Slashdot Mirror


Diffing Guantanamo Bay SOP Manuals

James Hardine writes "The Washington Post is reporting that Wikileaks has released another manual for Camp Delta, Guantanamo Bay together with the US military's rendition operations manual. This release follows from the Wikileaks release of the 2003 SOP Manual as discussed on Slashdot last month. Wikileaks compares the two manuals (2003, 2004) and reveals damning changes in official US detainee policy in exquisite detail. Who knew that diff could be such a powerful political weapon?"

16 of 563 comments (clear)

  1. Damning changes? by CRCulver · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Except for the fact that soldiers no longer have to carry a human rights card, what are these damning changes? I see little to protest in the diff.

    1. Re:Damning changes? by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think you meant "no longer have to carry a little laminate card" instead of "no longer have to abide..."

      No offense, but your statement seems to be reading a bit more into the document than it actually says.

      Anyway, if you believe Gitmo is evil, the document will support your belief. If you do not believe Gitmo is evil, nothing in the document will change your mind. Frankly, I think the entire article is a troll.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    2. Re:Damning changes? by rtechie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Gitmo is the place where the worst of the worst are kept. And you know this how? Neither you nor the government, has presented one iota of credible evidence that anyone at Guantanamo has committed any crimes whatsoever. The Bush administration has fought tooth and nail to prevent any such evidence coming to light.
      You do know that lots of people have been released from Guantanamo, don't you? And that many of those people have been formally exonerated by their home nations of committing any crime?

      One of the people held at Guantanamo has been there since he was 14. Was he one of the "worst of the worst"? The government won't say what he did but, perversely, has described him as a "good kid" that thrived under the tender mercies of the Guantanamo guards. Staff at Guantanamo have reported that, for the most part, they don't know why most people are being held there.

      These are the guys that are found actively fighting American forces or the local population or those that are known to have information that they are not willing to divulge. First, I hate to break it to you, but "actively fighting American forces" isn't a war crime. Whether you're wearing a uniform or not. Imprisoning prisoners of war outside the theater is a clear violation of the Geneva Conventions. So is interrogating them. So even assuming you're correct, Guantanamo Bay is illegal.

      And you're not. Most of the prisoners at Guantanamo Bay were sold to the US Army by Afghani warlords/drug lords. And they're about as reputable as they sound.

      Besides, that would be an incredibly waste of resources to ship every one of these people to Gitmo and interrogate them for hours only to have them confess to something that never happened. More like, "interrogate them for years". But you're right, it is a huge waste of resources.

  2. We're all boiling frogs by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Reading this article made me realize just how we've all fallen victim to the "boiling frog syndrome". Ten years ago it would have seemed nuts to be reading, and hearing about, the operation of concentration camps in the West, other than when reading about WWII. Now we read stuff about concentration camps, internment, loss of habeas corpus, the US kidnapping people from around the world, etc, and it's all just regular, "same old" news. A few people still feel a little shock, and even fewer actually bother to do anything about it, while the rest of us twiddle our thumbs and either hope it'll all go away or think that "well, we've done nothing wrong, so we'll be fine."

    I wonder what sort of stories we'll be reading in another ten years that would shock us now but will seem like regular occurrences in 2017? Thoughtcrime executions, archived recording of all telephone calls (the European Union is already working on this!), incarcerating people because they have the "genes" of a potential psychopath (again, the EU is looking into this)? It's gunna happen and we'll just keep boiling like the frogs we are.

    1. Re:We're all boiling frogs by Sique · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Please get your facts straight.

      1. About half of the "lovely freedom fighters" are sent home already, and none of them ever got charged with anything. Obviously at least half of them were never "lovely freedom fighters". Whoever they were, they surely aren't THEY beheading innocent people and videotaping them.
      Please explain how detaining people not connected to those crimes helps fighting the criminals.

