Slashdot Mirror


Canadian University Puts Tech Whiz Kids in 'Dormcubator'

jades writes "The University of Waterloo (Canada), sometimes billed as the 'MIT of the North' is establishing a residence 'incubator'. Meant to challenge 70 of their very top students in the tech and business fields, students will live together and work on 'the future of mobile communications, the web and digital media'. It's called 'VeloCity', and it launches in Fall 2008 after renovations are completed this summer."

188 comments

  1. Oblig by AndGodSed · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Fine - but will they use Linux?

    1. Re:Oblig by Smordnys+s'regrepsA · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Fine - but will they use Linux?
      That, or a Pirated copy of Windows. These are students, and therefore dirt poor :)
      --
      Just -1, Troll talking to another.
    2. Re:Oblig by AndGodSed · · Score: 1

      Yep. Dirt poor and smart - therefore Linux.

    3. Re:Oblig by ResidntGeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      These are "top students", not necessarily smart ones. There's usually a difference. There's little in this world in which the only way to succeed is true intelligence; hard work, organization, and time investment can almost always substitute (and are usually more important).

      --
      ResidntGeek
    4. Re:Oblig by cheater512 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Cramming the night before (or even right before hand) also helps.

    5. Re:Oblig by SolitaryMan · · Score: 1

      There's little in this world in which the only way to succeed is true intelligence; hard work, organization, and time investment can almost always substitute (and are usually more important).

      This is a sign of a good management, actually.

      --
      May Peace Prevail On Earth
    6. Re:Oblig by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wouldn't really say that. I'm a Canadian, and most of our students aren't dirt poor. If these really are the best students, they probably have a scholarship covering their most of their tuition. Not only that, tution is probably only around $6000 a year. Not bad for the best tech school in the country. Also, being that they are the best students, they probably get the best co-op placements. If you have a reasonable sized scholarship, and get a good co-op placement, you could probably get through without having any loans.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    7. Re:Oblig by Bopper · · Score: 1


      Bill Gates - college drop out
      Michael Dell - college drop out
      Larry Ellison - college drop out

      All tech billionaires. Thus ends the lesson.

    8. Re:Oblig by tbannist · · Score: 1

      Indeed, you can. I went to Waterloo and got through without taking out any loans, and I didn't, generally speaking, have the top marks in my classes. It's actually pretty easy to do, if you budget reasonably.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    9. Re:Oblig by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 1

      These are students, and therefore dirt poor Unlikely. I can't remember where I read it originally, but a quick Google search brings up a report with details of a study of top universities. Turns out in the top 146 universities, 74% of the students are from the top economic quartile, 17% from the second, 6% from the third, and 3% from the last. I don't know how egalitarian Canada's top collages are, but if they're anything like the ones here in the States, it is unlikely that the average student is dirt poor.
    10. Re:Oblig by vajaradakini · · Score: 1

      I'm also a Canadian... and I was dirt poor through undergrad. Not everyone goes into a coop programme or gets a good summer job. Some of us borrow heavily from parents or banks and work the drive through at Tim Hortons 40 hours a week four months of the year before returning to school in September and barely scrape by with the rent.

      --
      what's that now?
    11. Re:Oblig by jimbojw · · Score: 1

      hard work, organization, and time investment can almost always substitute (and are usually more important).
      ... says the guy posting on Slashdot at 7:00 am.
    12. Re:Oblig by russotto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unlikely. I can't remember where I read it originally, but a quick Google search brings up a report with details of a study of top universities. Turns out in the top 146 universities, 74% of the students are from the top economic quartile, 17% from the second, 6% from the third, and 3% from the last. I don't know how egalitarian Canada's top collages are, but if they're anything like the ones here in the States, it is unlikely that the average student is dirt poor.


      You're conflating the students with the families they come from. Students don't have a lot of spending money just because their parents have decent incomes.
    13. Re:Oblig by jmikelittle · · Score: 1

      Actually all University of Waterloo students get a free copy of XP pro or Vista through MSDN-AA. There shouldn't be a need to Pirate their copy.

    14. Re:Oblig by rs79 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I went to Waterloo and got through without taking out any loans[/quote]"

      Me too.

      Did yo notice this in TFA: "The university has received applications from as far away as Wilfrid Laurier University"

      WLU is down the street about 4 blocks.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    15. Re:Oblig by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Why not go into the coop programme? In the end, it takes an extra semester or two to complete your degree, but with that, you get a lot of job experience, and a lot less debt. I would really question the usefulness of getting a tech degree without any coop experience. If your school doesn't have a coop program, then your school, quite frankly, sucks. I'm not aware of any schools that don't offer coop programs. I'm not saying that all students are rich, but that the top students at the top tech university in the country probably don't have too much to worry about if they budget their money correctly.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    16. Re:Oblig by vajaradakini · · Score: 1

      I didn't go into the coop programme because I went to McMaster and wanted to do a physics degree with a specialization in astrophysics, but the only coop programmes that were available were those in core physics and in medical physics (though they're accommodating people who want to do co-op and specialize now). And I'm done my undergraduate degree anyways, so I'm not nearly as broke since I'm a grad student and get paid to be here.

      I can't say I'm particularly interested in any tech fields either. Computers are neat in their way, but they're mostly just useful tools for doing science, which is actually interesting, imo. However, when you said that Canadian students weren't poor, it didn't seem like you were just referring to those in tech programmes and also, a student being poor doesn't really have a lot to do with parents being poor. My parents made enough money that I couldn't get OSAP or any scholarships and bursaries aimed at people in financial need, but not enough that I wasn't poor throughout undergrad, even with summer jobs.

      --
      what's that now?
    17. Re:Oblig by roju · · Score: 1

      If they go to Waterloo, odds are they don't have a scholarship. That's not to say that they're poor, but UW is too young and too un-endowed to have much money for scholarships. The common gripe a lot of my friends had when we were at UW was that every school but UW that we applied to offered us scholarships. UW a) can't afford to, and b) doesn't have to.

    18. Re:Oblig by p0tat03 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hi, I'm one of the students selected for this "dormcubator" thing, and I've had the chance to talk to many of the other students, as well as the organizers themselves. The focus of this initiative definitely wasn't to look for brainiacs with high grades - my marks suck. More focus was put on having an existing portfolio and history of pursuing extracurricular projects - building your own roomba on the side, for example. These are guys who have not only the smarts, but also proven their ability to work.

    19. Re:Oblig by Katatsumuri · · Score: 1

      Also, imagine a Beowulf cluster of them!

    20. Re:Oblig by Antifuse · · Score: 1

      Yup, it was the same when I went to Waterloo for CS (class of 2001 baby!) - I was offered thousands in scholarships from other schools, including UofT, but Waterloo's co-op program sold me (and, to be honest, the scholarships still would have balanced out to less than the money that I made through co-op).

    21. Re:Oblig by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's better to study the old exams (your professors will reuse the questions they developed over the years) and develop a rapport with the TAs / professors (they are people and like people who like them.)

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    22. Re:Oblig by pnewhook · · Score: 3, Informative

      These are "top students", not necessarily smart ones. There's usually a difference.

