New Hampshire Primaries Follow-Up Analysis
Dr. Eggman writes "Ars Technica has posted a lengthy follow up analysis of the 2008 New Hampshire Primaries outcome. The article deals with the O'Dell machine/hand-count table that has been circulating through emails. It also points out the combination of factors that resulted in such an odd symmetry of numbers, although the article notes that these numbers have been corrected. The corrections still indicate a discrepancy among the tallies. The article also goes on to talk about the nature of the communities that arrived at these numbers and what/how the handcounts proceeds. This process has been inconclusive; something that does not bode well for the rest of the primaries and indeed the election itself, as only 16 states currently mandate both a voter-verified paper trail (VVPT) and a random manual audit of election results."
US Elections are so bad, so corrupted, that UN observers wont certify them because they fail to reach minimum standards. And you have seen the programmers testimony havent you? youtube-LHS associates.
I see no choice for you all, you are going to have to, um, rationalise away all that corruption and ignore the facts, just so you can sleep tonight and wake up believing the lie that you are someone who cares about authenticity.
Exactly! Which just goes to show any child born in America can dream about growing up and one day winning the popular vote for president... And still be screwed out of the presidency
No one gets screwed out of anything, that's just wishful thinking. The truth is much more mundane and less interesting. The system is designed to prevent megalomanical assholes like who you speak of from ruling via their perverted sense of self-importance.
Dopey? Naive to the point of embarassment? Thank goodness unelectable? Wrong about their signature issue? An inferior choice to a monkey? What phrase would you like?
Mrs. Kucinich is hot though.
Your ad here. Ask me how!