The Curious Histories of Generic Domain Names
cheezitmike writes "ITworld.com uses the Wayback Machine to document the histories of five generic domain names: music.com, eat.com, car.com, meat.com, and milk.com. 'In this brave new Web 2.0 world, it's almost a badge of honor to have a Web site name that only hints at what the user will find there (see Flickr) or is so opaque as to offer no clue at all as to what the Web site is about (see del.icio.us). It's easy to forget the first Internet gold rush of the mid-to-late '90s, when dot-com domain names based on ordinary (and, investors hoped, marketable) nouns and verbs were snapped up by hopeful companies from the humble geeks who had purchased them (often ironically) in the early '90s.'"
I'm still waiting for someone to make me an offer on my domain: thissitewillmakemerich.com
This guy's the limit!
I'm no marketing genius, but who the hell thought domain names like meat.com and milk.com were going to be goldmines?!?
...it's almost a badge of honor to have a Web site name that only hints at what the user will find there...
The only reason companies resort to those names is because (a) all the good ones are taken and/or (b) there are potential trademark infringement issues with using more common sounding names.
"I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey
Remember that domain names pre-date the world wide web. Someone may have been using barf.com as a simple FTP site and never had a web page associated with it.
purple.com always delivered what it promises.
I had a couple offers to buy my domain by 2 different owners and eras of skinny.com. I decided that an easy to remember URL and email address was worth more than they offered. The big bid was $5k, but half in cash, half in services I didn't need.
I wasn't holding out for the $big, but would take it of course. It was a personal investment, not a financial one.
The biggest advantage to a generic domain name is that you'll get lots of type-ins; for example, freemusic.com* I'm sure gets hundreds of hits a day, just from (unknowing) users typing it in, hoping for something good.
But in the new era, sites become popular because they are viral; flickr didn't become popular because of type-ins, it became popular because it offered a good service that people found useful, and it spread.
--A great name does not a great site make; but a great site can a great name make.-- Heck, just at Google! Verb, noun, and fun to say!
(*Disclaimer: I have no idea what's at freemusic.com, but I'm guessing it's parked by someone)
Nemilar http://www.techthrob.com - Visit Me!
"Hello, internet? I'd like some meat, please."
"Just send it right over. Thanks, bye"
XKCD:Xeric Knowledge Comically Dispen
I have sometimes wondered what Opera aficionados make of opera.com
I am sure someone at Slashdot will know how Opera got its name. I kind of guessed that some geek way back bought the domain name thinking it would be worth millions, then in the end used it for a company cause it was cool to have a generic domain.
Some domain names have been useful though. In Australia people sell ".au.com" domains, which are obviously sub-domains, quite different to Australia's official ".com.au" domains.
If the pattern goes 9am, 10am, 11am, why isn't noon 12am?
Whoever got apple.com must have been sitting on a goldmine.
09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
+2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
"Milk was a BAD choice"
The hosting costs crucified him
Monstar L
Badge of honor to have an opaque domain name?
Not so.
Try registering a domain name that isn't opaque. It's nearly impossible these days - people bought all the obvious ones, and most of the non-obvious ones. Most of them are just domain squatters hoping to get rich, or spamvertising sites.
Coming soon - pyrogyra
I was the original owner of "Codeplex.com" (Not so obvious of a name) before I sold it to Microsoft for a eye whopping $600. The site is now Microsoft's official opensource repository.
Microsoft created an umbrella company who specifically designed a horrendous website with no links back to them. Even after the research (which I found nothing), I thought I would be a nice guy and sell it to this nobody.
I know they did that so they didn't have to payout larger sums of money, but I still feel as if I was screwed first hand by Microsoft.
I suspect that in the next 10-20 years there will be a big rush on people's full names. Currently only web developers and bloggers have their own name as a domain but as the web becomes more and more popular and a part of people's life, they will eventually buy their own name and point it somewhere.
That's why I own http://www.nealgrosskopf.com/ and grosskopf.name. Having your last name as a domain is nice because it allows you to create sub-domains of family members and create email addresses such as neal@grosskopf.name.
"During My Service In The United States Congress, I Took The Initiative In Creating The Internet." -Al Gore