      I went thorough Computer Engineering at that university. Generally the top students in the first and second year that got by memorizing the textbook didn't do well in the upper years when you had to time manage and think for yourself. It was generally the creative types that could think on their feet that became the top students.

      Given that the article says they are upper year students, I'd say that very likely they are also smart.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    23. Re:Oblig by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      Ability to make money does not mean you are smart - just look at George W Bush.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    24. Re:Oblig by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      I went there for engineering and never saw any Linux rally, or any pro/anti software rally whatsoever. Not to say it didn't happen but it certainly isn't common occurrence. The geekiest thing I ever saw was a paper airplane contest. Free outdoor concerts and filling the bar with sand for indoor winter beach volleyball were the cool things I saw.

      They were likely transients hopped up on crack or something.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    25. Re:Oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's little in this world in which the only way to succeed is true intelligence; hard work, organization, and time investment can almost always substitute And when those fail, there's always legacy status and money. Hey, this is college we're talking about here.
  2. I was going to say... by zeromorph · · Score: 1

    I was going to say PIX PLZ but then, hey, why not start "Geek Big Brother" or "I'm a Geek... Get Me Out of Here!"

    I'm not sure, that it is the best way to get serious things done, but it sounds fun.

    --
    "Hannibal's plans never work right. They just work." Amy/A-Team
    1. Re:I was going to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They want to have 70 geeks living together. I would hope that you don't have Smell-o-vision.

  3. nice by wizardforce · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We have a similar thing going at the University I go to. It's nice to be around other people that are as academically minded as yourself.

    --
    Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    1. Re:nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Isn't this similar to what happens in the Vatican? They have this kind of brainstorming thing too when they have to elect someone. Maybe they should call theirs a Mass-cubator.

    2. Re:nice by Serenissima · · Score: 1

      Academics are nice and all, but where do I sign up for the pool to guess the date of the first LAN party?

      --
      Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. But light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
  4. bs by theheadlessrabbit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have friends who go to The U of Waterloo, and not one has EVER called that school "the MIT of the North"

    when asked, "how's your University", most of them just shrug and say "meh, it's alright, its a University."

    MIT of the North? who said that? the Marketing department for Waterloo?

    --
    -I only code in BASIC.-
    1. Re:bs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      As a UW student it's true that UW isn't the most engaging atmosphere, it's full over no-fun over-achievers (the best party I can find on some Friday nights is the math homework party). But one thing is does have is great academics and international performance. It is definitely regarded as the best university in Canada for computer science, and possibly the best in north america. Many tech companies (Microsoft, Amazon, RIM, etc.) hire more UW students than any other university. It has the worlds highest cumulative score in the ACM competition. So although it's lacking in student engagement in many respects, calling in the MIT of the north probably isn't the worst title. At the very least it's as well respected in Canada as MIT is in the US.

      Submitted anonymously because I'm gonna get modded down for bragging. Slashdot user taylortbb if you want to reach me.

    2. Re:bs by wrook · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm going to have to agree. Waterloo isn't a bad school for engineering and comp sci. But it's not significantly better than any of the other accredited schools. As someone who has hired a lot of people in my career, I wouldn't even put Waterloo in the top 5 of the schools I aimed for. Mostly that's because the less well known schools have a lot of good people, but they are in less demand and thereby easier to hire. In fact the two best Canadian programmers (in terms of pure talent) I've met came from Calgary and Carleton.

      In Canada, my opinion is that there isn't a good undergrad program for comp sci at all (I'm willing to be convinced, though). But all of the accredited schools are adequate. I'm not qualified to comment on engineering. However, my understanding is that Waterloo primarily achieved it's engineering reputation by being one of the first (if not the first) Canadian engineering department to really embrace a coop program. Now almost every school has one.

    3. Re:bs by Potor · · Score: 1

      I agree - (UW '92) - back then, I heard Microsoft indeed hired more grads from UW then anywhere else (could never verify that). At any rate, I did get hired at IBM (long since left), from an English programme!

      Join the Imprint - that rocked way back when - we were always pissing of the engineers with obscure record and film reviews. It seemed all they cared about was Monty Python.

    4. Re:bs by KillerCow · · Score: 2, Funny

      MIT of the North? who said that?


      American reporters.
    5. Re:bs by IainMH · · Score: 1

      I WENT to UoW on exchange. I've never heard it called that. Anyway, isn't MIT the the MIT of the North?

    6. Re:bs by Francis · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have friends who go to The U of Waterloo, and not one has EVER called that school "the MIT of the North"

      when asked, "how's your University", most of them just shrug and say "meh, it's alright, its a University." You're right on the first point, noone ever calls UW the "MIT of the North". As far as being just another university though, I'd have to disagree. I think UW is one of the strongest technical universities in the world. One of the things they like to brag about at UW is their results in the world ACM programming contest. (For reference, UW placed ahead of MIT 10 years in the last 15.) More anecdotally, having worked with graduates from all around the world, I'd really have to say that UW tends to produce more effective software engineers than other schools.

      I can see how your friends might have mixed feelings about the place though - the administration can treat people quite poorly, and life as an undergrad can be stressful. As an alumni, I'm glad to have gone through it, and I'm glad not to be there :)

      As for the original story, I'm glad to see UW doing something like this. Developing UW spinoff companies wasn't something that most of us considered, but this could really encourage that sort of thing. I think that's good for the school and the economy in the long term.

      --

      --
      #include <malloc.h>
      free(your.mind);
    7. Re:bs by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Only having experience with UofOttawa myself, I'd have to quite a agree at the quality of computer science programmes. However, you may want to take a look at the software engineering programmes. Personally I think that a software engineering degree can prepare you much better than a comp sci program for real world programming. Now I could be a little bias, because I have a degree in software engineering. However based on what I've seen from the two disciplines, and the people I've met in both programmes, I'd have to say that software engineering is by far the better programme.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    8. Re:bs by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      You do bring up a good point.

      If I went to MIT, I'd major in marketing.

      I have no reason to doubt that their technical degrees are quite good. However, based upon the absurdly disproportionate amount of press they receive, their marketing people have got to be absolutely fucking brilliant.

      Perhaps one of their engineers managed to clone Steve Jobs' Reality Distortion Field......

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    9. Re:bs by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      Waterloo is only about 75 miles more northern than MIT.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    10. Re:bs by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Speaking as someone in a Computer Science department in the UK, I'd put Waterloo near the top in terms of perceived reputation internationally (as would my head of department, who I discussed the university with a couple of weeks ago in reference to some historical parallels). That said, I'd put MIT in the same league as Cambridge for computer science - did some really great stuff a few decades ago, a few interesting things recently, but survives mostly on inherited reputation and marketing these days.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    11. Re:bs by eggnoglatte · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, I have an MMath in CS from Waterloo. Let me tell you that UW is nothing like MIT or any other top notch university. UW's achievements are almost exclusively on the undergrad teaching level, and while that is great if you are an undergrad and want to be taught, it doesn't put UW anywhere in the same league as a true research university like MIT (or UofT, UBC, and McGill in Canada).

    12. Re:bs by kraig · · Score: 1

      No, C&PA have never said that, nor has any official that I've ever seen. (I looked.)

