Slashdot Mirror


Playing With Atomic Clocks At Home

Wired is running a profile of the Time Nuts, a small group of people who buy surplus precision time equipment — cesium clocks for example — on eBay and keep really accurate time, because they can. The article quotes Tom Van Baak, who has outfitted a time lab superior to those of many small countries: "If you have one clock... you are peaceful and have no worries. If you have two clocks... you start asking, 'What time is it, really?'"

167 comments

  1. Clearly.... by Smidge204 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Some people have too much time on their hands.

    =Smidge=

    1. Re:Clearly.... by Kranfer · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is no time to argue about time, we don't have the time!

      --
      -- Josh
      "Whoopie! Man, that may have been a small one for Neil, but that's a long one for me!" - Pete Conrad
    2. Re:Clearly.... by Foundryman · · Score: 2, Funny

      and "it's ticking away with my sanity...."

    3. Re:Clearly.... by sm62704 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Funny yet insightful! How to mod, how to mod.

      Some people are way too anal. Jees, my ten dollar alarm clock is accurate enough for me, as are the cheap wall clocks, none of which ever differ by more than a minute.

      I have to set my clocks twice a year anyway. I don't have time to worry about what time it is.

      Next on slashdot: Obsessive Compulsive Disorder: Hallmark of the nerd?

      -mcgrew

      -

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    4. Re:Clearly.... by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Years ago, my wife got me an indoor/outdoor thermometer that also included a radio-synced clock that works with WWV. Between that and NTP on my computers, time is kept close enough.

      Besides, the only time that *really* matters down to the minute is when you're trying to record a TV show, and *they* aren't that accurate.

      So it just doesn't matter.

      Makes me think of the line by the disillusioned engineer in Tracy Kidder's "Soul of a New Machine," "I'm going to a commune in Vermont where I don't have to deal with any unit of time shorter than a season."

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    5. Re:Clearly.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > Besides, the only time that *really* matters down to the minute
      > is when you're trying to record a TV show

      Just because you have limited imagination..

      For example, when correlating long-baseline interferometer data
      from amateur radio astronomers there is ABSOLUTELY a requirement
      to have sub-millisecond accuracy.

      And that's just one example from recent experience.

    6. Re:Clearly.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Cannot run out of time. There is infinite time. You are finite. Zathras is finite. This... is wrong tool."

      -- Zathras, Babylon 5.

    7. Re:Clearly.... by haystor · · Score: 1

      Life is very short and there's not time for fussing and fighting my friend.

      --
      t
    8. Re:Clearly.... by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      I always wondered why every major city didnt have a time radio station and everything from watches to computers used it.
      Makes a lot of sense to do it that way.

    9. Re:Clearly.... by wombat_of_doom · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You're drunk!

    10. Re:Clearly.... by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      (But...)

      Does anybody really know what time it is?
      Does anybody really care?

      (that)
      Time has come today! TIME!!

      Ticking away the moments that make up a dull day.

      (even though)
      Time is on my side.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    11. Re:Clearly.... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "This is no time to argue about time, we don't have the time!"

      Hmm.. You're laughing at a Troi quote.... NO SEX FOR YOU!

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    12. Re:Clearly.... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      They already do; many TV stations (mostly PBS stations, although I don't know if they've kept it up) transmitted a timecode signal in their vertical blanking interval. With a properly-designed receiver, you could pick it up and get decently-accurate time out of it. At the very least it was enough to set your VCR, which was basically its purpose.

      Unfortunately most of the VCR manufacturers never implemented it.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    13. Re:Clearly.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If you have one clock... you are peaceful and have no worries. If you have two clocks... you start asking, 'What time is it, really?'
      I heard this as a joke years and years ago:
      Confucius say, "Man with one watch knows what time it is. Man with two is never sure."

    14. Re:Clearly.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, but it was actually Zathras who said that.

    15. Re:Clearly.... by lemonk · · Score: 1

      Even a stopped clock tells the right time twice a day.

      --
      You are only popular on the Internet.
  2. hm. by toQDuj · · Score: 2, Funny

    I like to be REALLY just on time for my meetings...

    --
    Every experiment which ends in a big bang is a good experiment.
    1. Re:hm. by phillips321 · · Score: 1

      it's cool to be late!

    2. Re:hm. by jimmydevice · · Score: 1

      until you get fired

    3. Re:hm. by XHIIHIIHX · · Score: 1

      it's still cool, you're just not late anymore

  3. As Linus might say by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Funny

    Real men just run ntpd and let the whole world keep time for them.

    1. Re:As Linus might say by Bucc5062 · · Score: 1

      Real men just run ntpd and let the whole world keep time for them

      Real geeks just run ntpd and let the whole world keep time for them....better!

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
  4. I'd be scared by DeeQ · · Score: 1

    I'd be too scared what his answer would be if I asked Tom Van Baak what time it is.

    1. Re:I'd be scared by Daimanta · · Score: 1

      That's easy. Ask what time it is. Wait for long explanation.

      Result: It's one hour later!

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    2. Re:I'd be scared by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I just want to know if he can turn the clock Baak.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  5. Stop. by RandoX · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hammer time.

    1. Re:Stop. by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1, Funny

      Please don't hurt him.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    2. Re:Stop. by StarfishOne · · Score: 1

      Pstt! We're not in the 90's anymore! Don't you know your XKCD classics? ;P

      http://xkcd.com/210/

  6. for the official US time.... by cynicsreport · · Score: 1
    --
    - Demosthenes
    cynicsreport.com
    1. Re:for the official US time.... by nicklikesfire · · Score: 1

      Do you ever have time to post on the WIFS boards?

  7. Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...who can have two or more clocks and not constantly ask myself "what time is it?... really?"

    1. Re:Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh man, you're seriously missing out on some crazy femtosecond fun!! (If nanoseconds are more your thing, a few of the guys a coming around for a dual-television-synchronicity party later on.. feel free drop to drop in.)

    2. Re:Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being a slashdot reader, my clock only needs these two readings:

      1) beer-o-clock
      2) infinity (defined as all time before beer-o-clock, "emerge -uND world" completion and the release date of Duke Nukem Forever)

    3. Re:Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every look at a clock, or your watch, then still wonder what time it is? Apparently they have.

