Slashdot Mirror


NASA Wants Fast Moonbuggies and Solid Lunar Lander

coondoggie writes "NASA may have its eyes on the Sun and Mercury this week but it is clearly focusing on the moon for the future. NASA is soliciting proposals from the scientific and aerospace communities for design ideas for its next lunar lander. NASA officials said the Altair spacecraft will deliver four astronauts to the lunar surface late during the next decade. According to NASA Altair will be capable of landing four astronauts on the moon, providing life support and a base for weeklong initial surface exploration missions, and returning the crew to the Orion spacecraft that will bring them home to Earth. And while they won't be flying to the moon but rather flying around the U.S. Space & Rocket Center in Huntsville, Ala., the space agency has set April 4-5 as the dates for 'The 15th Annual Great Moonbuggy Race'. The race is for high school and college teams where they build and race their lightweight, two-person lunar vehicles. More than 40 student teams from 18 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Canada and India have already registered." My proposal just features a domo-kun mouth and giant pink ears attached to an El Camino. Money please!

6 of 117 comments (clear)

  1. Re:NASA Wants Fast Moonbuggies by C0rinthian · · Score: 4, Funny

    Only if it's called The Crushinator.

  2. Better than that, what they need by ByOhTek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is an automated drilling/mining/processing plant. There are mineral deposits up there. If we could go up there and have the materials made on site, so we only needed to set up the base, a long term moon base would be fairly cheap.

    Energy certainly wouldn't be a problem, with every day sunny.

    --
    Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    1. Re:Better than that, what they need by iamlucky13 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Unfortunately, such things are not as easy in real life as they are in star trek. Have you seen even small processing operations here on earth? Even when you know exactly what you're working with, it has a high percentage of what you want, and the wheat is easily separated from the chaff, it takes a large piece of rather expensive machinery to accomplish it. Wheat and chaff case in point: a typical John Deere combine weighs about 12 tons. All it does it cut wheat, seperate the kernels from the heads, and dump the straw out the back. And it needs gas and air in sufficient quantities to produce about 200 hp to operate. Obviously that's a high volume farm implement, not an optimized space tool, but I stand by the basic point.

      Think about what that extensive mineral utilization entails. You're limited by what's up there. The lunar regolith is mostly aluminum oxide, silica, and some calcium, with trace amounts of various gasses like hydrogen and helium. Suppose then you want fiberglass. That's an easy one. You suspend the regolith in a liquid and separate the silica from the alumina based on density. Then you melt the silica and blow it out of a fine nozzle to form strands. Unless you can figure out how to do it in a vaccuum, however, which is plausible, you need a gas to blow it, either brought from earth or boiled out of the regolith.

      That right there is five primary subsystems:
      1.) Power
      2.) Regolith collector
      3.) Silica separator
      4.) Furnace and fiber machine
      5.) Gas storage and/or production.

      But fiberglass is all but useless without epoxy, and making fiberglass parts is a messy, complicated job here on earth. You'd be crazy to stake the success of your lunar base on the ability for a self deploying robot to produce useful and quality controlled parts on the moon. Not to mention, all you've got at that point is structural parts, which are only a fraction of the mass of supplies you need.

      You could look at the same needs for producing aluminum. It gets really interesting when you start looking at the mass of equipment needed to produce sheet aluminum out of cast ingots. The raw aluminum itself is very energy intenstive to produce, requiring 7.5 kW-hours of electricity per pound to reduce from alumina in high volume smelters.

      And I'm not even going to get started on what it takes to make complex shapes like a pressurized habitat or a seal for an airlock.

      All of this is why NASA is looking at landing all the needed supplies on the moon and practicing the techniques with human involvement from the start. The first supplies produced will probably be oxygen (which can be electrolytically separated from the silica, alumina, or small amounts of ice present on the moon), and bricks for radiation protection and insulation sintered from the raw regolith.

      Start simple. As you show you can make useful items from simple processes, then you add complexity.

    2. Re:Better than that, what they need by ByOhTek · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Too many people see problems as insurmountable: While things certainly aren't as easy as in Star Trek, special case solutions can be productive:

      > a typical John Deere combine weighs about 12 tons.
      Yes, but how many tonnes per day does it output? If you don't need that kind of output, it can be smaller.

      > And it needs gas and air in sufficient quantities to produce about 200 hp to operate.
      Due to that being the cheapest method to get it functioning on earth. With more reliable solar energy, you could skip the gas and air on the moon for any processing task which electricity is physically capable of handling.

      > Think about what that extensive mineral utilization entails. You're limited by what's up there. The lunar regolith is mostly
      > aluminum oxide, silica, and some calcium, with trace amounts of various gasses like hydrogen and helium.

      And several areas with notable high quantities of other elements, including but not limited to potassium, carbon, iron, and magnesium. There are places where the high concentrations of these are actually fairly close even.

      > Suppose then you want fiberglass. That's an easy one. You suspend the regolith in a liquid and separate the silica from the
      > alumina based on density. Then you melt the silica and blow it out of a fine nozzle to form strands. Unless you can figure out
      > how to do it in a vaccuum, however, which is plausible, you need a gas to blow it, either brought from earth or boiled out of
      > the regolith.

      Spin the container, quickly. There are many ways to apply pressure.

      > That right there is five primary subsystems:
      > 1.) Power
      Solar
      > 2.) Regolith collector
      Plenty of machines would work for this, being a generic digging tool, possibly with some instrumentation to ascertain rough
      composition.
      > 3.) Silica separator
      This could probably be automated, but I wouldn't know the specific process.
      > 4.) Furnace and fiber machine
      Again, run it on electricity, the process shouldn't be that hard.
      > 5.) Gas storage and/or production.
      Why? Not necessar at all.

      Here's a good example of what *COULD* be done.

      A small solar "digging" rover. It doesn't need to be fast, just reliable. It diggs regolith, and puts it in a bin.
      The bin, once sufficiently full, will close up and heat up. The aluminium and oxygen can be separated. The aluminum, melted, could then be released (possibly through a mechanism designed to pump out plates.
      The oxygen? Bring up some high tolerance balloons to store it.

      Similar processes could be used to make glass.

      Given the regolith composition will be known, a couple simple visual and pressure sensors should be sufficient to get the aluminum out reliably. Next time up, the astronauts just need enough material to assemble the (preferrably thick) aluminum sheeting into a shelter. It doesn't completely eliminate the weight requirements for a shelter of that size (they'll need nitrogen, heating mechanisms, food, etc.), but it will greatly reduce the required weight to make it.

      Not knowing exact compositions up there, other things could potentially be made as well. A lot of simple, but heavy-lift work should be automatable.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
  3. No room for Bender, huh? by Big_Monkey_Bird · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fine then. I'm going build my own lunar lander. With blackjack, and hookers. In fact, forget the lunar lander and the blackjack. Ah, screw the whole thing.

  4. Apologies to the Simpsons. by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can you name the Moonbuggie with four wheel drive,
    Smells like a steak, and seats thirty five?
    Lunorero! Lunorero!
    Well, it goes real slow with the hammer down
    It's the country-fried Moonbuggie endorsed by a clown
    Lunorero! Lunorero!
    Hey, hey!
    Twelve yards long, two lanes wide,
    Sixty five tons of American pride!
    Lunorero! Lunorero!
    Top of the line in Lunar works,
    Unexplained fires are for the managers of the dorks!
    Lunorero! Lunorero!
    She blinds everybody with her super high beams
    She's a rock-crusin', sand-spuin' drivin' machine
    Lunorero! Lunorero! Lunorero!
    Whoa, Lunorero! Whoa!

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.