      I have friends that go or have gone to virtually any school in Canada you care to name, when asked "how's your University", most of them just shrug and say "meh, it's alright, it's a University." I've yet to see masses of undergrads enthusiastic about *anything* that isn't alcoholic.

    13. Re:bs by Lally+Singh · · Score: 1
      --
      Care about electronic freedom? Consider donating to the EFF!
    14. Re:bs by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      I've definately heard MIT of Canada. Though I believe the name came about speaking to Americans that had never heard of the place, It gets across quickly the idea that its a CS nerd school. Aside from CS though the BIG thing about waterloo is its COOP program rather than research (MIT). It actually has a pretty tiny research faculties.

      As for velocity, lol this doesn't really deserve /. ing. Its JUST a residence, with slightly more requirements to get in. It is not a new building, i doubt anything will be reworked. And i'm sure nothing will come of it. The idea only got 1 article in the waterloo school paper and i dont think it was even 1st page since we were having elections or something. For that to make it to /. is surprising in the least. Not that i'm not happy to see my school /.ed i'm sure theres something nerdier we did that coulda been posted.

    15. Re:bs by nb+caffeine · · Score: 1

      Who would've thought that a software engineering program would churn out better software engineers...

      --

      "Something's wrong with you...and I hope we never do meet again." - Deftones When Girls Telephone Boys
    16. Re:bs by p0tat03 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Now almost every school has one.

      As a UW student who's looked at many other Canadian co-op programs... I urge you to look more deeply into UW's co-op. I hate to be a braggart, but I do not exaggerate when I say that UW's co-op is leaps and bounds beyond ANYTHING any other Canadian university has, despite their best efforts. The level of support, organization, and opportunities you get with UW co-op far exceeds any other school.

      With many other schools I feel as if the co-op is another thing to strike off their list "yep, we've got that too", whereas at UW you really feel that the school strives to make it part of its identity, and the results speak for themselves. We place a ridiculous number of students in jobs every term, incredible satisfaction and success rates from both employers and employees, and heck, companies come interview students on *our* campus...

    17. Re:bs by theJavaMan · · Score: 1

      that's why I go to Wilfrid Laurier University (located in the same city). It's MGLA (More Girls, Less Asians), and even the CS people have great parties :P

    18. Re:bs by Jeff+Hornby · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with Friday night math homework parties? (BMath '91)

      --
      Why doesn't Slashdot ever get slashdotted?
    19. When I was there, which was some time ago, more than one (math(cs) faculty member told me that getting the good teaching award was seen as a sign that you weren't spending enough time on your research. I didn't find it hard to believe.

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    20. I would agree with your assessment of CS at Waterloo. Both Calgary and Carleton have done some innovative things so it isn't a surprise you are happy with the people from there.

      I don't know what your definition of "good undergrad program" is so I can't disagree with your opinion that there isn't one in the entire country... but I certainly think there are many good undergrad programs in Canada.

      I believe the first full coop program offered in Canada was actually at Simon Fraser University (Vancouver), rather than Waterloo. One of the reasons Waterloo is highly regarded (or was, when I was there) is that they put a lot of effort into telling people that they were highly regarded.

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    21. I could be a little bias, because I have a degree in software engineering.

      Ya think?

      Apropos of nothing I worked briefly with a software engineer from Waterloo... he had no idea of what a stack frame was (in the context of procedure calls) or how you might use the call stack to debug a program.

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    22. Re:bs by MicktheMech · · Score: 1

      UW people love their Co-op program, but they're the only ones that do. They get points for being first, but they haven't been keeping up with the pace. Queen's and U of T (two of the top engineering schools in Canada, despite TFS's blatand propoganda) have long term (12-16) month placements. Employers and students both love this, because the students can actually become productive. Here's the catch. The UofT program is competitive. Good students get good jobs, others get mediocre jobs and many can't get a placement at all. At Waterloo everyone gets a lousy job, but they fool themselves into thinking their getting better value than everyone else.

      If co-op is an important point for you choosing a school, don't take what Waterloo tells you at face value.

    23. Re:bs by p0tat03 · · Score: 1

      The PEY (16 month co-op) program is counter-productive for both employees and employers. At UW (and other schools like UOttawa), 4 month cycling terms allow students to gain academic experience AND apply it to their work at the same time, as well as the fact that I can have *six* different work experiences under my belt before I hit the market. This is very beneficial for students, who now have a FAR more extensive network to call upon when they graduate, and a lot more street smart about the job market to boot.

      It's also easier to sell for companies who are not currently doing internships and co-ops. Getting a company to commit to a 4 month work placement is a heck of a lot easier than a 16-month term. It also encourages companies to take more risks with their candidates - the commitment, even if the student is lousy, is much less. This allows a lot of otherwise unseen talent to be discovered.

      Good students get good jobs, others get mediocre jobs and many can't get a placement at all. At Waterloo everyone gets a lousy job, but they fool themselves into thinking their getting better value than everyone else.

      Have you *been* to Waterloo? Good students get GREAT jobs here, others get mediocre ones, and the rest get lousy jobs. Almost nobody is left unemployed (especially at the upper year level). We *do* get better value than everyone else, considering the numerous hoops we DON'T have to jump through to get our internships, the prestige we carry with private industry, and the sheer number of companies recruiting here that simply do not recruit at UofT and other schools.

      FYI today was ranking day at Waterloo (the day where the system will finalize which job you get). I'm going to be getting a "lousy" job at Amazon, and I know many people who are getting equally "lousy" jobs at Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, and Google.

      Get off that high horse. There's a reason major schools in Canada are following Waterloo's 4-month model instead of the failed PEY 16-month model.

    24. Re:bs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is taylortbb. Disregard the parent post. I am a faggot.

    25. Re:bs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mostly that's because the less well known schools have a lot of good people, but they are in less demand and thereby easier to hire. In fact the two best Canadian programmers (in terms of pure talent) I've met came from Calgary and Carleton.

      Translation, you are only able to attract the bottom of the pool from Waterloo, and lo-and-behold, the worst students from Waterloo are not as good as the best from Calgary. You have no argument from me there and I'm from waterloo.

      In Canada, my opinion is that there isn't a good undergrad program for comp sci at all (I'm willing to be convinced, though).

      Ok, I'll have a go, using stats to remove obvious personal biases: highest entering grades, highest demand from industry at completion time from top notch employers, highest score in reputational surveys of employers, lots of anecdotal experiences, highest placement in the world over the last two decades in programming contests, top 5 for math contests, etc.

    26. Re:bs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is definitely regarded as the best university in Canada for computer science, and possibly the best in north america. I'll give Waterloo its props, but come on--off the top of my head--MIT, CMU, Stanford, Berkeley. And no, I didn't go to any of those.
    27. Re:bs by taylortbb · · Score: 1

      It's not that I'm looking for some serious partying, I'm definitely nerdy. I mean, I'm on Slashdot. But spending my Friday night doing my math homework because I can't wait is just too nerdy for me. On Friday night I want to relax and procrastinate my math homework.

    28. Re:bs by taylortbb · · Score: 1

      As a mathie I don't know if I could join the Imprint and betray mathNews. Besides, as good as the Imprint is at what they do mathNews is hilarious and that's worth a lot.

