Slashdot Mirror


Li-Ion Batteries Hit Final R&D Phase for Plug-in Cars

An anonymous reader writes "Tesla finally delivered its first production model of the all-electric Roadster this month. Coinciding with that, researchers from the big automakers and their outsourced startup labs are hitting stride in the development of cheap, high-powered lithium-ion batteries. These may actually end up in our garages. Toyota, in fact, says it's got enough of the chemistry down to roll out a test fleet for the plug-in Prius before the end of 2009. It's mass production of battery tech that's the holdup — which might mean Mercedes' electric hybrids beat the Prius to market en masse by 2010 or 2011."

42 of 238 comments (clear)

  1. Still waiting by The-Bus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm still waiting for the Ariel-Atom-based Wrightspeed X1.

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    1. Re:Still waiting by CSMatt · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm still waiting for my hovercar. Parallel parking is a nuisance.

    2. Re:Still waiting by Rei · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How about one that just looks like it could take off? :) It comes out next fall. I get mine in late summer of '09.

      Really, Tesla's approach is not economical for anything but the high-end market. "Laptop batteries" (graphite anode, LiCoO2 cathode) are ill-suited for EV applications. They're too expensive, and even if they weren't, their lifespans are too short, so only those who have money to burn can afford them. I think Aptera's approach is the most realistic: first, use a reasonable battery choice (lithium phosphate) -- sacrifice a little energy density for long life, a high degree of safety, high power density, low cost, and fast charging. Second, build the car light and ultra-aerodynamic. This adds extra cost, but it lets you get by on signficantly less battery power, meaning less battery expense (the Typ-1e only needs 10kWh for 120 mi). And since battery expense is the big cost in EVs, the extra you spent on streamlining is saved several times over in batteries.

      Anyways, keep your eyes out for:

      Lithium vanadium oxide batteries
      Silicon nanowire batteries
      Barium titanate ultracapacitors

      All of these promise 2-3x energy density with current tech while retaining rapid charge ability, and lower cost -- thus keeping all of the EV advantages over gasoline vehicles (noise, efficiency, home charging, pollution reduction, pollution displacement, high torque, low maintenance, low energy costs, etc), while meeting all of gasoline's traditional advantages over EVs (purchase price, range, recharge time). They're game changers. For now, we'll stick with a normal gasoline sedan for long trips (until a fast charging infrastructure becomes widespread) and our (upcoming) Aptera for daily use.

      --
      Margaret Thatcher died the other day. It was a sad day, but I like to think that she's looking up at us right now."
  2. Picture's for those that want to see the car! by phillips321 · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:Picture's for those that want to see the car! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Picture's"? WTF dude... is that like saying "There are three dog's who take walk's on most day's when their owner come's home after teaching lesson's to many kid's"?

      One picture. Two pictures. No apostrophe. English, motherfucker... do you speak it?

    2. Re:Picture's for those that want to see the car! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      He's from the "an apostrophe means 'look out, here comes an S'" school of English.

  3. Oh noes!!! by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Funny

    Please, please, tell me they are not getting their batteries from Sony!

    "50 cars caught fire on I-4 today."

    1. Re:Oh noes!!! by NeilMaguire · · Score: 2, Informative

      These batteries do require several levels of protection circuits and thermal management but its no where near the challenge of containing 22 gallons of the most highly combustible fluid on earth. Also Lithium, unlike Nickel-Cadmium and Nickel Metal Hydride batteries, is not a toxin. Commercializing Li-ion batteries takes investment and American engineering know-how. False perceptions about safety hurdles are not helpful. Since we are quoting Bruce: "The Doors open but the ride it ain't free"

      --
      Neil Maguire Alternative Energy Engineer
  4. Infrastructure? by CSMatt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No matter how well R&D goes for these vehicles, I don't see how we can successfully convert people to electric cars without some sort of infrastructure in place. Sure, you can charge your car at home for the daily commute, but what about road trips?

    Plug-in hybrids are a good compromise, though.