  8. NTP pool by tepples · · Score: 1

    Real men just run ntpd and let the whole world keep time for them. Except in democratic America, John Ackerman runs ntpd and keeps time for whole world. (Bottom of page 1.)
    1. Re:NTP pool by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1
      Okay, I just can't figure out what the heck you're talking about. At the bottom of page 1, see:

      Vendor information available

      The new information for vendors page is up! Please let me know if your operating system/appliance/software vendor is using the NTP Pool but isn't using a vendor zone. I follow the link for vendor information and see nothing about this John Ackerman.

    2. Re:NTP pool by tepples · · Score: 1

      At the bottom of page 1, see:

      Vendor information available I apologize for not clarifying that I meant page 1 of The Article, which states the following:

      John Ackerman, an attorney with a technology company, offers super-accurate time over the internet to anyone who wants it, courtesy of four of the most accurate NTP (network time protocol) servers in the world.
  9. really worthwhile? by digitalderbs · · Score: 1

    Keeping accurate clocks synchronized is great and all..that is until accidental light-speed travel makes the whole thing pointless.

  10. As I was reading slashdot dupes one day... by DigitalReverend · · Score: 1

    an article came up about atomic clocks and perfect time and I said...

    Does anybody really know what time it is?
    Does anybody really care?
    If so I can't imagine why
    We've all got enough time to troll....

    My apologies to Chicago.

    --
    I read Slashdot for the headlines, because the headlines, unlike the articles, are usually original and never duplicated
    1. Re:As I was reading slashdot dupes one day... by sjaguar · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the time is either 25 or 6 to 4.

      --
      If at first you don't succeed, call it version 1.0.
  11. Real men... by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 3, Funny

    Real men just run ntpd and let the whole world keep time for them.

    Anyone can make the world keep time for them. Only real men can make the sun keep it for them.
    --
    I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    1. Re:Real men... by Kattspya · · Score: 1

      Chuck Norris?

  12. Q-physics by mach1980 · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you really, really know what time it is. You will find yourself quite lost. Darn that Heisenberg!

    --
    Break the sound barrier - bring the noise.
    1. Re:Q-physics by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      Actually, you'll find yourself with quite indeterminate energy. Somewhere between college senior and Richard Simmons. Those are the two recognized physical limits on human energy states.

  13. According... by boris_the_hacker · · Score: 1

    ... to my watch I do have time to respond.

    However, according to my computer I don't.

    Interestingly, my boss concurs with my computer.

    --
    chris at darkrock dot co dot uk
    http colon slash slash www dot darkrock dot co dot uk
  14. Einstein says by pinguwin · · Score: 0

    Maybe they drive the clock around the block for a while trying to see if they relativistic time effects like Hafele and Keating http://www.teslaphysics.com/Chapters/Chapter030-H-K.htm

    Summary of article: Synchronize two atomic clocks and fly one clock around world in jet and see if it differs from a clock at "rest" on the ground.

    They did see if they could alter the clocks by gravity, motion is another way.

  15. How long... by Tongsy · · Score: 1

    until they are thrown in prison for being terrorists because they have these clocks and are accused of trying to make dirty bombs from them?

  16. See Time Fly by Dareth · · Score: 2, Funny

    I always said it was fun to throw a clock out a high window so you could see time fly!

    One must much more careful with these new atomic clocks. After time flies, they explode and destroy whole cities!

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
    1. Re:See Time Fly by Yetihehe · · Score: 1

      "You must be carefull only of those civilizations whose clocks count to zero."

      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
    2. Re:See Time Fly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And like a practiced golfer, the time aficiando will shout: "TIME OUT!"

  17. First post by carpe_noctem · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is really the first post; your clocks just don't agree with mine.

    --
    "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
    1. Re:First post by riffzifnab · · Score: 1

      You want a fight? Don't make me clock you.

    2. Re:First post by jasonwea · · Score: 1

      First posts do not work that way!

  18. what time is it really ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    >>>> If you have two clocks... you start asking, 'What time is it, really?'"

    Time to buy a 3rd clock? :)

  19. Radio Controlled clocks would do by Jameson+Burt · · Score: 2, Funny

    Radio controlled clocks are sometimes called atomic clocks because their underlying time resides in a Colorado atomic clock.
    These clocks give accuracy within a second as does the ntpd daemon on Unix computers.
    The world seems in balance when you set 3 radio controlled clocks in front of your computer,
    then watch all four with the same hour, the same minute, count the same seconds.
    You shouldn't tell your clock the time -- your clock should tell you the time,
    which radio controlled clocks and computers running ntp do tell.

    Frustrated by clocks throughout my home with different times,
    advanced by my wife to advance me, one clock advanced by 3 hours;
    I got 7 radio controlled clocks which she cannot set because they set themselves.
    Additionally, they give the day of week (Wednesday) and the date (December 11).

    I first saw a radio controlled clock in 1992 while in Germany -- a $200 clock made by Jungans.
    Several internet companies which mainly sell weather equipment also sell radio controlled clocks.
    I purchased 7 of these made by Lacrosse, which can have a big LCD and can cost as little as $10 (US).

    1. Re:Radio Controlled clocks would do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Additionally, they give the day of week (Wednesday) and the date (December 11)

      Might wanna check dem clocks.

    2. Re:Radio Controlled clocks would do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a radio controlled solar powered watch. It's awesome.

    3. Re:Radio Controlled clocks would do by FudRucker · · Score: 1

      umm, this is Tuesday December 11, 2007

      HappyTrails:)

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    4. Re:Radio Controlled clocks would do by codeButcher · · Score: 1

      On the subject of german radio clocks: A well-meaning, elderly german friend or relative of my mother once sent her a radio clock as a christmas present. Since you have to be within about 2000km of Frankfurt/Main to receive the signal, and since it would not run without at least a first boot-up signal, this was not a very practical present, seeing that my mom lives in South Africa. I think she sent it back to someone else the following xmas.

