Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Nokia Claims Ogg Format is "Proprietary"

Posted by Zonk on from the i-do-not-think-that-word-means-what-you-think-it-means dept.

a nona maus writes "Several months ago a workgroup of the W3C decided to include Ogg/Theora+Vorbis as the recommended baseline video codec standard for HTML5, against Apple's aggressive protest. Now, Nokia seems to be seeking a reversal of that decision: they have released a position paper calling Ogg 'proprietary' and citing the importance of DRM support. Nokia has historically responded to questions about Ogg on their internet tablets with strange and inconsistent answers, along with hand waving about their legal department. This latest step is enough to really make you wonder what they are really up to."

10 of 619 comments (clear)

  1. proprietary. by sh3l1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news Microsoft is making claim that odt is proprietary.

    --
    Help Me! I'm trapped in the tubes! Oh noes! Here comes a internet!
  2. Re:Ah, the "Humpty Dumpty" defense by callmetheraven · · Score: 5, Funny

    (1) choose open standard/software
    (2) have your lawyers claim it as your own
    (3) profit!

    Unless you're SCO...

    --
    You can have my SIG when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.
  3. Re:Well, isn't it obvious? by Aehgts · · Score: 5, Funny

    The engineer's mantra: If it aint broke, fix it till it is.

    --
    "If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research, would it?" - Albert Einstein
  4. Re:Well, isn't it obvious? by Dark_Gravity · · Score: 5, Funny

    The fact is MP3 got their first.

    Their first what?

    The suspense is killing me.

    --
    Bring back Sirius Punk!
  5. Re:Well, isn't it obvious? by sjames · · Score: 5, Funny

    If they MUST have DRM, I have a great win-win solution for them.

    They should encode their increadibly valuable content by moving it to the /dev/null 'encoder'. That way, nobody will ever be able to view even a split second of their content without paying and everyone else can be sure that they won't get ripped off with content that won't actually play properly where and when they want it to.

  6. Re:Well, isn't it obvious? by Coryoth · · Score: 5, Funny

    They should encode their increadibly valuable content by moving it to the /dev/null 'encoder'. That way, nobody will ever be able to view even a split second of their content without paying As a side benefit, /dev/null has a truly stunning compression. As long as they use /dev/null they could fit staggering amount of content onto their servers....
    --
    Craft Beer Programming T-shirts
  7. Re:Well, isn't it obvious? by Smidge204 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's also the only compression method that, when compressing RIAA material, actually improves the quality of the recording!

    =Smidge=

  8. Re:Well, isn't it obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just the other day I was compressing Simon and Garfunkel's "The Sounds of Silence" to /dev/null, and it came back much truer to the name than the original.

  9. Re:Well, isn't it obvious? by BeerCur · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just downloaded Microsoft's /dev/null decoder, and it's 8 gigs...

    --
    It's not what your Sig can do for you, but what you can do for your for your Sig.
  10. Re:Well, isn't it obvious? by Verte · · Score: 5, Funny

    Their first ".", which is surprising as MP3 is already 16 years old- but I guess everyone is different.

    --
    We at slashdot are scientists, specialists and kernel hackers. Your FUD will be found out.