      2. A concentration camp is something else than an extermination camp. Concentration camps were set up and are set up to round up people deemed somehow dangerous without ever telling anyone why exept for some general accusations. Germans were using the term "concentration camp" because it didn't have the horrible sound until it was discovered that the German concentration camps in fact were extermination camps.

      3. Please explain why you can mistreat people just because they aren't U.S. citizens.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    2. Re:We're all boiling frogs by MadJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People are being sent there without just trial! You say "bill of rights + constitution" do not apply, how about the laws of the country where they were taken from? How about human rights?
      The US is in the business of kidnapping people and imprisoning them without any form of trial or appeal. How is that fair? How is that just? How is that according to your rules of the land?
      To me that's bullying behaviour: "We don't like him, let's put him behind bars in a place where he can't hurt us."
      How many innocent people are in Guantanamo Bay?
      And why did the US built that prison in a foreign country?

      I can't believe you can still sleep at night.

    3. Re:We're all boiling frogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Let me know when prisoners are beaten, maimed, gases, burned, frozen, shot, or made to watch their children murdered."

      Apparently you have no problem holding innocent people in prison, without trial, without access to lawyers, without family contact, for 6 YEARS of their lives.

      Man, what an opportunist scumbag. Someone makes a comparison to concentration camps, and you jump up on your podium and start proudly trumpeting how humane your prison camps are!

      "Let's contrast this with these lovely freedom fighters, who for a little while were video taping a beheading-of the-week to be played all over the world."

      Sure, let's wipe our misdeeds under the table by pointing at worse criminals next door! The fact remains, you and the operators of these prison camps are criminals and abettors of criminals, and the fact that worse criminals exist in the world does nothing to temper that fact.

      "They murder innocent people by the thousands in the name of Allah."

      Who does? The people you're falsely imprisoning? Nope. If they had, you might give them trials. Why don't you give them trials? There is one obvious reason. You think they'll be set free. Now why might that be...?

      "SOP for detainees is to whine about mistreatment, torture, Koran mishandling, etc."

      Yeah, those whining ingrates! They should be licking our boots for imprisoning them in such a fine jail!

      "These are not US citizens; therefore, the Bill of Rights + Constitution do not apply."

      The fact is that the Bill of Rights is clearly not limited to US citizens, and our country is based on liberty and justice for all. That you would rant to the contrary only shows you both a bald-faced liar and a traitor of those values.

      You don't believe in liberty nor justice. You just take them for yourself. This is hypocrisy and worse.

      "These are not uniformed soldiers of a sovereign state; therefore, Geneva Conventions do not apply."

      I see. They're not soldiers, but they're not not soldiers. Hmm, what are they... I know! They must be alien invaders from Mars! Oh, sorry, wrong line, they're "illegal combatants." What's an "illegal combatant"? Well, nobody is quite sure, but we know they don't deserve trials, yessirree!

      "But we treat them far better than any other military would treat them."

      Oh, good for you. "Look, Frankie next door catches frogs and burns them alive! Why are you mad at me when I only poke out the eyes of the ones I catch?!"

      Scumbag.

    4. Re:We're all boiling frogs by spikedvodka · · Score: 4, Insightful

      These are not US citizens; therefore, the Bill of Rights + Constitution do not apply. These are not uniformed soldiers of a sovereign state; therefore, Geneva Conventions do not apply. But we treat them far better than any other military would treat them. Run that by me again... where in the Constitution, or any of it's amendments does it claim that the rights are only for citizens. in the few cases where it does care (i.e. Voting) it uses the term citizen, as opposed to "the people"

      I think you'd be hard pressed to argue that the bill of rights only applies to citizens, and not everybody under US law.
      --
      I will not give in to the terrorists. I will not become fearful.
    5. Re:We're all boiling frogs by rbanffy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "These are not US citizens; therefore, the Bill of Rights + Constitution do not apply. These are not uniformed soldiers of a sovereign state; therefore, Geneva Conventions do not apply"

      So, what you are saying is that because Gitmo is not subject to the rule of the US constitution, those civilians who were captured have no rights under it and that because they are civilians, they have no right under the GC. So, in fact, they have no rights whatsoever. And that everything is OK because they are allowed to practice their religion and brush their teeth.