      I wouldn't mind a clock though that picks up its signal from the GPS satellites. Or Galileo, once it becomes operational, but probably not both, since which one is correct? ;-)

      --
      Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    5. Re:Radio Controlled clocks would do by the_other_chewey · · Score: 1

      On the subject of german radio clocks: [...] you have to be within about 2000km of Frankfurt/Main to receive the signal

      It's a bit off Frankfurt actually, in Mainflingen, here's google maps' aerial view of the facility.

      The signal that's broadcast from there is generated in Braunschweig by the PTB (the german counterpart to the NIST, sort of) using a couple of different technolgy caesium clocks. (wikipedia about the system).

      Its range is very impressive, and even intercontinental reception can happen when all conditions (weather etc.) are just right, synchronisations as far as in Canada, the US and the Sahara have been reported. That's very rare though.

    6. Re:Radio Controlled clocks would do by RockedMan40 · · Score: 2, Funny

      His wife must have /.'ed him already........

  20. Please read the article by fishdan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Your missing out if you only skimmed the article. Make sure you find this gem:

    When the family returned to the suburbs two days later, the cesium clocks were off by the precise amount relativity predicted. He and his family had lived just a little more life than the neighbors.

    An amazing PROOF that time is actually affected by gravity. We still know so little (ahem) relatively about time in physics, that seeing evidence of it being manipulated in this manner is awesome. will there be giant contained gravity wells in ambulances to slow time while patients are rushed to the hospital? Will I be slowing down time so I can get First Post AND spell check? The possibilities are endless!

    --
    Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm
    1. Re:Please read the article by Domstersch · · Score: 1

      Uh, gravity? I think you mean velocity.

      --
      =w=
    2. Re:Please read the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      >>Will I be slowing down time so I can get First Post AND spell check?

      I'll give you benefit of the doubt that you put that line in AND then deliberately misspelt the first word in your post. So assuming that -- bravo! You rarely see that sort of self-aware irony.

      You're totally right though about the relativity stuff. Amazing

    3. Re:Please read the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he means gravity. Learn your relativity, and RTFA.

    4. Re:Please read the article by Atti+K. · · Score: 1

      Uh, yes, gravity.

      --
      .sig: No such file or directory
    5. Re:Please read the article by brunes69 · · Score: 3, Informative

      You do know that they proved this like 60 years ago right, when the first Atomic clocks were produced.... In addition there is an atomic clock on the shuttle. The time difference between it and it's perfectly synchronized counterpart on earth is very visible.

    6. Re:Please read the article by ari_j · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, anyone with a cesium clock at home lives just a little more life than his neighbors.

    7. Re:Please read the article by Foundryman · · Score: 1

      No, no, no...it's not enough to have a cesium clock at home. You have to take it on vacations and family outings in order to live a little more than your neighbors!

    8. Re:Please read the article by sg3000 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      > You do know that they proved this like 60 years ago right

      Yeah, but what made it cool was that the experiment could be repeated by a regular guy with surplus stuff from Ebay.

      "If you have one clock ... you are peaceful and have no worries," says Van Baak... "If you have two clocks ... you start asking, 'What time is it, really?'"

      Well, maybe not a regular guy, but you get the idea.
      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    9. Re:Please read the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he was talking about YOU when he said please read the article

    10. Re:Please read the article by Domstersch · · Score: 1

      OK, looks like I underestimated the effect of gravitational dilation (general relativity, if you like) versus ordinary old velocity dilation (special relativity). Gravitational dilation would certainly play a part. Although, I'm not convinced most of the 22 nanoseconds was due to it.

      In the famous clocks-in-jetplanes example, velocity accounted for about 10% of the dilation. But in this case we have 3 hours at 30m/s, versus 48 hours at 4000m. Anyone want to take a guess at the relative (heh) effects of each?

      --
      =w=
    11. Re:Please read the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learn your special relativity, not just general. OK? Thanks.

    12. Re:Please read the article by Atti+K. · · Score: 1

      Any physicists around? :)

      --
      .sig: No such file or directory
    13. Re:Please read the article by ari_j · · Score: 1

      I took my cesium clock to the park once. It wouldn't fetch crap.

    14. Re:Please read the article by leapsecond · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good question about the 22 ns. Unlike the airplane experiments, because the van traveled slowly (60 mph max) and only for a few hours getting to and from the mountain, the relativistic effect due to velocity alone would be about 0.05 ns, or 50 picoseconds. Too small to worry about.

      The dominate effect for this experiment, since the van and clocks just sat still a mile-high for the weekend, is the gravitational relativistic effect. The GR time dilation rate is approximately gh/cc, which for an elevation gain of 1340 meters and a stay of 42 hours, comes to about 22 nanoseconds.

      More info on the trip is at http://www.leapsecond.com/great2005/

    15. Re:Please read the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wouldn't fetch crap.
      you wouldn't want it to. My dog fetches crap all the time. Trust me, you don't want that licking your face.

  21. I don't get it. by jbarr · · Score: 1

    What's the fascination with uber-accuracy at home? Hell, I'm perfectly content with "about" accurate stuff. Kinda reminds me of weather forecasts. I remember when the weather forecast was "High in the upper 60's". If it was 46 or 70, no one complained. Now, it's "High today is 72" and people bitch when it reaches a sweltering 73.

    For many services and uses, highly-accurate clocks have their place, but for every-day home use?

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    1. Re:I don't get it. by jbarr · · Score: 1

      If it was 46 or 70, no one complained.

      Oops, that should have been "66", not "46".
      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    2. Re:I don't get it. by Alioth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's a hobby. Some people like to ride, say, horses for a hobby. Not terribly useful now everyone has cars. What's the use? The use is that someone enjoys doing it. Like the horse rider, the time keeping hobbyist enjoys tinkering with highly accurate time pieces.

      If you have to question why people have hobbies you don't find interesting, you're amazingly lacking in imagination.

    3. Re:I don't get it. by Magada · · Score: 1

      Maybe he meant practical uses? Like, say, crypto? Say there's a universally accessible source of noise (such as background microwave radiation) which both Bob and Alice sample and digitize at a given rate starting from an "offset" in time known only to the both of them. They now have an arbitrarily long one-time pad at their disposal!

      --
      Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
    4. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wouldn't say that if you rode the bus and lived someplace where it got cold.

