Slashdot Mirror


Alienware's Curved Monitor

ViperArrow writes "Alienware has showcased a curved display prototype supporting a resolution of 2880x900, aimed mainly toward gamers, with a refresh rate of .02ms. This 3-foot-wide DLP with LED illumination will be available by the second half of 2008. The monitor is still showing some flaws, but Alienware assures us that these will be gone by release. No price has been revealed as of yet."

5 of 269 comments (clear)

  1. That's a lot of pixels! by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can any graphics card handle the sort of fill rate required from this yet?

  2. Re:Here's a picture... by DaFallus · · Score: 5, Funny

    My bad, I use NoScript and I didn't realize you had to allow scripts to run from 5 different sites to get the pictures/video to load...

    --
    No one cares what your captcha was

    Houston TX, USA
  3. Re:hmm by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Informative

    480 is the number of lines in an NTSC picture. You probably live in an area with a slightly less primitive colour TV encoding. PAL encodes 625 lines, although only 576 are visible. Since PAL picture have 20% more vertical resolution, standard definition TV in the USA and other places which use NTSC looks terrible to someone used to PAL (the colour reproduction is very poor too, leading to claims that it stands for Never The Same Colour). It's probably one of the reasons why HD is doing better in the USA than Europe; the quality difference is much more apparent.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  4. Re:hmm by mrchaotica · · Score: 5, Funny

    What gets me is the "0.02ms refresh" thing.

    Maybe the person who said that used to work for Verizon?

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  5. Can't find the images for the scripts by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Come on, if your site needs to be able to run scripts from:
    1. 2mdn.net
    2. digg.com
    3. doubleclick.net
    4. gawker.com
    5. gizmodo.com
    6. googlesyndication.com
    7. gridskipper.com
    8. quantserve.com
    9. sitemeter.com
    just to convey a one-paragraph story with pictures, there's something seriously wrong with your site design, your privacy practices, and the lack of respect you have for the security of your readers. Sorry, Gizmodo, but your content is not compelling enough for me to drop my shields for all your friends. We are not one big happy fleet.
    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?