Slashdot Mirror
What is an Open Source Company Really Worth?
CNet has an interesting profile of MySQL, JBoss, and Zimbra, exploring what an open source company is actually worth. "Given how slowly revenue accumulates in an open-source company--assuming it is recognizing subscriptions over 12 months--bookings is probably the valuation metric being used or at least strongly considered. It surely is the metric by which the start-up wishes to be measured. So while Savio suggests we open-source entrepreneurs may be "sleeping with dollar signs in (our) eyes," there's clearly a lot of work to do before most open-source companies are worth selling. It's not worth selling out for $100 million. Not for the venture-backed companies, anyway."
So I guess since no one reads TFA anyway the link wasn't included...
FanFictionRecs.net
http://blogs.cnet.com/8301-13505_1-9853461-16.html
How do you value ANY company?
They own stuff (buildings), they have staff and they have current revenue.
It really shouldn't be that hard.
I wouldn't evaluate the worth of Oracle based on what I thought the
value of the Oracle RDBMS sourcecode was worth. I would look at what
they are selling to people.
With enterprise software, frontend licensing is just the tip of the iceberg.
MySql corp really isn't that much different than Sun, IBM or Oracle in this respect.
A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
A public company (think RedHat) trades for X times earnings. Buying RedHat would rationally need to have a return after debt service and 'thinning'. The software is free, but the services and integration and packaging that RedHat does is where the money is.
A private company like Digium, who does Asterisk, has a NIBT and may have additional potential for digital PBX widgets (look at their recent deal with 3Com for an example). They'd probably bring in 7 years run rate as a buy price.
Hyperic, while smaller, has great community development and might bring in more, because of a wider breadth of products touched. I'd value them at 10x annual run rate.
MySQL AB did a great job. Hurray for those guys; they deserve what they got. I hope that Sun can integrate MySQL well without butchering the company and product. Professional results can pay off.
---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
What's missing from the article is the usual valuation of a closed source company. Anyone know the answer to that?
This has it backwards. After a vendor such as JBoss has created a fully functionnal application server such as JBoss, what are properties such as WebSphere, WebLogic and JRun worth? How much would you pay once you realize you can get the same outcome for free? Sure, there are some old companies out there who still need the warm fuzzy that comes from paying $15,000 for WebSphere--but in the long run, what is that business worth? Not a lot. JBoss has already pulled a fast one anyway. What used to be free, circa JBoss 4.0.2, (embedding the app server in a shrink-wrapped application) is now for a fee. I used to work for a company that bet the farm on JBoss 4.0.2. And you know what they're doing now? PAYING JBoss. They have no choice.
When a program is "GPLv2 or later" and "Contributions are signed back to the company", if the OSS software is useful the GPL's patent poison pill actually makes it a more attractive buyout target.
You see, when Apple buys out CUPS, or Sun buys out MySQL, they can distribute the code under whatever liscence they want as copyright holders.
Which means, for THEM, its non GPL. But for everyone else, it is GPLv2 or later.
Thus you can still get community support with copyright transfer, but you have a competitive advantage in selling/using it commmercially.
I wonder if the FSF realized that this is a side consequence of GPLv3 and the "or later" clause?
Test your net with Netalyzr
It's worth whatever someone is willing to pay. As is anything else in this world. Make something valuable to someone with lots of money and they'll pay lots of money for it. It really is that simple.
The extremely poorly articulated point of the posting and article is that open source companies are often criticized because they face a serious issue other software companies do not. That issue is the re-use of their source code by other companies.
What is to keep another company, say NySQL Inc. from taking the source code to MySQL, compiling their own product, and then reselling it? Nothing. You might say "It's illegal!", but that's ONLY in the USA. I'd bet there are at least 3 companies in China reselling MySQL right now. Since they keep their source code release up to date, this means NySQL's product will always be up to date. And since NySQL has a bigger presence in China, Chinese customers will always go to them first.
Of course not! It's nothing! It's peanuts! What an insult! What do you take me for, some kind of fool? One day you'll all look up from the gutter, you will, and see King Zoidberg caressing your fancy box!
Link to article: http://blogs.cnet.com/8301-13505_1-9853461-16.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20