      The bus company here uses the time from WWVB; it's the time posted in their offices, the time their drivers are required to keep while on-route, and the time displayed by the radio-controlled clock on many of their busses. If I also keep that time, and live near a time point on the route, I can avoid several minutes of standing outside in the weather without fear of missing the bus. I could probably stand a few seconds of drift, but I need accuracy well within a minute for this system to be reliable.

      Other synchronization events come to mind as well -- I'd like my DVR to begin and end recording when the show actually starts and stops, but my DVR can't actually tell one show from another, so I use the published schedule of shows instead, which again requires that both my clock and the one at some distant location I don't control (i.e. the TV broadcaster) are keeping the same time. This system is even less forgiving for drift, anything more than about a second could get annoying very quickly.

      I'm sure I could come up with other uses for second-or-better accurate time in your home, which you can't get from a battery-powered quartz clock. Not to mention some people just like playing with clocks, much like woodworking or futzing with computers.

    5. Re:I don't get it. by lazarusdishwasher · · Score: 1

      Hell, I'm perfectly content with "about" accurate stuff.
      Have you tried kde then? I would suggest setting your clock type to fuzzy.
      http://docs.kde.org/stable/en/kdebase/kicker/clock-applet.html
    6. Re:I don't get it. by jbarr · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'll grant you the hobby aspect of it--that certainly cannot be denied. Were it not for dedicated hobbyists, many innovations and inventions would never have seen the light of day. It just seems to me that so many things are becoming so tuned to such fine-grained timings, and people are becoming more and more dependent upon these things that they miss the larger picture, and become helpless when something in such a fine-tuned system goes awry.

      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    7. Re:I don't get it. by jbarr · · Score: 1

      Great examples! I used to live and commute in Chicago, so I do understand the importance for good timing. I guess I'm just saying that when the timing runs our lives, we tend to miss what's really important, and become helpless when the timing gets messed up.

      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    8. Re:I don't get it. by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

      In an old movie, a bunch of prisoners were sitting around when the new guy asks, "Hey, what time is it?" and one of the old guys says, "Oh, about 1793".

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    9. Re:I don't get it. by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Other synchronization events come to mind as well -- I'd like my DVR to begin and end recording when the show actually starts and stops, but my DVR can't actually tell one show from another, so I use the published schedule of shows instead, which again requires that both my clock and the one at some distant location I don't control (i.e. the TV broadcaster) are keeping the same time. This system is even less forgiving for drift, anything more than about a second could get annoying very quickly. Really? I'd like my DVR to begin and end recording about 3 to 5 seconds earlier than the time kept by the cable box, because if it tries to change the channel precisely on time and both units keep the exact same time, the channel change will fail. The possible failure states are (a) that it will fail to change to the new channel, staying on the old one, (b) change to the wrong channel as some of the leading digits get discarded, (c) the box crashes, reboots, and remains in an off state where it won't respond to any signals other than power, or (d) the box locks up entirely displaying not the time (indicating a reset) but the last channel it successfully tuned, and displaying a static image, possibly black, until I notice that it isn't changing channels anymore and I have to turn it off and back on. Or some combination thereof.

      It's a race condition where updated guide data appearing on the cable box's banner (displayed because you started a channel change) throws out the user's entered channel number digits. It's only tripped up by third party DVRs controlling the box that keep the same time to the second, as humans aren't that precise and can recognize and correct for the error. And since the cable company has their own DVR service they want to rent to you, that's a big disincentive on fixing it (even though they charge the same amount for DVR boxes as they do tuner boxes).

      Damn you, Time Warner Cable and your Mystro beta software! I can't use my Series1 TiVos nor TiVo Suggestions on them or Series2 boxes in conjunction with your cable boxes anymore!
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    10. Re:I don't get it. by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 3, Informative

      What's the fascination with uber-accuracy at home?

      They are calling these "clocks" only because that is what the typical reader understands. A better term is "frequency standard". There are many uses for a stable frequency, the most common one is running a microwave transmitter. This is the major source of the surplus devices too, from cell towers. As the phone companies modernize equipment these "clocks" find their way to eBay and then into people's houses.

    11. Re:I don't get it. by Stefanwulf · · Score: 1

      The bus company here uses the time from WWVB; it's the time posted in their offices, the time their drivers are required to keep while on-route, and the time displayed by the radio-controlled clock on many of their busses.
      The Chicago bus system is reliable to within a minute of posted times? How do they compensate for changes in traffic? I can recall the days not long ago when DC's rail was that precise, but now they're delayed as often as not, and with the buses you're looking at a 10-15 minute window even on the reliable routes.
  22. The true obssessive by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny
    I would bet money that at least one of these guys adjusts for the speed of light between his eyes and the average viewing distance to his clock.

    I would also venture to guess that he has no girlfriend.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:The true obssessive by vadim_t · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, at least the one mentioned in the article reproduced already.

      Maybe this is what geeks should do. Pretend to be normal people for a few months, get married, have children, and THEN fill the house with strange hardware.

    2. Re:The true obssessive by BlueParrot · · Score: 1

      What is this about geeks not having girlfriends? I've had plenty of girlfriends... boyfriends too for that matter, and I'm about as geeky as it gets (For my desktop background I made an in my opinion artistic SVG diagram of U-235 and U-238 fission cross-sections plotted against incident neutron energy, I think that qualifies...)

      So I'd say that joke is thoroughly debunked, unless you somehow come claim boyfriend - girlfriend interaction causes destructive interference... Hmm, thinking about it, that is probably true...

  23. In the news by nerdyalien · · Score: 0

    Today, major swiss watch manufacturers declared they will be out of business in another decade as the atomic clocks will become the mainstream user friendly wrist watches.... ohh wait... aren't we too late to issue this news.. hold on..

  24. got a shorwave reciever? by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    you can hear NIST's WWV transmitters on 2.5, 5, 10, 15 & 20 megahertz AM (amplitude modulation), i set the clocks with my shortwave radio...

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  25. Are you a bot ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /me Looks at TFA then looks at Jameson Burts post full of quotes

    Dude, are you a bot ?
    You sure have a weird posting history of "poetic" quotes from the articles.

  26. Confucius says..... by deep_creek · · Score: 1

    Confucius says.....

