Slashdot Mirror


Dell Launches New UltraSharp 3008WFP 30-Inch LCD

MojoKid writes "Dell has taken the wraps off their new 30" LCD monitor today and launched the UltraSharp 3008WFP. You'll note that there are more than a few upgrades provided with this newer 3008 version. Specifically, the panel now has a 117% color gamut, in addition to having a 3000:1 contrast ratio, versus the 1000:1 performance of its predecessor, the 3007WFP. The panel also comes with the same pixel response time of 8ms but now has enhanced brightness capability at 370 nits. Also, Dell finally saw fit to add significantly more connectivity options to the panel, with not only two DVI-D inputs, but also HDMI, Composite, Component, S-Video and the new DisplayPort interface. In short, anything you could want to hook up now or in the future, can be hooked up to this new Dell 30" panel."

3 of 143 comments (clear)

  1. Re:so, how high? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    With this new monitor, your computer can correctly display many new, previously unaccessible colors, such as bleenish-grue, hooloovoo, ultrabrown, octarine, light black, dark white, and none more black.

  2. Re:OK, now 120Hz? by sexconker · · Score: 5, Informative

    120 HZ is good because of the whole video vs film thing.

    Film (movies) is usually done at 24 fps (23.976).
    Video (tv, some movies) is usually done at 30 fps (29.97).

    So if you've got a 60 Hz display, you're getting 2 frames of display per frame of video.
    With film, half of the frames of film will be displayed for 2 frames, and half will bd displayed for 3 frames.

    This causes a jerky display.

    With a 120 Hz display, each frame of video can be displayed for 4 frames (4 * 30 = 120).
    Each frame of film can be displayed for 5 frames (5 * 24 = 120).

    It also allows us to drive our computers at 120 Hz, which is good if you want to play Quake II.

  3. Re:I'll wait for the behardware review. by Orphaze · · Score: 5, Informative

    Unfortunately, Dell is well known for swapping panels. It's referred to as the Dell Panel Lottery on forums across the internet.

    In short, Dell has been known to swap S-IPS panels (a kind of TFT technology known for particularly accurate color representation) with various other kinds of cheaper panel technologies, all within the same model number. This is why many manufacturers, including Dell, refuse to list what technology they're using in the monitor specs, in order to reserve the right to use whatever cheapest panel they can find as they become available.

    I purchased a Dell 2001FP a few years back that had a genuine S-IPS panel. When it started to have problems (specifically, a piece of tape or insulation began migrating onto the screen underneath the plastic of the panel) they sent me the newer model of the same line. It looked awful in comparison, despite having virtually the same specs. (It was a PVA panel, from what I found out later.) Luckily, after spending 2.5 hours (persistence is key in these situations; eventually it's cheaper to give in than to continue dealing with you) in a chat with a Dell support tech, and her manager, I eventually convinced them to refund my money in its entirety, despite the fact I had purchased the monitor about 5 months ago.

    In any case, it pays to do a fair amount of research on a monitor before making a purchase. In the end, I ended up going with an HP LP2065, another S-IPS based monitor, which I have been very happy with. Things may have improved more recently though, so it may not be such a big deal these days.