Slashdot Mirror


Nanowires of Unlimited Length

StCredZero writes with word of a research team from the University of Illinois who have developed a way to manufacture nanowires of any length from various materials. Not, unfortunately, carbon nanotubes, or we would be looking for news on space elevators soon. The process is analogous to drawing with a fountain pen — as liquid is drawn from a reservoir, a solvent (water or an organic) evaporates and the solute precipitates onto a substrate. The researchers have demonstrated a way to spin and wind a nanowire onto a spool; they have produced a coil of microfiber 850 nm in diameter and 40 cm long. Here's the abstract from the journal Advanced Materials.

111 comments

  1. Hee hee hee by Warui+Kami · · Score: 5, Funny

    From TFA (The Fine Abstract):

    Abstract
    No abstract.

    1. Re:Hee hee hee by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

      Very concise. I like it

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    2. Re:Hee hee hee by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

      "abstract (b-strkt', b'strkt')
      adj.
      1. Considered apart from concrete existence."

      Sounds about right to me

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    3. Re:Hee hee hee by spectrokid · · Score: 2, Funny

      That is because it is written in nano-ink. Get out your magnifier glass.

      --

      10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

    4. Re:Hee hee hee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If the nanowires become too long, they would become microwires, milliwires, wires, kilowires, megawires, gigawires and so on...

  2. You know what they say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's not the length of the wire, it's how you use it.

    1. Re:You know what they say by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 5, Funny

      Is it... is it connected yet?

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    2. Re:You know what they say by slawo · · Score: 1

      We should soon see the kind of nano wire we had in Syndicate Wars replace the barbed wires... much more effective.

      Be sure military will find a use for veeeery thin wire... even if it's just candy at the moment, it sure they will make it with something much more consistent in the future.

      --
      The road to hell is paved with good intentions...
  3. Interesting by Idiot+with+a+gun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But they only made the wires out of sugar, and various other water soluble compounds. While they said they could make wires out of ingredients that dissolve in volatile organic compounds, when will they be able to make them out of metal?

    1. Re:Interesting by steveo777 · · Score: 1

      Yes... quite a downer on your day when the space elevator you just finished melts away due to a little rain.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
  4. Best part of the article by Weaselmancer · · Score: 5, Informative

    IMHO, is this:

    To further demonstrate the versatility of the drawing process, for which the U. of I. has applied for a patent, the researchers drew nanofibers out of sugar, out of potassium hydroxide (a major industrial chemical) and out of densely packed quantum dots.

    Nanowires made of quantum dots? Sounds like an outstanding way to make a super efficient solar panel.

    You could lay out nano structures of quantum dots with whatever spacing and precision you'd like. And unlike all the other advances we usually see here on /. this one is already working.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:Best part of the article by Kelerain · · Score: 5, Funny

      the researchers drew nanofibers out of sugar

      Ladies and gentlemen, this is an unparalleled breakthrough in cotton candy technology.

    2. Re:Best part of the article by Gazzonyx · · Score: 1

      the researchers drew nanofibers out of sugar

      Ladies and gentlemen, this is an unparalleled breakthrough in cotton candy technology. Will it keep it from sticking to my fingers, which I then lick, which leads to stickier fingers, which I lick again?
      --

      If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

    3. Re:Best part of the article by h4rm0ny · · Score: 3, Funny


      No - it will just slice your tongue to pieces. "Nano-Cotton Candy - the Sharpest Flavour Ever!" ;)

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    4. Re:Best part of the article by googlebear · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yeah the nano wires of quantum dots sounds very interesting. In my introduction to Nanotech course at school I did a presentation on qunatum dot cellular automata. Essentially they design logic circuits out of precisely laid out circuits of quantum dots. The technology is proof of concept and was awaiting improvements in production technologies . Maybe this will indeed be the key to unlocking 10-20ghz processors (They don't have the same leaky qualities when as densely packed as chips built with MOSFETT. They use electron interactions as a means of propagating signals as opposed to actual current flow) .. Anyhow here is a link to the university doing the research on QCA's for those of you interested... HERE -Ian Roessle

    5. Re:Best part of the article by nilbud · · Score: 0

      Its still just sugar. Heston will find a use for it.