      And you somehow think it's right.

      Keep in mind a lot of them were captured during the invasion of a country that had absolutely nothing to do with any terrorist attacks on the US and whose largest offenses were being ruled a obnoxious dictator that pissed off the POTUS and who have every right not to thank the US because they were bombed back to stone age and then invaded by so called liberators. If at some point in the future some foreign power decides to invade the US and a civilian resistance movement starts, would you be OK with your fellow countrymen being held in a legal limbo? Would it be fine to torture them as long as they can practice their religion and brush their teeth?

      If Gitmo is not part of the US, then what is it? Part of Cuba that has been invaded for so long that Cubans don't care anymore? Shouldn't it be under _some_ law?

      And, BTW, the US Constitution applies to everyone within any part of the US territory (including embassies, planes and boats in international waters) and not only to US citizens. It's sad (not to say it betrays the legacy of your Founding Fathers) to think one can bend _this_ law to serve any purpose.

      I hope this shameful episode will end someday.

  3. Re:Just a thought about Gitmo by bperkins · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What do you do when you've managed to grab a a wolf by there ears?

    One approach would be to claim that it's not really a wolf, it's a bloodthirsty monster, and we don't really have it by the ears, and it's being well treated anyway. Plus no one else will grab it by the ears for us.

    Or you can just take your licks for doing something that's so obviously stupid.

    My claim is that you need to introduce them to the US judicial system and let it sort things out. Some bad guys might be able to slip through the cracks, but in my opinion we deserve any blowback that we get.

  4. Re:congrats to wikileak by apparently · · Score: 4, Insightful
    for weaking america and making all of more vulnerable to terrorist attacks, hope you are proud of the work you are doing.

    I wonder if they're as proud as Bush was for ignoring memos titled Bin Laden determined to attack in US, not taking heed (and improving airline security), and successfully making us vulnerable to an attack.
    Cause that's totally comparable to someone releasing the SOP manuals of a prison.
    You see, friend, it's people like you who "weaken" and make America "more vulnerable to terrorist attacks". Instead of targeting your anger toward an administration that has let its incompetence actually harm American interests, you'd rather cry about some hypothetical weakening.

  5. come on. by apodyopsis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If they are guilty then charge them and let them have their day in court.

    If there is no evidence then release them.

    But holding them indefinitely on hearsay and suspicion in a legal limbo is madness. The problem will not get easier to deal with the longer you leave it, at some point they will have to be dealt with - so better to get it out of the way now. Confront the problem whatever the cost, return or charge them, and get that embarrassment and shut down.

  6. Re:Diff is powerful by sqrt(2) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's exactly right. It even happens with our constitution. Amendment 18 enacted prohibition, and over a decade later the 21st amendment nullified the 18th; but they're both still there.

    --
    If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
  7. Re:Just a thought about Gitmo by ray-auch · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If soldiers, they would be POWs and under Geneva conventions.

    If not, they are allegedly civilian criminals and should be prosecuted in the civilian judicial system.

    Problem with Gitmo is the US has decided these people are neither soldiers nor civilians but fall in some black hole category in between, where they have no access to civilian justice and no POW rights either.

  8. Re:congrats to wikileak by WindBourne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Exactly how did this weaken America? America is suppose to be the land of the free and a place where democracy rules. Gitmo is a prison (from what I understand, it is the nicest of all of our external prisons) where we are holding suspects. This prison is the one that the feds MEANT to show the press. So why should the press and our citizens not see what is the absolute nicest that we will be.

    What should worry ppl is what is NOT being seen. In those dark rooms, is where we should be casting a light.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  9. Re:prohibited! by snl2587 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am actually pretty conservative but torture is wrong.

    Anyone else spot what should be wrong about this statement?