Slashdot Mirror


Japanese Government to Regulate Online Communication

Chris Salzberg writes "The Japanese government made major moves this month toward legislating extensive regulation over online communication. In a series of little-publicized meetings, two distinct government ministries pushed ahead with regulation in three major areas of online communication: web content, mobile phone access, and file sharing. Content regulation will cover anything on the web, including personal blogs and web pages. Upcoming mandatory filtering of mobile phone access is targeted at users under age 18, and will cover chat rooms, forums, bulletin boards and social networking services. File sharing legislation will initially target illegal downloads, but, according to critics, may ultimately broaden to include streaming media from sites such as YouTube."

22 of 143 comments (clear)

  1. Before anyone cries censorship by dorpus · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is a way to make up for the deficiencies of Japan's legal system. Under the present system, people can post anonymously online , often through the "2ch" bulletin board, to make up false accusations about others, post their financial and medical records online, their bank account numbers, spew racist rhetoric, make death threats, etc. Japanese courts have shown no interest in enforcing the egregious violations of other people's rights. At present, there is a whole subculture of professional losers, the "NEETs" in their 20s and 30s who live at home with their parents and don't work, who spend their lives posting this stuff on the web.

    1. Re:Before anyone cries censorship by Yvanhoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And this is bad how ?

      Anonymous accusations have no credibility, it would show some maturity in society to just ignore them instead of suing their anonymous authors.

      Anonymous deth threats have no more credibility.

      Racist rethoric is, as far as I know, free speech.

      Posting of financial and medical records are possible only if someone has made a criminal incompetence in a bank or at a medical database. You should sue them instead.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    2. Re:Before anyone cries censorship by bersl2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And this is a better way to fix the system... how? By having Aniue make sure that neither they, nor anybody else, steps out of line? If the judges won't be responsible, why would any other part of the government be?

    3. Re:Before anyone cries censorship by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Anonymous deth threats have no more credibility.
      Tell that to Benazir Bhutto[1].

      [1] Just in case you're American, she was a former prime minister of Pakistan[2]
      [2] It's near India.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:Before anyone cries censorship by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can post anonymously on Slashdot and say 'Lindsay Lohan has an IQ of 74'
      Personally, I'm getting tired of these astroturfers, always spinning the truth to be more favorable for their customer.
      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    5. Re:Before anyone cries censorship by marcello_dl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Besides, people that accept countermeasures acritically can be easily tricked into accepting anything.
      You want to own the internet? first let a bunch of loonies roam it spewing falsehoods and bothering people. I guess many of them could be reported to their ISP and blocked before they learn about anonimity. Then, make some media fuss to augment the perceived scope of their actions, and then, legislate for generic censorship to "save the internet".

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    6. Re:Before anyone cries censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I live on Okinawa, home to the shortest High School school uniform skirts in Japan (and damn proud of it).

      Not a day goes by when I don't see some high school girl's underwear (or more when they don't wear them) just by driving to work.

      The problem lies with the girls themselves, competing to see who has the shortest skirt, loosest *ahem* socks, etc...

      All in all, Japan is not a bad place to live...

    7. Re:Before anyone cries censorship by urcreepyneighbor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      to make up false accusations about others, post their financial and medical records online, their bank account numbers, spew racist rhetoric, make death threats, etc. One of these things isn't like the others! ;)

      How in the bloody hell can you compare spewing racist rhetoric and posting medical records? If someone from the KKK or Kill Whitey wants to blather on and on about the evil black/white race, let him - it's cheap entertainment. No one with a double digit IQ will take them seriously.

      Hell. The Creationist nutjobs are a helluva lot more dangerous than any racist I've come across - but I still would protect their right to make an ass of themselves.
      --
      "The fight for freedom has only just begun." - Geert Wilders
    8. Re:Before anyone cries censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Why don't you try generalizing 100 million people a little more; I don't think you were quite bigoted enough. "Lolicon" is a subset of manga and anime; in no way is your incredibly broad generalization accurate when it comes to the majority of drawn material of any kind. From my experiences in Akihabara, there is no shortage of street performers and costume play cafe advertisers, but certainly no 12-14 year old girls selling photobooks of themselves that I saw in 3 months of near daily visits.

      I'd stop taking everything you hear reported in sensationalist or biased media at face value before you go off Japan-bashing.

