Nanotubes Form The Darkest Material Yet Created
toxcspdrmn writes "Bad news for Spinal Tap fans. The BBC reports that researchers at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, New York, have produced the darkest known material by manufacturing "forests" of carbon nanotubes. This forms a surface that absorbs or scatters 99.9% of all incidental light."
He will incorporate this new 'blackest' black into Doom 4.
(and you just thought you saw all possible shades of black and brown in Doom 3!)
I can't wait to paint my nerd den with this stuff... light be damned!
I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
...if anybody had found a picture of it. I'd see this article a few days ago and couldn't turn up anything.
Unfortunately, posting on Slashdot provides me with the perspective to see how stupid a question it was.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
"It's like, how much more black could this be? And the answer is none. None more black."
Just callin' it like I see it.
If the light is absorbed 99.9%, where does the energy go? Heat? If so, could this lead down the road to new power sources? Super-black nanotube network produces heat to produce steam to turn turbines... (??)
Case in point - I was once in a room that had contained a fire. The walls, floor, ceiling, and windows were all coated in a soft black soot that was perfectly uniform and ate all the light. The effect was very disconcerting and disorienting. None of the normal visual cues of highlights, textures, or reflections existed. Only the open door gave a reference point so that you didn't feel like you were floating in a void.
The article posits several uses, but can you imagine a person clothed in this black in full sunlight? Could we even see them? or a building covered in it? or a car? Sight requires a least some photons to hit the retina. Anyone? I know I sound repetitive, its 0430 and didn't want to lose the train of thought to sleep.
Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
I guess the article should really define "light" a bit more tightly. From your link:
Although Planck's formula predicts that a black body will radiate energy at all frequencies, the formula is only applicable when many photons are being measured. For example, a black body at room temperature (300 K) with one square meter of surface area will emit a photon in the visible range once every thousand years or so, meaning that for most practical purposes, the black body does not emit in the visible range.
My, possibly incorrect, interpretation (assumption?) of the article was "light" in the broad sense of all electromagnetic radiation. This, however, does not make your link less interesting; in fact, in makes it more interesting. Thank-you.
This story has a photo (seriously)
Pretty cool stuff. The sample on the left is carbon black, which is reasonably black, but the surface still texture stands out clearly with the flash. The sample of the new material looks like a black hole - which I guess it almost is. Except for the suckage.
You are wrong here. The 1366 W/m2 is indeed at the upper atmosphere. Lower in the atmosphere it is less, how much depends on the current state of the atmosphere. About 1000W/m2 is the right value.
The 100W/m2 is the energy output of a not so good photovoltaic module.
Nyh
Isn't that an ACME portable hole?
I wonder what it would cost to do? It would be wicked cool to do this to a bedroom!!!!
Ruby Neural Evolution of Augmenting Topologies