Slashdot Mirror


Google Adsense Cracking Down on 'Tasters'

ZerothOfTheLaw writes "It appears that Google is going to eliminate Adsense for Domains for all domains younger than five days old. From the post 'The Good news is that the Quantity of advertising will be spread among fewer domains now and so those domain owners that actually own real full domains should receive more money if bid prices start to rise as a result of this. However some advocates of Domain Tasting say that perhaps no one will be able to serve the niche for some ads and no one will make money on the unserved ads.'"

7 of 187 comments (clear)

  1. That's a problem? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    However some advocates of Domain Tasting say that perhaps no one will be able to serve the niche for some ads and no one will make money on the unserved ads

    Good. Advertising revenue is not something that anyone is entitled to receive. Show me a site with useful content supported with unobtrusive advertising and maybe you'll get my eyeballs for a while. What we don't need are more linkfarms.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    1. Re:That's a problem? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Slashdot has ads? One of these days I need to disable Privoxy, Adblock, and my Hosts file and browse the web like a normal person. For the last few weeks I thought there was a bug of some sort in Slashdot's fancy "New Discussion System". I'd expand an abbreviated post and there'd be this funny white space inserted between it and the next post, like there was an additional nested reply that wasn't getting displayed. It wasn't until I checked out something on Slashdot from a friend's computer that I realized that the blank space is supposed to contain a banner ad! Now I'm thinking I don't like their New Discussion System so much.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    2. Re:That's a problem? by coolGuyZak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd be careful. the last time I mentioned this, I was modded into oblivion.

      In any case, it's severely obnoxious. I'm stunned that the admins/editors/whatever. could consider this idea worthwhile, given how often we rail against similar behavior on other sites.

    3. Re:That's a problem? by mollymoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because $0.005 per page is too much to pay I guess. Seriously, just fucking subscribe if you don't want to see the ads. It's cheap, the layout works better and you're not freeloading.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  2. Tasting parasites by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I never quite understood the "tasting" concept. The vast majority of the people utilizing "tasting" are doing it for unscrupulous reasons. Anyone with a legitimate need for a domain is going to be willing to pay the going rate to actually register one.

  3. Why is Domain Tasting "Evil" by webword · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why is is evil? Well, domain tasters are folks trying to capitalize on traffic they don't really own. That's kind of hard to understand but you have to understand the definition of domain tasting to full grasp that.

    This should also help understand the "evil" behind the practice...

    "In January 2007, VeriSign said that among the top 10 domain registrars, 95% of all deleted .com and .net domain names were the result of domain tasting." (Information Week)

    Google's doing this to protect users who get to these sites on accident. I guess it's good for everyone.

  4. They should close it down alltogether by broothal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For me, Google adsense for domains is a scammers paradise anyway. How many hours haven't I wasted walking over "parked" domains trying to find a real domain. Let's face it - 99% of the "parked" domains aren't parked - they are purchased because people will visit them by mistake. It would be much faster if the domains simply didn't exist and as such wouldn't turn up in search results.