users will rarely if ever discharge them completely because they want/need the device to be working at all times. Discharge rates and sometimes charge rates too vary depending on how the device is being used and so on.

      colomb counting is a slightly better idea but you still run into the problems of efficiancy depending on discharge rate and lack of complete discharges causing error build up.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    17. Re:that's just stupid by Calinous · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that battery performance depends on temperature - a charge will support the device more in a warm climate than out in the cold

    18. Re:that's just stupid by samkass · · Score: 1

      One of our designers has a huge sign above his monitor that reads "The User Is *NOT* Like Me!" in big print. I think all engineering workstations should have this engraved alongside the screen.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    19. Re:that's just stupid by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The Psion Series 3 I owned a decade and a half ago had a great battery meter. It gave me a running total of the number of milliamp-hours I had used from the current set of batteries. Since the alkali cells I was using at the time gave me approximately 1.5 amp-hours, I knew a day or two before I needed to replace the batteries.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    20. Re:that's just stupid by The+Great+Pretender · · Score: 1

      Also if the sloshing noise indicates the amount of battery left, doesn't that sloshing noise use up some of the battery, so... I feel some Heisenburg coming on...

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    21. Re:that's just stupid by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      Imagine the insurance claims the cell phone companies will have to file... when people start shaking their phones and accidentally throwing them through their HDTV's.

    22. Re:that's just stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, Psions. People who actually realised battery life mattered. I miss my old psion 5mx.

      The battery life on modern devices really is appalling. Palms were okay for a while, but modern palms or any wince machine seem to barely last through a working day. You basically have to charge them every night to have a hope of them working.

    23. Re:that's just stupid by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      Neo1973 is supposed to get a coulomb counter as well as accelerometres.

      So I guess I'll be able to slosh the phone, not only swing it around MacSabre style... If that thing is half as great as it sounds, it'll be my favourite toy.

      And I might even phone someone from time to time.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    24. Re:that's just stupid by Steve+Newall · · Score: 1

      That's basically what the coulumb counter does. Once we calibrate for the basic capacity of the battery, the coulumb counter tracks the current (no pun intended) status of the terminal. Some of these counters include temperature sensors that may be used to help protect against overcharging (the battery may heat up rapidly when charged) and for the reduced capacity when the battery is cold. (See the comment by by Calinous (985536) below).

    25. Re:that's just stupid by Nullav · · Score: 1

      And what's a sloshing sound going to tell the 'average' user that a battery-shaped bar or a percentage can't? Neither method gives the user a good idea how much time is left, the motor and speaker would do a lot to drain the battery, and it's more practical to look at the screen than to shake the phone. Not to mention that the 'toy' value of it is just too tempting; people would start shaking it around to kill time (and the battery).

      --
      I just read Slashdot for the articles.
  2. Bat Summary Line by Algorithmnast · · Score: 1

    It's not as if the cell phone's contents are in any way being divulged... but rather a qualitative indication of battery life.

  3. Re:Stupid typist by Algorithmnast · · Score: 0

    Ok... that should've read "Bad Summary Line" as a title...

    More proof that just previewing a post isn't enough. I have to be awake too!

  4. Toy by peipas · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It sounds fun, but I don't understand how shaking a phone is functionally superior to simply looking at the screen to gauge battery life or messages. Not to mention shaking your expensive mobile device around may not be the smartest idea. Flying wiimotes, anyone?

    1. Re:Toy by CheShACat · · Score: 1

      You could quite easily say "I don't get how putting 4 workspaces on a cube is functionally superior to just having a little display in my toolbar" yet compiz/beryl are incredibly popular, for some reason...

    2. Re:Toy by Scutter · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It sounds fun, but I don't understand how shaking a phone is functionally superior to simply looking at the screen to gauge battery life or messages.

      You're new here, aren't you?

      Show me anything in the world that a geek won't want to tinker with and hack in odd ways. It's this kind of thing that will eventually lead to Star Trek tech. It takes a hundred or a thousand "useless little hacks" to filter out the one gem that will be the killer hack. And sometimes, you can take a piece of one useless hack and a piece of another useless hack and put them together to make something awesome.

      Yes, this may not be the most useful modification in the world, but think of what it could lead to...

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    3. Re:Toy by enjo13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's incredibly useful really.

      The battery indicator on your screen is passive. It just sits there (largely unnoticed) until your critically low on battery and then it beeps at you incessantly. By adding a physical element to the indicator you provide an ongoing battery status (in a very easy to understand metaphor no less) that is much more difficult to ignore.

      It is a very similar concept to the gestures used to control the iPhone. The trend in computing right now is to create interfaces that much more closely mimic physical experience. This has proven to greatly increase our ability to interact in meaningful ways with our machines. This is just another example of that.

      Really it wins on two points: 1) It's a useful piece of tech. and 2) it's an insanely cool hack.

      --
      Turn s60 photos into awesome videos with mScrapbook for all S60 3rd edition phones!
    4. Re:Toy by Loke+the+Dog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But the problem is that we get more and more screens to look at all the time. Our eyes get all the input, but that means the rest of our senses are just sitting around, basically, which is a waste.

      Its the same with aircraft controls, that have been debated for many years. There are many advantages to making them all electronic, but the problem is that electronics tend to only give information to the user through lights and sounds. Mechanical operation on the other hand gives feel to the controls, which gives the pilot further information.

      Its basically a good thing if designers stop every now and then and ponder "hey, is this information really best delivered through a screen or a sound, or would it be more convenient with shake or vibration". Obviously, this has already happened for cellphones many years ago, but it can be taken much further.

      The real revolution comes when we start wearing gloves that through electrical impulses tickle in hundreds of different ways, but are easily recognized by the brain since it was designed to read input from the hands. Or keyboards that sting a little when you make a possible typo, or mouses that basically allows webpages to have "surfaces" that feel different when you hover over them... The possibilities are endless.

