Slashdot Mirror


Wireless Keyboard "Encryption" Cracked

squidinkcalligraphy writes "While everyone is going on about wireless network security, it seems few have considered that increasingly common wireless keyboards can be vulnerable to eavesdropping. Particularly when the encryption is pitifully weak. All that's needed is a simple radio receiver, sound card, and a brute-force attack on the 8-bit encryption used. Passwords galore! Bluetooth, it seems, is safe for the moment."

3 of 232 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Under my desk by lhaeh · · Score: 5, Informative

    That idea came up when this item was posted to Hack A Day The reason for the limited reception range is that receivers use pathetically small, internal antennas: Mine was about 1/32 wavelength. With a full wave antenna or directional antenna, you can easily pick them up from outside a building. After I added a lager (1/4 or 1/8 wave) antenna to my receiver, I could type with my keyboard outside the house.

  2. Re:urm by sqrt(2) · · Score: 5, Informative

    My wireless logitech keyboard works from the next room over, although a bit unreliably. It's the basic, white, model with no fancy function keys or anything. I don't think they make it anymore.

    So you might need to worry about it in say, an office or school environment.

    --
    If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
  3. Re:Why a soundcard ! by thetartanavenger · · Score: 5, Informative

    A sound card is a cheap alternative to a digital and more importantly, recordable oscilloscope. By plugging the radio into the sound card, it allowed them to record the individual bit's being sent by the device to be analysed using a waveform viewer. If you were using a normal oscilloscope for that purpose the data flashes on the screen so fast it's impossible to be useful in any way, except possibly to read the carrier frequency of the signal, which is something your sound card would probably have alot of trouble doing because they're generally too slow.

    --
    Who need's speling and grammar?