Slashdot Mirror


Black Hole Blasts Neighbor Galaxy with Deadly Jet

butterwise writes to mention that astronomers have, for the first time, witnessed a super-massive black hole hitting a nearby galaxy with a "death-star-like" beam of energy. The story also has a video with simulations, pictures, and explanations. "The 'death star galaxy,' as NASA astronomers called it, could obliterate the atmospheres of planets but also trigger the birth of stars in the wake of its destructive beam. Fortunately, the cosmic violence is a safe distance from our own neck of the cosmos."

48 of 222 comments (clear)

  1. Phew, good job it's far away by Finallyjoined!!! · · Score: 2, Funny

    Imagine that on a Boeing, you wouldn't have to worry about collateral damage, there'd be nothing remotely collateral left :-)

    --
    If I had an Ass, I'd call it Fanny Bottom, then I could slap my Ass; Fanny Bottom, on the Arse.
  2. He Who Smelt It Dealt It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Black hole denies farting; blames it on nearby neutron star.

    1. Re:He Who Smelt It Dealt It by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'd have blamed it on Sirius.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    2. Re:He Who Smelt It Dealt It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd have blamed it on Uranus

    3. Re:He Who Smelt It Dealt It by nofx_3 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Me: "I'm sorry, Anonymous Coward, but astronomers renamed Uranus in 2620 to end that stupid joke once and for all."
      AC: "Oh. What's it called now?"
      Me: "Urectum. Here, let me locate it for you."

      -kap

      --
      Visualize Whirled Peas
    4. Re:He Who Smelt It Dealt It by DeadDecoy · · Score: 4, Funny

      It must've been silent but deadly.

    5. Re:He Who Smelt It Dealt It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd have blamed it on Sirius. Oh sure, the old "blame it on the dogstar" routine.
    6. Re:He Who Smelt It Dealt It by PCM2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Me: "Urectum. Here, let me locate it for you."

      Urectum? From the sound of it, u probably killed em.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  3. One flaw... by downix · · Score: 3, Funny

    When those pesky x-wings fly down and shoot the exhaust vent....

    --
    Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
    1. Re:One flaw... by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dude, it's no bigger than a womprat.. there's no way.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:One flaw... by budgenator · · Score: 2, Informative

      that two meters on the outside could be a whole galaxy on the inside, add in frame-dragging and it would be like shooting a whomp-rat from a billion lightyears away

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  4. The astronomers explained by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Funny

    that they could not nail down the exact nature of the exotic object giving off the deadly beam, but they did offer that "that's no moon"

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  5. Eminent domain... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is what happens when you're not willing to move your galaxy out of the path of a new intergalactic highway. Please don't complain about not knowing about it. The drawings been available in the next galaxy over for ages now.

  6. Old news by jonfr · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is old news, this did happen 1.4 billion years ago.

    1. Re:Old news by shadowbearer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And considering that the major damage to any inhabited planets that may have been there would have been radiation effects, one has to wonder if there's any intelligent species over there digging up 1.4 billion year old, relatively undamaged artifacts on their planets surfaces right now ;)

        (Disclaimer: I'm not saying we've found any here on Earth, just that it's interesting to speculate about)

        We'll never know...

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  7. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by Dachannien · · Score: 5, Funny

    Besides, the ability to blast an entire neighboring galaxy with a gamma ray beam is insignificant compared to the power of the Force.

  8. Won't someone think of the aliens?!! by Mistshadow2k4 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Fortunately, the cosmic violence is a safe distance from our own neck of the cosmos.

    That doesn't help the poor aliens living in that neck of the cosmos, you insensitive clod!

    --
    I dream of a better world... one in which chickens can cross roads without their motives being questioned.
  9. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by Veinor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Yeah, we all know that scientific nomenclature is serious business.

  10. No anomalies detected by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That would indirectly suggest that in this galaxy there was no sufficiently advanced life that would detect, and try to protect itself, or stop, said "death ray".

    Some people believe the universe is chock full of life, but this one is score for the skeptics. I remain a cautious optimist.

