Slashdot Mirror


New Wave Power Research Rising Off Oregon Coast

necro81 writes "A prototype buoy has been launched off the Oregon coast to try generating electrical power from the ever-present waves. The OSU device works like a giant shake-up flashlight. It is one of several competing designs to take advantage of a potential clean energy goldmine. It will be years before substantial power is contributed to the grid, but several companies have received permits to develop test platforms. The New York Times has an article that surveys the current outlook for wave energy, which it compares to wind energy's prospects back in the 1980s. Concerns about impacts to wildlife and fishing remain to be answered."

6 of 158 comments (clear)

  1. Sounds good by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Sounds like most of the resistance is from the fishing industry, but since it's not a very well proven technology, I'd say they have a fair point. So the current plan - to do some small proof-of-concept wave farms first - seems just the right thing to do. From the end of the article:

    Philip D. Moeller, a member of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and a supporter of wave and tidal energy projects, said the government was "not allowing these to go into sensitive areas." Mr. Moeller added, "We haven't defined sensitive area, but the point is we'll be cognizant of that."

    He said the commission was encouraging wave energy companies to seek a new five-year "pilot license" the commission has created specifically for wave and tidal energy projects. The license, which could be gained in six months, would let companies set up a short-term wave farm to test technology and demonstrate success to wary investors. If environmental damage became evident, he said, the equipment could be removed from the ocean fairly quickly, something that is far more complicated with dams.

  2. No energy is free by Eddi3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There's no such thing as free energy. What I wonder, is what this is affecting in the long run, and by how much.

    1. Re:No energy is free by LBArrettAnderson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The actual harnessing of the waves probably won't affect much. It would be much worse to create a man-made harbor instead -- all you're doing is breaking down the waves before they break on the beach. The only negative affects would come with giant metal buckets floating in the water with long rods going down to the bottom... some fish might bump their heads...

  3. Re:Laws of Physics by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Couldn't the same be said about all the wind turbines we're setting up stopping/slowing the wind?

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  4. Re:Laws of Physics by charlievarrick · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sure. Covering a substantial quantity of the earth's surface with solar panels would probably have a substantial effect on surface tempurature/weather patterns. So would releasing all the stored carbon energy by lighting everthing on fire.

  5. Re:Environmentalists will shut this down by jcr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Really I don't think the environmentalists (a) believe what they say, and (b) actually want to solve anything.

    There are environmentalists, and there are misanthropes who pretend to be environmentalists. The former are enthusiastic about alternative energy sources. The latter want us all to just freeze in the dark.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."