    5. Re:Toy by MrNemesis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have to wonder though, why bother with a physical interface at all?

      The battery indicator on your screen is passive. It just sits there (largely unnoticed) until your critically low on battery and then it beeps at you incessantly. By adding a physical element to the indicator you provide an ongoing battery status (in a very easy to understand metaphor no less) that is much more difficult to ignore.

      Very good point, but I'm not convinced I'd like to shake my phone to get an indication of power (not that the standard power meter is going anywhere I suppose) but I'd like a passive aural indicator - how about the phone altering the pitch of all of those poloyphonic ringtones as the charge diminishes? Normal ringtone for 100-30% charge, and then increase the pitch delta as charge drops from that. As soon as you get a call or a text, you can immediately hear something's "wrong" with your phone (consider the age-old comedy stalwharts of the broken alarm bell or the out of tune piano), and it'll have the useful side effect of actually improving a large percentage of ghastly ringtones ;)

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
    6. Re:Toy by fbjon · · Score: 1

      or mouses that basically allows webpages to have "surfaces" that feel different when you hover over them... The possibilities are endless. Yes, blinking flash ads that literally grab you.
      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    7. Re:Toy by grumbel · · Score: 1

      Its popular because it looks cool, not because its makes you more productive. It does have some advantages such as smoother edge-flipping, but the 3D cube really adds nothing.

    8. Re:Toy by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      Arrgghhh!! My ears! :P

    9. Re:Toy by CheShACat · · Score: 1

      My point exactly. Shaking your phone isn't neccesaryl more productive, neither is removing the buttons from your phone, or any of thousands of other innovations that occur every year, but they are COOL. As CmdrTaco said in the summary "What a bizarrely fun idea".The example of a desktop cube adds a new perspective (quite literally!) and emotive involvement to the user experience which is valuable, if not as easily quantifiable as productivity.
      Also, I would say that, while it may not initially be more productive, adding levels of interaction with technology beyond what we are used to is a fairly new science; it's potential to increase productivity has yet to be explored fully. In time, as we get more used to the varying ways in which we interact with our technology, it's more than reasonable to expect things like this to be refined to increase productivity as a whole.

    10. Re:Toy by CheShACat · · Score: 1

      I might add to that that I didn't really use my extra workspaces much until they were on a cube - so in my case it really did add productivity straight off!

    11. Re:Toy by nine-times · · Score: 1

      that is much more difficult to ignore.

      Frankly, that's the problem I would have with this: I want to ignore my battery life most of the time. The only time I want to think about battery life is when it's just about to run out, and even then, I don't want some sort of a constant noise bugging me all the time.

      I hate when cellphones/laptops beep incessantly when they're low on power. What if I know it's low on power and I just want to keep using it until it runs out? Do I need it to be beeping at me every 30 seconds? Most of the time, it's sufficient that I can glance at the battery indicator on the screen and know whether or not I should recharge it. Almost every device has something like that, and it's enough.

    12. Re:Toy by nine-times · · Score: 1

      But the problem is that we get more and more screens to look at all the time. Our eyes get all the input, but that means the rest of our senses are just sitting around, basically, which is a waste.

      Exactly. Use the other senses for a change. Where are all the smell and taste interfaces? When I'm on the NYC subway, I want to taste how close I am to the next stop. Actually, though, now that I think of it, the subway does seem to give a lot of information by smell.

    13. Re:Toy by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      These guys came and gave a seminar at my university a while back. Most of their ideas left me with that feeling. They were cool demoes, but were more about the shiny than about useful feedback. Most of their ideas seemed to give you less information and require more user interaction than existing systems.

      The battery charging problem was solved a long time ago by the iPod. Don't give good battery level feedback, give the user a reason to plug the device in other than just charging. My 3G iPod came with a dock, which plugged into my HiFi. When I got in, I dropped the device in the dock and it played through my speakers. I never once though about charging it, I just thought about listening to music and the charging happened automatically.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    14. Re:Toy by srmalloy · · Score: 1

      The article is, unfortunately, vague on how the feature is activated; powering the speaker is a drain on the battery, so having it rattle or slosh every time it moves as it sits in your pocket or your purse or on your belt is not desirable (not to mention the additional aggravation that would be caused by the constant rattling or sloshing of cell phones around you), so there would logically be a need to, say, press a button on the cellphone before you shook it. Having an audio response in this manner does, however, represent an increase in utility over the message counter or battery indicator on the display. With display icons, you need to open the phone and look at the screen, distracting your attention from other tasks; with an audible feedback indicator, you take out the phone, press a button, and shake it, using a secondary sense -- your hearing -- to gauge the value being returned by the device. This could also be extended to non-audible responses if the phone's firmware supported it, such as triggering the internal vibrator for a length of time proportional to the remaining battery charge, or for a number of pulses equal to the number of stored messages.

    15. Re:Toy by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Our eyes get all the input, but that means the rest of our senses are just sitting around, basically, which is a waste.

      Its the same with aircraft controls, that have been debated for many years.


      I get the point, but that probably wasn't the best example for this article...

      "Hey Bob, how much fuel do we have left, could you check the gauge?"
      "Nah, that's too much trouble, just shake the plane back and forth a bit. Ok, hold on, sshh, I'm trying to listen - one more time. Great. Yep, sounds like the tanks are somewhere between 1/4 and 3/4 full."
      "So, what does that mean?"
      "It means we should land immediately and then go beat the designer of that sensor to a pulp."

    16. Re:Toy by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      The battery indicator on your screen is passive. It just sits there (largely unnoticed) until your critically low on battery and then it beeps at you incessantly. By adding a physical element to the indicator you provide an ongoing battery status (in a very easy to understand metaphor no less) that is much more difficult to ignore.

