Slashdot Mirror


First Scareware For the Mac

I Don't Believe in Imaginary Property sends us news from F-Secure of what they claim is the first rogue cleaning tool for the Mac. MacSweeper is a Mac version of Cleanator, hosted from a colo somewhere in the Ukraine. The article points out that the company's About page is lifted verbatim from Symantec's site. With the Mac's market share closing in on double digits, perhaps it's not surprising to see the platform targeted with crapware as PCs have been for years. The F-Secure author adds as a footnote that a journalist said to him something you don't hear every day: "I visited the macsweeper.com website. I know I probably shouldn't have but I used a Windows PC so I knew I wouldn't get infected."

17 of 301 comments (clear)

  1. gamespot gave it 11 out of 10 by User+956 · · Score: 5, Funny

    With the Mac's market share closing in on double digits, perhaps it's not surprising to see the platform targeted with crapware as PCs have been for years.

    I didn't realize Kane & Lynch had been announced for the Mac platform

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
  2. Not the smartest journo by MLCT · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The journalist should have visited using a linux livecd. If the site hosts mac malware then it is a pretty good bet they already have established "businesses" in the field of windows malware.

    1. Re:Not the smartest journo by Chyeld · · Score: 5, Funny

      Real security experts telnet to port 80 and hand craft their HTTP requests. It's the only way to be sure!

    2. Re:Not the smartest journo by MrKevvy · · Score: 5, Funny

      re: "If the site hosts mac malware then it is a pretty good bet they already have established "businesses" in the field of windows malware."

      If the site was detecting the user agent or using some other method of determining platform and delivering targeted malware based on it, I doubt they would have also been delivering a fake Mac scan to a Windows browser as they did in the article.

      --
      -- Insert witty one-liner here. --
  3. Isn't any "cleaning tool" rogue on a mac? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The category of "cleaning tools" was rather dodgy even before the trojaned ones started showing up. The notion that getting infected by god knows what, running a little wizard, and being all ok again is insane. Both the notion that one can reliably detect malware that has already had time to romp with your system and the idea that infection is so routine that there should be tools to be run every few days for it are pretty gross.

    And now we have an example of this fine species showing up on a platform that doesn't really have malware. How could anybody trust a cleaner for a platform that doesn't, as yet, need cleaning?

  4. fixed that for you by joeyspqr · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I visited the macsweeper.com website. I know I probably shouldn't have but I used a Mac so I knew I wouldn't get infected."

    oh wait ...

    --
    +1 fashionably cynical
  5. Yeah and moon is made from.. by Fri13 · · Score: 5, Insightful


    What, you need to download something to your mac and then INSTALL it?

    This kind software has be there long time ago and there is nothing new to see here.
    Market share is still smaller than GNU/Linux and it is not having this kind problems, wait, it has.

    Come back again when F-secure and others have proof for worm or virus what works like windows platform, automatically.

    1. Re:Yeah and moon is made from.. by willyhill · · Score: 5, Informative
      Come back again when you understand how Windows machines are largely compromised. Crapware vendors don't need to wait for the next IE vulnerability to target people, all they need is social engineering and lack of common sense. The last few major botnet herding attacks have been perpetrated like that. The fastest-spreading worms have been perpetrated like that. Coming a close second is exploiting vulnerabilities that people can't be bothered to patch. Yet all of this has somehow become Microsoft's fault, but in this case I guess it's the user's fault, right?

      Idiocy can and will spread happily across platform boundaries. It really does not matter what OS you are using. And this article proves it. It's just that until now Windows was losing by the weight of sheer numbers. It has more vulnerabilities, sure. But those are irrelevant to the people who make big $$$ compromising machines. They simply don't need them.

      --
      The twitter monologues. Click on my homepage and be amazed.
  6. Re:the shit hits the fan! by necro2607 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yeah the difference is, you can't get spyware installed on a Mac by clicking a banner ad in a browser. The software doesn't even have permission to do software installation, so it would be asking for a password (unless some unknown vulnerability is exploited). Frankly if you're entering your password for your computer when some arbitrary website asks for it, you've already got have way worse problems than spyware on your Mac.

  7. double digits? by BeanThere · · Score: 5, Funny

    There are now 10 or more Mac users?

  8. First Scareware? by Macrat · · Score: 5, Funny

    I thought Symantec released the first Scareware for Macs?

