Slashdot Mirror


Office 2003 Service Pack Disables Older File Formats

time961 writes "In Service Pack 3 for Office 2003, Microsoft disabled support for many older file formats. If you have old Word, Excel, 1-2-3, Quattro, or Corel Draw documents, watch out! They did this because the old formats are 'less secure', which actually makes some sense, but only if you got the files from some untrustworthy source. Naturally, they did this by default, and then documented a mind-bogglingly complex workaround (KB 938810) rather than providing a user interface for adjusting it, or even a set of awkward 'Do you really want to do this?' dialog boxes to click through. And of course because these are, after all, old file formats ... many users will encounter the problem only months or years after the software change, while groping around in dusty and now-inaccessible archives."

6 of 555 comments (clear)

  1. Easy fix by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 5, Informative

    An easy work-around is to just install Open Office and then open the obsolete files using the appropriate Open Office program (Writer for Word documents, Calc for Excel spreadsheets, etc.). The user can then do a "save as" and select a newer Microsoft file format. Voila. Problem solved.

    Microsoft probably won't like this work-around since a certain percentage of users may realize that they don't need to pay Microsoft for programs that don't do what they want and they can get a suite of programs that does what they want for free. Realizing this, Microsoft may decide to come up with a better internal solution but don't count on it.

    Cheers,
    Dave

    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
    Ben
  2. Mind-bogglingly complex? by Tim+C · · Score: 5, Informative

    I guess the submitter missed the link to an exe you can use to do it for you. I mean, it is buried in the KB article as "Method 1" after all...

  3. Typical MS "Planned Obselescence" by Zymergy · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_obsolescence
    Examples:
    -No DirectX 10.x API for WinXP or Win2k. (The nature of the API to be a higher-level Application Programming Interface, I'd forgive not developing for Win2k as it is no longer for sale, but there's NO good reason to deny the API in WinXP, other than to force clearly Planned Obsolescence)
    -No IE7 for Win2k. (interestingly, Firefox still bests ALL versions of IE..)
    -No Support on your year-old PC for Full Windows Vista use. (Again, why? Even Apple and Linux have pretty eye-candied desktops working on older hardware)
    -No to the Sale of WinXP to OEM (non-Business) customers this month http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/12/microsoft-pulling-oem-windows-xp-next-january/.
    -Etc... (insert your own here)

    I know that in my present line of work, my colleagues and I write meticulous research reports for our multi-million dollar clients.
    Our clients specifically require us to NOT use *any* MS Office 2007 file format; We are to utilize 'not newer than MS Office 2003 format'. (Typically Excel, Access, and Word formats are used).
    Our clients have gone on to clarify, specifically, that the Office 2007 file formats are incompatible with the older MS Office versions and necessitate needless corporate updating for their thousands of internal users, (not to mention the client has decades of reports on file that get updated every 10 to 20 years, often utilizing the original editable report document).

    I too will soon be installing in Open Office very soon. (Hopefully the Excel 2003 formulas and those dating back to Excel 2.0 all work properly in Open Office?)...
    It appears that this "update" is not so much for security or even for ease of development (because it WAS previously WORKING in situ). It stragetically forces users of the older versions of MS Office to update to the new version (or rather adopt the new format) due to interoperability issues.

    If MS Office 2003 did 'it' before and it does not do 'it' now, post-SP3... that is *Intentional*, not "For Your Protection".
    -This would be akin to IE8 not opening 'older' web page formats at all because they used some older and (potentially) unsafe format of html, CSS, Scripting etc.. it deemed unsafe!

  4. Re:Default value goes back pretty far by Angostura · · Score: 4, Informative

    Originally from http://thedailywtf.com/

  5. Re:Default value goes back pretty far by mattpalmer1086 · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is a tool called DROID (Digital Record Object Identification) that will scan a bunch of files and identify the file formats (including the version, not just the mime type).

    It is developed by the Digital Preservation department at the UK National Archives, licensed under a BSD license, and is available from source forge:

    http://droid.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Introduction

  6. Re:Default value goes back pretty far by novakyu · · Score: 4, Informative

    Even a career student shouldn't still be doing their PhD 12 years after they started their undergrad. Are you sure about that?

    Most people already finish their PhD *at least* 9 years after they start undergrad (that's assuming 4 years of undergrad and 5 years of graduate school, which is actually lower than average). And suppose someone graduated from college, spent a few years (2 to 3, maybe?) in the industry, and then decided to go back and earn a PhD (I suppose there are a number of reasons for this, ranging from the PhD being necessary to advancement in career to becoming disinterested in making money and (re-)entering academia). That's easily 12 years, and I didn't have to concoct any unusual scenario like someone waking out of coma after 10 years.

    As for what kind of information one would be looking for ... well, how about the syllabus? The information in that, like which textbook is used in the course and what will be covered, is not available in any commonly-sold textbook. Of course, this doesn't fit with the PhD thesis scenario, but if you just imagine someone staying out of school just a little longer (oh ... 5 to 8 years) and then applying to grad school, you can see how this will be a problem: some grad school applications ask for textbook used in the course (to gauge the level and breadth of the course), and ... guess what, that information is locked away in a "deprecated" file format.