    "man with one watch always know exactly what time it is....man with two watches never quite sure."

    1. Re:Confucius says..... by jon287 · · Score: 1

      "man with one watch always know exactly what time it is....man with two watches never quite sure."

      Man with three take average, have smaller margin of error.
      --
      To boldly use to and too two times and get it right too! They're not gonna believe their eyes when they see it there!
  27. Half way solution: GPS by FridayBob · · Score: 4, Informative

    NTPD isn't good enough for me -- bad weather on the Internet has caused my server to loose synchronization one too many times, which can be mighty irritating when comparing your log files with those of other systems. On the other hand, acquiring an atomic clock seems a bit over the top to me. So, I figured a good compromise solution would be to connect a GPS receiver to my serial port and synchronize NTPD to that. I've ordered a Garmin GPS 18 OEM LVC that I will receive later this month (hopefully). According to these instructions it's not that difficult to set up, while the result is microsecond precision on Linux 2.6 and nanosecond precision on BSD -- good enough for me. All you need to do is to make sure that your GPS device has a reasonable view of the sky.

    1. Re:Half way solution: GPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Replace 'reasonable view' with 'is outside, on the roof, in the countryside'.

      The receiver on those GPS18's sucks.. outside my house even my N95 can see 3 satellites and the average TomTom has a perfect lock.. the GPS18 refuses to lock at all.

    2. Re:Half way solution: GPS by elysium-os · · Score: 1

      Okay first of all I am **NOT** some time freak but...

      The latency on the USB bus is so bad that you get a better time using NTPD, even when using a server on the other side of the world!

      But it does have a better nerd factor so good luck!

      Marcel

    3. Re:Half way solution: GPS by wed128 · · Score: 1

      not to mention NMEA 0183 is specced to 4800 baud rs232!

    4. Re:Half way solution: GPS by SevenHands · · Score: 1

      Unfortuntaely some of us still live in our parents' basement thus barring us from ever seeing the light of day, much less a clear view of the sky.

    5. Re:Half way solution: GPS by FridayBob · · Score: 1

      The latency on the USB bus is so bad...
      Who said anything about a USB version? I've ordered the LVS version and mean to attach it to the serial port using some simple electronics and a small power supply. The only thing I might want to use the USB bus for is as an alternative power source, as the linked article suggests.
    6. Re:Half way solution: GPS by dino2gnt · · Score: 1

      That's why you should run a local ntpd server and sync your machines to it instead of having all your nodes sync to some external ntp source. Sync the master, and let your client machines sync to it.

      --
      Future events such as these may affect you in the future!
    7. Re:Half way solution: GPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either way isn't very good. Unless you buy a better receiver (we use TrueTime) the latency of the NMEA messages will be unpredictable. As the article linked you explains, you need to use the PPS signal to get better than 100 ms accuracy. The PPS is just a clock signal (square wave).

    8. Re:Half way solution: GPS by russotto · · Score: 2, Informative

      With a GPS time source you get the time value (in ASCII) through a serial port, but the synchronization is done through a pulse per second interrupt. So the latency on the serial bus doesn't matter as long as it is significantly less than one second.

    9. Re:Half way solution: GPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      NTPD isn't good enough for me -- bad weather on the Internet has caused my server to loose synchronization one too many times, which can be mighty irritating when comparing your log files with those of other systems.

      How many upstream servers do you sync to? "Bad internet weather" shouldn't desync your NTP server given enough peers to talk to. My local NTP server syncs up to five remote servers spread over three continents, and the only event that my NTP server process noticed was my DSL modem melting down.

      My long-term NTP traffic rate is maybe 1 packet every 5 minutes, so it takes a hella big network disruption to make NTP take notice.

      I've ordered a Garmin GPS 18 OEM LVC that I will receive later this month (hopefully). According to these instructions it's not that difficult to set up, while the result is microsecond precision on Linux 2.6 and nanosecond precision on BSD -- good enough for me. All you need to do is to make sure that your GPS device has a reasonable view of the sky.

      ... and that you have a way of using the GPS18's PPS output to set your clock, because the *ONLY* way you are going to get sub-second accuracy out of your setup is to set your clock as soon as possible after the PPS output goes active. The GPS isn't going to give you any other help, since its NMEA stream only provides time accuracy to one second (or 0.1 second if you get the GPS18 version that gives you five PPS transitions per second). The PPS output is the only authoritative source as to when that second occurs.

    10. Re:Half way solution: GPS by FridayBob · · Score: 1

      That's only a solution for making sure that all the machines on the same local net stay synchronized. What I was referring to is when it becomes necessary to compare one server's log files with those on a remote system, e.g. when troubleshooting SMTP problems. In such cases, an out-of-sync server can easily lead to a wild goose chase.

    11. Re:Half way solution: GPS by Gnavpot · · Score: 1

      That's only a solution for making sure that all the machines on the same local net stay synchronized. What I was referring to is when it becomes necessary to compare one server's log files with those on a remote system, e.g. when troubleshooting SMTP problems. In such cases, an out-of-sync server can easily lead to a wild goose chase.

      Firstly, I think I know the cause of your SMTP problems if you don't have a working Internet connection for ntp.

      Secondly, how long are those outages? Any decent operating system will not only use the ntp data to correct the clock but will also use them to adjust the speed of the system clock (not the hardware clock). This means that it will be able to manage quite well on its own for a long time.

      Several years ago, I tested this. I let a Linux PC adjust the speed of the system clock using ntp data, and then I let the system clock run on its own without any external correction. Over the next two weeks, I never saw an error above 20 milliseconds when making a "read-only" ntp check.
    12. Re:Half way solution: GPS by renoX · · Score: 1

      >which can be mighty irritating when comparing your log files with those of other systems

      Are those other system on the same LAN?
      If yes, synchronise one server (two for redondancy) and use it as the time reference for all your systems..

    13. Re:Half way solution: GPS by FridayBob · · Score: 1

      Are those other system on the same LAN?
      Nope; in that case this wouldn't be an issue. I was referring to remote systems.
    14. Re:Half way solution: GPS by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 1

      NTPD is not good enough? How far off does your system drift after being disconnected from a server? Typically not more than seconds per day. Have you ever lost an Internet connection for more then a day. Even so all your servers would still remain sync'd to each other. I hope you do not have all of your local machines going over the Internet to get time. Set up three or four local machines to be level 3 and then the others sync to those.