    1. Re:No anomalies detected by magarity · · Score: 4, Insightful

      sufficiently advanced life that would detect, and try to protect itself, or stop, said "death ray"
       
      If there's a civilization that can shut down supermassive black holes at will then we'd know about it by now. Either because we're on the menu or we're needed to help clean the sewer mains on the black-hole-shutting-down supership.

    2. Re:No anomalies detected by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Riight. Who says this black hole blasting a galaxy isn't exactly the kind of megaengineering we've been looking for?

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    3. Re:No anomalies detected by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That would indirectly suggest that in this galaxy there was no sufficiently advanced life that would detect, and try to protect itself, or stop, said "death ray".

      Um, dude? That "death ray" has a significant scale relative to the size of a galaxy, all of it traveling at (x-rays, gamma rays) or close to (electrons) the speed of light. For one any species caught in its path wouldn't see it until it hit them, and two even if they knew about the beam it isn't clear that they could do anything about it except hide underground for thousands of years or bug out to another part of the galaxy, which itself would require faster-than-light travel. To actually redirect or shield themselves from the beam at a degree that would be visible in our telescopes would require technology on a scale that we can't even dream of.

      I find it highly odd that you would be skeptical of the existence of life arising elsewhere in the universe (which while we have no idea what exactly it takes, we know is possible because it has happened at least once), because of the apparent lack of faster than light travel (which according to our current theories is impossible) or even more miraculous feats of what amount to complete science fiction. We can't say that it could ever even be theoretically possible to be "sufficiently advanced" to pull off what you propose, much less if humanity could ever attain it.

      Have you seen the Hubble Deep Field? That's an extremely narrow view of the sky, and it's completely stuffed with galaxies. And because this one particular galaxy has not, as far as we can tell, birthed a civilization with Q-like powers, you're questioning whether there could be life anywhere else out there at all? That's literally the oddest form of skepticism I've ever heard.

      Unless this is just dead-pan humor. I'll admit that I have problems detecting it when done with subtlety.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    4. Re:No anomalies detected by graffix_jones · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That deep field photo is humbling beyond words. It really gives you perspective on just how insignificant we are, in the philosophical grand scheme of things.

      To paraphrase Carl Sagan's Contact, if there isn't any intelligent life out there, it sure would be an awful big waste of space.

    5. Re:No anomalies detected by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If there's a civilization that can shut down supermassive black holes at will then we'd know about it by now.

      "If you'd quit giving our transmitters dumb names like "pulsar" and instead listen to the dang things, you might learn a thing or two."

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  11. Real Leap forward: Telescopes by writerjosh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We often take for granted when we see these cool renditions of distant space that these images are only possible when based on the leaps and bounds made with various telescopes over the last 50+ years:

    "Only now by combining the images of radio telescopes, the optical and ultraviolet eyes of Hubble Space Telescope and the Chandra X-ray Observatory, can researchers put together the entire violent story about this intergalactic mugging.

    The coordinated use of such an array of diverse and powerful telescopes is one of the unheralded triumphs of modern physics, Tyson said. "This is an example of the triumph of that exercise." http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2007/12/17/galaxy-black-hole-02.html

    Just the fact that we can observe such a dramatic event is awe-inspiring.

  12. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Funny

    Both are correct as long as you mean kwork as kw-orc. If you mean that like kw-irk, then that's the word quirk, which has a very different meaning.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  13. Wrong, astronomers use fiction all the time ... by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you want to be taken seriously as an astronomer then might I suggest not comparing your research to fictional works

    Your suggestion is laughable, astronomers use fiction all the time. Consider the names of the planets, some constellations, etc. I apologize if you believe in the greek/roman gods, you have to consider that most of us consider them fictional. ;-)

    1. Re:Wrong, astronomers use fiction all the time ... by budgenator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Asimov was asked questions about his fictional work "The Endocrinic Properties of Resublimated Thiotimoline" at the oral defense of PhD thesis.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  14. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have no idea if it's right, but I pronounce it like the name of the Ferengi in Star Trek: Deep Space Nine.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  15. the universe could get caught in a drive-by by mrpeebles · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The space age is great. It lets us all see that we live on the same small world. One that could, in princple, be accidently blown up by a careless, nearby black hole.