    9. Re:Before anyone cries censorship by DrLang21 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes because porn in America doesn't at ALL try to choose women who look younger than their age. You don't see it on the magazine racks, but there's a huge market for "barely 18" pornography websites out there. Don't be fooled, the "barely 18" is just another way to say "I want them younger, but I'de be a terrorist under US law if I said so out loud". The low age of consent in Japan prevents teenagers who have sex with eachother from getting put on child sex offender databases like we have here. Sure Japan isn't the utopian society that many people would like to believe it is, but we arn't doing much better in the good ol USA. And why is it that so many people here seem to think that simplistic drawings and photos of the same thing are on the same pornographic level? There are plenty of fine arts works in small museums out there that are down right pornographic. Yet when we talk about art in a museum, that is somehow different because suddenly people are somehow trying to interpret it.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    10. Re:Before anyone cries censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      First off this is Japan, not the US, so the laws aren't the same, nor is free speech treated the same. Also on this point, don't assume that Japan has as tight of a lock on medical records as the US does.

      I will illustrate with an example.

      I went to the doctor for a cold. Since I am a foreigner, I have to show my Foreigner Registration Card to see the doctor. This card has my work contact information on it. After my visit was over, the doctor contacted my work and told them I had visited and what I was diagnosed with.

      This has happened to other (foreigners) as well. I don't know if the same happens to Japanese people as well. But the point is, don't assume that there is a Japanese HIPPA.

      I am not an expert on the Japanese legal system, but I am quite aware that there are very few lawyers here compared to the US. Don't assume that you could just easily sue someone either. I'm sure its not that easy to do in the US, but I would be greatly surprised if the Japanese system was anything close to the US.

      I guess this whole point has nothing to do with the original topic at hand. Mainly it was to point out that a lot of the comments, not just this poster's, are rather ethnocentric in nature and shouldn't really be modded as insightful, since they are anything but.

    11. Re:Before anyone cries censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you are going to bash Americans, you need to go full-out.

      Tell that to Benazir Bhutto[1].

      [1] Just in case you're American, she was a former prime minister of Pakistan[2]
      [2] It's near India.[3]
      [3] That's in Asia. [4][8]
      [4] East of Europe[5], North of Africa[6]
      [5] You know, England, France[7], etc
      [6] Where Florida hurricanes[11] and black people come from.
      [7] Ballet, Dijon mustard, and ... oh, never mind, the Eiffel Tower.
      [8] Still not getting it? The Eastern hemisphere[9]
      [9] The other side of the world[11] from where you are now[10]
      [10] No, NOT Brazil. The OTHER other side.
      [11] The weather, not the sports team
      [12] Planet Earth, where everyone... oh fuck it.

    12. Re:Before anyone cries censorship by Macka · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Anonymous accusations have no credibility, it would show some maturity in society to just ignore them instead of suing their anonymous authors.
      So if I were to submit a post accusing you of being a pedophile, siting names, dates, times and places of various misdeeds and degenerate behavior; but did so anonymously, then my accusations would have no credibility? It wouldn't matter that I was making it all up. If I sounded convincing enough for people to believe it then I'd be willing to bet you'd soon change your mind when you started receiving your first lot of hate mail and death threats.

      Anonymous deth threats have no more credibility.
      Really? Following on from my previous point; imagine you're now receiving anonymous death threats because someone out there now believes you're a pedophile. Are you going to ignore this and not bother reporting them to the police because they have no credibility? You'd be a bloody fool if you did.

      Racist rethoric is, as far as I know, free speech.
      Not in the UK it's not. You can go to jail for using racist rhetoric to incite racial hatred, and rightly so!

      Posting of financial and medical records are possible only if someone has made a criminal incompetence in a bank or at a medical database. You should sue them instead.
      Really? And what if the person who posted all that information about you got it either by breaking into your house or car, or by sifting through your rubbish? Or perhaps your PC got 0wn3d and hacked because you visited a dodgy web site and you're generally clueless when it comes to system security?

      I find your comments extremely naive.

    13. Re:Before anyone cries censorship by u-235-sentinel · · Score: 2, Interesting


              Anonymous deth threats have no more credibility.

      Tell that to Benazir Bhutto[1].


      You make a compelling argument there. Death (not deth) threats should always be taken seriously regardless if it's anonymous or not. This should have been investigated and the poster taken to the looney house.


      [1] Just in case you're American, she was a former prime minister of Pakistan[2]
      [2] It's near India.


      Thanks for the Geography lesson. Believe it or not, some of us have moved past Geography 101

      I guess American's no longer have the monopoly on arrogance. Pity. It's spreading.

