Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

The Grammy In Mathematics

Posted by kdawson on from the woodie-rides-again dept.

An anonymous reader writes "A mathematician will receive a Grammy award for restoring the only known recording of a live Woody Guthrie performance — a bootleg someone made in 1949 using a wire recorder. Guthrie's daughter, who had never heard her father perform in front of a live audience, oversaw the restoration. The article links very cool before and after clips."

34 of 150 comments (clear)

  1. In other news... by bigattichouse · · Score: 4, Funny

    The RIAA sues same gentleman for 100,000,000 USD over same infringement of Guthrie's works, especially by the current owner. DMCA invoked on compromise of special wire-based recording medium, daughter of famous singer fined and sent to Gitmo, Hail freedom! Homeland security mistakes old recordings as bombs and bans them from all flights. Shall I go on?

    --
    meh
    1. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Can we have a "-1, Trite" mod? DMCA, RIAA, Gitmo, and airport security? All this guy needs is a reference to Microsoft, and we have Slashdot Bingo!

    2. Re:In other news... by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To all those who like to argue against the ongoing use of analog recording mediums for original masters, let this be a lesson to you.

      Always record your originals in analog and immediately transfer to digital, and one day you may find that more of the original sonic environment can be recovered from that master than you ever thought possible through the progression of physics, chemistry and math.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    3. Re:In other news... by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well perhaps OP knew that you yourself would provide the Microsoft reference.

      Oh - BINGO!

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    4. Re:In other news... by clickclickdrone · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Along the same lines, back in the 80's, An Atari ST was used to analyse and decode the output from an analogue video disc created by Baird (I think) in the late 1920's and managed to extract and display the image of a man's face.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    5. Re:In other news... by VorpalRodent · · Score: 5, Funny

      Anybody can bash Microsoft, that's why it's the "Free" space at the center of Slashdot Bingo.

      --
      Take it to the limit, everybody to the limit, come on, everybody fhqwhgads.
    6. Re:In other news... by DdJ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      1) Things that we believe we can't distinguish now, we may demonstrate that we can distinguish in the future. Just because you can't tell the difference consciously when you listen to two samples doesn't mean that some subconscious part of your brain can't determine a difference. We cannot rule out subsonics, subliminal effects, and so on.

      2) There are technologies that would benefit from having more information available. Imagine being able to extract enough information from a recording to simulate that vocalist singing something else. Heck, for an example of a technology that benefits from much fancier recordings than some people ever thought they would need, consider the game "Rock Band". You can't (today) use a master recording in Rock Band unless each drum in the drum kit has a separate recording track. This is why the old Rush songs in the game are covers and not masters. Almost nobody imagined they'd actually have a need for those more detailed recordings, but now we do. (I say "you can't today" because the software to de-mix the drums isn't advanced enough yet. Once it is advanced enough... we may determine that common digital recordings aren't as good for this purpose as straight-up analog recordings!)

      3) This is the far-out one -- go ahead and warm up your mockery engines... what about superhuman hearing? Are you sure that, by technology (biotech, cybernetics, whatever), human hearing won't ever be improved? What about ... here it comes ... uplifted dolphins? (This is really just a sensationalist version of #2: "applications we haven't thought of yet".)

    7. Re:In other news... by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The limits of human hearing isn't the only factor.

      Because later down the line we might find that we do care about that missing information that we discarded because it had no obvious value at the time. The Romans didn't measure the temperature on a daily basis, but they did measure crop yields and other factors. From those figures we were able to deduce the average daily temperatures. To the Romans, the daily temperatures weren't useful. To us, it helps us track global climate conditions.

        It is well known that string instruments Wouldn't it be interesting to know how a Stradivari sounded when it was only a few months old? We could have compared that information to surviving examples and had a better understanding of how the instruments age.

      Granted that is just an off the cuff example, but I'm certain that it is better to preserve as much information as possible when dealing with musical performances.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    8. Re:In other news... by Intron · · Score: 3, Funny

      His post was partially overwritten, but advanced techniques could recover that information from the original analog keystrokes.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    9. Re:In other news... by audubon · · Score: 4, Informative

      The 4-frame-per-second video recordings were made on 78-RPM lacquers by John Logie Baird in 1927 and 1928. Don McLean performed the restoration.

  2. Title of story wrong? by Mushdot · · Score: 5, Informative

    The title of the article says the mathematician was norminated for a grammy, yet the article itself says the recording was put forward, which sounds more plausible.

    1. Re:Title of story wrong? by Guanine · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, the title of the article is correct, this recording did indeed win a Grammy (it won in the category of "Historical"). See more at the Grammy website.

  3. Re:In even more other news... by Loibisch · · Score: 5, Funny

    Congress declares that audio restoration is in fact nothing more than DRM circumvention and will henceforth be illegal under the NORESTORE act.