    15. Re:Half way solution: GPS by nthomas · · Score: 1

      NTPD isn't good enough for me -- bad weather on the Internet has caused my server to loose synchronization one too many times,

      Your NTP setup is misconfigured if this is the case.

      The NTP daemon has many algorithms built in to measure jitter (how "off" a clock is from what NTP thinks is the realtime) and factors in network delay as well. (Run ntpq -p to see a list of time servers that your NTP client is accessing and their associated jitter/delay/offset values.)

      NTP's primary job is to poll various time servers, figure out which ones are good and use that data to set your clock. This so called "bad weather" you refer to should not be a problem for NTP if it is setup correctly.

      As others have mentioned in this thread, you should set up one or two primary NTP servers that probe external servers (preferably from the pool.) and then have your interval servers probe those site-local time servers.

      Thomas

    16. Re:Half way solution: GPS by Temkin · · Score: 1



      Furthermore, he should be able to "fudge" the stratum of one of his servers to a slightly higher priority so that his entire organization drifts as a whole, rather than each machine independently.

    17. Re:Half way solution: GPS by SeanMon · · Score: 1

      NTPD isn't good enough for me -- bad weather on the Internet has caused my server to loose synchronization one too many times. . . [Using GPS to get the time, all] you need to do is to make sure that your GPS device has a reasonable view of the sky.
      Then you'll have to worry about real bad weather.
      --
      "Scud Storm!" -- Jeremy of PurePwnage.com
    18. Re:Half way solution: GPS by FridayBob · · Score: 1

      NTPD is not good enough? ...
      Usually there's no problem, but a handful of of times in the last six years there has been, and it's the frequency of these errors that I hope to reduce. Of course, I could just be headed for a different set of problems, but we'll see about that when we get there.

      How far off does your system drift after being disconnected from a server? ...
      I can't say for certain, but it is my understanding is that NTPD stops syncing when the time difference becomes greater than five seconds. Perhaps I've just had some really awful motherboard clocks.

      ... all your servers would still remain sync'd to each other. ...
      Obviously. However, it does get irritating when, for example, I'm trying to troubleshoot an SMTP problem between a local server and one of the remote systems that I manage, and my clock turns out to be off.
    19. Re:Half way solution: GPS by FridayBob · · Score: 1

      Your NTP setup is misconfigured if this is the case.
      I don't know about that. I thought my /etc/ntp.conf was okay:

      driftfile /var/lib/ntp/ntp.drift
      statsdir /var/log/ntpstats/
      statistics loopstats peerstats clockstats
      filegen loopstats file loopstats type day enable
      filegen peerstats file peerstats type day enable
      filegen clockstats file clockstats type day enable
      server ntp.xs4all.nl
      server ntp2.xs4all.nl
      server ntp2-3.xs4all.nl
      server ntp2-4.xs4all.nl
      server ntp2.theinternetone.net
      server ntp2d.mcc.ac.uk
      server ntp2c.mcc.ac.uk
      server tock.fh-augsburg.de
      #server ntp1.altarisoluzione.com # Unreliable - jitter too high
      server ntp1.sandvika.net
      server ntp0-rz.rrze.uni-erlangen.de
      server pool.ntp.org
      server pool.ntp.org
      server 127.127.1.0
      fudge 127.127.1.0 stratum 13
      Then again, I could be wrong. Although xs4all.nl is my local ISP, ntpq -p always shows that the system is synchronized to something else. This is my home server that we're talking about, so I don't have the luxury of a second local NTPD. Also, I have an ADSL Internet connection, while my understanding is that NTPD does better with symmetric connections,
  28. Joke's on him by RealGrouchy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sure, he's got all those fancy clocks in his "Time Lab", but they only go forward!

    - RG>

    --
    Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    1. Re:Joke's on him by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Sure, he's got all those fancy clocks in his "Time Lab", but they only go forward!

      He just needs a flux capacitor and a supply of terrorist-grade plutonium.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  29. Does anybody really know what time it is? by LazloToth · · Score: 1

    Does anybody really care? If so I can't imagine why, We've all got time enough to cry . . . . (For all the oldsters out there)

    --


    It's only funny until someone gets hurt. Then, it's hilarious.
  30. If you have one clock... by Le+Marteau · · Score: 1

    If you have one clock... you are peaceful and have no worries. If you have two clocks... you start asking, 'What time is it, really?'"

    What kind of blather is that? Did he read that from a fortune cookie or something? I could almost hear the sound of a gong somewhere.

    If you have one clock, you can't be sure what time it is. If you have two clocks, and they are both within a minute of each other, you can be fairly sure what time it is.

    --
    Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    1. Re:If you have one clock... by El_Smack · · Score: 1

      If you fill your garage with clocks, where will you park the DeLorean? /Get back, Marty //guitar riff goes here

      --


      There are 01 kinds of cars in the world. The General Lee, and everything else.
  31. The real reason by jgoemat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Isn't it obvious? It wasn't relativity, the family lived an extra 22 milliseconds because they drove up a mountain and were closer to God. That's the only logical solution, I can't see this "gravity" you speak of. Every time someone has a problem with time physicists think they can solve it just by throwing a few nanoseconds at it. Ridiculous...

    1. Re:The real reason by timeOday · · Score: 4, Informative

      Isn't it obvious? It wasn't relativity, the family lived an extra 22 milliseconds because they drove up a mountain
      After noticing your comment I read the whole article just because 22 ms sounded like an impossibly large relativistic effect for a car. It was actually 22 nanoseconds. You're off by a factor of a million.
  32. No no no, the saying is... by Relic+of+the+Future · · Score: 5, Informative

    They got the saying all wrong. It goes "A man who wears one watch always knows what time it is; a man who wears two watches is never sure."

