Slashdot Mirror


New York Decision On ODF Vs. OOXML Approaching

christian.einfeldt writes "In August of 2007, the State of New York passed legislation requiring its CIO, Melodie Mayberry-Stewart, to gather information on the advantages and disadvantages of adopting either ODF or OOXML as a document standard, and to report her findings by 15 January 2008. As part of her duties under that legislation, the CIO issued a Request For Public Comment to get feedback on the topic. The deadline for that public comment is 28 December 2007 — so there is still time for the Slashdot crowd to be heard."

6 of 160 comments (clear)

  1. Being Diplomatic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Please folks, if you're going to comment on this issue be polite and don't use form letters. Refer to government open standards, how OOXML isn't a stable standard and is ungoing massive changes at Ecma, that kind of thing.

    Mostly though emphasis on the "polite" part. Imagine how persuasive someone can be when they're not a dick about it and when they just lay out some good clear arguments :)

  2. When is.... by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When is a standard not a standard?

    Perhaps... it's when the company who wrote it won't pass it over to standards bodies.

    Perhaps we ought to have "varying" standards for road design... or we should have ever-changing standards for building construction.

    Considering this is public documents are at stake, it is our history. It is no less important than safety.

    --
  3. Re:Not even Windows users like OOXML by corsec67 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Which version of .doc?
    They are fairly incompatable, and not even Office can open all of the versions correctly:
    95, 2000, XP, 2003?
    There is no "doc" standard, it is just the memory dump of the version of Office, which changes with each release, and that is the problem.

    TXT would indeed be better, if only because it isn't going to change in the future.

    --
    If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
  4. Re:Write! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    what right do you have to complain when you don't get it

    Let's see - the NY taxpayers are already paying this CIO's (probably hefty) salary, and she is supposed to recommend that which is best for her constituents.

    From all the info I've seen regarding the matter, ODF and OOXML are two document standards. One was written by committee and has the support of multiple companies, organizations, and individuals. The other is written by a monopoly and has support of no one except MS and their paid shills.

    The fact is there is absolutely no reason for a government body to go with MS's lock-in format considering the technical merits of both, and most especially the past behavior of MS. OOXML is a pseudo-standard, purposefully obfuscated to keep the MS monopoly gravy-train running smoothly.

    If these government agencies can't start making no-brainer decisions in the interest of their constituents, perhaps it's time that these positions were simply abolished...

  5. Advice on History final by smittyoneeach · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "in other words" is not spelled "another words".
    Grammar on a final examination is as important as grammar in a letter to your congresscritter.
    May your professor mod up your exam score.

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  6. You do by Titoxd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You answered your own question. Standardization does not equal adoption, but the State of New York is asking its CIO which format it should adopt. PDF became popular and a de-facto standard before ISO 32000 was approved, so it is important to note that a government is asking for public comment about which format to implement, regardless of ISO status.