      Well, if you don't shake it, this is a passive technique as well. It's not like you'd already be shaking your phone under normal circumstances and this would clue you in to a low battery. A phone that's sitting there dying won't get shaken anyway.

      And, amusingly enough, since it takes battery life to make this work (power the speakers and read the accelerometers), people would be constantly shaking their phone to figure out the remaining battery life, and depleting the battery. Using more energy to know if you have killed the batteries yet seems somehow backwards to me.

      It also might have the rather strange behaviour that as you run up a flight of stairs or to catch your flight, you make a sloshing noise if you didn't have to hold a button to enable this. That would be rather funny, especially in airports. Because when you make an unexpected sloshing sound, some security guy is gonna think something is up.

      Do I think it's cool technology to make it work? Absolutely. Would I think it's a desirable enough feature to ever pay for it? Not likely.

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    17. Re:Toy by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      It sounds fun, but I don't understand how shaking a phone is functionally superior to simply looking at the screen to gauge battery life or messages. Not to mention shaking your expensive mobile device around may not be the smartest idea. Flying wiimotes, anyone?

      Apart from the things some people already mentioned, this seems to be a very nice feature for, say, blind users.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    18. Re:Toy by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      And, amusingly enough, since it takes battery life to make this work (power the speakers and read the accelerometers), people would be constantly shaking their phone to figure out the remaining battery life, and depleting the battery. Using more energy to know if you have killed the batteries yet seems somehow backwards to me.

      Well, all we need now is a mechanism like the one in shake-rechargeable flashlights...

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    19. Re:Toy by ZERO1ZERO · · Score: 1

      My boss's P990i has this feature! His ring tone kinda warbles a bit and then dies. Just as if the battery is permanently flat. Oh wait...

    20. Re:Toy by AeroIllini · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is just a version 1.0 hack, but I could see lots of different uses for this.

      When you pick up an opened can of soda, do you have to shake it vigorously to figure out how full it is? No... you generally know how heavy a full can is, and how heavy an empty can is. When you pick up the can, the amount of inertia the can has tells you how heavy it is, just in one motion. Our brains rely on this kind of feedback when we handle physical objects. Ever picked up an empty can you thought was full? You end up exaggerating the amount of force needed to pick it up, and more likely than not end up almost throwing it across the room. It certainly surprises you.

      Now imagine that the combination of an accelerometer and some clever programming of an off-center vibrate weight could simulate different weights in an object that doesn't actually change weight. (I don't think that's what the technology in the article does, but it might lead to the new uses I describe.) When you first pick up your phone off the table, if the battery is low, it would simulate an "empty" phone. If the battery was full, it would simulate a "full" phone, and resist movement more. This kind of tactile feedback would be readily used by a great many people, and would give them a better appreciation of battery life. They would know instantly, every time they handled their phone, whether they looked at the screen or not, how much battery it had. This has lots of potential uses. Even if the phone was in your pocket, you would be able to feel the "weight" of the phone as you moved.

      Tactile feedback is a Good Thing (tm). More devices should use it in creative ways however they can. The only drawback I could see is adoption: the phone manufacturers might realize that this would clue the users in on just how awful the battery life of their phones is, and refuse to add it to keep people blissfully using power-hungry phones with crappy battery life.

      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
    21. Re:Toy by Threni · · Score: 1

      Sloshing - as long as they use Slosh 2.0 crowdsourcing - really groks the blogosphere!

    22. Re:Toy by caffeinemessiah · · Score: 1

      Now imagine that the combination of an accelerometer and some clever programming of an off-center vibrate weight could simulate different weights in an object that doesn't actually change weight.

      Just like you can fly by pulling on your shoelaces, nothing you do can change the weight, either real or "perceived", of an object sitting in your hand.

      --
      An old-timer with old-timey ideas.
    23. Re:Toy by Thunder+Rabbit · · Score: 1

      I notice three super cool points on this immediately:

      1. I think it would be great for blind users
      2. My little battery icon is tiny, but using essentially the full length of the phone as the battery indicator gives a much finer grain of remaining battery life.
        (if they can make the battery-life detector accurate *and* the sloshing feedback accurate, of course)
      3. When I'm on the phone, I will automagically have a sense of the battery life without even looking at the display.

      Conceivably, the sloshing technique could become preferable to the battery icon.

    24. Re:Toy by Dr_SimonCPU · · Score: 1

      I dunno dude. I can imagine a new type of toy though. Just replace the audio file for the shaking device, and you've got a new toy that will be a hit among women. =)

    25. Re:Toy by stickyc · · Score: 1
      It sounds fun, but I don't understand how shaking a phone is functionally superior to simply looking at the screen to gauge battery life or messages.

      Don't assume that all mobile phone users have the gift of sight.

  5. Needs more cowbell... by Joce640k · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Needs more cowbell...!

    --
    No sig today...
    1. Re:Needs more cowbell... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      Wow... I must read Slashdot too much. For a second there, I thought you typed "Need more Cowboyneal!" I don't think *any* of us really want THAT on our cellphones!

    2. Re:Needs more cowbell... by Obsi · · Score: 0

      That's just what we need -- a ringtone of CowboyNeal saying various slashdot memes.
      Our overlords who pour hot grits on Natalie Portman's naked body with PJ debunking SCO's FUD support me!

  6. Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also, getting sloshed while on your cell phone will better allow you to divulge your contents to anyone unlucky enough to be in your address book.

    1. Re:Also by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1, Funny

      Also, getting sloshed while on your cell phone will better allow you to divulge your contents to anyone unlucky enough to be in your address book.

      Yeah, that's fun. I have a buddy who tends to call his ex-girlfriend whenever he gets tanked. It got to the point where I had to take his cellphone from him before we hit the bars.

