Slashdot Mirror
Air Pollution Causes Sperm Mutations In Mice
Reservoir Hill writes "Epidemiological studies in humans have suggested a link between air pollution and reduced male fertility, but such studies are often confounded by other lifestyle differences such as diet, genetic background, and economic class. Now a study of mice, reared in cages kept in a shed downwind of two steel mills and a busy highway in a Canadian city, showed a host of genetic changes compared to similarly housed mice breathing filtered air. DNA in the sperm of the mice in the polluted area contained 60% more mutations, had more strand breaks, and had more bases that had been chemically modified via the addition of a methyl group. Precisely how the pollution caused the DNA damage remains unclear but changes may be a more general response to particulate pollution. 'It's important to move this forward to the next step: determining whether there are any human corollaries to this,' says Jonathan Samet, an epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins University."
The sperm mutations aren't only in *mice*.
And no, I don't want to talk about it.
I, for one, welcome our new mutant Canadian mice overlords.
You just got troll'd!
How does the sperm get INTO the mice? I mean, science for science's sake, but wtf.. that's sick!
First, a grain of salt. There hardly seems to be anything that doesn't screw mice up. Their physiology is extremely fragile compared to that of humans.
But this seems like a pretty significant argument to take pollution seriously. Perhaps some of the methylation sites in particular will have human analogues that can be easily tested for (though, too, at least from the nutrient studies I've read, mice seem to be ridiculously sensitive to methylation).
I think there'll be lots and lots and lots of things about the 19th-20th centuries that we'll feel really stupid about having done, once we figure out what they do to biological systems.
How exactly did they harvest the ...erm... samples?
Seven Days with Ubuntu Unity
As is mentioned in the article, I would take the wild guess that one of the culprits in this situation is probably the collection of good old reactive oxygen species--hydroxyl radicals from peroxides formed via enzymatic transformation of superoxide ions, for instance. Naturally, the guess is worthless without being tested and proven. However, increased free radical production is fairly well implicated in similar DNA damage (base damage, double and single strand breaks, etc.) due to some types of ionizing radiation. You can show that cells in a high-oxygen environment will "respond better" (i.e. be more likely to be "killed" (i.e. transformed in a way that makes them not reproduce)) upon low-LET radiation exposure compared to cells that are poorly oxygenated. This implicates oxygen (and, eventually, reactive oxygen species) as a _partial_ explanation for DNA damage due to ionizing radiation. (This happens to be important when you consider that cells that are closer to the centers of some tumors are poorly oxygenated--not enough that they necessarily die, but enough so that they are not as easily killed as those cells on the periphery.) Similar damage might be caused by similar chemical, if not physical, processes, but my speculation is just that: speculation.
It bears mentioning, though, that much like the picture for radiation, it is just about certain that there is more to the story than just oxygenation. High LET radiation (think alpha particles compared to, say, low-energy x-rays) cause damage that is virtually unaffected by oxygen concentration, so we know there's more to the story.
Given how relatively poorly understood are the biological changes due to ionizing radiation, it's a little surprising to me, at least, that we don't know more about the mechanistics of damage due to "pollution." Many, many more people deal with high doses of pollution than deal with high doses of radiation, and it's a lot easier (usually) to control who gets the radiation as opposed to who breathes in the pollution. Anyhow, I suppose what I'm saying is that it shouldn't be surprising that ROS-es might be fingered as _a_ cause, but it'd be shortsighted to think of them as the only cause--not that it seems that's happened here, fortunately.
Well, step aside my friend
I've been doing it for years
I say, sit on down, open your eyes
And open up your ears
Say
Put a tree in your butt
Put a bumblebee in your butt
Put a clock in your butt
Put a big rock in your butt
Put some fleas in your butt
Start to sneeze in your butt
Put a tin can in your butt
Put a little tiny man in your butt
Put a light in your butt
Make it bright in your butt
Put a TV in your butt
Put me in your butt
Everybody say
I, hey, that's, man, I ain't putting no trees in nobody's butt,
no bees in nobody's butt, putting nothing--
You must be out your mind, man,
y'all get paid for doing this?
