Slashdot Mirror


Balancing Robot Can Take a Kicking

BotKicker writes "A Japanese team has created the first full-size humanoid robot that won't fall over if you push it. A video shows it staggering and regaining balance after blows from a researcher. Being able to withstand shoves and kicks is essential if robots are to truly be our buddies, they reckon. 'The robot's balancing ability depends on its joints. For one thing they are never kept rigid, even when standing still, meaning they yield slightly when the robot is pushed. Force sensors within each joint also work out the position and velocity of the robot's centre mass as it moves around. Control software rapidly figures out what forces the robot's feet need to exert on the ground to bring it back into balance, and tells the joints how to act.'"

16 of 207 comments (clear)

  1. Chuck Norris by silgaun · · Score: 5, Funny

    What about a roundhouse kick?

  2. Re:Been done by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh yeah, well I saw a PBS special where a no legged robot could maintain its balance when kicked. I think it was disguised as a garbage can or something. So that's even cooler!

  3. I, for one, by MPAB · · Score: 4, Funny

    welcome our new never falling robot overlords.

  4. With friends like these...... by NiteShaed · · Score: 4, Funny

    Being able to withstand shoves and kicks is essential if robots are to truly be our buddies, they reckon.


    If these guys tend to kick and shove their buddies, it may explain why they have so much time to work on robots....."Finally, a friend I can kick who won't think I'm a jerk"
    --
    Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
  5. Nothing like the Server's Kicking. by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 4, Funny

    Unlike the robot, the server seems to have been unable to cope with the kicking it got after getting a good hard slashdotting.

    --
    Evil people are out to get you.
  6. With friends like these... by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 4, Funny

    Being able to withstand shoves and kicks is essential if robots are to truly be our buddies, they reckon. If you can't kick your buddy in the head, he really isn't your buddy.

    Sounds like someone's been playing too many violent video games.
    1. Re:With friends like these... by khendron · · Score: 5, Funny

      Being able to withstand shoves and kicks is essential if robots are to truly be our buddies, they reckon. The next generation of "friend" robots will also help you hide a body.
      --
      Life is like a web application. Sometime you need cookies just to get by.
  7. Cool by Cillian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is obviously a massive step forward - the major stereotypical problem with robots in the past has been their instability and slow shuffling. This opens the door to having them perform tasks like bend over and pick up weighty objects, which would have probably been impossible without this balancing mechanism.

    --
    -- All your booze are belong to us.
    1. Re:Cool by CRCulver · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is obviously a massive step forward - the major stereotypical problem with robots in the past has been their instability and slow shuffling.

      I'd say the major stereotypical problems with robots in the past is that they might go beserk and kill people.

    2. Re:Cool by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > perform tasks like bend over and pick up weighty objects

      A robot should not bend over and pick up weighty objects. It should squat and pick it up while maintaining it s rear electrical conduit in a straight configuration to prevent getting a herniated servo in the back.

      --
      Evil people are out to get you.
  8. Next step: decide when staggering is a good idea by merreborn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sometimes, staggering backwards is the wrong choice.

    For example, you're standing on the sidewalk with your back to traffic. Someone bumps into you. You will do everything in your power *not* to stagger backwards in this situation -- you might reach out to grab something solid, like a signpost, a trash can, or the hand of someone with a body mass comparable or greater than your own. But you wouldn't reach for the hand of a child -- you'd just end up pulling them into the street with you.

    You've got a split second to make this choice, as well. Make it wrong, and you may die, or even take someone else with you.

  9. Quoth the robot by halcyon1234 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... "Kick my shiny, metal ass."

  10. Contempt for Robots by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Funny

    That video will probably be one of the first exhibits in the Case for the Robot Uprising. As you can clearly see, not only did humans from the beginning view robots as being menial servants that we can push around and bully, we actually engineered them so that we could shove and kick them at will without interfering with their service of us! They're designed to be abused!

    In an cruel twist, it is this same ability that will make our punches and kicks ineffectual for defending our fleshy bodies from the robots when they turn against us.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  11. Just wait till they fight back... by stuporglue · · Score: 4, Funny

    The robot in the video sure looked like he was just waiting for the researcher to turn his back.

    --
    https://www.facebook.com/digitizeicm -- Show your support for the digitization of the Iron County Miner newspaper archiv
  12. Re:Next step: decide when staggering is a good ide by mcmonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    You've got a split second to make this choice, as well. Make it wrong, and you may die, or even take someone else with you.
    I think you're spending the last moment of your life over-thinking the situation.

    First, why wouldn't I reach for the hand of a child (if that was the closet/best option)? If the issue is I'm falling back beause my center of mass is behind me, I only need to shift the mass, not overcome the momentum of my movement. Yes, I will pull the child towards me, but it may be enough of a shift in mass to pull myself towards the child as well.

    Second, this is likely on of those less-is-more situations. If I'm on the side of a busy street, and not on the edge of a tall cliff, I'm probably better off just taking a small step back to steady myself. In fighting to keep my feet in front of me, I leave my body without support, and end up falling into traffic.

    Third, if I make a habit of putting myself into situations where the slighest loss of balance may result in a life-or-death situation, maybe the gene pool will be better off if I do fall into traffic.

  13. Other applications.... by CodeShark · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I wonder if people get the significance of this, because robotics at it's core isn't always about autonomous arthromorphic creations. Sometime's it's about assistance.

    I recently met an MS sufferer that has been completely confined to a wheelchair for years because the nerves in her legs don't fire properly, even though she has sensation and can tell when she is not balanced.

    So take this so called "robot" technology, and make it something that becomes sort of like a small exo-skeletal muscle system. Call it robotically controlled balance assistance, or whatever you want.

    End result, she's out of the chair. In the real world. Good, no?

    --
    ...Open Source isn't the only answer -- but it's almost always a better value than the alternatives...