      --
      never let a man put his dirty how-do-you-do into your bajingo
    6. Re:Best part of the article by Devar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Am I the only one that read that comment and heard Professor Frink saying it?

      --
      It's a Bagel.
    7. Re:Best part of the article by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      Stay away from nano cotton candy. Did you see what happened when Neo touched the mirror in The Matrix!?

      Nuff said.

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    8. Re:Best part of the article by networkconsultant · · Score: 0

      Yes but the improbability of the chips ever being correct about a simple math instruction may cause programmers to take on various Grand Unified Theroy stances that aren't really needed for simple multiplication, and how do you make quantum dot's impervious to static? or solar wind for that matter?

    9. Re:Best part of the article by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      And unlike all the other advances we usually see here on /. this one is already working.

      Yeah. To demonstrate nanowires of unlimited length - they've made one a whopping 40cm long along with a bunch of other nanoscale demonstrations.
  5. Good by multipass666 · · Score: 0

    Now I can finally string one across a lane of traffic. Preferably at 4WD hight. I've been waiting a long time for shigawire.

    1. Re:Good by qbwiz · · Score: 1

      They're made out of sugar or potassium hydroxide, so good luck with that.

      --
      Ewige Blumenkraft.
    2. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >

      Great. So much about the focus on the advancement of science. NEw-age extortionism. " Pay, I or won't tell you!" Bastards.

    3. Re:good by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

      Can we do live recordings of Woody Guthrie concerts with these nano-wires?

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  6. Spiderman sitings ahoy by arivanov · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In other news a goofy red-blue character with the habit of spinning threads of various lengths has been seen roaming the streets of New York.

    On a more serious note this is what many silk spinners do. They excrete silk as liquid and it becomes a wire or a sheet a few ms later. Some silk spinners manage threads which are in micrometers in diameter as well.

    --
    Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
    http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    1. Re:Spiderman sitings ahoy by gotzero · · Score: 1

      Maybe we can start feeding them metal or carbon pellets?

      It will be neat to see the future of this. Hopefully they can scale everything for more production, and get some alternate materials in there.

    2. Re:Spiderman sitings ahoy by stereoroid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Fibres in the m range are nothing new - that's where optical fibre lives, with the long-range fibres below 10 m. This story is about fibres in the nanometre range, a thousandth the diameter of optical fibre.

      I wonder how strong the fibre is, and how long it will be before it gets turned in to a weapon? Attach it to a stick, hang a weight on the other end, and whoops! there goes my head, rolling down the stairs.

      --
      (this is not a .sig)
    3. Re:Spiderman sitings ahoy by Jesus_666 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This could mean that artificial silk is around the corner. And I don't mean some silk-like synthetic but instead something with the exact properties of real silk but a much lower price. If they do manage to make silk that way I predict that in a few years silk will be the next big fad. Of course this doesn't work like a real silk gland at all, but maybe something workable can be achieved.

      Outside of the fashion world (where things actually matter), this might also mean a big step towards artificial spider silk, which a lot of people are very interested in - spider silk is very tough and is would be useful wherever you need a very light tough fabric, especially when you want something that is biodegradable. Currently we can produce the protein, but we can't spin it. Perhaps this technology might enable us to create something reasonably similar to real spider silk.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    4. Re:Spiderman sitings ahoy by somersault · · Score: 1

      W00T PANTS!! Where's my Spiderman webslinger?!!

      --
      which is totally what she said
    5. Re:Spiderman sitings ahoy by samkass · · Score: 2, Funny

      "This is my drawer full of various lengths of wire... that's my interstellar spaceship.... here, let me show you some wire..."