    1. Re:Infrastructure? by Loibisch · · Score: 4, Funny

      Easy...
      1) Buy an extension cable.
      2) Find the nearest Starbucks.
      3) Buy a cup of coffee.
      4) Instead of plugging in your laptop you covertly plug in your car.
      5) Profit! (for you)
      Same difference, isn't it? :D

    2. Re:Infrastructure? by jdjbuffalo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Any car that can't be refueled both quickly and at common locations, is not likely to perform very well (in the market place) IMHO. I've got to disagree there. While I certainly think that gas(unleaded, diesel, ethanol)/electric hybrid will be the most popular choice for single people. I think that in multi-car families there will likely be only one car that is a hybrid and the others will be all electric (they will be cheaper). It's estimated that 85-95% of all driving is done within 30 miles of your home. This means that all electric cars become reasonable at 100 Miles per recharge. Ideally I would like to see ones that can get around 200+ Miles per recharge but we probably won't see those be mainstream and affordable for 5-10 years.
      --
      We have four boxes with which to defend our freedom: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box.
  5. Re:Rolling Timebombs? by pipatron · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How safe is your huge tank of extremely flammable gasoline in case of a car crash?

    --
    c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
  6. Re:Rolling Timebombs? by LinuxDon · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually, a lot of research has gone into making those tanks as safe a possible.
    In a crash: they will bend, not break.
    How often does a car catch file after a crash? Only very rarely.

  7. Are Batteries Evil? by webword · · Score: 2, Insightful

    OK, so rather than pollute the air as we burn fossil fuels, we'll fill up landfills with bazillions of batteries. Electric cars might not be as "green" and wonderful as people like to think.

    These batteries are probably recyclable but it isn't cost effective, based on what I rad. So, the potential to recycle is there but are people actually going to do it?

    1. Re:Are Batteries Evil? by plague3106 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I can't believe how many people can't be bothered to even visit the companies page. The price of the car includes battery replacement, and they require you ship it back to them and they recycle it.

    2. Re:Are Batteries Evil? by NameIsDavid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Today's cars have a single lead-acid battery, but this battery is almost completely recycled. Thus, there's reason to be optimistic about the prospects of recycling. The automobile is one of the most fully-recycled consumer products. Think about it ... you don't just toss one in the trash. There are specific permitted ways to dispose of one, meaning anyone who wants to recover value from it are able to do so.

    3. Re:Are Batteries Evil? by legoman666 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      You have no idea how clean or efficient modern coal plants are, do you? I work in the power industry and I can tell you that powering cars by charging batteries using electricity from the wall that came from a coal plant is way more efficient and clean than burning gasoline or diesel.

      Go troll some place else.

    4. Re:Are Batteries Evil? by Firethorn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Batteries, especially 'bazillions' of them like what would be in electric cars would get recycled much like the lead-acid batteries currently are.

      The only reason NiCD and NiMH end up in landfills so much is that they're used and disposed of at home - most people can't be bothered to take them in somewhere to be reycled. Same with liIon.

      An electric car battery, even a hybrid battery is such that you're taking it to a store to be replaced - and they'll have enough to haul them over to the recycling facility that'll pay money for them in a truck big enough to at least break even.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    5. Re:Are Batteries Evil? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Oh, it's worse than all that. You're still going to get that electricity for the batteries from mostly-coal.

      Uh-huh. And then we replace the coal plant with a nuclear plant, or augment it with wind power, or whatever, and your car magically becomes more environmentally friendly without you having to do anything!

      This is the beauty of the plug-in electric car. It decouples transportation from the source of power. So when a better source of power comes along, you don't have to replace the entire fleet of existing cars to benefit, which would mean overcoming a huge amount of inertia.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  8. The Cold by Timberwolf0122 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How well to these batteries fair in the cold? If they are like the Li-ions in my video camera you'll get to the end of the street then they'll die.

    --
    In the not too distant future, next Sunday A.D.
  9. How quick they are to forget hydrogen... by distantbody · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...and hopefully good riddance. Say, did you know that an electric vehicle was the first to travel at 100km/h...



    ...in 1899!!!