    Also: RIAA patents bad recording quality as a copy protection measure.
    (couldn't be closer to the truth for your average CD...)

    someone else take the torch from here :)

  4. Only known what? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wait, there are lots of recordings of Woody Guthrie. I don't know where the claim that this was the "only known recording" comes from.

    He was on a weekly radio show in the 40's and I've heard tapes of that, too. Hell, you can go to Wikipedia and listen to a streaming recording of Guthrie.

    It's not the only "live" recording in front of an audience, either.

    You think I'm gonna spend the time to read TFA to see what their actual claim is? No friggin' way.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Only known what? by Spad · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's poorly phrased, but they mean the only known live recording of *that* performance.

    2. Re:Only known what? by ericpi · · Score: 2

      I don't know where the claim that this was the "only known recording" comes from.

      I believe that TFS means 'the only known recording of a particular live Woody Guthrie performance'.

    3. Re:Only known what? by Stooshie · · Score: 3, Informative

      TFS actually says:

      ... the only known recording of a live Woody Guthrie performance ...

      In 1949, recordings of live concerts were extremely rare. Live performances were rarely recorded. They were transmitted on the radio or TV and that was it. Call it short sighted but people really thought back then that TV and Radio were never going to catch on.

      --
      America, Home of the Brave. ... .and the Squaw.
    4. Re:Only known what? by hcdejong · · Score: 2, Informative

      Call it short sighted

      Why call it shortsighted? In 1949, recording technology was neither mature nor inexpensive. TV and radio had nothing like the budget they enjoy today, so there often simply was no money to archive broadcasts. Hell, the BBC (not what you'd consider an insignificant or poorly-funded organization) was plagued by this well into the '60s.

    5. Re:Only known what? by danzona · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here is what Wikipedia has to say:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wire_recorder

      Didn't you ever watch Hogan's Heroes? Newkirk had one in his sewing kit. The thread in the kit was actually wire. And the Germans never figured it out!

  5. Re:aif file not working in Helix player on Ubuntu by simcop2387 · · Score: 4, Informative

    plays fine under mplayer

  6. mirror please? by v1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    because featuring two aif's on slashdot is clearly not going to go well.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  7. For those of us who don't know Mr. Guthrie by ale_ryu · · Score: 2, Informative
    From wikipedia:

    Woodrow Wilson "Woody" Guthrie (July 14, 1912 - October 3, 1967) was an American songwriter and folk musician. Guthrie's musical legacy consists of hundreds of songs, ballads and improvised works covering topics from political themes to traditional songs to children's songs. Guthrie performed continually throughout his life with his guitar frequently displaying the slogan "This Machine Kills Fascists". Guthrie is perhaps best known for his song "This Land Is Your Land" which is regularly sung in American schools. Many of his recorded songs are archived in the Library of Congress.
    --
    Check out my blog!
  8. A Mathematician by radarsat1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Congratulations, "A Mathematician"!!

    How awesome is that, to do some really interesting work, and finally get some world-wide recognition and even get your name on the front page of Slashdot!

    Oh, wait...

    Common people, let's give credit where credit is due. Thanks. The guy's name isn't even mentioned until the 11th paragraph of the story! Somehow when it's something cool like this it's enough to say, "mathematics did it!", as if this restoration technique of identifying the hum of a 1949 power supply to help guide a dynamic warping and interpolation technique just dropped out of thin air.

    (It's Kevin Short by the way, although if I understand the article, this sound engineer Jamie Howarth played a large part as well.)

  9. Re:The difference is negligible .. by NekSnappa · · Score: 4, Informative
    Okay, where to start?

    Yes there is less hiss in the background, but to say that the vocals are unchanged is wrong. I don't know what you were expecting here, but the point was to get it to sound as close as possible to hearing him playing live. The tone and pitch is correct, the high nasal voice is common in folk music, and that is how other Guthrie recordings sound.

    If you read TFA you would know that they used different mathematical approaches to compensate for kinks, and breaks in the original wire recording media, and various slow downs, and speed ups during recording which change the pitch when played back.

    And I have to say... Banjo? WTF! If you can't tell the difference between a banjo and an acoustic guitar you have no business commenting on this article.

    --
    I want to shoot the messenger!
  10. Come back Woody Guthrie by aethera · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I to post hear all the reasons why everyone should know and admire a true American Here like Woody Guthrie, a guy who worked as a migrant farmer when the Depression and Dust Bowl drove him from Oklahoma at age 16, served in the Merchant Marine, got his head bashed in more than a few times fighting for the unions and against corrupt politicians....but I thought I could just let some of his own words say it for him:

    ""I am out to sing songs that will prove to you that this is your world and that if it has hit you pretty hard and knocked you for a dozen loops, no matter what color, what size you are, how you are built, I am out to sing the songs that make you take pride in yourself and in your work. And the songs that I sing are made up for the most part by all sorts of folks just about like you."

    "I hate a song that makes you think that you are not any good. I hate a song that makes you think that you are just born to lose. Bound to lose. No good to nobody. No good for nothing. Because you are too old or too young or too fat or too slim or too ugly or too this or too that."