Cause y'all gotta get some kind of money
Cause this don't sound like the kind of--
I'd rather golf, to be perfectly honest,
than put somethin in somebody's butt
to be truthful
Well step aside my friend and let me
show you how you do it
When big bad E just rock rock to it
Put a metal case in your butt
Put her face in your butt
Put a frown in your butt
Put a clown in your butt
Sit on down in your butt
Put a boat in your butt
Put a moat in your butt
Put a mink coat in your butt
Put everything in your butt
Just start to sing about your butt
Feels real good
Though it's pretty much automatic to exclude it presently out of scientific habit in our concepts of hereditability (like the summary seems to), don't forget epigenetics now tells us we have "mutated", "unmutated", and... "other", in terms of things that cause particular effects via descent.
Personally, I find it rather fascinating to be at the point of genetics that we can be mapping such subtle causal relationships, genetic and environmental.
Also interesting to me, as a side thought-experiment, is it appears that within epigenetics, Lamarck and certain Catholic literalisms (for those so inclined) are making something of a "comeback".
~ Whence do you come, slayer of men, or where are you going, conqueror of space?
Where do I sign up for the human studies? Can I choose to be housed in the filtered air cabin?
Not that I would be adverse to living in a smoggy hell-hole - so long as they pay for room & board and "collect" my sperm on a regular basis.
Just -1, Troll talking to another.
it mad my mouse smartur for a littul bit but...
Say you have a contaminant in the environment that is currently dangerous to the way the system (ie the mouse) works. That means you want to change the system, in order to compensate for the changed environment. So you induce random changes in the sperm and see which baby survives.
In other words : the system works. Hoorray ! Perhaps it does the same in humans.
Isn't this therefore perfectly normal ? Or are you all believers in intelligent design ? This is a good thing, and regardless, we can't stop it (and we shouldn't try).
This is quite disturbing! This just proves that in a few years all our children will be mutant mice!
lol: You see no door there!
It isn't pollution that's harming sperm. It's the impurities in our air and water that are doing it!
The grass is always greener on the other side of the light cone.
I mean, it's a mouse. What did they use? A tiny version of the device they use on prize bulls and horses?
This got to be one in the top ten lousiest jobs ever: mouse sperm gatherer
I wonder how this news matters to the nerd crowd on slashdot. O wait, maybe the sperm changes to have some flying ability. Coupled with some homing ability. Now, THAT might be news.
I just saw the movie Children of Men the other day, for those that don't know, it takes place about 20 years in the future where a baby has not been born in over 18 years. No one knows why everyone is infertile but one of the many theories was air pollution! Seems like an interesting coincidence.
Reviewing just the first hour of video games.
I guess the eulogy for that mouse was: he died because he had the cojones
This is great news for Congressman "Smoky Joe" Barton's friends at the smelter upwind of Dallas. Next time they get hauled before the clean air folks, they can just say "We're not generating air pollution! We're controlling Dallas' rodent population!"
Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
It's worth noting that they have yet to find any evidence of negative effects. Odds are high, given the content and packaging of sperm, that there will be serious detrimental effects, but as of yet they have proven no such thing. Also, humans are vastly larger creatures than mice, so it is quite feasible that the causal agents can be in far less concentration by the time they reach our bits.
Besides, 60% could easily be 16 mutations instead of 10.
I live in constant fear of the Coming of the Red Spiders.
Is this how the Biker Mice From Mars came about? I mean if they had pollution-mutated sperm and were created that way.....thats depressing. Should have called them "Biker Mice from a little shed downwind of the factory"
We're in college now. There's girls here. They do stuff....
FTA:
"The mice, reared in cages kept in a shed downwind of two steel mills and a busy highway in a Canadian city, showed a host of genetic changes compared to similarly housed mice breathing filtered air."
"No such research has been done on people in Hamilton Harbour, Canada, where the mouse studies were carried out."
"Canadian researchers found that filtering out particles from polluted air lessened the risk of heritable mutations in mice caged near Hamilton."
"After three weeks of breathing the Hamilton air, the mice were already showing more signs of DNA breakage than control mice breathing filtered air."
Guess who else lives in this neighbourhood?
Damnit. Now I'm going to have to start putting filters around all the doors and windows.
Soylens viridis homines es
DEAD...
That is the most polluted air in the world.
But nevermind, the whole point is that the slashtards are using their site as an enviro fear-inducing platform. We know this. The site here is about the ideology of liberalism, not geek culuture.
Sperm on mice.. understandable.. in mice... sick.. just sick..