Slashdot Mirror


Pictorial Tour of World's Longest Linear Accelerator

Wired has a great pictorial tour of their recent visit to Stanford University's linear accelerator, the longest in the world. The accelerator has been the vehicle upon which three Nobel Prizes were earned and a the next big project will boast an electron laser roughly 10 billion times more powerful than existing x-ray sources.

6 of 79 comments (clear)

  1. Re:SLAC is great, but... by bcdm · · Score: 5, Informative

    125 staff members at SLAC have been let go this year (so far), and 200 projected layoffs at Fermilab by the end of the summer. Wired has the fuller scoop.

    --
    I can has sig?
  2. Re:Not a dupe per se... by eecue · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yeah that was also an interesting article, my photo editor pointed it out to me after we had wrapped up the captioning process. I think we saw a somewhat different side of SLAC (although we got the klystron gallery shot of course)

    --
    -- sigs suck --
  3. Microwave ovens do *NOT* have a klystron inside. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Picture 8 has a description that starts with: "Your microwave oven has a klystron inside" which is wrong. All modern microwave ovens have a cavity magnetron inside not a klystron.

  4. Re:SLAC is great, but... by niklask · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well thats what happens when you mostly do "B" physics. High-energy physics, like the BaBar experiment, is only a fraction of what SLAC does these days. SLAC is heavily involved in photon science and particle astrophysics.
  5. Re:SLAC is great, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yeah but from my understanding, Belle just had them beat (mainly due to that long safety related shutdown which pretty much killed BaBar's competitiveness). Coupled with CDF/D0 and soon LHCb (I'm aware the these are hadron collider experiments and are therefore more complimentary than direct competitors but still...), there just wasnt much of a physics program left that wasnt being done better elsewhere or hadnt already been measured by BaBar and Belle to great precision.

    I would be interested in hearing from some of my SLAC colleagues if I'm very much mistaken which I may be to some degree.

  6. Re:Richard Feynman Was There by Guy+Harris · · Score: 2, Informative

    For the benefit of those who think "Dolly" when they hear "Parton", the parent artice is presumably talking about the parton model, devised by Feynman to explain some high-energy collision results; as the article says, eventually the partons Feynman talked about were identified with the quarks that Gell-Mann and Zweig proposed, and the gluons that bind them together in hardons^Whadrons. (Oh, and "Bjorken" is James Bjorken.)