      --
      E pluribus unum
    6. Re:Spiderman sitings ahoy by pclminion · · Score: 1

      that's where optical fibre lives, with the long-range fibres below 10 m

      I should certainly hope they don't need fibers thicker than 10 meters... Where do you get such a thick fiber anyway? That's like, house-sized.

  7. good by rastoboy29 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now we can finally start closing the so called "garotte gap" with the Russians.

  8. wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    doesn't it have to be around or under 100nm to be considered nano?

    1. Re:wait... by Garridan · · Score: 4, Funny

      Apparently, a thing needs only be measured in nanometers to be considered "nano". My car is also nano-scale, being a scant 1524000000 nanometers tall!

    2. Re:wait... by julesh · · Score: 3, Informative

      doesn't it have to be around or under 100nm to be considered nano?

      AFAIK, the most common definition is under 1um, so this just qualifies.

    3. Re:wait... by slaingod · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hear you, but in this case, I think because it lies within the range of nanometers ( ie. less than 1 micrometer) that it is an accurate and valid usage.

      --
      http://blog.slaingod.com
    4. Re:wait... by Garridan · · Score: 3, Funny

      Do you doubt that I could measure my car to within a range of +/- 1 micrometer? No sweat. My micrometer is about 3.5 inches long, and my car is 5' tall, plus or minus an inch. That puts it at a height of 17.15 +/- 0.28 micrometers. No wonder shuttles keep crashing... you Americans know nothing about the metric system!

    5. Re:wait... by audunb · · Score: 1

      I'm a nanotech-student, and the definition we're always using is below 100nm.
      I haven't read the article, I just skimmed through parts of it, but it seems like they are naming the >250nm-fibers microfibers and the smaller ones nanofibers.

    6. Re:wait... by silicone_chemist · · Score: 1

      Yes, TFA refers to 25 and 100 nm structures as nano and the 850 nm structure as micro. "...nanofibers approximately 25 nanometers in diameter..." "...nanofibers approximately 100 nanometers in diameter..." "...microfiber was approximately 850 nanometers in diameter..."

    7. Re:wait... by jez9999 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Apparently, a thing needs only be measured in nanometers to be considered "nano".

      Or, rather small and made by Apple.

    8. Re:wait... by slaingod · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Um, that wasn't the point. The point is that they are 850nm thick which is less than a micrometer. In no way is any dimension (of the usual 3 :) of your car less than 1 micrometer.

      --
      http://blog.slaingod.com
    9. Re:wait... by slaingod · · Score: 1

      And I don't doubt there are a lot of things you can measure that are 3.5 inches :) JK!!!

      --
      http://blog.slaingod.com
    10. Re:wait... by Rostin · · Score: 1

      I think the gp is right.. under 100 nm is still the most common standard. But, IIRC, a few months ago a seminar speaker in my department casually remarked that many people in the micro- and nanofluidics community were applying the nano label to structures under a micron.

    11. Re:wait... by DinZy · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call them nanowires. 0.85 um is hardly nano. But I suppose I am biased because I work with actual nanowires. This is just a case of the U of I trying to patent something and turn a profit from it. It is a disturbing trend that is happening in our universities. Universities create these Technology transfer divisions, spend millions on staff, etc, charge us poor research groups higher overhead to pay for it, and then try to turn a profit by patenting our results. It is not profitable for the university and it makes research even harder to do because it steals a good percentage off the tops of our rapidly dwindling, funds.

    12. Re:wait... by jagdish · · Score: 1

      Is it nano scale car, or is it a Nano Car? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nano_car

    13. Re:wait... by Timmmm · · Score: 1

      Due to the fact that actual 'grey goo'-style nanotechnology is many decades away, people have latched on to the nanotech buzzword by describing anything whose *components* are nano-scale as nanotechnology. For example if you put really small particles in paint and that makes it have interesting properties, that makes it 'nanotechnology'. In this case the nanotubes themselves are nano-sized.