  16. Alternative viewpoint. by palegray.net · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you want to relate to the masses, instead of assuming everyone who might be interested in your work has a degree in astrophysics, you might compare your research to fictional works easily recognized in society.

  17. Possible names for the galaxies? by bark76 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Terrence and Phillip?

  18. 1.4 billion light years by ConcreteJungle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The article states: Both galaxies are situated about 1.4 billion light-years away from Earth.

    and then goes on with: The offending galaxy probably began assaulting its companion about 1 million years ago...

    If the distance is 1.4 billion light years, light from the event should be taking that much time to reach us, and something that happened only a million years ago should not be visible yet.

    What am I missing here?

    1. Re:1.4 billion light years by shadowbearer · · Score: 4, Informative

      The collision began about 1.5 billion years ago, about one million years before we observed it. The estimate is based off the two galaxies motion relative to each other.

        It's just imprecise language. :)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    2. Re:1.4 billion light years by budgenator · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm sure what they really meant to say was that the galactic events we are seeing happened 1.4 billion years ago and had been occurring for 1 million years before we noticed it.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    3. Re:1.4 billion light years by Edward+Ka-Spel · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not 1.5 billion, 1.401 billion years ago.

  19. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by Radres · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't try to frighten us with your sorcerer's ways, Dachannien. Your sad devotion to that ancient religion has not helped you complete your Q2 deliverables on time, or given you clairvoyance to know when your boss won't notice that you're reading Slashdot...

  20. Re:WTF ... by CroDragn · · Score: 4, Informative

    You're correct, they can't (though lookup black hole evaporation for a way matter "exits" a black hole w/o actually crossing the event horizon). However, as matter circles the black hole prior to actually falling into it's event horizon it becomes superheated and a great deal of radiation is shot off from both the holes poles prior to the matters actual disappearance into the event horizon.

  21. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by Surlyboi · · Score: 5, Funny

    I find your lack of karma disturbing...

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine...
  22. Radix! by Nyago · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Woah! This is exactly the premise of A. A. Attanasio's Radix! A line of energy from a black hole hits earth (after having passed over countless other worlds) and interferes with its magnetic field, eventually leading to mass mutations. Brilliant book. :D Out of print, though, as far as I can tell. :(

    --
    Reality is fluffy!
  23. That is No Deathray Kids by g16n · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is what happens when a seductive mama galaxy spins in close proximity to an excited papa galaxy.

  24. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well I'm a particle physics professor and the overwhelmingly common pronunciation is 'kwark'. Although I have heard the occasional 'kwork' but only from US people and that only rarely....so now that re-education campaign has worked we just need to get them to pronounce the name of the Z ('zed') boson correctly! :-)

  25. In related news by Falstius · · Score: 2, Funny

    In a speech today, Bush promoted renewed investment in the space agency. "See, we've finally found the WMD and they're in another galaxy, see. It is imperative we develop the technology to impose regime change as quick as possible. 9-11."

  26. Re:Could you imagine ... by callmetheraven · · Score: 2

    No, but I can imagine Beowulff Shaffer flying the Long Shot to go have a look at one.

    --
    You can have my SIG when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.
  27. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by fbjon · · Score: 3, Funny

    On the contrary, the karma-bonus modifiers are strong in this one.

    --
    True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  28. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Don't try to frighten us with your sorcerer's ways, Dachannien. Your sad devotion to that ancient religion has not helped you complete your Q2 deliverables on time, or given you clairvoyance to know when your boss won't notice that you're reading Slashdot..."

    And how is that women are not turned on by statements like that, I'll obviously never know...

    --
    There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
  29. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Funny

    though I don't know how his voice box says it.

    Since hackers got at it, it now pronounces it as 'penis'.

    Who said physics was boring?

  30. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by Chaymus · · Score: 2, Funny

    System 3C321 Major: Stellar Nursery, I am your father....

    Stellar Nursery: NOOOOOO!!!!

    System 3C321 Major: Come to the Event Horizon side, it is your density