    2. Re:Also by ari_j · · Score: 1

      It has long been my belief that the next new feature on cell phones should be a breath alcohol measurement device. The phone should allow you to set a maximum BAC per contact, so that you can't call your mother if you're over .08, can't call your girlfriend if you're over .15, and can't call anyone but your lawyer if you hit .30.

  7. A cellphone without an accelerometer... by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is like a cow without an altimeter.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:A cellphone without an accelerometer... by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 2, Funny

      How else are you gonna know when the cow's about to hit the ground, huh?

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    2. Re:A cellphone without an accelerometer... by k_187 · · Score: 1

      Umm, just look down?

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    3. Re:A cellphone without an accelerometer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. That would be why Nokia are starting to add them to their new phones like the N95 and 5500 then? It's not like they use a lot of power or take up much space, and you can do a lot of interesting stuff with them.
      For example, how do you think the iPhone auto-screen orientation works? They have an accelerometer inside it and monitor the output with a fairly simple algorithm.

    4. Re:A cellphone without an accelerometer... by pimpimpim · · Score: 4, Funny
      That answer is only valid if you are located higher than the cow's current position. If the cow was, for example, just catapulted from a fortress by french knights, and you were standing in the range of the catapult, you'd better look up.

      However, if the cow would have an altimeter coupled to a wifi server, you could read out it's height independent of your own position so you wouldn't need to decide whether you should look up or down.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    5. Re:A cellphone without an accelerometer... by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      Nokia had added accelerometers to their phones while the iPhone was a glint in Steve's eye. Another totally cool feature of the accelerometer on the N95? The Wellness Diary, which lets you track and graph weight, etc, and step count - you can keep the phone in your pocket and have it function as a pedometer, all tied into the system with calorie tracking, etc, based on your weight as tracked on a daily basis, etc.

    6. Re:A cellphone without an accelerometer... by DrStoooopid · · Score: 1

      An accelerometer is a double-edged sword...that way phone companies can look at the phone's internal memory and see just how hard it got dropped.

      --
      There are 2 groups of people you can make fun of on the Internet without fear of attack. The illiterate, and the Amish.
    7. Re:A cellphone without an accelerometer... by spyrochaete · · Score: 1

      I know it's been forever since you posted this, but just wanted to tell you that it still has me in stitches. Good show, sir.

  8. Apostrophe abuse in summary by operagost · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nokia's
    An apostrophe does not mean, "Look out! Here comes an S!"
    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    1. Re:Apostrophe abuse in summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      pi'shpo'sh! it mo'st certainly doe's.

    2. Re:Apostrophe abuse in summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously the correct form is Nokiat.

    3. Re:Apostrophe abuse in summary by wfWebber · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nope. An apostrophe usually means, "Look out! Here come the grammar nazis"

      --
      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway. -- Andrew S. Tanenbaum
    4. Re:Apostrophe abuse in summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Don't you mean grammar nazi's?

    5. Re:Apostrophe abuse in summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It usually means, this post was written by a non-native English speaker, mixing up their grammar with the English grammar.
      If I had mod points, I'd have modded you down.

    6. Re:Apostrophe abuse in summary by arevos · · Score: 1

      It usually means, this post was written by a non-native English speaker Aren't grammatical errors something editors are meant to correct?
    7. Re:Apostrophe abuse in summary by Nethead · · Score: 1

      It usually means, this post was written by a non-native English speaker.. You can say American if you wish.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    8. Re:Apostrophe abuse in summary by swillden · · Score: 1

      It usually means, this post was written by a non-native English speaker Aren't grammatical errors something editors are meant to correct? Here, let me fix that for you. This being slashdot, you should have written:

      Aren't grammatical errors something editors are meant to add?

      Yes. Yes they are.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    9. Re:Apostrophe abuse in summary by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      I've talked to a number of illiterate Brits online as well. America has no monopoly on ignorance, we're just a little more humble than the rest of y'all.

    10. Re:Apostrophe abuse in summary by vuo · · Score: 1

      So to completely overshoot it, notice also the context "runs on Nokia's". In Finnish, this is expressed with the inessive case "-ssa". So, skip the "on" and use "runs Nokioissa".

      You could also use the adessive "-lla", but a cellphone is a small object and the software is definitely inside it, so it'd be unusual to use an external locative case. For some reason, the external locative cases ("on" -lla, "from" -lta, "to" -lle) are sometimes used when talking about desktop computers and operating systems (as in "the game works with Vista" peli toimii Vistalla vs. Vistassa). Also, because Nokia is the name of a city, you should not mix it up and say "Nokialla", because then in unambiguously refers to the city.

      Note also that Nokia (although a proper name) is not an atomic word, but already a partitive plural of nois, "pine marten".

    11. Re:Apostrophe abuse in summary by adatepej · · Score: 1

      Good English is a necessity if you wish to communicate good.

  9. Terror Alert! by CheeseburgerBrown · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think this is a good idea -- harnessing already honed human perceptions and using them to relieve some of the bandwidth hogging our visual senses are subjected to. It could be quite intuitive, and save valuable screen real estate.

    On the other hand, I guess it means we can't take our mobile phones on airplanes anymore, can we?

    Homeland Security Agent: "How much liquid is in that phone?"

    You: "None. It's virtual liquid."

    Homeland Security Agent: "It sounds like at least a few ounces."

    You: "Virtual liquids have neither volume nor weight."

    Homeland Security Agent: "Do I look stupid to you?"

    You: "Can I take the fifth on that?"

    Homeland Security Agent: "That's Mistake Number Two, bub. Quoting from documents concerning the governance or liberties of American citizens is suspicious activity Level Blue. Ever heard of Ron Paul?"

