Most In US Have False Sense of Online Security
BaCa sends along a link from Net-Security on a study of attitudes among Americans about the security of their PCs, versus their actual vulnerability. "More than half of computer users who think they are protected against online threats like spyware, viruses, and hackers actually have inadequate or no online protection, according to an independent research study conducted for Verizon... While 92 percent of participants thought they were safe, the scans revealed that 59 percent were actually vulnerable to a variety of online dangers. Ninety-four percent of those surveyed said they would find it helpful to be able to diagnose or check their online security status on a regular basis to make sure their PCs were safe."
At least once a year, these results come out in yet another study. Perhaps we should declare a new holiday: False Sense of Security Day (and of course, False Sense of Security Eve, when a hacker in a Santa suit constructs an enormous botnet and takes down a few small mailservers with spam).
Palm trees and 8
I don't know how good Verizon is at online bank security. I mean ... how safe can you be when you look at your bank account and can't distinguish .02 dollars and .02 cents?
*ducks*
Apology to Ubuntu forum.
this missive is stored on a secure server.
My name is Milo T. Farnsworth, D.O.B 27/07/1974 My Switch number is 3975-4438-0098-2310, expry 04/09
Please take care of this, I will be on an extended trip for the next 2 months, during which I will require great use of my $10,000 credit limit.
A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
I know I'm secure. I use only genuine Microsoft products. I remember seeing an ad that said that they're the most secure computer company there is.
This guy's the limit!
In other news, 92% of all drivers feel that their driving ability is above average.
'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
That's why you need a Mac. It has a Time Machine.
Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
I'm surprised such a router isn't readily available, especially with the new "evil bit" in RFC 3514: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3514.html :P