  10. Re:Rolling Timebombs? by Muad'Dave · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've run into this education issue personally. I have a sand rail (what most people call a "Dune Buggy"). The gas tank is right behind the passenger's heads, inside the roll cage. My mother freaked when she saw that - she was concerned it was so close to passengers. "What happens in an accident?" she asked. I pointed out that the best place for the tank is where there's the most protection, and that's near the people, inside the roll cage. If it were outside, you'd guarantee a ruptured tank (no body skins on this vehicle, just tubular frame). Inside, your body would take as much damage as it takes to rupture the tank, meaning you'd probably be dead of blunt force trauma before a fire started from a ruptured tank.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  11. Heat by gilesjuk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Heat is a problem with Li-ion batteries. If they get too hot they explode. Leaving a phone in a car with direct sunlight is enough.

    Seems a bit odd they would be used in cars.

    1. Re:Heat by loshwomp · · Score: 4, Informative

      How do these things handle short trips in freezing weather?

      Quite well, actually, speaking as an electric vehicle engineer.

      A simple resistive water heater for cabing heating uses about 2000 watts on average, and perhaps 4000 watts worst case. Compared to a typical road load of 20,000 watts, it's obvious that the cabin heat makes a difference, but it's on the order of a 10% reduction in range.

      In the future, electric vehicles will use heat pumps (basically a bi-directional air conditioner) that will reduce the cabin heat energy budget by at least a factor of 3. The air conditioner in AC Propulsion's eBox vehicle uses about 700 watts worst case, and less depending on duty cycle.

  12. Re:Rolling Timebombs? by raidfibre · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wasn't that the point of him saying "How safe is that tank ..." ? Anyway - any technology that stores a lot of energy is going to have some potential (ha ha) for danger. There haven't been that many problems with LiIon batteries when you take into account the number of batteries that exist in the world.

    With that said, there's this problem of obtaining lithium which isn't nearly as abundant as nickel. I still like NiMH batteries for EVs, and I'm sure they will give lithium a run for the money (if not for weight). Even NiCd batteries are pretty good for electric cars, and the technology is practically antique. The issue with large NiMH cells (>10Ah) is that Texaco owns the patent.

  13. Re:Rolling Timebombs? by plague3106 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Um, to the Telsa Motor's site, and they'll have answered this already. Basically a cell in the battery pack can be on fire, and it won't affect the other cells.

  14. Re:Why now? by QuickFox · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's called product development.

    Or, with an analogy, how will new computers hold up vs the current computers? If something was wrong with the current computers, you would think they should have built the new ones to start with.

    (I do realize I'll be hanged for making an analogy without cars in it on Slashdot. But the argument is already about cars! Adding more cars into the analogy would probably cause a pile-up crash or something.)

    --
    Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
  15. Re:Rolling Timebombs? by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Lithium iron phosphate batteries (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithium_iron_phosphate_battery) are supposed to be pretty safe, at the expense of storing a bit less energy per size and weight than current Li-Ion batteries.
    They are also made from relatively cheap and plentiful raw materials, so I'd expect them to become the most frequently used batteries in electric cars.

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
  16. Re:Rolling Timebombs? by value_added · · Score: 5, Funny

    How often does a car catch file after a crash? Only very rarely.

    Wrong. Everyone knows that cars always explode after a crash. Sometimes, though, the explosion happens after the driver and occupants escape to a safe distance.

    I've seen it myself hundreds of times, both on TV and in movies.

  17. Re:Great News for the Coal Industry by mark-t · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or, perhaps an increased demand for electricity might spur on searches for alternative ways of producing it rather than through the burning of coal. Geothermal, wind, solar, hydro and even nuclear power all hold some immediate promise in this regard as potentially more environmentally friendly alternatives. At least with an existing electric car infrastructure, as the centralized methods used for generating the electricity might slowly change over time, the infrastructure of existing cars wouldn't need to be upgraded with it.

  18. Texaco owns the patent! by Chrisq · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is that to prevent people developing an alternative to petrol?

  19. Re:Great News for the Coal Industry by misleb · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's why it would be great to recharge these cars from a solar or wind source, where possible.


    That's why I recommend a wind generator be installed on every car. That way you can charge as you drive. Ever hang your hand out the car window and think "Wow, if I could just harness this power, I'd be rich!"