    You: "Uh, sure."

    Homeland Security Agent: "You're under arrest."

    1. Re:Terror Alert! by CoolGopher · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      If I had mod points that wouldn't be "Funny", that'd be "Sad but True".
      Well, if I had modpoints and more flexibility in classification of comments.

    2. Re:Terror Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      visual senses You mean "eyes"? How many visual senses do you have?
    3. Re:Terror Alert! by CheeseburgerBrown · · Score: 1

      The eyes are a mechanical part of the apparatus, yes, but the actual imaging goes on in the brain. A pair of eyes without neuronal processing of the inputs is about as useful for vision as a pair of fuzzy tennis balls.

    4. Re:Terror Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean "eyes"?

      The preferred term is "orbs of sight".

    5. Re:Terror Alert! by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      you have two large clusters of light sensing cells each inside an aiming and focusing unit and each backed up by a lot of neurological processing.

      Pretty amazing really.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    6. Re:Terror Alert! by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Alternate version:

      Homeland Security Agent: "How much liquid is in that phone?"

      You: "None. It's virtual liquid."

      Homeland Security Agent: "It sounds like at least a few ounces."

      You: "Listen, I'll turn the volume down."

      Homeland Security Agent: "So it's not just any liquid, it's one you can electronically change the sound of? I've heard enough. Stand over here."

  10. I wonder by DeeQ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How much faster the battery runs out with this feature. Its always annoyed me that my phone beeps every min when the battery becomes low. I thought the idea was when the phone starts to run out of power to conserve it to make it last long enough till you could charge it next. Considering how much faster my phone dies with the sound on and beep compaired to when I have the sound off and low bat, i wonder how much juice it takes to shake the thing to check the bat level.

    1. Re:I wonder by HeadlessNotAHorseman · · Score: 1

      If they were really smart, they would make it so that the shaking action help recharge the batteries, a la those kinetically recharged watches that one sees occasionally. Whilst the charge generated by shaking wouldn't be all that much, surely even a little bit is better than nothing?

      --
      I like my coffee the way I like my women - roasted and ground up into little tiny pieces.
  11. Why the shaking? by Gigiya · · Score: 1

    I understand frustration with cellphones, but why is it that every new method of doing something with them seems like it's going to involve shaking them?

    1. Re:Why the shaking? by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      People have been doing that for ages with babies, that's why.

    2. Re:Why the shaking? by Mishotaki · · Score: 1

      Cuz we all know that mens like to shake... their... thing... and the objects they find or presents they get, off course.

    3. Re:Why the shaking? by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 1

      No kidding, I worked for a phone manufacturer and in the late 90's a corporation (cheap auto repair) ordered tens of thousands of GSM phones for their staff, the thing is they asked the ring "melody" to be forced to their ad jingle. Within a month, half of them had been returned. Most of them were a bag of totally smashed plastic and parts (think "will it blend?") (sometimes even partially incinerated) with "oops, it felt off my pocket" or other mundane excuse as the problem description. So don't tell me of shaking a cellphone out of frustration.

    4. Re:Why the shaking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have to shake it. If you watch the video, you can wag your hips like a male prostitute when you walk and it will work too.

    5. Re:Why the shaking? by drewski3420 · · Score: 1

      Because it works so well for Babies

  12. Balls by Shadyman · · Score: 1

    "The same technique can be used to represent new messages by simulating balls rattling around inside a box."

    I can't wait for this. I'll shake my cell phone, and someone will ask me WTF I'm doing. I'll proudly be able to proclaim, "My cell phone has balls!"

  13. That's all well and good. by TheDreadSlashdotterD · · Score: 1

    Does it make phone calls?

    --
    I have nothing to say.
  14. Re:Stupid typist by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It's also proof that Slashdot can drive one bats.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  15. Ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that it would use the speaker and vibrator, which drain the battery, to indicate battery life.

  16. A solution to....? by ThreeGigs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I love cool little gimmicky inventions like this.
    Unfortunately, it seems to be a solution that was applied to a problem that didn't need solving.

    Now, perhaps if they linked the sloshing behavior to the amount of milk left in the carton as reported via my networked refrigerator, they'd have me interested.

    1. Re:A solution to....? by jsiren · · Score: 1
      So to find out how much milk you have, you would shake the refrigerator?

      Interesting.

      --
      Usage: km/h for speed (kilometers per hour); kph for very slow impulses (kilopond hours).
  17. Verizon... by BadEvilYoda · · Score: 1

    ... will surely find a way to either a) cripple something like this or b) charge for it. Or worse, do their standard bass-ackwards job of crippling it, like they manage to do with every other firmware and interface they "design" (and I use that term loosely) so it's constantly sloshing and having balls bounce around inside of it.

  18. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "simulating balls rattling around inside a box"

    That line makes me laugh for some reason. I know, I know. Immature Slashdotter, blah, blah, blah...

  19. Juice by Radon360 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I guess this puts a new spin on the colloquialism of how much "juice" is left in a battery.

  20. Great Idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I'm concerned the battery's low, I'll be SO glad that checking it takes more power than before... Rather than peaking at an LCD number, it'll use more power making sound and vibrating! And it will make more noise than it ever did before - silence really gives me the creeps.

    Progress, isn't it great!

  21. Battery life by zokier · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This would kill battery life of a device, cellphones are already at only few days of usage. Lets just add a gimmicky effect that needs more battery. 'Oh how much do I have battery left? *shake* None, anymore anyways...'

  22. peoples' eyes reveal their content by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no gadgets required. nor does one need to shake/rattle them to find out what's inside. just look in their eyes

  23. Battery life isn't important for me: thanks USB by dada21 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Thanks to the mini-USB connector on my phone, battery life is completely not important to me. In the car, I charge my phone. At work or at a client's, I plug it into a laptop or PC. If I am desperate, I have a little USB hand crank that can power my phone for 20 minutes with about 3 minutes of cranking.