    29. Re:bs by Potor · · Score: 1

      mathNews - wow. Totally forgot about that ... Yeah, no mathie could write for Imprint, now that I think about it.

    30. Re:bs by wrook · · Score: 1

      As someone who has *been* the employer who went to various schools,
      I have to disagree with you. Big companies go to virtually
      every school. Small companies go to the schools in their area.
      I've worked for both and I've travelled to many, many, many
      schools.

      Coop is popular. Every school hires out all their students. It
      is very rare in the extreme that people go without jobs (I'm
      talking comp sci here, IT degrees are a different story I think).
      Again, I never hired any engineering students, so I don't
      know about that.

      Honestly, the quality of the students vary dramatically with
      *every* school. I've had more than a handful of students from
      UW who could not code their way out of a paper bag, even if
      you took the bag away. We're talking less than 100 lines
      of *new* code in a whole term! But this is par for the course
      with every University (if you're wondering why I hired them,
      I didn't. Usually where I worked hiring coops was done on
      a rotating basis and I often got saddled with extremely poor
      selections made by other people. I like to think that my choices
      were good, but I have to admit that I've made my share of
      mistakes too ;-) ).

      It is true that Microsoft *only* went to UW for coops for
      a long time. I don't know the reason for that. Many people
      say it was due to the quality of students, but my experience
      is different.

      In terms of support from the employers end, I've had good
      coop coordinators from UW and I've had bad ones. Just
      like every other school.

      I have to say that you've bought into the hype for UW's
      program. There's nothing wrong with the program, so
      don't worry. But it's not the be all and end all. Coop
      itself is not the be all and end all. The two good programmers
      I mentioned before weren't even *in* coop.

      And for what it's worth, I *hate* the coop format from
      UW. Term 0 (or whatever they are called) coops are
      usually useless. I mean people who have never written
      code in their life. They end up do stupid joe jobs
      for small minded people who like power trips. I once
      saw a coop re-enter all the data from a database into
      a new schema. The reason? Didn't know how to write
      the code to do it and his supervisor didn't want to
      show him.... Great...

    31. Re:bs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the grad level, yes, at the undergrad level no. Just look at the relevant stats.

    32. Re:bs by Digi-John · · Score: 1

      Apropos of nothing I worked briefly with a software engineer from Waterloo... he had no idea of what a stack frame was (in the context of procedure calls) or how you might use the call stack to debug a program.

      That's not just a UW thing. I've met plenty of SE students who don't really know anything about a stack except for that data structure they made in Java during CS 1. The idea that there is a chunk of memory called a 'stack' in their programs is foreign to them.

      --
      Klingon programs don't timeshare, they battle for supremacy.
  5. Funny summary by kamapuaa · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's funny, I never heard of MIT before, I've always heard of it as "The University of Waterloo (Canada) of the South."

    --
    Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    1. Re:Funny summary by MightyYar · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just want to know what chuckle-head thinks that University of Waterloo is significantly further north than MIT. Pretty sure that Boston and Toronto are roughly at the same latitude.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:Funny summary by yabos · · Score: 1

      Tell that to the idiots that come here to Southern Ontario to go skiing in the summer.

    3. Re:Funny summary by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wonder if the French Canadians secretly resent having to go to a school called Waterloo.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:Funny summary by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Probably the same people that think Barry is in Northern Ontario.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re:Funny summary by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 1

      I just want to know what chuckle-head things that University of Waterloo is in Toronto.

      Yeah, I checked it out... Waterloo is 1 degree north of Boston.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    6. Re:Funny summary by Pope · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, he did move a few years ago and it's been a while since I talked to him. Tell him I said "Hello!"

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    7. Re:Funny summary by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Well, strictly speaking MIT isn't in Boston either - I was just sort of going for closest major city. I know that Waterloo is close to Toronto (what, an hour's drive?), and I've actually walked across the river to Boston from MIT. It's the first stop in Cambridge on the "T".

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    8. Re:Funny summary by vajaradakini · · Score: 1

      Which probably includes the same people who don't know how to spell Barrie.

      --
      what's that now?
    9. Re:Funny summary by Azarael · · Score: 1

      Actually, it gets even more complicated. Waterloo used to be called New Hamburg, but they changed the name around WWI for some reason.. I hear good things about their OctoberFest though.

    10. Re:Funny summary by BrianGKUAC · · Score: 1

      I thought it was spelled Barrie... Have you been spending too much time at the Roxx?

      --
      Menus: Linux=function, Windows=vendor, OS X=as little as possible. Makes a statement, don't you think?
    11. Re:Funny summary by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

      Barry?. Last I heard he was still in Pickle Lake. Why, has he moved?

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    12. Re:Funny summary by Obsidians · · Score: 1

      I had a prof at UW who went to a conference of some kind in France. More than once, he was asked "why did you name a university after a famous defeat?" Perspective....

    13. Re:Funny summary by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      But will the Battle of Eton be won in the classrooms of Waterloo?

    14. Re:Funny summary by aastanna · · Score: 1

      Are you sure about that one? Maybe you're thinking of Kitchener which used to be called Berlin. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waterloo,_Ontario

    15. Re:Funny summary by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      He should have replied "It wasn't a defeat if you were English."

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  6. It's called 'VeloCity'... by mykdavies · · Score: 5, Funny

    but known as the "Dorkubator"

    --
    The world has changed and we all have become metal men.
    1. Re:It's called 'VeloCity'... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod this up! It's the obvious and correct name for the place. veloCity... puh-leeze.

    2. Re:It's called 'VeloCity'... by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking 'Dumbcubator' - particularly if the tech students interact in any significant way with the business students.

      The business students won't gain anything from the lash-up because they won't be able to understand what the techies are saying, and the tech students IQs will drop by double digits from listening to inane golfing stories. ;)

      --

      Lodragan Draoidh
      The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
  7. VeloCity? Seriously? by IBBoard · · Score: 2

    They wanted an incubator for academically minded people and they called it VeloCity? Seriously? You'd have thought they'd have come up with a decent name rather than trying to combine a word for speed with a word for a large conurbation (which I doubt it is) in some jauntily capitalised construction.

    The basic idea is quite good, even if it does just sound like a slightly more segregated version of "Halls of Residence" from the summary.

    1. Re:VeloCity? Seriously? by p0tat03 · · Score: 1

      Honestly, the name sucks... I thought it was some sort of municipal bike initiative (velos? anyone?) when I first heard about it...

  8. Waterloo vs U of T by florescent_beige · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Waterloo has always fancied itself an industry supplier of productive bodies. My brother the EE went there and benefited from their work-term model. He got lots of practical experience which helped him land a job, although he took longer to get his degree than me.

    I did an ME at the U of T. (Funny that the article calls Waterloo "MIT North", because U of T profs liked to call MIT "U of T South". Which is all very embarrassing, like stop with the MIT comparisons for heck's sake.)

    The problem I have with this Velocity thing is: who pays and who benefits? Seems to me a chunk of everyone's tuition will go toward it, while only some will be in a position to get in. And those who can get in will be the ones who can deal with the extra work load.

    In a perfect world, it would be the more clever who could handle the added work. In reality, it is the ones who have external support, like whose parents live not far away, or who come from richer families, that can focus on the work. The poor slobs who have 2 pair of pants for 4 years and who eat leftover mac & cheese for 5 days in a row wouldn't fit in.