      It is indeed silly, but otherwise we wouldn't have much that we could really call nano-technology.

    14. Re:wait... by gr8scot · · Score: 1
      Garridan:

      No wonder shuttles keep crashing... you Americans know nothing about the metric system! slaingod:

      And I don't doubt there are a lot of things you can measure that are 3.5 inches :) JK!!! No wonder we Americans keep having to farm IT jobs overseas and lower immigration standards. They're just following our academic standards, which are now nearly oxymoronic.
      --
      All 19 hijackers were known terrorists 09-10-2001. Lack of FBI intelligence does not justify warrantless wiretaps..
  9. Been watching too much Futurama by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    And over there is my intergalactic spaceship. And here's where I keep assorted lengths of wire.

  10. My height by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently I am of unlimited height... times 4.

  11. PENIS PENIS HAHAHAHAHAHA PENIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    i have a penis of unlimited length. i just thought you all should know this.

    1. Re:PENIS PENIS HAHAHAHAHAHA PENIS by Vexor · · Score: 1

      Brings a whole new meaning to karma whoring...

      --
      ~Vexed and loving it!
  12. Re:Shigawire!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hm... nano-wire made from sugar? Cotton candy isn't known for its extreme strength.

  13. the fibre so thin that ... by zen-theorist · · Score: 2, Funny

    there's nothing to see here. move along.

  14. I've created an infinite length nanowire by doomy · · Score: 3, Funny

    It looks like this "O"

    --
    ...free your source and the rest would follow...
    1. Re:I've created an infinite length nanowire by Loibisch · · Score: 1, Funny

      Since it's a nanowire wouldn't it look more like "o" or even "."? :)

    2. Re:I've created an infinite length nanowire by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      It looks like this "O" *golfclaps*
      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    3. Re:I've created an infinite length nanowire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It looks like this "O"
      You know, for kids!
  15. unlimited? by Drantin · · Score: 3, Funny

    How long will it take to manufacture a nanowire of infinite length?

    --
    Actio personalis moritur cum persona. (Dead men don't sue)
    1. Re:unlimited? by Yetihehe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Better question: How long will it blend?

      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
    2. Re:unlimited? by dohzer · · Score: 1

      Nothing is unlimited except for unlimity itself.
      Or something like that.

    3. Re:unlimited? by blueg3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Forever.

    4. Re:unlimited? by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      Actually it is called Unlimitanium, a close cousin to Unobtainium

      Both theorized to exist in their natural form as key elements that make up the legendary Money Tree.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    5. Re:unlimited? by DTemp · · Score: 1

      Touché fine sir!

  16. I dont think that word means what you think it mea by dissy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nanowires of Unlimited Length So would that be comcast unlimited length, timewarner unlimited length, or AT&T unlimited length?

    And could you convert that to a unit of cars or library of congresses?

  17. Damn! by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    The moment I read the first sentence, the subject of the second sentence popped into my mind. Then I read it.

    Heavy sigh.

    But it's still progress.

  18. Possibly a first step to carbon nanotubes by Mathinker · · Score: 1

    Considering that carbon nanotubes are graphite-like structures first found in the soot of arc discharges, it seems reasonable that an organic nanofiber of the right composition might decompose into a nanotube if strongly heated under the right conditions (almost certainly, for a start, anaerobic ones).

  19. And over there is my intergalactic spaceship... by dmitriy88 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ...and here is where I keep assorted lengths of wire!

  20. Re:Mircro by i_liek_turtles · · Score: 0

    One of the tags previously on there was "mircro."

  21. Re:Shigawire!! by Tancred · · Score: 3, Funny

    Frank Herbert was prescient....

    Yeah. Must have been all the melange.

    Anyone else remember the ornithopters dragging a big loop of shigawire in an assassination attempt? Probably around the Children of Dune / God Emperor time period.
  22. nano nano by dwater · · Score: 4, Funny

    There's only one image I see when I read the word 'nano'. My brain always doubles it up into 'nano nano'.