    --
    Those who fail to understand communication protocols, are doomed to repeat them over port 80.
  33. If you have one clock... by CSMatt · · Score: 2, Funny

    "If you have one clock... you are peaceful and have no worries. If you have two clocks... you start asking, 'What time is it, really?'" If you have an entire garage of clocks, you can scare the shit out of your teenage neighbor when they all strike 8:00 AM.

    For extra fun, tell him that they are all twenty minutes slow, making him late for school.
  34. Relieving by jockeys · · Score: 1

    to know I'm not the only one who obsesses about this sort of thing. Makes me feel fairly normal for being upset when my watch gains a second every other week and I worry about not being on time.

    --

    In Soviet Russia jokes are formulaic and decidedly non-humorous.
  35. Does anybody really know what time it is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anybody really care?

  36. Keeping time by Venik · · Score: 1

    I found a great alternative to ntpd: I just use my $20 Casio digital watch to set time on all my servers once in a while. Why cares about time anyway? Is it December yet?

  37. Keeping track of time by Device666 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Despite the amount of confusing clocks you might have, a benevolent dictator of time becomes handy: Temps Atomique International (french) abbreviated: TAI. For us mere mortals who use time for civil needs, another timescale is dissiminated, Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). UTC is derived from TAI, but synchronized using leap seconds to UT1, which is based on actual rotations of the earth with respect to the mean sun.

    International Atomic Time (TAI, from the French name ) is a high-precision atomic time standard that tracks proper time on Earth's geoid. It is the principal realisation of Terrestrial Time. As of 2007 TAI is exactly 33 seconds ahead of UTC: 10 seconds' initial difference at the start of 1972, plus 23 leap seconds in UTC since 1972. TAI in this form was synchronised with Universal Time at the beginning of 1958, and the two have drifted apart ever since.

    Accurate time is very important for computer systems/networks. The best way to keep track of time is to install a local timeserver which synchronizes against a reliable public timeserver like pool.ntp.org. The local time server can be used to synchronize other computers you might have.

  38. A cheaper alternative by Hanners1979 · · Score: 1

    Just buy a clock and don't put any batteries in it - It's guaranteed to be 100% accurate two times a day.

    1. Re:A cheaper alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Accuracy and precision - a stopped clock is precisely right twice a day. A clock that runs 5 minutes slow is more accurate than the stopped clock.

  39. How to set? by russotto · · Score: 2, Interesting

    OK, as much fun as it would be to have my own stratum-1 NTP server, how do you (read: some ordinary joe, not a university researcher) synchronize these things to TAI in the first place?

    1. Re:How to set? by msauve · · Score: 1

      The easiest, and most common method, is to lock to GPS. GPS time, like TAI, is not adjusted for leap seconds like UTC. GPS time is 19 seconds behind TAI.

      But note, NTP isn't based on TAI, but on UTC, so a leap second table is required to maintain accurate time. That's the simple explanation. NTP/UTC/leap seconds is more complex in reality.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    2. Re:How to set? by russotto · · Score: 1

      I'm not really worried about the whole-second offsets, they're relatively straightforward. I'm just thinking that as precise as my (wholly hypothetical) atomic clock is, it can't be truly accurate unless I can somehow synchronize it precisely with some equally precise standard. Is GPS (or any reasonable GPS receiver I might lay my hands on) precise enough to synchronize an atomic clock to within that clock's own inherent precision?

  40. 'Time is an illusion... by jackpot777 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...lunch-time doubly so.'

    Ford Prefect. Which is very apt, because today is Mos Def's birthday.

    --
    Shiny. Let's be bad guys...
  41. RC clocks worthless? by reidconti · · Score: 1

    What is with radio controlled clocks? They seem worthless to me. I have an Oregon Scientific one sitting on my desk here that has never seen a time signal. Not here at my desk at the very south tip of the SF Bay, not at my old house 5 miles away, not sitting outside in the driveway or by the window. I've had it in the Seattle area as well, and it has never received a signal there, either.

    Is this whole thing a joke, or do these clocks actually work for some people? I had another one several years ago that also did not work.

    1. Re:RC clocks worthless? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      Yep, I've had several and they've all worked fine. Never lived on the West Coast, though. But I had a Radioshack alarm clock, with an external antenna, that seemed perfectly happy even in central Maine. Maybe the internal antennas on the clocks you're buying aren't very good? Or perhaps there's something generating interference on 660kHz (I think that's the frequency it uses) in your area.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    2. Re:RC clocks worthless? by wumingzi · · Score: 1

      Is this whole thing a joke, or do these clocks actually work for some people? I had another one several years ago that also did not work.

      I have an Oregon Scientific clock which has traveled with me from the South Bay to Seattle to Vancouver, BC and now back to Seattle. It works great and has done its part to keep me on time. As long as you are inside WWVB's footprint and aren't doing wrong things which will mess with longwave propagation (i.e. living in a house which is running unshielded electric motors all day or having a wall of bare monitors), it should work fine.

      I have a tangential story about a roommate with a piece of hardware that messed up all my RF, but it's Not Safe For Slashdot. ;-)

    3. Re:RC clocks worthless? by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      I have had one that didn't work at all, one that worked all the time, and one that was intermittent. With the intermittent one, I actually read the manual, and found that it only tries to sync twice a day, so if you can't get a signal during the couple of minutes that it tries each day, the clock has to wait until the next cycle. Why they built it this way, I don't know, and I doubt that they all work this way, but it took about 3 days for it to get it's first signal.

    4. Re:RC clocks worthless? by Bohiti · · Score: 1

      "I have a tangential story about a roommate with a piece of hardware that messed up all my RF, but it's Not Safe For Slashdot. ;-)" My imagination just imploded.
    5. Re:RC clocks worthless? by Temkin · · Score: 1


      I've owned a Oregon Scientific WWVB clock since the late 90's. Used it both in the SF bay area, and central Texas. Worked fine in both places. It did provide some portable amusement once... It was my one and only visible Y2K bug. It fixed itself the next day. Weird...

      They can be interfered with. They don't like dimmers, touch lamps, and some CFL bulbs.

    6. Re:RC clocks worthless? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      They can be interfered with. They don't like dimmers, touch lamps, and some CFL bulbs.

      The signal that it syncs with is basically an AM radio signal, so anything that that will mess around with AM radio reception will affect the clock. Also, you'll get a better signal at night too. I got one of those clocks, and it wasn't able to sync the day when I put the batteries in, but the next morning it was all synced up.