    -matthew
    --
    "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
  20. There is no free lunch by FlyingGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The electricity to charge all those batteries has to come from someplace. all you are doing is shifting the the consumption of fossil fuel from one place to another. The energy required to manufacture these batteries in VERY large quantities has to come from someplace as well.

    Last time I checked there are not many rivers left to damn up for hydro so the juice has to come from someplace and since fusion power isn't quite ready for prime time you are going to have to build a hell of a lot more power plants to transfer the power generation from a facility on 4 wheels to some very big stationary ones.

    That being said, you can gain a hell of a lot of efficiency because large power plants do much better then the internal combustion engine, but they still have to burn something, either that or be prepared to have a big nuclear power plant coming to a neighborhood near you.

    --
    Hey KID! Yeah you, get the fuck off my lawn!
    1. Re:There is no free lunch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think everyone with a rudimentary knowledge of science understands that electric cars are not free-energy/perpetual-motion devices. Of course the energy has to come from some place, and we all know where it's coming from: the power grid. In the U.S. this corresponds to roughly 50% coal, 20% nuclear, and the rest a mixture of fossil fuels, hydro, and renewables.

      What many people fail to realize is that using gasoline is hardly a direct way of powering cars. There are two important components that go in a car: gasoline, and motor oil. The distillation of gasoline uses an enormous amount of energy that we do not account for when arguing against electric vehicles. 19% of the pump price of gasoline is the cost of refining (distillation, cracking, reforming, etc.). So, no, we are not merely shifting the consumption of fossil fuels from one place to another. In effect, having all-electric vehicles would mean 20% of the electricity used is from nuclear energy, ~10% from renewable sources, minus the energy used for refining the gasoline, and the energy saved due to the efficiency of power generation and the efficiency of the electric motors. As for motor oil, this is also a component handled by the petroleum refining industry. Its manufacture is very energy intensive and there is a large market for it. Remember all those signs you see around storm drains that tell you not to dump your motor oil there? Guess what, it turns out motor oil is pretty bad for the environment. When people bring up the argument that electric vehicles have batteries that need to be replaced every so often, well internal-combustion vehicles have motor oil that needs replacing every 4000 miles.

      Another thing that bothers me that people don't talk about is pollution. There are two type of pollution: point source and non-point source pollution. The former means that there is a well defined area where the pollutants are being put into the environment, while the latter means the source of pollutants is diffuse and comes from many sources. Pollution from automobiles is non-point; they are everywhere. Pollution from power plants is point; you can point your finger at the building and say "that is where the pollution is coming from." When you shift to all-electric vehicles, you are effectively moving millions of diffuse points of pollution (tailpipes) into a few source locations (power plants). The advantages of this are enormous. With electric vehicles there is no need to worry about the emissions from individual vehicles (that means the emissions testing industry dies), all you need to worry about are the power plants. If the policy makers decide we need better air quality, we just need to fit the power plants with better scrubbers, or carbon sequestering equipment. If there is a development in fuel-to-electricity efficiency only the power plants need to implement it, and the benefits are immediately passed on to the electric car drivers. This is to say that you don't have to retrofit millions upon millions of vehicles with a new technology every time the emission or efficiency standards change. All of this is of course very inconvenient for car manufacturers, the car service industry, and the oil industry in the U.S. and abroad. No wonder the EV1 went the way it did.

    2. Re:There is no free lunch by jcaplan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, not necessarily, I know some folks with a solar car. Well, its a truck, actually - an electric Ford Ranger. The solar part is on the rooftop of their house. (You didn't think they were dragging around a solar array, did you?) They generate more than enough power to run their house, charge their truck and sell extra back to the utility. Who are these fabulously wealthy people who can afford this technological extravagance? A school teacher and a tutor. The economics of their situation is helped by California sunshine and California tax rebates and a lack of kids.

      This is all with yesterday's technology. Tomorrow's technology will make this solution available to more people, as cost of solar seems to be dropping rapidly (Nanosolar.com, etc).

      There are still issues with peak demand and charging, but if you can plug in at work or at the parking meter, then you nicely match solar power's power peak.

      -Jon

    3. Re:There is no free lunch by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "The electricity to charge all those batteries has to come from someplace. all you are doing is shifting the the consumption of fossil fuel from one place to another. The energy required to manufacture these batteries in VERY large quantities has to come from someplace as well."

