Slashdot Mirror


SquirrelMail Repository Poisoned

SkiifGeek writes "Late last week the SquirrelMail team posted information on their site about a compromise to the main download repository for SquirrelMail that resulted in a critical flaw being introduced into two versions of the webmail application (1.4.11 and 1.4.12). After gaining access to the repository through a release maintainer's compromised account (it is believed), the attackers made a slight modification to the release packages, modifying how a PHP global variable was handled. This introduced a remote file inclusion bug — leading to an arbitrary code execution risk on systems running the vulnerable versions of the software. The poisoning was identified by a difference in MD5 signatures for version 1.4.12. Version 1.4.13 is now available."

2 of 182 comments (clear)

  1. Thank Heaven For Open Source by mpapet · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If this were to happen to a proprietary application you wouldn't get an honest answer from the vendor. The bigger the vendor the worse the response.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
  2. Re:You know... by KiloByte · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What's the point? If you download the signatures from the same website as the packages, you won't catch any but most lazy/inept attackers. The ones here were that stupid, but come on, this trick works only once.

    In fact, if an attacker can tamper with the website on any point (including a router/proxy on the way), they can change the md5 whenever they change any other communication if they only care enough. For any resilience, you'd need public key cryptography; but even then you will be only as safe as the least safe private key.

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.