Slashdot Mirror


Best Presidential Candidate, Republicans

A few days ago we posted a story for you to discuss the best presidential candidates for Super Tuesday, but I figured it would be an interesting idea to try that again, but split the discussion into 2 halves. This is the Republican half — please only discuss the Republican candidates in this story. Huckabee, McCain, and Romney only.

15 of 1,481 comments (clear)

  1. Ron Paul? by mc+moss · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Why not Paul?

  2. Typical! by Svippy · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Yeah, why should we not mention Ron Paul? So much for "freedom of speech". Apparently this is not Finland.

    --
    Clicked pie.
  3. dare i fill the shoes of a spam bot? by DigDuality · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I thought Ron Paul was still in the race?

  4. This isn't a poll, so I can complain about options by Anti_Climax · · Score: 0, Redundant

    No Ron Paul?

    Terrible.

    --
    Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
  5. My candidate is not allowed? by jonnythan · · Score: 0, Redundant

    He's running on the Republican ticket.

    I plan to vote for him in the Republican primary in my state.

    But you've specifically disallowed his mention in the Best Candidates - Republican thread?

    Quite an oversight, CmdrTaco. I would have expected better of you than of the typical CNN/Fox News media that have done their best to ignore him. I expected that from them. But from you? The one candidate that most values our freedoms? You specifically forbid us from discussing him?

    *That* is lame.

    1. Re:My candidate is not allowed? by bigdavex · · Score: 0, Redundant

      He has as much chance of getting the nomination as I have. And I'm not running.

      That's a load of crap.

      Maine:

      Romney 2,362 52% 18 Winner
      McCain 958 21% 0
      Paul 851 19% 0
      Huckabee 268 6% 0
      Undecided 94 2% 0
      Thompson 4 0% 0
      Giuliani 2 0% 0
      Hunter 0 0% 0

      http://abcnews.go.com/politics/elections/state?state=ME&ref=ipb

      How about Nevada?

      Romney 22,649 51% 17 Winner
      Paul 6,087 14% 4
      McCain 5,651 13% 4
      Huckabee 3,616 8% 3
      Thompson 3,521 8% 2
      Giuliani 1,910 4% 1
      Hunter 890 2% 0
      --
      -Dave
    2. Re:My candidate is not allowed? by bc90021 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      You're obviously not following the primaries very well.

      Ron Paul got 14% of the votes in Nevada. (14 is a double-digit number.) He came in second.

      Ron Paul got 18% of the votes in Louisiana. (18 is a double-digit number, and almost 20%!) He came in second. There are issues in Louisiana, and it may turn out that he actually polled higher there.

      http://news.yahoo.com/election/2008/dashboard/?d=states

      You may be annoyed by us, but we are here to stay. Every post where you post erroneous statements will be corrected. Freedom and personal liberty is the only true path on which the self-governed can take themselves. Eventually, everyone will learn that!

      Oh, and that "base that contributes money"? Ron Paul was the #1 GOP fund-raiser last quarter. (Note I said "fund-raiser". Not "self-donater". Take away Romney's contributions to himself and he didn't get that much.) He has spent more in Super Tuesday states than all the other candidates. He has more cash on hand than everyone except Romney (again, because Romney is using his personal fortune). A candidate that you yourself says "has no chance" has more chance of staying in the race than both McCain and Huckabee! Furthermore, the more people that learn about him (and this dedicated army is teaching at every chance they get) the more people like him.

      Americans are largely sick of the system as it's being run. Sure, the sheeple will vote McCain or Hillary, but those with forethought will come to realise just how excellent a candidate Ron Paul is, and just how much this country needs him.

  6. Ron Paul? by somecoder · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The last I checked, he is in this race as a republican, has raised more money than Huckabee, and just beat him in the Maine caucuses.

    "Deficits mean future tax increases, pure and simple. Deficit spending should be viewed as a tax on future generations, and politicians who create deficits should be exposed as tax hikers."
    -Ron Paul

  7. Ron Paul by CooKiEz · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Huckabee is nuts: http://youtube.com/watch?v=D08Dq_iNMRk

    McCain knows jack shit about politics. He was asked an economics question in the last FL debate by RP and couldn't answer it.

    Romney is a freaking warhawk.

    Ron Paul is the only valid candidate.

  8. Re:This isn't a poll, so I can complain about opti by jcr · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Actually, by omitting him from the list, Taco ensured that nearly all of the discussion would be about Ron Paul.

    Thanks, Cmdr Taco!

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  9. Ron Paul is the best candidate by beatmania · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Talks about and swears by the constitution. Thinks that free markets and true freedom will lead to prosperity. So do I, and lots and lots of other people. Fuck Romney, McCain, Huckabee. More government is bad, mmkay? Can't you see this...? Ron Paul is who I'm voting for, and you should be ashamed of yourself for excluding his name. You're as bad as Fox News and CNN. Die in a fire.

  10. Yet more censorship of Ron Paul by FliesLikeABrick · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Nice to see that we can have a nice well-rounded discussion here.

    Suffice to say, Ron Paul is my candidate of choice. I never thought I'd want to vote Republican after seeing this mess that was the Bush Administration, but now I want to see nobody in the White House other than Ron Paul. The other Republican candidates are either ridiculously dumb, scare or religious... or a combination of those. The Democratic candidates are better, but still nowhere near as balanced as Paul.

    Nice one there, CmdrTaco

  11. Re:Ron Paul? by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 0, Redundant

    - he's not going to win -

    Errrrr, only one of them is going to win, thus by your "logic" the press should only talk about one person -- the winner.
    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  12. Re:Ron Paul? by fatlaces · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I have to vote for Ron Paul.
    The lesser of two evils is still evil. Romney with his shady demeanor, and rehearsed replies to questions, and McCain with his vague sense of conviction, are the same old fake, say whatever I need to say to win the sheeple candidates.

    Ron is about Liberty, economic freedom, and sovereignty. The other dudes are just going to want some moralistic neofascist fake democracy.

  13. Re:Ron Paul? by kiddailey · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Ron Paul won Louisiana, or would have if the LA GOP wasn't actively trying to keep him from winning. Between shifting deadline dates around and refusing to count 650 provisional ballots, they've effectively kept him in 2nd place and out of the news because of it.