    Am I alone?

    Please say I am. I wouldn't wish it on anyone...

    --
    Max.
    1. Re:nano nano by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you mean this?

    2. Re:nano nano by somersault · · Score: 1

      I thought he was referring to Mork and Mindy

      --
      which is totally what she said
    3. Re:nano nano by aug24 · · Score: 1

      Well, you were alone, you bastard...

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    4. Re:nano nano by dwater · · Score: 1

      You, sir, are correct.

      --
      Max.
    5. Re:nano nano by eXFeLoN · · Score: 0

      One word for your brother... Shazbot!

      --
      My other sig is a knife wound.
    6. Re:nano nano by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn you!! I'm never going to be able to see the word nano again without doubling it!!

    7. Re:nano nano by IonOtter · · Score: 1

      You're posting Mork & Mindy jokes on SlashDot. Of course you're alone.

      --
      [End Of Line]
    8. Re:nano nano by Rockin'Robert · · Score: 0

      1. Yes, you are,
      2. No, you're not, and/or
      3. You are indeterminate
      Mork.
      http://atheism.about.com/library/glossary/general/bldef_schrodingererwin.htm
      RR

  23. Princess Bride by tekrat · · Score: 1

    They're NULs (nanowires of unlimited length)...
    Either that, or they've gone to /dev/NUL
    There's too many jokes here...

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  24. Re:Shigawire!! by Kreigaffe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    [geekhat]
    actually, I believe it was Heretics of Dune, when Sheeana was on the rooftop of the Priesthood of Rakis's building, and was saved by a Bene Gesserit who I *believe* wound up cut up by the shigawire.. but it's been a little bit since I've read the series, it might've been someone in the Priesthood who got cut up
    [/geekhat]

    --
    ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
  25. Unlimited?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Arbitrary length maybe.. unlimited? Not.

    1. Re:Unlimited?? by gr8scot · · Score: 1

      Well said. Where the hell are the articles by people who understand their topics?

      --
      All 19 hijackers were known terrorists 09-10-2001. Lack of FBI intelligence does not justify warrantless wiretaps..
  26. CNTs != space elevator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Not, unfortunately, carbon nanotubes, or we would be looking for news on space elevators soon.

    Carbon nanotubes have a unique structure that gives them amazing strength, conductivity and resilience. These properties, however, only exist at the nanoscale and have never been scaled up. (Ballistic conduction, for instance, usually only occurs for ~100 um.) So the idea that a space elevator will be constructed from CNTs is something of a Popular Science induced myth.

    Glavin.

  27. Webshooters? by Avitor · · Score: 0

    "The process is like drawing with a fountain pen - the ink comes out and quickly dries or 'solidifies,' " said Min-Feng Yu, a professor of mechanical science and engineering, and an affiliate of the Beckman Institute. "But, unlike drawing with a fountain pen, we can draw objects in three dimensions."
    Didn't a teenage New Yorker figure this out in the '60s?
    --
    My /. Karma is a bum rap.
  28. NoULs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think they exist.

    1. Re:NoULs? by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Glad to see I'm not the only one who immediately thought of that. Never seen the "Try to be more original" error on slashdot before!

  29. Artificial Silk by Phoenix666 · · Score: 1

    Bah! You young whippersnappers!

    I'd rather get my silk the old-fashioned way, by milking goats:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/889951.stm

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
    1. Re:Artificial Silk by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      That's what I meant with "we can produce the protein". The problem with goat silk is that it's just the protein in raw form. Spiders do some very specific things with their silk protein in order to form strands of it. The company that came up with goat silk tried to replicate it but failed - they finally abandoned the effort. However, if this new technology also worked for spider silk protein, we could get close to the real deal. It'd probably still not match what real spiders produce, but it's better than a bottle full of a gel that just happens to be made up of the same proteins as spider silk.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  30. Nano by stevensinger · · Score: 1

    So what can we really do with it? Like what is the real world app?

