Slashdot Mirror
Scientists Find Believing Can Be Seeing
Ponca City, We Love You writes "Scientists at University College London have found the link between what we expect to see, and what our brain tells us we actually saw revealing that the context surrounding what we see is all important — sometimes overriding the evidence gathered by our eyes and even causing us to imagine things which aren't really there. A vague background context is more influential and helps us to fill in more blanks than a bright, well-defined context. This may explain why we are prone to 'see' imaginary shapes in the shadows when the light is poor. "Illusionists have been alive to this phenomenon for years," said Professor Zhaoping. "When you see them throw a ball into the air, followed by a second ball, and then a third ball which 'magically' disappears, you wonder how they did it. In truth, there's often no third ball — it's just our brain being deceived by the context, telling us that we really did see three balls launched into the air, one after the other." The original research paper is available on PLOS, the open-access, peer-reviewed journal."
When I'm driving, I only really notice things that move.
What are you, a T-Rex? ^_^
____
~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey
because this is about the only thing which explains my friend and his girlfriends belief in Ghosthunters and such...
I always looked at things this article covers along the lines of we make a decision and justify it later, not the reverse.
* Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
"Who are you going to believe, me or your own eyes?" - Chico Marx dressed up as Groucho in "Duck Soup" (context information serves as anti-pedantry device).
While your statement is 100% correct, normally when I'm wearing beer goggles I'm looking for something other than a relationship :)
In an effort to conform with internet communication standards, please note that the above comment is 100% biased opinion
I think 640 observers would have been more like it...
the scientists are seeing the results they want to see, and not what the results actually are. That would both invalidate, and validate their claims.
Steve's Computer Service, Hobbs, NM
"Only if you choose to see it that way."
These are not the droids you are looking for.