    "Yes, as through this world I've wandered I've seen lots of funny men; Some will rob you with a six-gun, And some with a fountain pen"

    "This song is Copyrighted in U.S., under Seal of Copyright # 154085, for a period of 28 years, and anybody caught singin' it without our permission, will be mighty good friends of ourn, cause we don't give a dern. Publish it. Write it. Sing it. Swing to it. Yodel it. We wrote it, that's all we wanted to do."

    1. Re:Come back Woody Guthrie by Zwack · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And of course the "missing verses" from "this land..."

      As I was walkin' - I saw a sign there
      And that sign said - no tress passin'
      But on the other side .... it didn't say nothin!
      Now that side was made for you and me!

      Arlo is great in concert, but I would love to have seen Woody too.

      Z.

      --
      -- Under/Overrated is meta-moderation, and therefore is Redundant.
  11. Er, but... by sm62704 · · Score: 3, Informative

    My dad had an album, late 50s or early 60s, called ICRC, either The Weavers On Tour or The Weavers Live at Carnegie Hall. It had such great folks songs like "Drill, ye terrier, drill" and "So Long, It's Been Good ta know ya".

    Woodie Guthrie and Pete Seeger were both on this album.

    After my folks were divorced in 1976 (the year I got married) it wound up being mine. Sadly the copy was stolen along with my killer stereo and most of my other albums.

    Unlike what they call "stealing music" these days I no longer have my copy of the Weavers. Furthermore, it's out of print and I can't get a new copy. It should be in the public domain and I should be able to at least get a good SHN of it.

    In USSA, copyright steals from ME.

    -mcgrew

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    1. Re:Er, but... by penguinchris · · Score: 2, Informative

      Both albums were recorded and released after Guthrie stopped performing, so I think you must be remembering incorrectly. It is possible and maybe even likely that Guthrie played with The Weavers, and though there are Weavers live recordings from as early as 1950-1951, he's obviously not on them if his own daughter and the researchers who worked on this restoration could not figure that out.

      Sources:
      http://www.amrhome.net/contents/sepdsc.txt "The Weavers on Tour (1956-58)" "The Weavers at Carnegie Hall (December, 1955)"

      Guthrie stopped performing sometime before 1954 according to Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woody_Guthrie#Deteriorating_health

      Also, while indeed the album you're referring to (The Weavers On Tour) is out of print, The Weavers Live at Carnegie Hall is available on CD: http://www.amazon.com/Weavers-at-Carnegie-Hall/dp/B000000EFX. There is a Guthrie-penned song on there, which might be the root of your mis-remembering.

  12. about time by mbius · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Original != optimal. Is this theoretically ultimate format DVD-A? 'Cause I, for one, am tired of buying the damned White Album.

    http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2004/10/8/134958/152

    In the late 1970s when digital recording was born, 44 k samples per second was the best the equipment of the time could do. It was deemed "good enough," since the labels "golden ears" (humans with hearing well above average) didn't hear any noise and the sound of aliasing was something they had never encountered. They knew what hiss sounded like. They knew what a "muddy" recording sounded like. They knew what harmonic distortion sounded like. They knew what clipping sounded like. But aliasing was new, and they didn't hear it- because they could not possibly listen for it, as they listened for the above mentioned distortions they knew.

    At a CD's 44 ksps sample rate, the very highest frequency it can reproduce at all is 22 khz. This is well above human hearing- but here, the model fails. Because its 22 khz frequency response is not an undistorted response.

    --
    you can have my violent video games when you pry them from my cold, dead hands.
    Prime UID Club
    1. Re:about time by Mprx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is no problem with aliasing on correctly mastered CDs, as they are supposed to be low pass filtered at 20KHz. The extra 2KHz overhead is so you can have a shallow enough rolloff that no perceptible distortion is introduced.

  13. As a side note... by Misch · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As a side note, Nora Guthrie (Woody's daughter, Arlo Guthrie's sister) is the curator of the Woody Guthrie collection has been handing out bits and pieces of her fathers poetry, lyrics, and unfinished songs to various musicians to finish up or add melodies to. The Klezmatics have recorded an entire album of Woody's lyrics, and I've heard plenty of other songs from other musicians who have received a piece of his writing.

    --

    --You will rephrase your request for me to go to hell. Goto statements are not acceptable programming constructs
  14. CoralCDN mirror by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Informative

    TFA: http://www.sciencenews.org.nyud.net/articles/20080209/mathtrek.asp

    http://www.sciencenews.org.nyud.net/articles/20080209/Guthrie1.aif
    http://www.sciencenews.org.nyud.net/articles/20080209/Guthrie2.aif

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  15. Grandma-ies by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2, Funny

    They the awarded Woody Guthrie best heavy Metal performance.

  16. Sigh. I can't hear the difference... by hhr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I mean, the 2nd recording may sound a bit more clear, but I would never have noticed if I wasn't told. Any one else have ears as bad as I?