    --
    Fear Nothing, Respect Everything. Singer 2006
  31. Re:I dont think that word means what you think it by Non-Huffable+Kitten · · Score: 1

    I know you are joking, but FWIW, they are speaking of potential infinity, not actual infinity :)

    --
    Medium cat is MEDIUM.
  32. Now that you mention it... by pragma_x · · Score: 1

    Ladies and gentlemen, this is an unparalleled breakthrough in cotton candy technology... bhay-gn-flay-vn.


    FTFY. :)
  33. Space Elevators Not Needed for Cheap Launch by StCredZero · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Space Elevators going up to geosynchronous orbit aren't needed, so carbon nanotubes aren't needed either. We could build a Space Pier - which is a series of towers 100km tall with an accelerator on the top - out of pressurized cylindrical columns made out of boron. (The linked article talks about diamondoid materials, but other researchers have looked into more conventional materials which would allow us to build towers 100km high.) Also, Robert Zubrin has looked into a Hypersonic Skyhook which doesn't extend all the way to the ground or out to geosynch. However, it's a lot easier to design and build a SSTO or TSTO craft that can acheive 100km altitude and 4 or 5 km/s delta-v, as opposed to 8.5 km/s needed for low earth orbit. It is rumored that Burt Rutan's White Knight Two is designed to also launch a higher performance rocket plane that could acheive this. (In addition to the Space Ship Two space tourism craft.)

  34. nanowire of unlimited length by pclminion · · Score: 1

    Is that kind of like a potion of unlimited healing? And more importantly, how many mages can you strangle with a single, unlimitedly long wire?

  35. Re:I dont think that word means what you think it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's over 2,500 unlimited movies, or 50,000 unlimited mp3s.

    Both of which will get you throttled, and reported to the authorities.

  36. Unfortunately... by C10H14N2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It would take three or four Hiroshimas worth of power to spin a single Library of Congress length of nanowire, but amazingly it would only weigh one Escalade despite being able to support five Empire State Buildings. Unfortunately, it would also cost one Medicaid budget per Los Angeles to Sydney length of cable the width of a human hair.

    1. Re:Unfortunately... by dissy · · Score: 1

      Thank you!

      Now if only the article summary made as much sense ;}

    2. Re:Unfortunately... by Sibko · · Score: 1

      But what is that in Volvo stacks?

  37. It doesn't have to be very long by DMCBOSTON · · Score: 1

    It doesn't have to be very long to be woven into long ropes. Fibers are short, then woven. So it would seem that something 40 cm long could just do the trick.

  38. So how long is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Twice the distance from the middle of an unlimited sized thread to one of its ends? But how do you find the middle of an unlimited sized thread?

  39. Unlimited is not infinite by mangu · · Score: 1
    There is a method for making unlimited ingots of steel. This only means that an unbroken block of steel will keep coming out of the machine as long as you keep pouring molten steel in the other end.


    If you can do the same thing with some ultra-strong material, such as spider silk, for instance, this would mean an advancement in materials technology comparable to the invention of steel casting processes.

  40. Westley says ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is best to use Nanowires of Unlimited Length against the Rodents of Unusual Size.

  41. Re:You know what they say... EXACTLY! by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    There's a vas deferens between tubes and wires, one being that tubes usually transmit things *inside* their diameter and wires... oh, hell. Nano wires might be useful for one LCDR Data to deliver his stimulating positronic-originating, nano-pump-boosted shock-waves in a variety of stimulating, articulated positions...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  42. Nanowire battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope the University of Illinois is working with Stanford on the Nanowire battery: http://news-service.stanford.edu/news/2008/january9/nanowire-010908

  43. Unlimited? Nice. by obeythefist · · Score: 1

    Let's run one out to Alpha Centauri.

    No? I guess "unlimited" was a bit of an overstatement then.

    --
    I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.