    When cell phones had proprietary connectors that changed with each new model, battery life was maybe #3 on my list of important features. Now I don't even think of it. I can not recall a day in the past year when I had less than 60% battery life (even with WiFi and Bluetooth enabled on my HTC Trinity).

    Is it really a big deal for a lot of people? Where are you that you can't plug in, even if just for 10-15 minutes to top off your battery?

    1. Re:Battery life isn't important for me: thanks USB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm... a hand crank cell phone charger, that sounds very useful. I just went and researched getting one for my phone because I had not thought about that possibility.

      Usually cell phone charge is not a problem because, like most portable devices, I charge it every night and I usually use it far less than talk time on a charge. On the other hand, I have had multiple occasions where I was on a long train/bus trip and wanted to talk on the phone but couldn't because my phone only gets about 2 hours of talk time, and I needed my phone working in case I needed to call whoever I was meeting at my destination. In those situations, having to crank while talking would not be an inconvenience at all.

      (posting anon because I already moderated)

    2. Re:Battery life isn't important for me: thanks USB by Nephrite · · Score: 1

      And I thought "mobile" means "which may move around", and not "being tethered to a power outlet"

    3. Re:Battery life isn't important for me: thanks USB by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, the new Li-Ion batteries handle that quite OK, with older tech, you would have ruined your battery within a year by partially reloading it that often.

    4. Re:Battery life isn't important for me: thanks USB by Isaac-Lew · · Score: 1
      It is possible to move around *and* be connected to a power source (car charger, or small dynamo attached to a bicycle wheel).

      I believe the OP's point was that given the ubiquity of opportunities to use a USB charger, it makes sense to charge the phone/device whenever you can (a viewpoint with which I agree - I have 3 separate chargers; home, work & in my car).

    5. Re:Battery life isn't important for me: thanks USB by Flwyd · · Score: 1

      Places I have USB connections are mostly places I have land line access.

      Which, I suppose, is why I don't have a mobile phone.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature.
  24. Patent? by Traa · · Score: 1

    Sorry, didn't RTFA, but did they patent this cute idea? It sounds like fun, something that I might want on my cellphone even. Willing to pay for it, but as a developer for a large cellphone component maker I could probably create this application myself. If the idea is patented, and from what I have heard from patent lawyers this sounds rather patentable, it would prevent a quick and widespread adoption. The biggest problem is that though the idea is innovative, it is hardly remarkable. It falls into the category of "we thought of it first", rather then "we spend a huge budget on research to come up with this innovation for which we need some exclusive time in the market to recoup our cost and make a reasonable profit".

  25. Couple of musings... by stoofa · · Score: 2, Funny

    How much battery power is consumed in producing the sloshing noise to tell me how much battery power is left? And if you have unread messages while checking the battery power will you get balls sloshing around in the liquid? And would the smaller messages float?

    1. Re:Couple of musings... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And would the smaller messages float?"

      Only if they weigh the same as a duck.

  26. Cool, but how about accurate battery life? by dpbsmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While this is very cool, it does bring up a pet peeve of mine: why can't devices show accurate battery life?

    Currently, all battery charge indicators are wildly nonlinear and grossly inaccurate.

    To be more specific. Conceptually, imagine a device that holds three small batteries instead of one large one, and drains them in succession one after the other. The battery life measurement on each battery would be somewhat imprecise, but when you'd exhausted the first battery you'd know that you really had 2/3 of the charge left; when you'd exhausted the second, you'd know that you really had 1/3 left.

    Alternatively, how about a device that holds two smaller batteries and double-buffers them; that is, draws from one battery until it's exhausted, then draws from the second while allowing you to replace the first?

    1. Re:Cool, but how about accurate battery life? by Avohir · · Score: 1

      the issue as I understand it is that batteries hold less charge over time, and the rate at which they decay varies per the type of battery, and isn't something that can be easily predicted.

      In your example, the batteries would be worn unevenly. Say you drain it halfway before charging it, the third battery would be used the least, because it would only supply power if the phone was below 30%, so now after a year of use, the third battery holds more, and your 1/3 indicator is off

      --
      To err is human, to really foul up requires a computer
    2. Re:Cool, but how about accurate battery life? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Conceptually, imagine a device that holds three small batteries instead of one large one, and drains them in succession one after the other. The battery life measurement on each battery would be somewhat imprecise, but when you'd exhausted the first battery you'd know that you really had 2/3 of the charge left; when you'd exhausted the second, you'd know that you really had 1/3 left.
      Indeed but then you have to allow for that fact that higher discharge rates tend to mean lower efficiancies and also allow for the losses in the switchover system.

      I strongly suspect that the decrease in efficiancy would not be considered worth the increase in display accuracy.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    3. Re:Cool, but how about accurate battery life? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      While this is very cool, it does bring up a pet peeve of mine: why can't devices show accurate battery life?

      The individual who can figure out how to do this with cheap consumer grade components under the wide variety of load condtions even a single cell phone encounters... Is in for a life of fame and fortune. Predicting battery life, even under ideal conditions, is a crapshoot at best.
       
       

      To be more specific. Conceptually, imagine a device that holds three small batteries instead of one large one, and drains them in succession one after the other. The battery life measurement on each battery would be somewhat imprecise, but when you'd exhausted the first battery you'd know that you really had 2/3 of the charge left; when you'd exhausted the second, you'd know that you really had 1/3 left.

      Somebody is reading too much into the "batteries are like buckets of electricity" analogy we all got back in school. Real batteries don't work quite like that.
    4. Re:Cool, but how about accurate battery life? by Eivind · · Score: 1

      Somebody is reading too much into the "batteries are like buckets of electricity" analogy we all got back in school. Real batteries don't work quite like that.

