Britain Advises Against Vista, Office 2007 for Schools
An anonymous reader writes "The British government's educational IT authority has issued a report advising schools in the country not to upgrade their classroom or office systems to Windows Vista or Office 2007. According to this InformationWeek story, the British Educational Communications and Technology Agency says costs for Vista and Office 2007 'are significant and the benefits remain unclear.' Instead, Becta is advising British schools to take a long look at Linux and open source suites like OpenOffice.org."
Sounds like they are negotiation with Microsoft for cheaper licenses
I don't read replies by ACs.
I fear people like you. Hope you don't ever get near important infrastructure.
Who cares? The above is the wrong question.
Is OOo good enough to do the work that needs doing? Often it is. And for all general classroom work, and all the administrivia associated with keeping a school running, it most assuredly is. I speak as someone who daily handles curricula and "back office support" for classes, who also has a degree in programmer/analyst studies.
Student assignments and administrative tasks are prosaic work; bling actually gets in the way. MS Office 2007 has a lot more bling than MS Office 2003, and oodles more than OOo. That bling is important to all kinds of pimps and advertising firms, but it doesn't add any value to the classroom or school office.
Considering that its long term costs are lower (mostly due to its freedom from enforced upgrade cycles and the lower overheads of maintaining ODF archives), OOo is the natural choice for schools. And also for a lot of businesses that don't need to have the latest in bling in their documents.
Of course the kicker is that for less than 15USD, we can provide each student with a USB flash drive loaded with their own customizable copy of Portable Apps OOo, and they can learn to manage their home work with 21st century workflow concepts.
That is priceless.