      The above is correct. But there are two other factors

      (1) In the US only about 1/2 of our electric power is from burning fuels like coal. But even coal, as bad as it is, it is not imported. We expect this trend to improve as other types of power plants are built, nuclear, geo, wind soloar and so on. An electric powered car even today runs mainly on hydro-electric power if you live in the north on either US coast.

      (2) Even if 100% of our electric power were generated with liquid fuels it would be BETTER to to burn those fuel in some big plant some place. When you burn them in a car very little of the energy from the fuel goes into moving the car, most goes to heating the air around the car and is wasted. A large plant can do to things (a) be very efficient at conversion and (b) can capture the products of combustion - they can pump the carbon back underground where it came from. Cars have to be light enough to move under their own power but power plants can be massive because in a stationary plant mass has zero effect of efficiency.

  21. Re:Ergs must come from somewhere by fprintf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Come on. This is not always about shoving stuff down the little guys throat. There are plenty of communities that would love having a power plant in their town. For many more rural areas of the United States, they provide the only steady local jobs, provide taxes to help run the town, and sometimes even subsidized electricity (they do in the town next door to mine).

    --
    This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
  22. Just Rent A Car by soren100 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sure, you can charge your car at home for the daily commute, but what about road trips? Seriously -- how often do you go on a road trip? Most people only go on road trips a few times a year due to job and other considerations. So you rent a car, and you get to drive a new car that is fully maintained by *someone else* -- you don't have to take your car to the mechanic for a pre-trip "checkover". And you better hope that your mechanic doesn't cheat you and tell you something needs to be fixed when it doesn't.

    One of the huge bonuses associated with electric cars is reduced maintenance. There are no timing chains to break, no radiators to leak, no oil to be changed. Electric motors are highly reliable and very easy to fix. In the documentary "Who Killed the Electric Car?" they discussed that the dealers did not like the electric cars at all because of the tremendously lowered need for maintenance and repair. (Of course the mechanics loved them because the cars were easy to work and and the mechanics didn't end up covered in oil and grease all the time)

    If you really do a lot of extended road trips, you should get a gas car or hybrid, but for everybody else the electric car + renting a gas car occasionally would be the much better choice.
  23. Recursion! by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Using a car analogy when the topic itself is cars would be recursion.

    It would be even better if you could say that analogy with a LISP.

    --
    :(){ :|:& };:
  24. Re:Rolling Timebombs? by NeilMaguire · · Score: 2, Informative
    I used to design E85 and gasoline fuel systems and now I work on Li-ion batteries. Gas tanks do not blow up contrary to Hollywood's depiction. The vapor is too rich to burn even when a spark is ignited. If you shoot a bullet at a gas tank it leaks. A second spark after leakage could ignite. E85 is actually combustible at certain temperatures in the fuel tank. We had to invent a flame arrestor for the fill pipe which would quench a flame as it heads down the fill pipe. This is for idiots who smoke when they fill a tank.

    As for Lithium batteries, they do need to be protected by electronic circuitry and mechanical enclosures but no more so than a fuel tank. If you shoot a bullet through it, they could produce a thermal runaway (fire). But if someone is shooting at you, you have bigger concerns.

    Net is we need to move cars off of Saudi oil and onto our grid, then we can have independent discussions on how we power our grid. In CA, we are ~ 50% renewable. Search for eGrid and you will find data that supports the fact that burning coal and natural gas in power plants is many times more clean than in cars, 2-stroke weedwackers, and other gas applications.

    --
    Neil Maguire Alternative Energy Engineer
  25. Git yer marsmallows and grahams ready for... by rickb928 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Carbeque!

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  26. Re:Rolling Timebombs? by WalksOnDirt · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...there's this problem of obtaining lithium which isn't nearly as abundant as nickel. Lithium is about half as abundant as nickel, which isn't that great a difference. For comparison, boron, only half as abundant as lithium, is thrown away with the wash by people who use Borax.

    Considering that the lithium used will eventually be recycled, I don't expect lithium availability to be a major long term bottleneck.
    --
    a,e,i,o,u and sometimes w and y (at be if of up cwm by)