Benchmarking the Benchmarks
apoppin writes "HardOCP put video card benchmarking on trial and comes back with some pretty incredible verdicts. They show one video returning benchmark scores much better than another compared to what you get when you actually play the game. Lies, damn lies, and benchmarks."
We used to benchmark a computer by *gasp* actually running things on it. If you wanted to find out how well it would perform running a game, you played the damn game and found out. Course, thats not good enough for these ubernoobs who think they are cool with their benchmark scores on their forum signatures...
If sharing a song makes you a pirate, what do I have to share to be a ninja?
I used to do this benchmark:
10 PRINT TIME$
20 FOR I=1 TO 9999
30 NEXT I
40 PRINT TIME$
I then improved it to be:
10 A$=TIME$
20 IF A$=TIME$ THEN GOTO 20 !breaks out when the seconds change
30 I=1:A$=TIME$
40 I=I+1:IF A$=TIME$ THEN GOTO 40
50 PRINT I
Ahhh...the good old days... (1970s, early 1980s)
...And an international benchmarking committee.
To avoid concentrating all the data management in a single entity, we need a national benchmarking committee for each country and then international elections to get a chief of benchmarking interrelationships or CBI.
To avoid the possible corruption of the CBI, we would need an independent international supervision committee for the review of benchmarking standards.
The IISCRBS would review the actions of the CBI yearly and produce a thorough report.
That report (which would be called the IISCRBS-CBI report) would be the main reference to start any kind of productive debate about who has the leetest rack and who's a lame n00b.
Are you one of those software pirates?
Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
Translation: if you mod me down, I will become more insightful than you can possibly imagine.
Thank God for evolution.