Slashdot Mirror


Is the Dell XPS One Better than the Apple iMac?

An anonymous reader writes "The Apple iMac is probably the standard all-in-one desktop computer. Great operating system, built-in software and design around solid, but pretty normal, hardware guts. According to Walter Mossberg, there's a new kid in town that not only matches it but is 'sightly ahead': the Dell XPS One. His latest review is already causing the usual suspects to weigh in. Mossberg says it is a better machine, but Vista and its built-in software make it inferior than Apple iMac's Leopard and iLife suite. Would you choose the better hardware of the Dell XPS One -which is more expensive- or the elegant design and software of the Apple iMac?"

5 of 627 comments (clear)

  1. Hmm... by pwnies · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't quite understand why they rate the XPS one higher than the iMac.
    First off, let's compare tech specs.

    iMac (Low-end) $1199
    20" wsxga+ screen
    1GB Ram
    250GB HDD
    Dual Layer DVD burner
    ATI Radeon HD 2400XT (128MB)
    802.11n Wireless

    XPS ONE (Low-End) $1399
    20" wsxga+ screen
    2GB Ram
    250GB HDD
    DVD burner Integrated Video
    "WiFi" (doesn't say which)

    Now notice that the only thing the dell beats the mac in is memory. However, for $150 you can upgrade to the same amount when you order an iMac (or get a stick on newegg for half that), and have a machine that still is $50 LESS (and with a real video card, a dual layer burner, and guaranteed 802.11n). Gizmodo also already agreed that Leopard was the better operating system (see the link in the article below the video). So this begs me to ask, why do they consider the more expensive, less equipped, and weaker operating system computer better than the other?

    1. Re:Hmm... by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 5, Informative

      So this begs me to ask, why do they consider the more expensive, less equipped, and weaker operating system computer better than the other?

      The Dell comes with a TV tuner. People who like Dells also like American Idol and Fox news.

    2. Re:Hmm... by stewbacca · · Score: 5, Informative
      From TFA:

      I still recommend the iMac over the XPS One for several reasons other than hardware design.
      Funny how a misleading slashdot summary can make everyone in the thread think that Walt Mossberg is saying the XPS is better than an iMac.
    3. Re:Hmm... by stewbacca · · Score: 4, Informative

      Are you serious? Why would you repeat such myths about the Macbook trackpad, when they have been rebuked a million times just on this site. Not only does the Mac trackpad register taps as clicks, it does double clicks, click and drags, two finger scroll (right and left AND up and down), AND second finger right clicking. Perhaps it doesn't carry over into Windows, but is that really Apple's shortcoming, or Windows (or probably both, since Apple would need to make the driver and Windows would need to support it)? Or maybe it does work in Windows too?

  2. Re:Do some homework by pwnies · · Score: 4, Informative

    First off, I noted that the RAM was less in the Mac. That's why I said that you could upgrade it to an equal amount, and still pay less for the mac.

    Also, "Fear The Clam" already noted my forgetting the TV tuner ( http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=400096&cid=21833078 ), and I noted this. Read others comments before you flame.

    And Integrated Video versus a dedicated graphic card? Please. I just bought a Lenovo X61 with one of intel's latest integrated chips, the Intel GMA X3100 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_GMA#GMA_X3100) and I have trouble playing Counterstrike on it ( i get about 25 fps @ 640x480). Not Counterstrike Source mind you, the original CS from 1999. My old Radeon 9800 out performs it greatly ( 100 fps @ 1280x1024), and that has about one third [270Mhz clock vs 800 Mhz clock] the power of the 2400XT (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_ATI_Graphics_Processing_Units#Radeon_R600_series). Granted CS isn't a full benchmark (and it can't run on a mac) but it at least gives us a basic comparison between the performance of the cards.

    However, yes, the dell does have 200Mhz more. I overlooked that.