    I have no problem with elitism, it's a central component of hereditary capitalism, our beloved system. But not when the winners are being subsidized by the losers, that just strikes me as wrong.

    I'm obviously biased, but I like the U of T approach: classical. Give everyone the same education and chuck them all into the market and let life sort them out. I hate the idea of university admins having the power to pick winners.

    --
    Equine Mammals Are Considerably Smaller
    1. Re:Waterloo vs U of T by Dulcise · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Mod perant up.
      While this may benefit a select few, those that were already achieving well, those that aren't doing so well now have less places to look for good study practice, which I have found (at least on me) rubs off.

      When you're working with people who party all the time, you tend to work less, when you are with people who study more, you study more. So now the struggling student has even less of a work atmosphere than before, and the students that don't need more of a work atmosphere and are doing fine are being skimmed off to be in one.

    2. Re:Waterloo vs U of T by moosesocks · · Score: 1
      Well, for starters, I imagine that this will be funded through the government's grant rather than tuition dollars.

      Most students outside of the US pay very little for tuition. Tuition fees generally fund the university's variable costs associated with taking on more students, whilst the university's core operation and fixed costs are paid for by the government. State universities in the US operate on a somewhat similar principle, unless you happen to live in a state that is unwilling or unable to fund its public university system, or want to (gasp!) leave your home state.

      The problem I have with this Velocity thing is: who pays and who benefits? Seems to me a chunk of everyone's tuition will go toward it, while only some will be in a position to get in. And those who can get in will be the ones who can deal with the extra work load. From what I've seen, even the most "gifted" university students are worked to the core. The divide between the "average" and "better" students is typically directly proportional to the amount of time/work spent studying. The assumption that the most gifted students are also going to be the least worked/stressed is just plain false. Given the general flexibility of a university curriculum, "gifted" students most frequently increase their courseload so that they can graduate early, or begin to take graduate-level courses as part of their undergraduate studies.

      The notion that there are gifted students who barely do any work is an absolute myth at the university level.

      (Note: None of this applies to Arts majors)
      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    3. Re:Waterloo vs U of T by florescent_beige · · Score: 1

      Well, for starters, I imagine that this will be funded through the government's grant rather than tuition dollars.

      If it is funded from general revenue then the money comes from a mixture of tuition and subsidy. Subsidies are allocated per student, so each student is worth a certain number of tuition plus subsidy dollars to the university. The university is not compelled to spend the money it gets from a given student on that student.

      That might sound hard to believe but it's true. At my alma mater the administration was much hated for allocating less money to the engineering faculties that it received from them. Basically it took some of the engineering tuition and subsidies and diverted them to other faculties like arts & medicine. We resented that a lot.

      So it's very possible this Velocity thing is feeding off non-participants.

      The divide between the "average" and "better" students is typically directly proportional to the amount of time/work spent studying.

      That's true, but stress levels play a big role too. In the interest of full disclosure I have to admit my academic career was a story of redemption. I was the guy with the 2 pairs of pants & the mac and cheese and I flunked out because it was just too hard. At the same time lots of the other students had their own nice apartments and cars and girlfriends and shoes etc etc. and they definitely weren't as stressed out. Which can only have been good for them.

      Funny thing is, after the department of Engineering Science left me for dead, Mechanical Engineering (and in particular one prof) for some reason let me in and I became a top student. So I'm living proof that you shouldn't try to pick winners. Not people that are that young and who come from such diverse circumstances.

      So if you are trying to say that life's fair in school, no I don't think so. The bureaucrats that run a university have no way of knowing who fails because they lack the mental chops and who fails because they have a nervous breakdown. Allocate the funds that each student is worth to that actual student and let the chips fall where they may.

      --
      Equine Mammals Are Considerably Smaller
    4. Re:Waterloo vs U of T by eggnoglatte · · Score: 1
      I completely agree on the MIT comparisons, but this:

      I'm obviously biased, but I like the U of T approach: classical. Give everyone the same education and chuck them all into the market and let life sort them out doesn't make sense to me. EVERY university is in the business of picking winners; it is called "admissions".

      One problem that Candadian Universities face is that because of their public status, and (in most provinces) the resulting mandate to educate the masses, the variance of student capabilities is much higher than at elite universities down south. Most lectures will aim somehwere at the center third of the students, leaving behind the bottom third, and not really challenging the top third at all. The way to fix that is to offer tutoring to the bottom third, and more challenging activities such as research involvment (or this new "VeloCity" thingie) to the top third.

    5. Re:Waterloo vs U of T by p0tat03 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Note: I'm one of the selected students for this VeloCity thing, so I may be biased. To answer some of your questions...

      The problem I have with this Velocity thing is: who pays and who benefits?

      The residence component is paid by the residents, barring a small (

      Beneficiaries is everyone. In the worst case scenario nothing of real value comes from this, and nothing happens, money down the drain. In the best case scenario we're talking about massive new employment opportunities in the region, and potentially tens of thousands of high-tech jobs (the type the gov't likes) created in the region. The KW region is trying to justify a lot of infrastructure upgrades right now, and having the employment numbers to back it up won't hurt.

      I hate to get all Ayn Rand about this, but... smart people don't work in a vacuum. Larry Page and Sergey Brin didn't make those billions by themselves - they bootstrapped a company that now employs tens of thousands of people worldwide. Supporting initiatives like this isn't being elitist, it's forward-looking, and ultimately benefits everyone.

      I hate the idea of university admins having the power to pick winners.

      The group of students were picked by VeloCity's organizers, which, FYI, were also students.

    6. Re:Waterloo vs U of T by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      The problem I have with this Velocity thing is: who pays and who benefits? Seems to me a chunk of everyone's tuition will go toward it, while only some will be in a position to get in. And those who can get in will be the ones who can deal with the extra work load. You mean like how everyone pays for the introductory classes even if they don't need to take them because they're too easy for them? You know all that classroom space they take up is paid for by everyone as well and some of those classes aren't very populated. What about the counseling classes that exist for students with mental issues or study habit problems? What about the writing tutoring that probably exists as well for those who don't know how to write a resume? No of course, if it benefits you but someone else pays then it's great but god forbid you have to pay for something that benefits someone else.

      In a perfect world, it would be the more clever who could handle the added work. In reality, it is the ones who have external support, like whose parents live not far away, or who come from richer families, that can focus on the work. The poor slobs who have 2 pair of pants for 4 years and who eat leftover mac & cheese for 5 days in a row wouldn't fit in. So, should people with support be forced to take classes too easy for them? Should they not be allowed to reach their own best level simply because you can't match them? Should they be screwed over to make you look better? That's apparently what you want.

      I have no problem with elitism, it's a central component of hereditary capitalism, our beloved system. But not when the winners are being subsidized by the losers, that just strikes me as wrong. So others should be screwed over because you're doing worse?