      Yes they do. If you have three identical, batteries, all fully charged, then each of them will hold aproximately the same amount of energy. If you drain one of the 3 without touching the other 2 you have now drained 1/3rd of your available energy.

  27. I'm not buying my Mum one of these... by Hanners1979 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can just see her filling her mobile phone full of water when 'the liquid has run out'.

  28. Ha! I love it! by jollyreaper · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Most of our computer humor comes from people trying to apply inappropriate models to understanding the way computers work, thinking they're like cars or household appliances. I've had people ask me if computers need tune-ups, belts changed, etc. And us techs can be dicks about it, too. "Yeah, you dropped that CD and now all the bits shifted to one side. It's going to be unbalanced, like a washing machine. So what you need to do is shake the CD until all the bits get evenly distributed."

    Shaking the battery to hear how "full" it is, it's an intuitive approach for someone who knows nothing about technology and makes the geeks laugh, but here they go and make it work. Very, very funny. But this is the sort of thinking that helps make the toys easier to use. More power to 'em.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  29. Cellphone Breathalizer that sloshes by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Can we get a cellphone + breathalyser combo that makes sloshing sounds if you try to talk drunk?

    Even better if it's part of your OnStar(TM) system, it can shut off your ignition and call a cab for you.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  30. It's "Blind"ingly Obvious by EgoWumpus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have to imagine that any blind user of a cell phone would think this is awesome. No longer do you have to wade through some exchange with a computer to figure out if you have messages; you just shake your cell phone. And figuring out your charge without any need for visual interaction must be useful, too.

    Additionally, though, I don't think there is all that much problem with shaking solid-state electronics. The 'Wiimote syndrome' isn't at issue, because you're not trying to control cartoon characters on the screen - and shaking a rattle, say, is a far more sedate activity than swinging a hammer. Unless you're way, way hyper-aggressive.

    --

    [Ego]out

    1. Re:It's "Blind"ingly Obvious by nuzak · · Score: 1

      > No longer do you have to wade through some exchange with a computer to figure out if you have messages

      Huh, I just hold down "1" for about 3 seconds and hear "you have no new messages". It's a digital control, no need to wiggle it til it responds. Blind users tend to like buttons as long as they've got tactile feedback.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    2. Re:It's "Blind"ingly Obvious by EgoWumpus · · Score: 1

      But compare that to the 'instant' response you get by looking at the readout. I think that wiggling it would be faster, and does not require you to take it out of your pocket.

      --

      [Ego]out

    3. Re:It's "Blind"ingly Obvious by Eivind · · Score: 1

      It's annoying though. I much prefer the alternative being presented here: how about a phone that detects when charge starts to get low (say 25% left) and that responds by shifting the pitch of ringtones and beeps downwards and slowing them down ?

      Sorta how a old-fashioned tape-player that is almost out of juice sounds.

  31. Why not do two things at once? by andrewbaldwin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Add in small magnets + coils (or reverse run the accelerometer if it's suitable) and charge the phone from the shaking?

    It's not as if the Slashdot crowd have atrophied wrist muscles after all :-) [runs for cover]

  32. doesn't the vibrator use a lot of battery? by Crazyswedishguy · · Score: 1

    This thing is awesome: after shaking my phone and causing the vibrator to work for 10 minutes, I know my battery's depleted!

    --
    This space up for sale.
  33. Shaking by rossdee · · Score: 1

    Now why couldn't they get the shaking to CHARGE the battery? After all they can do that with flashlights.

  34. Neat for the blind by lantastik · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My sister-in-law is legally blind and she is always asking how much battery life is left on her phone and how many messages she has. From an accessibility perspective, I think it's a pretty neat idea. Otherwise, it's a useless feature.

    1. Re:Neat for the blind by blhack · · Score: 1

      What use does your blind sister have for text messages?

      Or are you talking about voicemail? I guess I assumed that this hack was for txt only (thats what they show in the video)....what would be cool is if somebody could actually figure out a reliable way of telling me how many voicemails I have! My phone always says like 10-15 even though i usually have about 8.

      --
      NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    2. Re:Neat for the blind by painQuin · · Score: 1

      once upon a time we had these things called voice messages
      I personally don't like them, but then I don't like having to spend an extra minute dealing with that interface when I could just be reading...

      --
      A guilty conscience means at least you've got one.
    3. Re:Neat for the blind by painQuin · · Score: 1

      eh, now I feel dumb because slashdot cropped your message.
      sad.

      --
      A guilty conscience means at least you've got one.
  35. re: cool uses for accelerometers in phones by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Actually, some of the 3rd. party "unauthorized" apps for hacked iPhones make really clever use of the accelerometer.

    The most recent one was an electronic level. It draws the little bubble level on the phone's display, and the bubble moves just like a real level, indicating the phone sitting level when the bubble is between the 2 lines. It works pretty well, and given the shape of the iPhone (not likely to be attached to some sort of belt clip or holster that prevents it from lying flat on a surface), it's a practical application for it too.

    I also saw someone's experimental pedometer application. Not sure it's perfectly accurate, but seems to make a pretty good attempt at counting your steps as you walk or jog. (Yeah, Nokia did this first - but it's just worth noting they're doing it for iPhones now too.)

    The little drawing applet for iPhones someone wrote is funny too. If you shake the phone, it erases the current drawing, sort of like an etch-a-sketch tablet.

    I agree that shaking one's phone is probably not such a "practical" or "more efficient" way of working with it. It's done more for the "cute" or "cool" factor of it. But I like some of the other things the accelerometers make possible, like the iPhone's automatic screen orientation change when it sense you flipped it sideways.