  9. Re:Oh no! by Tsiangkun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd prefer to focus on the ZERO self propagating pieces of malware in the wild.

  10. Hi i'm MacSweeper Developer, listen to me by MacSweeper · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I would like to explain all the situation, about MacSweeper. We are really trying to make a good software, and you wont find any viruses/spyware/trojans/malware in MacSweeper (test it your self, if you don't believe me, you can use any type of firewalls, dissemblers, or other tools) . The problem is that we are using selling partners that forces us to use this marketing type. We would like to leave them, we don't want to completely destroy Good Name of MacSweeper application.
    Personally I adore Mac Platform, and it hearts to here that the program you wrote is said to be some kind of "Rogue application" , i wouldn't like to destroy good manners of software written for it :((
    I would like to say sorry for all inconveniences that we could bring to you, but believe MacSweeper is meant to be a useful application.

    You can ask Questions, and i will try to answer them! Thank You!

    1. Re:Hi i'm MacSweeper Developer, listen to me by Lewrker · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dear Sir,
      thank you for make clear mistake. I find myself have found an inheritance of 50 BILLION DOLLARS (AMERICAN). I rely my confidence on your arm in relate your website macsviper.kom be legitimate business as of identity yours will be made clear as mine is, for this I will need your kindest help with transfer five hundred dollars of administration price, for which of as of now I am not in relation available.
      Sincerely yours,
      Ba Ba Baa, Nigeria

  11. Re:Oh no! by Garridan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a linux user, I am under no delusion that my system is "more secure" than a windows box or a mac.

    For me, the worst thing that can possibly happen, is somebody destroys my home directory. Ok, that's easy, if a virus is logged in as me. If they hose my system, so what? I can always re-install linux, that isn't a problem. There aren't any other users. I allow myself access to the internet and to email, so if a virus starts spamming the world, well, that isn't stopped by security policy either.

    What you're talking about is a linux server. There, it's hard to root the machine and cross-infect, sure. But what spreads viruses the most these days is users downloading shit in email and not knowing that their browser just executed something. Linux is *not* more secure. *I* am a user am less prone to viruses because I maintain a strict policy of which sites I use each browser for, where I take cookies from, and I browse sketchy shit only inside vmware and restore from a clean image frequently. But I'm still vulnerable to all sorts of attacks -- if google pushes an ad with linux-targeted malware, for example.

    If you think linux is somehow inherently virus-proof, you're deluding yourself. Using linux on the desktop is the same as using any other desktop system -- if somebody else knows how to make an executable for your system, it's probably vulnerable.

  12. Re:Oh no! by dryeo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1. Privileges, an ordinary user can't mess up the entire system. Unless the user is *really* stupid, they are not root and therefore do not have Write privileges on system-critical files. So even if you ran "rm -rf /" as a normal user, you would only lose the files you had access to and not break the system. So you figure it is better to only lose your home directory containing everything you care about, email, pictures, personal documents, all your settings like bookmarks etc. As long as the rest of the system, which is easy as hell to reinstall, is not compromised?
    As a desktop user I severely disagree, I'd rather lose everything but ~ and if I'm stupid enough to run malware that malware will have the necessary permissions to delete everything I care about.
    And about opensource being better because people can look at it and find vulnerabilities. Have you ever looked at the Mozilla code? Lots of people have and yet regularly there are new exploits found, some that have been there since the browser was called Mozilla.
    I monitor a few open source applications mailing lists and often when a security vulnerability is found, it has been there a long time. How many more are lurking in that mess of C++ code?
    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  13. Re:Hi i'm MacSweeper Developer by ncryptd · · Score: 5, Informative
    Well... a quick disasm of your binary doesn't show anything blatantly malicious, which is good... but I also don't see anything really useful. Pretty much everything your program does (and much, much more) can be done with OnyX. For free.

    Oh, and you mis-spelled "purchase" in two methods in MacSweeperDaemon. ;-)

    (void) purchaise
    (void) purchaiseThread
    I also noticed you left a somewhat interesting TODO list in the app bundle.

    The binaries have references to KIVViSoftware throughout them -- you wouldn't happen to be one and the same with these guys, would you?

    Disclaimer: I didn't find anything blatantly malicious -- but I only took a quick look. Given the folders that it tinkers around with, any bugs could do some damage to your Mac, so be careful.