Slashdot Mirror


Dutch Government Adopts Open Source Software Initiative

christian.einfeldt writes "The Dutch government has set a target date of April 2008 for its agencies to start preferentially using open standards-based software. Organizations in the government will still be able to use proprietary software and formats ... but will have to justify it. A Microsoft Netherlands spokesman claims that Microsoft's Office productivity suite will still be used widely in the Dutch government until April, and that Microsoft Office will comply with the new Dutch rules once Microsoft's so-called "Open Office XML" standard is approved as an international ISO standard in February."

5 of 118 comments (clear)

  1. Open Standards != Open Source by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Let us not confuse the issue. Open Standards are common minimum goal for all advocates of open source software, new comers promoting closed software, free software and new entrants selling software. Let us not play into the hands of advocates of walled gardens, established players desperately clinging to straws by conflating the two. If the public and government officials confuse between the two, the other side can argue against Open Source to defeat Open Standards.

    Supporters of open source should tone down the rhetoric about it and fight for open standards. If open source is better, as they believe, it will win if the playing field is level. What levels the field is open standards. Same is true about the free/paid software issue.

    We should not fall for the well engineered PR spin of conflating these two.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  2. Re:I love it by fjhb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It doesn't matter how "open" OOXML is, or if it'll become an "open standard". The bottom line is, that whatever it becomes, it'll never be a specification of all the secrets that Microsoft Office puts in its file formats. Things like autoSpaceLikeWord95, etc, must remain secrets since their secrecy is the only thing that makes MS-Office worth buying.

  3. Re:mmmm by Skinkie · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was at the commission meeting, lets say the Christian Democrats really don't get what Open Source is. They think in terms of 'Experimental' and 'Gratis'. The other parties understand the concept completely, thank God ;) ODF is the preferred way to go. Open Source should have preference if the software is equal on the requirements. Next to this, software specially made for the government shouldn't be licensed to, but completely owned by the government. This was the procedure but many 'errors' were made at some ministries.

    The Socialist Party wants the cost of a PC split in a software part and a hardware part. This concept of course is the way to go, but I don't see this happen soon.

    Microsoft should not worry at all, since the users in the government use the plug-in at some departments already. I didn't hear anyone mentioning OpenOffice.

    --
    Support Eachother, Copy Dutch Property!
  4. Re:Brazil too, if I recall correctly by tsa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is not about 'MS crap'. This is about open standards. If MS adopts open standards for use in their programs, their software can still be used.

    --

    -- Cheers!

  5. Get the facts ;) by CDR-80 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hi All,
    I attended the conference of ososs.nl (http://www.ososs.nl/, mainly Dutch), which was held the day after the documents passed Dutch parlement. Ososs was set up by the Dutch government and they are co-writes of the document of the Netherlands Economic Affairs Ministry

    To get the facts ;), this is what it boils down to:
    1) Any govenmental agency must by default use solutions and products that use open standards. Only with a very good reason one can choose a closed standards product. If currently a closed standards solution is used, replacing it should be done with an open standards version ("ist" to "soll" situation).
    2) Open-Source products must be considered in any aquisition of new products. It must be weighted on equal terms with closed-source products.
    3) All things being equal, open-source is the preferred choice.
    4) Interoperability, govenmental transparancy and innovation are at least as important as the price of the solution.
    4) There is a deadline of April 2008 to implement the use of Open Document Format for all external communications within all branches of the govenment
    5) All semi-govenmental agencies have until 2011 to implement ODF
    6) The parlement explicitly stated that education must be included in this initiative. Not only for their internal ICT, but as an integral part of education of pupils and students in ICT.
    7) The parlement will keep watching progress being made.

    I personally feel that the most intresting point is not just the points above, but the fact that the govenment is using a top-down approach, which has full support of both the Home office as well as the Economic Affairs Ministry. I feel this is a landslide victory for open standards and open source in the Netherlands.
    Futhermore, I'd like to add that all parties in the parlement, left to right, were in favour of this act; this has not happened in a very long time...