  36. more people in theaters jerking their by Locutus · · Score: 1

    Just what we need, more people in movie theaters jerking their phones around with the sound of balls rolling around.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    1. Re:more people in theaters jerking their by PPH · · Score: 1

      I hate to be the one to tell you this, but that's not a phone that Pee-Wee is shaking.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  37. But but but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...using the accelerometers and the vibrator to get a reading on battery life ends up reducing the battery life each time you shake that phone. Kinda like Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle. So you're going to be walking around with a huge dilemma of whether to find out how much battery is left, or to shut the heck up and not make it even worse.

  38. Hmmm... Makes one wonder.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will it make a "SPLAT" sound, when I hurl the stupid thing against a wall?

  39. Shameless plug by Walles · · Score: 1

    This *is* a shameless plug, which is more or less on-topic here. You have been warned :-).

    http://www.nongnu.org/bubblemon/

    The Bubbling Load Monitor (or "Bubblemon" for short) is a system CPU and memory load monitor. It displays something that looks like a vial containing water. The water level indicates how much memory is in use. The color of the liquid indicates how much swap space is used (watery blue means none and angry red means all). The system CPU load is indicated by bubbles floating up through the liquid; lots of bubbles means high CPU load. If you have unread mail, a message in a bottle falls into the water.

    A screenshot doesn't do the applet much justice, since part of its coolness is its physics engine, making the bubbles move and the surface ripple.

    It's a GNOME applet, try "apt-get install bubblemon" on your favorite Debian derivative. There are also some forks which also have bubble related names.

        Have fun :-) //Johan

    --
    Installed the Bubblemon yet?
  40. Yet another... by catdevnull · · Score: 1

    Yet another way to annoy your office mates and everyone at the movie theatre.

    Reminds me of the "internet is full" cartoon from Dilbert.

    --

    I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
  41. Another feature to be crippled by Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just one more thing they won't let you do, even if the phone has this feature on any other network.

  42. Sounds like a decent solution by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    You just need to add a correction factor. Every time the device actually reaches the cutoff voltage, take the raw output from the integrator and store that as the normalization constant.

    Divide by the constant and you should get a pretty good (though over) estimate of the fraction used. If you want to go "really" complicated, you could multiply the correction factor by a correction factor based on how recently it was last updated, to account for the possibility of accelerating degradation. And even more complicated, the correction factors themselves would make a pretty good indicator of when the battery should be replaced instead of recharged.

    I'm assuming you're doing the integration in software or digital IC, of course, since a variable normalization factor would be difficult to store for any significant length of time in an analog circuit.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  43. Already done... by ZipR · · Score: 1
  44. But... by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

    ... does it contain more than 3oz of liquid? (Virtually speaking...)

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
  45. Not bad, but... by mengel · · Score: 1
    But if they could make it actually feel lighter as the battery drains, *that* would be some feedback.

    Maybe some sort of submarine-style ballast tanks, but with helium?

    --
    - "History shows again and again how nature points out the folly of men" -- Blue Oyster Cult, 'Godzilla'
  46. 3 words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    cycle usage order

  47. oblig bob by xant · · Score: 1

    BtaF sounds off hilariously on this issue.

    --
    It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.
  48. Simpler Approach by mongus · · Score: 1

    Just add 9 volt battery terminals to the outside of the phone that are connected directly to the battery. To check the charge simply apply your tongue to the terminals. Isn't that how everybody checks a 9 volt battery?

    No software update or accelerometer required.

  49. A very novel approach by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 1

    All the derision about it being 'cute but pointless' aside, I think it is a really novel approach, and a step in the right direction for portable device UI development. It really seeks to take advantage of the way our brains process everyday physical stimuli and apply it to processing simple bits of information from our phones.

    --

    Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
  50. really cool by eneville · · Score: 1

    that's really cool - but does it have to be on such a big device? what happened to things getting smaller as technology develops? it seems phones and laptops have gone into reverse with larger screens.

  51. Impress the TSA Agents by Frescard · · Score: 1

    Also make sure to show this feature to any TSA agents when you check into the airport. They'll be very impressed! ;)

  52. Nokias suck Re:Apostrophe abuse in summary by reginaldangermouse · · Score: 1

    Na, 'sall good, he was contracting "Nokianally retentive moronic-menu-laden celephony devices".

  53. The real reason people like this... by adatepej · · Score: 1

    ...is that this is how human beings spent the vast majority of their evolution checking how much of something is left.

    You'd hold it, feel it, shake it, or at least eyeball it in three dimensions.

    Any way of making our experience of how much power is left more like the way we did it for most of our history is just naturally appealing to human beings.

    It's not that it's more "functional" in some sense that is detached from our simple, arbitrary preferences -- it's functional in the sense that the purpose technology is to make us happy, and being able to feel a quantity of something, for no particularly "good" reason, makes people happy because it's familiar.

    Any of the other benefits are just gravy. I could definitely see this catching on if this effect can be implemented in a way which feels natural (literally) and is affordable.

    The effect shouldn't require active shaking of the object, even -- you should be able to feel the weight constantly, and the shifting of the weight should be evident anytime the phone is moving or has just stopped moving.

    There is no way in which such a feature wouldn't be superior to a solely visual mechanism, and it would just feel good.

  54. Scottish not british! by Pax681 · · Score: 1

    Scottish researchers at a Scottish university......uk..PAH!

  55. Options! by EgoWumpus · · Score: 1

    I don't think the point is to find "The One True Solution". There is no such thing. There are many, many ways to do things, and if you can find some use for a thing chances are you can build on it. Personally - though I may be a bit OCD about such things - I find the 'slowing' distortion of noises to be grating, like nails on a chalkboard. And, contrariwise, I love tactile feedback. But I could see how others would want it other ways.

    --

    [Ego]out