      --
      Has Comcast disconnected your Internet account? Same here. You can read about it at http://comcastissue.blogspot.com
  2. I am going to join by Martian_Kyo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    MIAU just cause of it's name.
    From what I read, I kind of skimmed over the article, this is more of internet regulation law, then internet censorship law. I think some from of such law should exist.

  3. Green grass and fences. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The Japanese government made major moves this month toward legislating extensive regulation over online communication. "

    Hmmm. Is this the point were everyone brags at how much better broadband is overseas?

  4. Advice for all governments by sakdoctor · · Score: 3, Funny

    Use the AskSlashdot section of this site to find out if your hair brained IT scheme is feasible before suggesting it or spending any money on it.

  5. A real life bad example by Freaky+Spook · · Score: 2, Informative


    Just recently in Melbourne a newspaper journalist lifted comments posted on a forum and reported them as fact in a sensationalised article, without confirming or verifying with the authenticity of the comments, when in fact some of the comments on the forum had been made as satire.

    This was then published in Australia's highest selling newspaper.

    People may write unsubstantiated rubbish, but as soon as some lazy journalist finds it and treats it is fact in mainstream media, it can be very damaging for an individual or business.

    1. Re:A real life bad example by TapeCutter · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Just recently in Melbourne a newspaper journalist lifted comments posted on a forum and reported them as fact."

      My guess is it's Andrew Bolt in the Herald-Sun, that guy has perfected willfull ignorance as a political tool.

      In Melbourne there are three commercial TV channels, every night of the week two of them run current affairs style programs that are full of advertorials, miracle cures, and other sensationalist bullshit. They are often the prime targets in "Chaser's war on everything" (also from Melbourne).

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  6. Nonsense. Censorship to close the society. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    "This is a way to make up for the deficiencies of Japan's legal system."

    Nonsense. Dangerous nonsense.

    You don't attack subcultures with censorship. This is about ethnic cleansing before the old guard leaves the Diet. Anyone trying to close a society does the same things, censorship is just one of the steps taken.

    It's part of the Lock Down of Japan that is underway. If you don't believe that, you 1. don't live here and 2. don't understand the xenophobia the government is in the process of stoking up.

    - Fingerprinting (and if you don't give them they are "forcibly" taken, then you are deported... what does "forcibly" mean when the government uses that term?)
    - Random "Gaijin Ca-do Checku" (dirty foriegner passport or residency cards are randomly checked by cops... usually as you're trying to board a train making you late)
    - New Visa rules (which aren't clear)
    - Black vans with police protection broadcasting "Foreigners go home" from loudspeakers waking me up in the morning...

    I'd love to stay... they want everyone non-japanese to leave. And they want all foreign influence and opposition crushed.

  7. However by Blice · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Japanese government will NOT be regulating Gundam content.

  8. Several different issues, no laws yet by Petaris · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I read the article and after you get passed the first part and down to the "steps" listed you will see that there are several different issues here, but no laws (that I can tell).


    1) The web.
    For the web content it looks like they want to be able to filter at will anything the independent body deems "harmful" but don't forget that they will have to prove its harmful and be able to justify their decisions. I am sure that they will see a lot of input from the educational institutions and rights groups on this. One would also note (as did the article) that this doesn't apply to private personal communications (which I take to mean email, chat, voip, etc). And don't forget Japan has a court system too, if this does become law it will see challenges to it. Also this seems to be just a report or recommendation at this point and is not a bill or a law and (according to the article) has not yet been proposed as a bill.


    2) Mobile phone filtering for persons under 18.
    If you read through this it is clear this was enacted because of parents concerns. Though filtering was available before it was not well advertised and very rarely used. This order (the article doesn't say its a law) just requires the filtering to be on by default and the owner of the phone (usually the parents) can request it (the filtering) to be disabled. So if the parent has a problem with there child's mobile web access being filtered they can just request it be turned off.


    3) File Sharing.
    This is at the behest of the RIAJ (Recording Industry Association of Japan). They are just doing the same thing as the RIAA. From my take on the article it looks like they are using the same reasoning and justifications as the RIAA have done, and I doubt they will be anymore successful.


    So from what I can tell there are no laws or proposed bills yet (other then possibly the mobile phone web filtering, anyone know if this is a law or just a decree?) and there are groups out there speaking against them. They are using the public comments system and voicing their opinion. If you are a Japanese citizen or permanent resident and you have a problem with it voice your opinion about it too. But don't claim it to be more then it is. This same stuff has come up in the US before too, remember the war on porn anyone? Just don't forget that there will be plenty of opposition, after all we know what the internet is for. ;)

    --
    ~Petaris "The world is open. Are you?"