Slashdot Mirror


Domain Key Identified Mail vs Phishing

alphadogg writes "Some of the Internet's most powerful companies — including Yahoo, Google, PayPal and AOL — are brandishing a new weapon in the ongoing battle against e-mail fraud. DKIM is an emerging e-mail authentication standard developed by the IETF. DKIM, which stands for DomainKeys Identified Mail, allows an organization to cryptographically sign outgoing e-mail to verify that it sent the message. DKIM addresses one of the Internet's biggest threats: e-mail fraud. As much as 80% of e-mail that purports to be from leading brands, banks and ISPs is spoofed, according to a report released in late January by the Authentication and Online Trust Alliance (AOTA)."

8 of 180 comments (clear)

  1. Good. by AndGodSed · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe those C_a_n_a_d_i_a_n Pharmacies selling V1a-gra can start using this technology so that I can finally know the stuff is ligit!

  2. Re:Useless.... by Intron · · Score: 4, Funny

    You frequently get phish attempts from your friends and family?

    --
    Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
  3. Oblig by W3bbo · · Score: 4, Funny

    TFA advocates a

    (*) technical ( ) legislative ( ) market-based ( ) vigilante

    approach to fighting spam. Your idea will not work. Here is why it won't work. (One or more of the following may apply to your particular idea, and it may have other flaws which used to vary from state to state before a bad federal law was passed.)

    ( ) Spammers can easily use it to harvest email addresses
    ( ) Mailing lists and other legitimate email uses would be affected
    ( ) No one will be able to find the guy or collect the money
    ( ) It is defenseless against brute force attacks
    (*) It will stop spam for two weeks and then we'll be stuck with it
    ( ) Users of email will not put up with it
    (*) Microsoft will not put up with it
    ( ) The police will not put up with it
    ( ) Requires too much cooperation from spammers
    (*) Requires immediate total cooperation from everybody at once
    ( ) Many email users cannot afford to lose business or alienate potential employers
    ( ) Spammers don't care about invalid addresses in their lists
    ( ) Anyone could anonymously destroy anyone else's career or business

    Specifically, your plan fails to account for

    ( ) Laws expressly prohibiting it
    ( ) Lack of centrally controlling authority for email
    ( ) Open relays in foreign countries
    ( ) Ease of searching tiny alphanumeric address space of all email addresses
    ( ) Asshats
    ( ) Jurisdictional problems
    ( ) Unpopularity of weird new taxes
    ( ) Public reluctance to accept weird new forms of money
    ( ) Huge existing software investment in SMTP
    ( ) Susceptibility of protocols other than SMTP to attack
    ( ) Willingness of users to install OS patches received by email
    ( ) Armies of worm riddled broadband-connected Windows boxes
    (*) Eternal arms race involved in all filtering approaches
    (*) Extreme profitability of spam
    (*) Joe jobs and/or identity theft
    (*) Technically illiterate users
    (*) Extreme stupidity on the part of people who do business with spammers
    ( ) Dishonesty on the part of spammers themselves
    ( ) Bandwidth costs that are unaffected by client filtering
    (*) CPU costs that are involved with cryptography
    (*) Outlook

    and the following philosophical objections may also apply:

    ( ) Ideas similar to yours are easy to come up with, yet none have ever been shown practical
    ( ) Any scheme based on opt-out is unacceptable
    ( ) SMTP headers should not be the subject of legislation
    ( ) Blacklists suck
    ( ) Whitelists suck
    ( ) We should be able to talk about Viagra without being censored
    ( ) Countermeasures should not involve wire fraud or credit card fraud
    ( ) Countermeasures should not involve sabotage of public networks
    (*) Countermeasures must work if phased in gradually
    ( ) Sending email should be free
    (*) Why should we have to trust you and your servers?
    ( ) Incompatiblity with open source or open source licenses
    ( ) Feel-good measures do nothing to solve the problem
    ( ) Temporary/one-time email addresses are cumbersome
    ( ) I don't want the government reading my email
    ( ) Killing them that way is not slow and painful enough

    Furthermore, this is what I think about you:

    (*) Sorry dude, but I don't think it would work.
    ( ) This is a stupid idea, and you're a stupid person for suggesting it.
    ( ) Nice try, assh0le! I'm going to find out where you live and burn your house down!

  4. Re:Useless.... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

    I get spam sent from myself offering around 75% off viagra products.
    I cannot mark myself as spam so it continues.

    Just this morning I found out I was offering an unprecidented 78% off!

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  5. Re:Useless.... by Lumpy · · Score: 1, Funny

    My friends and family don't tell me my Ebay and Paypal accounts have been reset and click here to fix it.

    If your friends do, I suggest getting new friends.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  6. Re:Introduction to DKIM by notnAP · · Score: 2, Funny

    A site that I administer has a great introduction to DKIM for those interested:
    http://what-is-what.com/what_is/domainkeys_identified_mail.html
    (disclaimer: I am affiliated with that site)
    What a coincidence!
    A site I also administer has a great introduction to DKIM for those interested:
    http://what-is-what.com/what_is/domainkeys_identified_mail.html
    (disclaimer: I am not affiliated with that site, but I did pwn it and use it as a spam bot)
  7. Re:Useless.... by mstahl · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's unprecedented! I'll take eight!

  8. Re:Useless.... by VirtualWizard · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought the purpose of Viagra products was to give you more not less.