Slashdot Mirror
Failed Avionics a Possible Cause of BA038 Crash
Muhammar writes "As you may have heard by now, both engines of the Boeing 777 aircraft flight BA038 suddenly cut off without warning at very low altitude and low speed during autopilot-assisted landing at Heathrow. A prompt reaction of the pilots prevented the stall and saved all lives aboard. The crash landing short of the runway tore off the landing gear on impact, and the fuselage plowed a long, deep gouge in the grass. With the investigation ongoing, the available information points to an electronic control problem as the most likely cause of the sudden engine power loss."
I'm sure the CIA will make "unofficial" statements shortly saying that they have credible evidence that it was Iranian terrists behind the whole thing.
This guy's the limit!
They actually have a decent excuse for lost luggage for once.
If you haven't made a developer cry, you've wasted a day.
"It might be premature to say that a software problem is the likely cause of failure..."
Unless it was running on an OS like Windows for Aircraft, "now with fewer crashes".
Yes, I know it's all custom designed. But thinking about the infamous Windows for Warships I couldn't resist
"It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
Now we're all going to be forced to re-learn Ada!
If it is a software problem, then expect more public scrutiny of software based machinery.
That is not likely. More likely is they had a glitch from a strong RF field someplace. Knowing the timing, it is likely to be either a radar or other high power beam or a very near lower powered source such as a cell phone inside the farady cage. Very likely the radio source is from something like this; **RING** **RING** "Hi hon, we are landing now.. Oh no, somethings wrong.."
The truth shall set you free!
It's uncanny how they made the flight control system sound just like my wife.
As Coward stared at the controls, the autothrottle demanded more thrust.That's a feature that is sadly lacking, though.
Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
An old-timer with old-timey ideas.
Well I hope they didn't outsource the coding to 5 different software companies in India who then in turn outsource it to the same subcontractor :).
So how many airlines are still flying the De Havilland DH-50 anyway!?
AT&ROFLMAO
The problem was not computers. After extensive investigation, the authorities
have released what actually caused the accident. The evidence is clearly visible
in these pictures:
http://www.heathrowpictures.com/pictures/images/picturegallery_baw_b772_gymmm20.jpg
The cause for the engine problems is massive ingestion of dirt. The manuals clearly
specify that the engines need to be run on air, not dirt. Even small quantities
of dirt can cause loss of power.
No, I'm New Here
Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
obTWW:
"We're flying in a Lockheed Eagle Series L-1011. Came off the line twenty months ago. Carries a Sim-5 transponder tracking system, and you're telling me I can still flummox this thing with something I bought at Radio Shack?"
Yes, but it doesn't make for as a striking newspaper headline as Coward the Hero!.