      I'm obviously biased, but I like the U of T approach: classical. Give everyone the same education and chuck them all into the market and let life sort them out. I hate the idea of university admins having the power to pick winners. The same education? Muahahahaha, if that's the case your university must have sucked ass. I during my undergrad took graduate classes, did research, took advantage of networking opportunities and so on. That's what gifted people usually do and only a fool believes that those people don't learn more as a result.
    7. Re:Waterloo vs U of T by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      I have no problem with elitism, it's a central component of hereditary capitalism, our beloved system. But not when the winners are being subsidized by the losers, that just strikes me as wrong. This is quite correct and it is one of the reasons why I am also against taxpayers subsidizing college tuition in public universities. In effect, those who are going to college or getting into "elite" programs are being subsidized by those who did or could NOT attend the subsidized university. Some people attempt to use the "diamond in the rough" argument as a rebuttal to the anti-subsidy crowd (i.e. the brilliant student raised in poverty), but that one falls flat on its face, at least IMHO, because the "diamond in the rough", presuming that he or she commonly exists (which is debatable), can take out a privately financed loan, based upon expectation of high productivity and future earnings following the successful completion of their degree, and use that to fund their education. It may not be "fair" that he or she has to take out a loan, but when you get right down to it is it "fair" that they have genius level IQ while the wealthier student, who maybe doesn't have to take out a loan, does not? What is unfair is to maintain the expectation of a "right" to a particular good or service, paid for out of the pocket of another man by taxes, simply because you really want it but don't want to pay the full price. The students who really want it would find a way to make it happen, subsidy or not, and they are the ones who really should be at the university.
    8. Re:Waterloo vs U of T by illaqueate · · Score: 1

      no, they (a) let many students wash out in first year, or change to an easy major (b) most students in the sciences have a horrible GPA

      I attended Berkeley and U of T, both are comparable assuming you pick a major with standards. The students with less aptitude are funneled into lesser course work through minimum gpa requirements. The average student at Stanford or MIT is smarter - but I've seen the coursework, we use the same texts, students ask the same dumb questions, etc. That said, Waterloo has one of the more difficult Computer Science programs due to its unusual maths emphasis. That level of rigour is more common in engineering.

    9. Re:Waterloo vs U of T by Shazow · · Score: 1

      You'd be interested to know that it's not true.

      You can skip introduction classes. In fact, you can skip any requirement, so long as you make a good argument for it.

      I also took graduate courses in my undergrad, did research, took advantage of networking opportunities and so on. I honestly felt there was no bureaucratic limitation for me at UofT -- all of the rules were sufficiently flexible to overcome to those who were sufficiently interested.

      I certainly wouldn't say that my university sucked ass. I chose it over a scholarship offer from Waterloo, and I don't regret it one bit.

      - shazow

    10. Re:Waterloo vs U of T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the "diamond in the rough" ... can take out a privately financed loan, based upon expectation of high productivity and future earnings following the successful completion of their degree
      That's a much higher risk that I'd be willing to stake $50k on. How do I know this self-declared genius is actually going to go places?
    11. Re:Waterloo vs U of T by Digi-John · · Score: 1

      Waterloo has always fancied itself an industry supplier of productive bodies. My brother the EE went there and benefited from their work-term model. He got lots of practical experience which helped him land a job, although he took longer to get his degree than me.

      My university, RIT, tends toward the same kind of thing. According to Wikipedia, we have the fourth oldest co-op program in the world (started 1912); it's currently the fifth largest in the nation. Although we're expanding into more and more research, RIT was basically created to provide good engineers and technicians for the (then huge) industry in Rochester. Somewhere along the line we've picked up more science majors, a big art college, and one of the nation's most respected film colleges :)

      You can get a Ph.D. in some programs, but mostly you go for a bachelor's or a master's. We even have a BS/MS program (which I'm taking) where you complete the Master's within 6 years of freshman enrollment (if you don't get it done, they matriculate you with a BS after 6 years).

      --
      Klingon programs don't timeshare, they battle for supremacy.
  9. hmmm by MassiveForces · · Score: 1

    Did they mean Dorkubator? And what will be the implications of this ungodly dork breeding program, if hell in fact does freeze over and it is successful?

  10. Campus news sources by Valacosa · · Score: 2, Informative

    If anybody is interested in further reading, the campus newspaper did a story on this a couple of months ago, as well as the engineering newspaper.

    --
    "Live as if you'll die tomorrow." Ridiculous. You could die later today.
    1. Re:Campus news sources by florescent_beige · · Score: 1, Funny

      Waterloo, jeesh. That's not a campus newspaper....THAT"S a campus newspaper. (Large pdf warning).

      Example article titles: "White Guilt Month Set to be Best Ever" and "The Many (Retarded) Uses for Facebook". Yeah. Waterloo sucks.

      --
      Equine Mammals Are Considerably Smaller
  11. What a waste by Shohat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It realy "grinds my gears" to see bright people waste their valuable time on Web/Social/Communication applications. If one thing in the world is currently going well, it's that field. That field has been developing well, there are plenty of bright minds working on it, no need to direct more geniuses that way.
    Let them work on REAL challenges. Like better engines (we've been using the same combustion engine for 100 years now), better flight (which as not progressed much since WW2 jets), new energy sources (we never went beyond nuclear, which was 60 years ago). Why not let them work on wireless power, on indoor agriculture, desalinization technologies ? REAL challenges, not some hyper-popular niche that doesn't suffer from the lack of talented people.

    1. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      --
      My Starcraft 2 Blog [sc2blog.com]

    2. Re:What a waste by tinkerton · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I tend to agree with the anonymous coward (who in a cruel display of injustice got modded -1) that you got your priorities wrong. The real challenges are not so much technological, they're in areas like sociology, economy, politics. Technology is easy, that's why it can evolve so fast. Of course, technology is also an area where you can achieve a lot by just being intelligent.

    3. Re:What a waste by Sethus · · Score: 1

      How can you claim that time spent on Web/Social/Communication applications is wasted? Do people in this world work inside of a box completely devoid of human communication? No! Yes, there are issues and problems to work on that this world desperately needs, but social interaction and communication is a part, and I would argue a major part of this age's work force.

      How can you communicate with your client, boss, or coworkers excactly what you want and need from them if you have inadequate social skills? Appropriately conducting yourself at work is a key aspect of garnering the respect of your peers as well as making yourself known to those around you. Nay sayers might argue that in an ideal situation you shouldn't have to garner any respect or authority, but this isn't the case in the real world. Social skills are more important than ever, espeically on group projects and in a large workforce, and it's not something that you're taught in class, but rather learned through human interaction in our society. How many of you have learned effectively on how to pick up social cues and nuances? This is a difficult skill, and most likely this program is just another type of class to encourage human interaction and to help the students excel in school.

      --
      Posting with out proof reading since 2001.
    4. Re:What a waste by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      We all know that happened the last time we tried to develop a plane in Canada.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re:What a waste by eggnoglatte · · Score: 1

      That was most definitely not the last time Cnaada developed a plane. Baombardier must have developed a dozen new plane models since then. It MAY be the last time Canada developed a FIGHTER plane (I wouldn't know for sure), but maybe you can give it a rest after 50 years? Sheesh.

    6. Re:What a waste by darkwhite · · Score: 1

      That is bullshit. The solutions to our social and political problems will be almost exclusively technological. To suggest that our society's economical structure - a mind-bogglingly wasteful festival of gratification, which also dictates the social and political challenges you talk about - can be improved or made sustainable with anything but technology is laughable.