    7. Re:RC clocks worthless? by tgd · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the desk clocks, but I have a watch that picks up the signal and it rarely has any problems getting resynced.

  42. I threw my atomic alarm clock against the wall... by anandamide · · Score: 1

    Now I have to wear lead pajamas.

  43. Latency doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Latency really doesn't matter as long as you have a good understanding of the sources of delay and can statistically even out variations. NTP is the proof of that. A calibration of the USB solution (or whatever the communication path was) could probably help estimating the delay. The real sources of errors are aging hardware and/or long-term variations in hardware timings due to e.g., surrounding temperature changes.

  44. Stupid wristwatch! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    For example, when correlating long-baseline interferometer data from amateur radio astronomers there is ABSOLUTELY a requirement to have sub-millisecond accuracy.
    Darn! I wondered what I was doing wrong!
    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  45. and voila! by Bananatree3 · · Score: 1

    The next generation of geeks comes! The first guy from Washington took atomic clocks on his family camping trip and showed his children direct evidence of Einsteins Theory of Relativity. If I were growing up and my father showed me this, not to mention other cool time/electronics like this guy has, you can guarantee that I'd be hooked. Not that I'm already hooked by other things, but you get my point.

  46. Relativity is proportional? by WK2 · · Score: 1

    He wanted his children to see that relativity is proportional.

    'nuff said.

    --
    Write your own Choose Your Own Adventure. http://www.freegameengines.org/gamebook-engine/
  47. Life As It Should Be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some (most?) may want to ridicule this person for what they
    see as a meaningless waste of time and resources.

    Actually, this man deserves much applause for he is truly living
    life to the fullest. Our modern age has experienced revolutionary
    scientific developments and only a select few can even comprehend
    let alone participate. This gentleman, in a feat that can be classed
    only as superhuman, is extending his personal horizons well beyond
    the ordinary. The pleasures from such a transcendent vantage can
    only be perpetually edifying and inspiring.

    All of his critics can only slip back into the inane mediocrity of
    television and the movies, for they will know -- and live -- little
    else.

  48. Atomic WHAT?! by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Whew, there's IS an "L" in that word.... was worrying... for a second, or two... tick tock, tick tok...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  49. Re:What time is it? Why, well time for Trumpton!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...Telling the time, steadily, sensibly; telling the time for Trumpton" or if you prefer you might want to ask your girlfriend - What Time Is Love?!?

  50. DIY GPS clocks by wsanders · · Score: 1

    You can buy a cheapo GPS module from Garmin or somebody and then plug into the serial port of your computer. With NTP, presto! Instant GPS time reference anywhere in the world.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
    1. Re:DIY GPS clocks by tylernt · · Score: 1

      True, and that's fine for accuracy within a few seconds. The NMEA data is always streaming through the RS232 lagged a little behind reality though, and there is a fair amount of jitter unless your GPS receiver can skip all the other NMEA sentences and only send the time (i.e., in the time it took to send positional data through the port, the timestamp now coming through is a few hundred milliseconds "old"). To get stratum 0 quality time from GPS, you need a slightly more expensive unit with PPS (Pulse Per Second) output.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
  51. Threat to national security? by Lupu · · Score: 1
    I'm surprised such equipment isn't found as a threat to national security. How can a regular Joe have any use for atomic clocks while they could be used for terrorist applications.

    Shouldn't atoms be regulated or something?

  52. They work fine for me, in Mountain View by wsanders · · Score: 1

    I have two and they work fine for me both in my old house in Mountain View an my new house in Contra Costa.

    They are not totally immune to interference, if all your lights are on dimmers, or they sit right on top of your PC with an open case. But I get a "lock" about 4 out of 5 days.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  53. Seriously, how hard is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOOSE is the opposite of TIGHT
    LOSE is the opposite of FIND (or of WIN)

    Why is this so difficult to get right?

    1. Re:Seriously, how hard is it? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Why is this so difficult to get right?

      Ah doon't noo.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  54. Accurate to the minute by iMachias · · Score: 1

    I have a master clock system at home comprised of a collection of classroom clocks made by the Standard Electric Time Company from before 1950. These clocks are controlled by an electronic master clock from 1989. I couldn't take the drift of the master clock and now have it synchronized with ntpd. So my old classroom clocks are now synchronized to the second, though they only display to the nearest minute (and make a loud audible clunk when they advance to the next minute). I obsess over clocks not on the system (alarm clocks, microwave etc) and make a point of making sure that they advance when the clock system does.

  55. my super-accurate clock by speculatrix · · Score: 1

    I have a clock that I know is absolutely accurate twice a day. Snag is, if I don't put a new battery in it I don't actually know even approximately what the time is!

  56. Why radio clocks only sync up 2 times a day by SomethingOrOther · · Score: 1

    Why they built it this way, I don't know,

    It's cos running the radio recever uses lots of battery power compared to running the clock alone.
    If the clock has its own quartz crystal for local timekeeping, then a 'lock' and resync to the radio time signal twice a day is *more* than enough for a very accurate household clock....

    --
    Anyone quoted by a reporter knows how little they understand
    Don't believe what you read is the truth.
    1. Re:Why radio clocks only sync up 2 times a day by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      I new that the clock kept way better accuracy than necessary. I did not realize that the receiver would take enough power to matter. Thanks for the info.

  57. Kinda like the Open Source community by Britz · · Score: 1

    Some guy playing with clocks making sure everyone else gets a correct time via ntp.

    Some people playing with code making sure everyone has access to good quality free software. I can't code worth sh.., but have been a very grateful (bug reports) and happy Debian user for almost ten years now.

    Just great :-)

  58. Not possible... by msauve · · Score: 1

    TAI itself isn't known until after the fact, since it is an average of multiple national time standards. Even those standards aren't synchronized to within their inherent precision. Different clocks which contribute to TAI can differ from each other in the microsecond range.

    Timing GPS receivers can sync to well under that. NIST has some information on tracability.

    The short answer is that your question was in regard to NTP, and a time server locked to GPS time is considered to be Stratum 1.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law