      --

      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    7. Re:What a waste by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      Technology is easy, that's why it can evolve so fast.

      No, it's not. It's just that we're so good at it that it looks easy.

      Producing a modern, competitive CPU requires a $2 billion factory which will be outdated in under 10 years.

      Building the A380 involves sourcing parts from thousands of suppliers, integrating systems from different manufacturers, and thousands of hours of safety and durability tests.

      We have gotten used to the idea that integrated circuits will double in density every 18 months. This does not happen because shrinking integrated circuits is easy. It has taken breakthrough after breakthrough to make the T61 I'm typing this on possible, in many different fields around the world.

      Of course, technology is also an area where you can achieve a lot by just being intelligent.

      Not so much anymore. There's a reason that you can't get an engineering job without a college degree - it's not just a matter of being intelligent, it's a matter of having the field-specific knowledge to put your intelligence to work.
  12. But can they solve this? by Smordnys+s'regrepsA · · Score: 4, Funny

    What is the average air speed VeloCity of an unladen geek?

    --
    Just -1, Troll talking to another.
    1. Re:But can they solve this? by hool5400 · · Score: 3, Funny

      African or European?

      --

      Remember, it takes 42 muscles to frown and only 4 to pull the trigger of a sniper rifle.
    2. Re:But can they solve this? by definate · · Score: 1

      I don't know.

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    3. Re:But can they solve this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      As a current student at UW, I assure you, the correct option is "asian."

    4. Re:But can they solve this? by Carewolf · · Score: 4, Funny

      What do you mean by unladen? A geek is always prepared. Maybe you meant unlaid?

    5. Re:But can they solve this? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Canadian obviously. Didn't you read the summary?

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    6. Re:But can they solve this? by syousef · · Score: 1

      What do you mean by unladen? A geek is always prepared. Maybe you meant unlaid?

      He means without a pocket protector

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  13. Very smart by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have been trying to get the state of Colorado to offer various X prizes for needs of the state. For example, one of the suggestions was to come up with a means of stopping Pine beetles, which are devastating literally 100 of millions worth of lodge pole and other pines. I figured that ppl, roughly students, would go into the woods and look for lodge pole trees that appeared to survive the beetles. Once they do that, they could then look for what is different. What is amazing is that now a company in Mass (from MIT), has a way to stop them. They found it by following the method that I suggested. It appears that Colorado will spend somewhere between 10-100 millions to save just a fraction of the lodgepole pines. I suspect that other states will spend similar amounts or more.

    All in all, Gov. CAN help fund ideas. The Canadian approach will help lead to companies with loads of ideas AND ppl to try and incubate them. My suggestion would only have costs iff an idea was worthy. Hopefully more universities will pick up the idea of integrating ppl, rather than separating them (and perhaps offer incentives).

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  14. Hmmm. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    you code only in basic, and you rip a decent university. Let me guess. You were shot down for admission?

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Hmmm. by theheadlessrabbit · · Score: 1

      If you pay close attention to my post, I am in no way ripping U of W.

      I simply state that not one person I know calls it the 'MIT of the North', and I know quite a few people who go there.
      This leads me to believe that its a BS line made up to sell an article.

      I'm sure it's a very good school.

      But why call it the "MIT of the North"? thats like announcing "hey, we play second fiddle to MIT", "we're not quite as good, but we're close."

      --
      -I only code in BASIC.-
  15. You're so wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Funny I see this thing the opposite way. We have great technology all around, nothing is impossible. We just lack the reason to do anything and prosperity is distributed very unevenly. Some people are literally bathing in milk when other people are dying of thirst.

    Unfortunately I don't think those people were intended to ponder the really important questions of humanity but instead the petty little issues you want them to think about.

  16. Re:MIT of the North by chronosan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Waterloo is only ONE degree north of Cambridge, and not too far west. On a global scale, they're in the same place.

  17. Relax by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    I was just kidding. Every nation has what they regard as their own MIT. Some really do compete, and others do not. All nations are proud of what they have to offer, for in general, they have at least one person in each major fields who is competitive. After all, I noticed that North Korea was matching their child prodigies around the stage for the philharmonic. Says a lot.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  18. When it ultimately comes down to it.. by newr00tic · · Score: 1

    but known as the "Dorkubator" ..I suspect the proper term would be "Mass-Turbator."

    --
    A horse can't be sick, you know, even if he wants to.
    1. Re:When it ultimately comes down to it.. by keysersoze_sec · · Score: 1

      [...]the program has received about 30 per cent female applicants[...] Yeah, I guess Mass-Turbator would do.
  19. The real question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does the business field count with lots of women?

  20. curb the turb, my nurb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this similar to what happens in the Vatican? They have this kind of brainstorming thing too when they have to elect someone. Maybe they should call theirs a Mass-cubator. That's turbator to you, old man, turbator.
  21. North. by DTemp · · Score: 1

    Judging by my freaking freezing ears, MIT is in the North.

    1. Re:North. by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      Kind of like declaring that you are the smartest person North of Barrow, or the best public University in Wyoming.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    2. Re:North. by Animats · · Score: 1

      Judging by my freaking freezing ears, MIT is in the North.

      Yes. I'm a Stanford grad, live in Silicon Valley, and some years back someone from MIT was trying to recruit me for the Media Lab to work on physically-based animation. We're walking across the MIT campus to the T station. It's sleeting, with light hail. He says "and there are fewer distractions out here".

      I'm still in California.

  22. "As Far Away As..." by Taeolas · · Score: 4, Informative

    Gotta love the article saying how they got applicants from "As far away as Wilfred Laurier" (a university that is literally a block away from UW) and UofT (90 minutes away by the 401). In any case, seems like UW's looking at ways to turn their new company budding into a formal process of sorts.

  23. Real Genius by jbeardsl · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or does this idea sound straight out of the movie Real Genius??

  24. Burning what I got by Shohat · · Score: 1

    I am going to be modded down for this, because there is no "+1 I hate this person and he is fucking wrong" mod thingy.
    I agree with you, that our great challenges are sociological, economical and political. But Thing is, we are already living in the peaceful times in human history. We have not a single real war outside of Africa. If you think I am wrong, I advise you to take a few history classes.
    But the real social challenge is moving away from democracy and capitalism, and embracing a more advanced model which does not revolve around individualism and revenue. Of course, the USSR stands as shining beacon of colossal failure, which simply makes communism and the lack of individual rights look bad, and it pisses me off even more to see China "opening up" instead of other countries taking its model and improving it. Democracy is not the end of political and social evolution. Nothing truly great can be achieved as long as we act as individuals.

    1. Re:Burning what I got by piemcfly · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not entirely disagreeing here, but last time I checked, Colombia, Papua, Iraq, Mexico, Birma and Kashmir were all in a state of war...

      I think your high opinion of the chinese system is also a bit... silly. Unless you agree with a confucian ethic (nepotism, corruption, yay?), mixed with dictatorial suppression (that is what the chinese model is after all... capitalist economics with political dictatorship). Unless you're talking about the old china, which was just as bad as Russia.

  25. Re:Poor kids by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Poor kids is right.

    The ones that don't get rich will commit suicide. This project is the academic equivalent of cockfighting.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  26. Re:Linux by RicardoGCE · · Score: 1

    Gene Ray, is that you?

  27. Drunk computer science majors by ruinevil · · Score: 1

    No one else in college drinks as much as business majors. So by mixing them with engineering types, you are only going to get drunk engineers. Maybe they stay in the Ballmer peak , and make beautiful, functional programs that the business majors will market, giving little of the profit to the computer science majors.

    1. Re:Drunk computer science majors by Rampantbaboon · · Score: 1

      Are you lambasting drunk engineers?

      I resent that. Although I do plan on business for grad school, so whatever.

      (more beer, please)

    2. Re:Drunk computer science majors by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I love it when I code something drunk. The next day, I'm always amazed at the progress that I've made - and the errors are always amusing and really, really, basic.

      You shouldn't try to debug drunk, though. Just move on and get it tomorrow.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    3. Re:Drunk computer science majors by Seakip18 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Coding and other software related 0problems that had me stumped on during working hours suddenly became easier to see other ways via, er, Mr. Beam's advice. I think my senior project for college would have never gotten done without it actually.....

      DISCLAIMER: Not saying you should reach for the bottle for every problem though. That

      --
      import system.cool.Sig;
  28. Here in Canada... by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 1

    Our government will support social networking DORMS... which will probably lead to research on better methods of intoxication. If we were american, it'd lead to faster methods of (insert aggressive american stereotype here).

  29. Updated title by dzfoo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "Canadian University Puts Tech Whiz Kids in 'Dorkubator'"

    There, fixed it for you.

        -dZ.

    --
    Carol vs. Ghost
    ...Can you save Christmas?
  30. Shad Valley does this already, doesn't it? by KWTm · · Score: 1

    Shad Valley does this already, doesn't it? They still have it at the U of Waterloo, I think.

    --
    404555974007725459910684486621289147856453481154 in hex is "You sank my Battleship?"
    [GPG key in journal]
  31. Actually, it's not *that* north.. by yebb · · Score: 2, Informative

    Waterloo, Ontario, Canada - 43 28'
    Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA - 42 36'

    Most people forget that southern Ontario dips well south into the great-lakes basin.

    1. Re:Actually, it's not *that* north.. by mrdarreng · · Score: 1

      Most people forget that southern Ontario dips well south into the great-lakes basin. Yes, despite our best efforts you Canadians have managed to encroach into the South in some places.
  32. As a former Waterloo student... by FlyingOrca · · Score: 1

    ...I have to say that the geekubator concept is already up and running, and has been for a long time. It's called WCRI. It was well-established when I was there in the 80s.

    --
    Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges.
  33. As if athletic ghettos weren't bad enough by plopez · · Score: 1

    We segregate our student athletes at a lot of schools, now we're going to segregate the nerds? Am I the only one who feels uneasy about this?

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  34. Just go to MIT, Caltech, CalPoly, etc by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Where the whole school is that way. Its an amzing experience to be surrounded by people with 140 IQs 24/7 and interested in technology.

  35. Fact checking required by Kinthelt · · Score: 2, Informative

    The university has received applications from as far away as Wilfrid Laurier University

    2 blocks is considered far away?
    --

    "Evil will always triumph over good, because good is dumb." - Dark Helmet (Spaceballs)

    1. Re:Fact checking required by jmikelittle · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you had bothered to quote the whole sentence, you would have written "The university has received applications from as far away as Wilfrid Laurier University and the University of Toronto, but the program is only open to University of Waterloo students." Although that likely would have reduced the impact of your point. And yeah, Laurier is far from Minota, especially when it's -25 with the windchill

  36. Re:MIT of the North by Kinthelt · · Score: 1

    Nice obscure reference. :) Mod parent up!

    --

    "Evil will always triumph over good, because good is dumb." - Dark Helmet (Spaceballs)

  37. Re:Linux by bytesex · · Score: 1

    Hey ! Those are my hyphens ! Somebody - stop that man !

    --
    Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
  38. Not emough people... by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    70 is not enough to form a culture. In fact, it is barely enough to represent most fields.

  39. Ass Backwards by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 1

    Waterloo is not "MIT North".

    MIT is "Waterloo South".

  40. Sounds Like BB by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    Sounds like Big Brother. What channel do I tune into to see who gets evicted next?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  41. Oh god by imgod2u · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As if CS/Engineering majors needed their college experience to be even more of a sausage-fest.

  42. No doubt .... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... decorated to look like their mom's basement.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  43. Anecdotes -- they're almost as good as data! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That guy behind the counter at Taco Bell -- college dropout
    The janitor working the graveyard shift -- college dropout
    The attendant emptying bedpans in the nursing home -- college dropout
    etc.

    1. Re:Anecdotes -- they're almost as good as data! by Bopper · · Score: 1

      The point is that high intelligence is not a pre-requisite as long as the qualities are present. It is great folly to think creating some artificial dorkubator at U of Woo will result in anything other than more mediocrity (already in high abundance at most institutions of higher learning). Being a janitor never necessitated a college level education, however, one has to wonder why its not a requirement for the captains of high tech.

      Oh yeah, Steve Jobs - college dropout

    2. Re:Anecdotes -- they're almost as good as data! by AndGodSed · · Score: 1

      On that note, I read somewhere that the guy with the current highest IQ in the world (that is alive and that had is IQ tested) is a bouncer in a nightclub.

      His IQ is 200+, and a no I don't have a source.

      Smart = more than intelligence.

      To work hard = smart.
      To plan ahead = smart.
      To invest = smart.
      To grab opportunity regardless of how intelligent you are = smart.

  44. Of course... by ivan256 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The school wants you to think of your profitable ideas while they still have some financial claim to them...

  45. They'd better hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the Alpha Betas' house doesn't burn down!

  46. What the hell is the 'U of T'? by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

    I'm serious.

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    1. Re:What the hell is the 'U of T'? by florescent_beige · · Score: 1
      --
      Equine Mammals Are Considerably Smaller
  47. Not everyone learns in incubators by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
    As parent says, there is a huge difference between "top students" and intelligent ones. Einstein failed his university entrance examinations.

    Everyone has a different leartning style. Some think best when in an incubator-like evironment and others think more by walking around outside.

    I hope they give these kids lots of healthy fresh air too. No point in burning them out.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  48. MIT wishes they were Waterloo by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    In their deepest fantasies.

    Americans really need to realize that their concept of secondary education is nothing more than football teams with daycare centers bolted to them.

    Outside of the US, the schools are pretty much viewed as a joke. Even the supposedly prestigious "ivy league" schools.

    Just saying.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:MIT wishes they were Waterloo by epee1221 · · Score: 1

      So... do I get to tell people I learned calculus in day care?

      --
      "The use-mention distinction" is not "enforced here."
  49. You know Jack? by PinkPanther · · Score: 1

    I have friends who go to The U of Waterloo, and not one has EVER called that school "the MIT of the North"

    You are absolutely right. And having "friends that XXX" means you'd have keen insight to a well established cultural reference like this...that is to say that NOONE has EVER called it MIT of the North.

    Jack-ass.

    --
    It's a simple matter of complex programming.